Strongest Appetite Suppressant Over the Counter Now Available in USA - PhenQ Medically Accredited Craving Control Supplement OTC
Phenq
New York City, NY, June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- For Americans seeking the most effective, safe, and convenient way to control food cravings and promote weight loss, a breakthrough is here.
PhenQ, the strongest appetite suppressant over the counter (OTC), has officially launched in the United States and worldwide—earning the rare and coveted 'clinicians' choice' status after being medically accredited by over 800 medical professionals.
For men and women looking to lose weight, manage appetite, and improve overall health without the risks of prescription appetite suppressants or weight loss drugs, PhenQ is the OTC appetite suppressant the world has been waiting for.
Product Launch: A New Era for Clinician-Backed OTC Appetite Suppressants
PhenQ's arrival marks a turning point in the world of weight loss supplements. For decades, Americans have struggled to find effective appetite suppressant pills that are both safe and available without a prescription.
Prescription appetite suppressants and weight loss drugs often require doctor supervision, can lead to high blood pressure, and may not be suitable for those with a higher body mass index or specific health concerns.
Now, with PhenQ, users can experience the best appetite suppressant over the counter, with a formula that has been medically accredited, approved, and recommended by over 800 clinicians.
This level of medical endorsement is a rarity for OTC appetite suppressants, making PhenQ the clear leader in the category.
Main PhenQ Benefits & Features
PhenQ delivers a multi-faceted approach to weight loss and appetite control. Here's what makes it the most effective appetite suppressant OTC and a top choice for weight management:
1. Clinically Proven Appetite Suppressant
PhenQ's formula contains α-Lacys Reset®, a patented complex that accelerates metabolism and promotes thermogenesis, helping users suppress appetite and burn calories more efficiently. Clinical studies have shown that people using α-Lacys Reset® lost up to 7.24% of body fat, 3.44% of body weight, and gained 3.8% muscle mass, making it a unique weight loss supplement for those looking to lose weight while retaining lean muscle.
2. Reduces Food Cravings
Through its blend of chromium picolinate, nopal cactus, and natural caffeine, PhenQ helps reduce cravings for sweets and carbs. This powerful appetite suppressant formula is designed to help users stay on track, avoid emotional eating, and break the cycle of late-night snacking.
3. Promotes Weight Loss and Fat Burning
PhenQ combines thermogenic agents like Capsimax powder (a blend of capsicum, piperine, caffeine, and niacin) to ignite fat burning and help users reach their weight loss goals faster. This is not just an appetite suppressant, but a comprehensive weight loss supplement for total body transformation.
4. Enhances Energy and Mood
Unlike many diet pills or prescription appetite suppressants that can cause fatigue or mood swings, PhenQ contains caffeine, nopal, and L-carnitine to provide all-day energy and cognitive support. This keeps users motivated, focused, and ready to conquer their health and fitness journey.
5. Supports Normal Appetite and Keto Lifestyles
PhenQ is a natural appetite suppressant that fits perfectly into keto or low-carb diets, helping users manage appetite and maintain healthy eating habits for sustainable weight loss.
6. No Prescription Required—100% OTC
As one of the strongest OTC appetite suppressants, PhenQ is available for purchase without a prescription. This makes appetite control more accessible than ever for millions of Americans.
7. Vegan & Vegetarian Friendly
PhenQ is made from 100% vegan and vegetarian ingredients, ensuring inclusivity for a wide variety of dietary needs.
Company Name and Location
PhenQ (USA)Wolfson Brands (UK) Limited12 Payne Street, Glasgow, G4 0LF, United KingdomDistributed in the USA, Canada, UK, Australia and globally
PhenQ Pricing Details
PhenQ is competitively priced with attractive savings for multi-bottle purchases and includes a risk-free guarantee:
1 Bottle: $69.99 (Retail $79.99) — 1 Month Supply
2 Bottles + 1 Free: $139.99 (Retail $239.99) — 3 Month Supply (Most Popular)
3 Bottles + 2 Free: $209.99 (Retail $399.99) — 5 Month Supply (Best Value)
Free Shipping: On all orders over $79.99
60-Day Money-Back Guarantee: Try it risk-free
Order and see current offers at official PhenQ website
Launch Date & Availability
PhenQ is now available to buy OTC in the United States and ships to over 190 countries. Orders are processed and shipped within 24–48 hours from warehouses in the US, UK, and Germany. PhenQ is also now available for purchase worldwide, providing rapid delivery and discreet packaging.
