
Tariffs And Small Business: Insights From Industry Experts
Trump's new tariffs—some as high as 145%—are hitting small businesses the hardest and threatening their ability to survive.
What began as a geopolitical strategy has now become a direct threat to the livelihood of small business owners. Without meaningful relief, the backbone of American entrepreneurship could suffer the most severe consequences.
Small businesses typically operate lean, unlike large corporations with deep pockets, supply chain redundancy, and legal teams to handle disruptions. Smaller companies rely on speed and agility to compete — often launching innovations far faster than larger companies burdened with lengthy internal approval processes. However, that agility becomes irrelevant for smaller brands when tariffs disrupt access to affordable materials.
Large corporations have the advantage of buying power. They can negotiate better terms, absorb sudden cost increases, and pivot sourcing strategies quickly—often with multiple backup suppliers already in place.
In contrast, small consumer packaged goods (CPG), wellness, home goods, fashion, accessories brands, and even smaller construction companies sourcing materials from China typically rely on long-standing relationships with manufacturers. These connections—often built through trade shows, industry networking, and personal referrals—offer access to lower minimum order quantities (MOQs), favorable terms, and more competitive pricing. These trusted partnerships make it possible for small businesses to operate and grow.
Shifting away from long-standing partnerships isn't simple. For many small businesses, U.S. manufacturing cannot compete with China's infrastructure, speed, or cost-efficiency. In industries that rely on materials like plastic, glass, paper, and aluminum, it's common for U.S. companies to fulfill small domestic orders. However, once businesses hit certain order thresholds, production often shifts overseas—out of financial necessity and because many domestic manufacturers moved offshore decades ago. Even when companies try to source locally, scaling typically forces them abroad, making it nearly impossible for many small businesses to manufacture packaging and materials entirely within the United States.
"In theory, bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. sounds great—but we don't have the infrastructure to support it. Small businesses will suffer the most, while larger industries like electronics are already receiving tariff exemptions," says Sebastian De Vivo, a financial advisor at the Small Business Development Center (SBDC).
Many small businesses relying on China are scrambling to find suppliers in countries with comparable pricing and production capabilities. But for small businesses, replacing a manufacturer isn't easy. It often means starting from scratch—vetting new factories, negotiating pricing, investing in new tooling and molds, waiting weeks or months for samples, and navigating unfamiliar regulations, taxes, and import processes. For small businesses, this disruption can delay product launches by quarters—or even years—costing tens of thousands or more. Most lack the team, capital, or infrastructure needed to survive such a transition.
California Governor Gavin Newsom is pushing for an exemption for California-made products from the latest round of tariffs. According to a recent statement from his office, "Retaliatory tariffs will also have an outsized impact on California businesses, particularly its more than 60,000 small business exporters. Mexico, Canada, and China are California's top three export destinations, accounting for nearly $67 billion in exports—over one-third of the state's $183 billion in total exported goods in 2024."
The statement also highlighted that retaliatory tariffs are hitting farmers and ranchers especially hard at a time when the U.S. agricultural economy is already struggling—further underscoring the need for mitigation efforts and expanded access to foreign markets.
"For many small and mid-sized businesses that rely on imports from China, these tariffs are existential," says Los Angeles-based business attorney David Schnider. 'Most are holding off on placing orders, hoping the situation improves. Ports are slowing, and shipments from China are rapidly declining. If the tariffs aren't lifted in the coming weeks, retailers will face supply shortages and rising prices during the holiday season. Many of the small businesses I work with are seriously considering shutting down entirely.'
Schnider also predicts widespread sales losses and layoffs. Since most businesses cannot quickly reshore production, they have little choice but to raise prices or absorb devastating losses.
The last major economic blow to small businesses came during the COVID-19 pandemic when financial assistance was available to help eligible companies survive. Today's landscape is different. Businesses facing sudden cost increases on ingredients, packaging, and finished products are forced to pivot quickly—navigating unfamiliar territory with little support or relief.
As Allison Kent-Gunn Garibay, Cosmetic Packaging Sales Director, explains:
"Some brands are being forced to scale back on costly initiatives like innovation and sustainability to stay afloat. It's a harsh reality—especially for companies that are among the most values-driven and sustainability-focused in the industry."
Still, Garibay remains optimistic. She's witnessed resilience firsthand, with many of the brands she supports successfully pivoting to manufacturing partners across Mexico, Vietnam, Canada, India, and Colombia—along with select domestic options—helping stabilize costs and build more localized, agile supply chains.
"It's not an easy transition," she says, "but for those willing to rethink their sourcing strategies, there's a path through the turbulence."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Attack on rural America': Kentucky governor hits Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear argued the Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax policy bill will have a 'devastating' impact on rural communities. 'It's the single worst piece of legislation I've seen in my lifetime, and it is a congressional Republican and presidential attack on rural America,' the Democrat told CNN's Dana Bash in a July 6 interview on "State of the Union." He said around 200,000 people in Kentucky are could lose their healthcare under the bill, which implements new work requirements for Medicaid and a raft of other restrictions that healthcare experts argue will trigger hospital closures in rural areas. Lawmakers included a $50 billion fund in the legislation to prop up these hospitals, but experts say it won't be enough to make up for the $155 billion expected decline in federal Medicaid spending in rural areas. Beshear, who is considered a potential presidential candidate for the party in 2028, said up to 35 rural hospitals in Kentucky could be at risk of closing as a result of the bill. 'What that means is our economy takes a huge hit,' he said. 'You lose 200 jobs from doctors and nurses and orderlies and all of a sudden the coffee shop does worse, the bank doesn't have as many folks coming in. This is going to hit rural America right in the face.' Still, Republicans have argued that the biggest expected cut to Medicaid – the implementation of work requirements for able-bodied adults – is popular among voters, and other changes such as more frequent eligibility checks are common sense options. Democrats "unfortunately seem to think that poor people are stupid. I don't think poor people are stupid. I think they have agency, and I think to have them register twice a year for these benefits is not a burden," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also said on CNN on July 6. "People who want to infantilize the poor and people who need these Medicaid benefits are alarmist.' Republicans in Congress passed the massive tax-cut and spending package on July 3. Trump signed it into law on July 4. It was the key goal for Trump and Republican leadership in Congress, which captured a trifecta during the 2024 elections and has used that political muscle to force what they've dubbed their "One Big, Beautiful Bill" through both chambers at a rapid-fire pace. The passage came despite deep reservations within their own party and unanimous opposition from Democrats who see it as a ticket to winning back congressional majorities in 2026.