Scientific Data and Studies
PhenQ's appetite suppressant formula is backed by clinical research:
α-Lacys Reset®: Clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals demonstrate significant reductions in body weight, body fat, and increased muscle mass compared to placebo.
Capsimax Powder: Research in Bioscience Report highlights the ability of capsaicinoids to increase thermogenesis and potentially stop the formation of new fat cells.
Chromium Picolinate: An eight-week Cornell University study showed chromium supplementation helps reduce carb cravings and supports healthy blood sugar levels.
Caffeine: Multiple studies confirm caffeine's ability to suppress appetite, increase alertness, and boost metabolic rate.
Nopal Cactus: Rich in fiber and amino acids, nopal helps manage appetite, increase satiety, and reduce fluid retention.
References:
Whiting S, Derbyshire E, Tiwari BK. (2012) Appetite Control.
Zemel MB, Thompson W, Milstead A, et al. (2004) Obesity Research.
Docherty JP, Sack DA, et al. (2005) Journal of Psychiatry Practice.
Health & Safety Benefits
PhenQ is designed as a safe, effective alternative to prescription appetite suppressants and weight loss drugs:
All-Natural Appetite Suppressant: PhenQ includes only natural, high-grade ingredients with a strong safety record.
No Major Side Effects: No prescription required, and hundreds of thousands of users have reported no significant adverse effects.
Suitable for Long-Term Use: Can be used as long as needed for weight management, unlike some weight loss drugs that are only approved for short-term use.
No Habit-Forming Ingredients: Unlike some prescription appetite suppressants, PhenQ is non-addictive and safe for ongoing use.
Made in FDA & GMP Approved Facilities: All manufacturing is done under strict quality controls in the US and UK.
Scientific Innovation of OTC Weight Loss Supplements
What makes PhenQ a leader among OTC appetite suppressants and diet pills?
Multi-Action Formula: Combines the strongest ingredients for appetite control, fat burning, energy, and mood—unlike most other weight loss supplements that target a single aspect.
α-Lacys Reset®: A unique, trademarked, and scientifically validated ingredient at the heart of PhenQ's effectiveness.
Synergy of Ingredients: Each component supports the others for a holistic approach to appetite suppression and weight management.
Transparency: Full ingredient disclosure and clinical research citations—no hidden blends or proprietary secrets.
OTC Diet Pills Market Disruption
PhenQ is fundamentally disrupting the appetite suppressant and weight loss supplement industry:
Medically Studied by 800 Professionals: PhenQ's 'clinicians' choice' status is nearly impossible to attain and sets a new bar for OTC appetite suppressant pills.
Outperforms Prescription Appetite Suppressants: Without the need for a prescription or risk of high blood pressure and other side effects, PhenQ is safer and more accessible.
Superior to Traditional Diet Pills: PhenQ's multi-pronged formula makes it more effective than many single-purpose appetite suppressant pills or dietary supplements.
No Prescription, No Hassle: PhenQ brings prescription-level results to the OTC market—no waiting rooms, no doctor's approval necessary.
Consumer Benefits
Users of PhenQ enjoy a wide range of benefits—making it the strongest and most trusted OTC appetite suppressant available:
Strongest Appetite Suppressant OTC: Clinically proven to suppress appetite, crush cravings, and help users lose weight effectively.
Promotes Weight Loss: Helps reduce calorie intake, supports fat burning, and assists in lowering body weight and body mass index.
Appetite Control and Satiety: Natural ingredients help users feel full, satisfied, and in control of their eating habits.
Counter Appetite and Emotional Eating: Reduces stress-related snacking and helps break the cycle of emotional eating.
Supports Healthy Weight Management: Sustained use assists in long-term maintenance of healthy weight, reducing the risk of regaining lost pounds.
Safe for Most Adults: No major side effects, no habit-forming components, and suitable for both men and women.
Fits Modern Lifestyles: Only two pills per day, no drastic diet changes required, and works with keto and other popular diets.
Money-Back Guarantee: If you're not satisfied, get a full refund within 60 days—no questions asked.
Quote from PhenQ Spokesperson
'PhenQ is the result of years of scientific research and clinical study. To be named a clinicians' choice by over 800 medical professionals is an extraordinary honor—and a testament to our commitment to safety, effectiveness, and transparency. As the strongest OTC appetite suppressant available today, PhenQ is helping people in the USA and around the world take control of their appetite, lose weight safely, and achieve lasting health.'— Kay Norris, Product Innovation, PhenQ
Distribution Channels
Direct-to-Consumer: Only available from the official site to guarantee authenticity and best pricing.
Worldwide Shipping: To over 190 countries, with free shipping on orders over $79.99.
Discreet Packaging: All orders shipped in plain packaging for your privacy.
Website URL & Contact Person Details
Website: https://phenq.com/pages/appetite-suppressant
Email: support@phenq.com
Phone: +1 (646) 513 2632
For media inquiries:Wolfson Brands (UK) Limited12 Payne Street, Glasgow, G4 0LF, United Kingdomsupport@phenq.com
Safety Certifications & Testing
FDA & GMP Approved Facilities: Manufactured to the highest US and UK standards.
Third-Party Lab Testing: For purity, potency, and safety.
Full Ingredient Transparency: No hidden blends or undisclosed substances.
Vegan & Vegetarian Safe: 100% plant-based ingredients.
Product Usage & Dosage
Recommended Use: Take one PhenQ pill with breakfast and one with lunch.
Do Not Exceed Recommended Dose: Due to natural caffeine content, avoid taking after 3pm.
Long-Term Use: Safe for ongoing appetite control and weight management.
Appetite Suppressants in the Modern Age: How PhenQ Changes the Game
Appetite suppressants work by helping users feel full, reduce food cravings, and lower overall calorie intake. However, most prescription appetite suppressants and weight loss drugs come with potential side effects, high blood pressure risks, and often require strict medical supervision. OTC appetite suppressants like PhenQ are changing this landscape by providing a safe, effective, and accessible solution for Americans struggling with weight management.
PhenQ's unique composition of scientifically proven ingredients sets it apart from alli weight loss pill and other common dietary supplements. It is not just a diet pill; it is a comprehensive, medically endorsed appetite suppressant designed to suppress cravings, promote weight loss, and support lasting health.
Conclusion: The Future of Appetite Control Is Here
PhenQ is the strongest appetite suppressant over the counter now available in the USA and worldwide—backed by 800 medical professionals and trusted by nearly 200,000 satisfied customers. With its powerful, natural appetite suppressant formula, robust clinical validation, and unmatched safety profile, PhenQ is setting a new standard for OTC appetite suppressants and weight management.
About PhenQ (USA) / Wolfson BrandsPhenQ is produced by Wolfson Brands, a global leader in health innovation. With a focus on science, safety, and customer success, PhenQ continues to redefine what's possible in appetite suppressant pills and weight loss supplements.