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Social Security no taxes message on Trump bill raises eyebrows
President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is sending mixed messages about whether most Americans are required to pay federal income taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'It's a mixed bag for seniors, because some seniors will get some tax relief; the cost of that, though, is borne by the entire Social Security system,' Alex Lawson, executive director of left-leaning advocacy organization Social Security Works, told USA Today. The bill, which Trump signed into law on Saturday, included a $6,000 tax deduction for Americans 65 or older. After Congress passed the bill on Thursday, the Social Security Administration said the legislation 'delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans.' 'The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples,' the Thursday press release said. 'Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.' However, policy experts are concerned that the bill does not include a provision to eliminate federal income taxes on Social Security benefits. 'There is no provision in the budget bill that directly 'eliminates' or even reduces taxes on Social Security benefits,' Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, told the Washington Post. Trump's bill offers a tax deduction of $6,000 to seniors making up to $75,000 individually, or $150,000 on a joint return. The deduction is lowered for incomes above that level and axed for seniors with individual incomes of more than $175,000, or $250,000 jointly. However, the new deduction for seniors is set to expire within a couple of years. The median income for seniors in 2022 was about $30,000. 'The people who benefit by definition have to be richer, and people who benefit the most are the richest people,' Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, told CBS News. Before the megabill's passing, 64 percent of seniors receiving Social Security income paid no tax on their Social Security due to exemptions and deductions, according to an estimate by Trump's Council of Economic Advisers. Under Trump's megabill, 88 percent won't be paying. Marc Goldwein, senior vice president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, told the Post that the rise is due to the bill's increase in 'the standard deduction for seniors, which, as a result, reduces the number of seniors who will pay taxes on their Social Security benefits.' Put simply, the new legislation will provide limited benefits for lower-income seniors because they already pay less in taxes. 'Lower-income earners benefit less than middle and upper-middle income households,' Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, a center-right think tank, told USA Today. 'It's been marketed as tax relief for seniors, but a lot of seniors are going to be surprised when they find out it doesn't apply to them,' he added. 'I'm getting asked all the time by folks what this actually means for their tax situation.'


San Francisco Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Musk forms new political party after split with Trump over president's signature tax cuts law
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — Elon Musk say he's carrying out his threat to form a new political party after his fissure with President Donald Trump, announcing on X that he is forming the America Party in response to the president's sweeping tax cuts law. Musk, once a ever-present ally to Trump as he headed up the slashing agency known as the Department of Government Efficiency, broke with the Republican president over his signature legislation, which was signed into law Friday. As the bill made its way through Congress, Musk threatened to form the 'America Party' if 'this insane spending bill passes.' 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk said Saturday on X, the social media company he owns. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' The formation of new political parties is not uncommon, but they typically struggle to pull any significant support away from the Republican and Democratic parties. But Musk, the world's richest man who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump in the 2024 election, could impact the 2026 elections determining control of Congress if he is willing to spend significant amounts of Monday. His reignited feud with the president could also be costly for Musk, whose businesses rely on billions of dollars in government contracts and publicly traded company Tesla has taken a hit in the market. It wasn't clear whether Musk had taken steps to formally create the new political party. Spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, didn't immediately comment Sunday. As of Sunday morning, there were multiple political parties listed in the Federal Election Commission database that had been formed in the the hours since Musk's Saturday X post with versions of 'America Party' of 'DOGE' or 'X' in the name, or Musk listed among people affiliated with the entity. But none appeared to be authentic, listing contacts for the organization as email addresses such as ' wentsnowboarding@ ″ or untraceable Protonmail addresses. Musk on Sunday spent the morning on X taking feedback from users about the party and indicated he'd use the party to get involved in the 2026 midterm elections. Last month, he threatened to try to oust every member of Congress that voted for Trump's bill. Musk had called the tax breaks and spending cuts package a 'disgusting abomination," warning it would increase the federal deficit, among other critiques. 'The Republican Party has a clean sweep of the executive, legislative and judicial branches and STILL had the nerve to massively increase the size of government, expanding the national debt by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS,' Musk said Sunday on X. His critiques of the bill and move to form a political party mark a reversal from May, when his time in the White House was winding down and the head of rocket company SpaceX and electric vehicle maker Tesla said he would spend 'a lot less' on politics in the future. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who clashed with Musk while he ran DOGE, said on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that DOGE's 'principles' were popular but 'if you look at the polling, Elon was not.' 'I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,' he said. ___ Associated Press writer Meg Kinnard in Chapin, South Carolina, contributed to this report.