Media Contact:Kay Norris, Head of Product InnovationWolfson Brands (UK) Limited12 Payne Street, Glasgow, G4 0LF, United Kingdomsupport@phenq.com
These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult a physician before use.Attachment
Phenq
CONTACT: For media inquiries: Website: https://phenq.com/pages/appetite-suppressant Email: support@phenq.com Phone: +1 (646) 513 2632 Wolfson Brands (UK) Limited 12 Payne Street, Glasgow, G4 0LF, United Kingdom support@phenq.comSign in to access your portfolio
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate megabill marks biggest Medicaid cuts in history
Senate Republicans on Tuesday passed the largest cuts to Medicaid since the program began in the 1960s, a move that would erode the social safety net and cause a spike in the number of uninsured Americans over the next decade. The tax and spending bill is projected to cost more than $3 trillion during that time, but it would be partially paid for with about $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid. Almost 12 million lower-income Americans would lose their health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). It still needs to pass the House again, where some moderate Republicans have expressed concerns about the cuts. The CBO was still analyzing the bill after it was released late Friday, and many last-minute changes meant a more exact forecast on coverage losses wasn't possible before the Senate rushed to vote on it. President Trump and most congressional Republicans say the reductions aren't true cuts. They argue nobody who should be on Medicaid will lose benefits. 'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' President Trump said at the White House last week. Still, experts and health advocates say the CBO analysis confirms that despite Trump's repeated pledges to only cut waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, the legislation would enact an unprecedented reduction in the program currently used by more than 70 million low-income Americans. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) made an impassioned speech on the Senate floor Sunday night warning that Trump was breaking his promise not to cut Medicaid. 'The people in the White House advising the president, they're not telling him that the effect of this bill is to break a promise,' Tillis said the day after announcing he would not seek reelection. 'I'm telling the president, you have been misinformed. You supporting the Senate mark will hurt people who are eligible and qualified for Medicaid.' Over time, the losses will blunt the significant coverage gains made under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), signed by then-President Obama in 2010. 'This bill isn't being crafted to improve health care in America, or to improve the Medicaid program, or to improve the [ACA]. The purpose of these cuts in the bill is to try to find savings to pay for tax cuts,' said Andrea Ducas, vice president of health policy at the Democratic-aligned Center for American Progress. 'It's treating these health care programs as a [piggy bank]. It's just, how do we extract as much from these programs as humanly possible so that we can find the savings to pay for tax cuts,' Ducas said. The effects of the cut could be devastating, beyond coverage losses. People who lose their Medicaid would have to pay more out of pocket, driving up medical debt and leading to them likely delaying needed treatment or medication. Hospitals would see a spike in uncompensated care and overcrowding of emergency rooms. Even people who still have insurance may not have anywhere to go for care. Hospitals, nursing homes and other providers operating on thin margins warn they could close. 'Seniors will struggle to afford long-term care. People with disabilities will lose critical healthcare coverage that allows them to work and live independently. Rural communities across America will be decimated from hospital closures, and people will lose their lives,' said Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in a statement. 'It is unfathomable to see policymakers intentionally inflict so much damage on the people they represent.' Experts said it's nearly impossible to take almost $1 trillion out of Medicaid without impacting the entire health system, not just the people who lose insurance. By design, the group that would be hit the hardest are people who gained insurance when their states expanded Medicaid under ObamaCare. 'The bill particularly attempts to undermine the Medicaid expansion,' said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the Uninsured at health policy research organization KFF. 'It doesn't exactly repeal it, but many of the provisions target both expansion states and the expansion population.' The bill would achieve its savings in various ways, but the bulk of the cuts come from a strict national work requirement and new restrictions on state-levied taxes on health providers. The provider taxes were the second-largest Medicaid cut in the House bill, after the work requirements. The cuts are even larger under the Senate design. Those changes would reduce spending by nearly $191 billion over a decade, according to the CBO estimate. States impose taxes on providers to boost their federal Medicaid contributions, which they then redirect to hospitals in the form of higher reimbursements. Limiting provider taxes is a long-held conservative goal, as they argue states are gaming the current system and driving up federal Medicaid spending. But senators representing states with poorer, rural populations have objected to the scale of the provider tax cuts, including Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Tillis. The House bill would freeze the tax rate for most states, but the Senate version would require many states to lower their existing rates. As an incentive for senators uncomfortable with the provision, the bill includes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals. Overnight Monday, senators voted down an amendment from Collins to double the size of the fund and increase taxes on the ultra-wealthy, but the final version ultimately included $50 billion for the fund. Hospitals said the relief fund isn't enough to make up for the impacts of the bill, and they urged lawmakers to reject it in favor of the House version — which also would have enacted unprecedented Medicaid cuts, but was less damaging to rural providers. Even some Republicans sounded the alarm. Tillis focused his ire on the provider taxes and state-directed payments, arguing they were simply too harmful to his constituents. He warned his fellow Republicans that their support for the bill could boomerang and cost them politically. Hawley condemned the provider tax cuts and other Medicaid changes but voted for the bill anyway. Part of his reasoning, he said, was that the bill was changed to delay implementation of the cuts for another year. He also touted 'tax cuts for working families' and an extension of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. Hawley in a statement after the vote urged the House to pass the bill quickly, while sounding a warning on Medicaid. 'Let me be clear, I will continue to do everything in my power to reverse future cuts to Medicaid. If Republicans want to be the party of the working class, we cannot cut health insurance for working people.' The other major Medicaid change in the bill is work requirements. For the first time in the history of the Medicaid program, the bill would require beneficiaries to prove they are working or in school at least 80 hours a month to keep their health insurance starting Dec. 31, 2026. The Senate version extends the requirement to low-income parents of children older than 14, in addition to childless adults without disabilities. States can apply for a 'good faith' exemption to delay the start until 2029, but it's up to the discretion of the Trump administration to grant it. Advocates said giving the administration power to delay coverage losses has the potential to politicize the work requirements, as the White House could grant waivers to important states Republicans need to win. The work requirements are projected to save about $325 billion over a decade, because millions of people would be moved off Medicaid rolls. Nearly six million people would eventually lose Medicaid for not meeting the House bill's work requirements, according to CBO. Work requirements 'are only money savers if people lose coverage. Otherwise they wouldn't be in this bill,' Ducas said. 'I think that's pretty clearly the intent.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
How Trump's tax bill could cut Medicaid for millions of Americans
The Senate cleared President Donald Trump's domestic spending and tax cut bill that will enact steep cuts to the nation's safety-net health insurance program for low income families. In addition to delivering tax cuts and increasing immigration enforcement, what Trump has called the "Big Beautiful Bill" would cut nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid, the state-federal health program for low-income families and the disabled. The bill is projected to eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Another 5 million could lose coverage if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made Affordable Care Act plans more affordable for consumers. The legislation amounts to "the biggest rollback in health care coverage in the history of the United States," said Joan Alker, a research professor and executive director and co-founder of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Vice President JD Vance, who cast the tiebreaking vote July 1 to pass the Senate bill 51-50, said in social media posts the Medicaid cuts are "immaterial" compared to savings the bill will fund through bolstered immigration enforcement. The House is scheduled to consider the legislation on July 2 in advance of Trump's self-imposed July 4th deadline for his signature domestic policy legislation. How will the legislation cut Medicaid? The legislation would require states to double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states, which administer Medicaid, would have to set up systems to verify a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation requires "able-bodied" Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month or qualify for an exemption, such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The original House version limited the work requirement to low-income adults without children, but the Senate version added the work requirement to parents of children older than 13. The legislation defines "able-bodied" people as those not medically certified as physically or mentally unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks because of administrative miscues. What do hospitals and doctors think of bill? Medicaid insures 83 million low-income children and adults, according to KFF, a health policy nonprofit. That represents more than 1 in 5 Americans. Health policy experts have warned the cuts could harm rural hospitals and doctors who serve a higher percentage of people enrolled in Medicaid. The Senate bill added a $50 billion rural health care fund, double the amount that an earlier version of the legislation proposed. Still, hospitals are "deeply disappointed" the bill cleared the Senate, said Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association, a trade group. Pollack said the $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts would cause "irreparable harm to our health care system," and reduce access to care for all Americans. Hospitals are required to diagnose and stabilize anyone who visits an emergency room. Eliminating coverage of nearly 12 million Americans will "drive up uncompensated care for hospitals and health systems," Pollack said. Pollack said hospitals might be forced to cut services and staff, and patients could face longer wait times in emergency rooms. Some rural hospitals and facilities in underserved communities could close, Pollack said. Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said the cuts to Medicaid and a federal food assistance program "will make our country sicker, put children at risk of going hungry and make it harder for families to afford basic necessities" while delivering tax cuts. When will the Medicaid cuts take effect? Medicaid recipients won't immediately be impacted by the legislation. The bill sets a Jan. 1, 2027, deadline for states to begin twice-a-year eligibility checks and verify work or exemption status of non-disabled enrollees. However, some states already have submitted waivers to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to begin Medicaid work requirements. CMS might choose to approve the waivers and allow some states to launch Medicaid work requirements before January 2027, Alker said. A KFF survey found nearly 2 in 3 people on Medicaid are employed full or part time, and others would qualify for an exemption from the work requirement because they are caregivers or students. Just 8% were not working due to inability to find work, retirement or other reasons, KFF said. While the bill doesn't mandate work requirements before January 2027, states will likely need to plan for big changes before then, said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the KFF program on Medicaid and the uninsured. States will need to prepare for smaller Medicaid payments from the federal government while adding the extra administrative duties of verifying an enrollee's work or volunteer status. "Some states are anticipating this reduced revenue," Tolbert said. "At the same time, they are also required to make pretty costly changes to their eligibility systems." 'Death by a trillion cuts': Health care workers lobby Republicans in Congress Johannah Alabi's days usually consist of feeding, bathing, and caring for residents at two nursing homes in Bloomfield, Conn. She said most of her patients depend on government health insurance programs, so she is concerned about what will happen to them and her job if Trump signs the bill into law. Medicaid is the primary payer for 63% of nursing home facility residents and an additional 13% rely on Medicare as their primary payer, according to KFF, a health policy nonprofit headquartered in San Francisco. 'If some of that money is going to be taken away, something has to give,' Alabi said. 'It's going to come down to the resident care. It's going to come down to the food. It's going to come down to the activities.' That's why she was inspired to join Service Employees International Union members to lobby lawmakers to vote against the bill last week. They arrived at the Capitol with signs reading, 'Death by a trillion cuts,' and wearing shirts with the message, 'Republican cuts kill.' Jennifer Woods, another SEIU member who works in the claims department at Kaiser Permanente, ran into Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, during her trip to Washington. She said she tried to explain how cuts could 'ruin people's lives' and potentially lead to some patients' deaths as she followed him through the Capitol building. 'He just shook his head and would keep going,' Woods said. 'He didn't really say anything. None of them did.'
Atlantic
7 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Biggest Anti-Abortion Victory Since ‘Dobbs'
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Amid all the news coverage of the GOP's spending-bill extravaganza—the late-night deficit debates, the strategy sessions, the hallway blanket-wearing —one piece of the package has received comparatively little attention: a provision that would block abortion clinics from receiving Medicaid funds for any of the non-abortion services they provide. During the past three years, abortion restrictions have mostly taken effect mostly in red and purple states—where legislatures have voted to enact them. But if this proposed provision passes, clinics all over the country will be affected. It would 'have a pretty devastating impact on a lot of providers,' Mary Ziegler, a legal scholar and an Atlantic contributor, told me. Some would probably close, and others would have to limit the number of patients they serve. It's 'a really big deal,' she said, with perhaps the most significant consequences for abortion access since the passage of the 1976 Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funds for abortions in most cases. All of this is complicated—which helps explain the dearth of attention to the matter. But funding for independent abortion providers works like this: Clinics receive money from a variety of sources, including local donations, insurance payments, and Medicaid reimbursements. (Yes, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America receives millions in contributions every year, but most of those funds are earmarked for advocacy, Ziegler told me.) A big percentage of Planned Parenthood's patient pool relies on Medicaid. In keeping with the Hyde Amendment, providers are not reimbursed for abortions, but they do receive federal payments for other services, such as breast-cancer screenings, Pap smears, and STI testing. This new legislation would make Planned Parenthood and other clinics ineligible for any kind of Medicaid reimbursement, Ziegler said. If clinics are not paid for these services, then, in many cases, they won't be able to provide them. Maybe some clinics would be able to find funds from state legislatures or local donors to fill in the gaps, but many wouldn't. An initial version of the bill passed by the House would have blocked Medicaid funding for 10 years, but the current version, which passed the Senate earlier today, would prohibit that funding for just one year after the law's passage. (That's right—we'll all be back here again soon.) The cuts represent a pretty clear departure from President Donald Trump's 'leave it to the states' approach to abortion policy. They'd affect clinics everywhere, not just in places where Americans have grown accustomed to hearing about abortion restrictions. Most Planned Parenthood clinics at risk of closure under the bill are in states where abortion is legal, the organization says. That's partly because more blue states have recently expanded Medicaid. Up to one-third of patients at Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, for example, are on Medicaid, and reimbursement totals in the millions of dollars, PPNNE CEO Nicole Clegg told me. 'We'll work with our state leaders' and increase local fundraising efforts, she said. But it will be difficult to make up the difference. The bill's passage is part of an abortion one-two punch: Last week, the Supreme Court made it easier for states to deny Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. 'This is tremendous progress on achieving a decades-long goal that has proved elusive in the past,' Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, told me in a statement about the SCOTUS decision and the GOP bill. 'This proves what we've said all along: Congress can cut Planned Parenthood's funding—and they just did,' Kristan Hawkins, the president of Students for Life of America, wrote on X about the bill. 'The moral obligation is clear: If we can do it for 1 year, we must do it for good.' The events of this week also represent a slight strategy change. Reporters like me who have long covered the anti-abortion movement anticipated that, under the second Trump presidency, activists would shift their efforts in a different direction: attempting to outlaw abortion via the 1873 Comstock Act. Many who follow this debate agree that they probably still will. But so far, Trump 'hasn't really been doing a lot of what the anti-abortion movement has wanted,' Ziegler said. She wonders whether it was 'a self-conscious decision to go where they thought Republicans already were'—to work toward withholding funding, which is probably politically safer for the GOP than pursuing a relatively unpopular outright abortion ban. Next stop: the House of Representatives. Lawmakers there took up the bill today and want to make it law by Friday. But defenders of abortion access are keeping an eye out. As always, with a razor-thin Republican majority, anything could happen. A big, bad, very ugly bill Jonathan Chait: Congressional Republicans didn't have to do this. A classic childhood pastime is fading. Today's News President Donald Trump visited ' Alligator Alcatraz,' a makeshift migrant-detention center in the Florida Everglades, and said that he wants to see more detention centers in 'many states.' Trump wrote in a social-media post that the Department of Government Efficiency might need to reexamine government subsidies for Elon Musk's businesses. Zohran Mamdani officially won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary by 12 points. Evening Read The Birth-Rate Crisis Isn't as Bad as You've Heard—It's Worse By Marc Novicoff First, the bad news: Global fertility is falling fast. The aging populations of rich countries are relying on ever fewer workers to support their economy, dooming those younger generations to a future of higher taxes, higher debt, or later retirement—or all three … By about 2084, according to the gold-standard United Nations 'World Population Prospects,' the global population will officially begin its decline. Rich countries will all have become like Japan, stagnant and aging. And the rest of the world will have become old before it ever got the chance to become rich. Sorry, did I say 'bad news'? That was actually the good news, based on estimates that turned out to be far too rosy. More From The Atlantic Watch. F1 (out now in theaters) threads the nitty-gritty details of Formula One racing into a traditional underdog drama, David Sims writes. Read. Soft Core, by Brittany Newell, is a noirish novel set in the world of strip clubs and BDSM dungeons that ventures beyond titillation and into the daily grind, Lily Burana writes.
