Rap group Kneecap banned from Hungary before festival
Belfast-based Kneecap, who regularly display pro-Palestinian messages during their gigs, have caused controversy elsewhere, including in June at Glastonbury Festival in southwest England where their frontman - known by the stage name Mo Chara - accused Israel of committing war crimes.
Israel has denied such accusations.
"Hungary's government has moved to ban Kneecap from entering the country and performing at Sziget (Festival) ... citing antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah as justification," government spokesperson Zoltan Kovacs wrote on X.
Kovacs later posted official letters from immigration authorities banning the band for three years and saying their entry would "seriously threaten national security".
In May, Mo Chara was charged with a terrorism offence in Britain for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed Hezbollah.
He denies the offence.
In a post on X critical of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and what it called his "authoritarian government", Kneecap said the decision to ban them was outrageous and a political distraction.
"There is no legal basis for his actions, no member of Kneecap has ever been convicted of any crime in any country," they said.
The band has said previously that its members do not support Hamas or Iran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, and that it condemns "all attacks on civilians, always".
Hungary's government had previously asked festival organisers to drop Kneecap from the line-up at the week-long event, which draws several hundred thousand music lovers to an island in the River Danube each year.
More than 150 artists and cultural figures, including Academy Award-winning director Laszlo Nemes Jeles, had signed a petition protesting against Kneecap's planned performance on August 11.
The festival organisers issued a statement calling the government's ban "an unprecedented move which we believe is both unnecessary and regrettable".
"Sziget Festival's values mean we condemn hate speech, while guaranteeing the fundamental right to artistic freedom of expression for every performer. Cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution," they said.
Performers at this year's festival include Post Malone, Shawn Mendes and Charli XCX.
Hungary has banned Irish rap group Kneecap from entering the country to perform at a music festival, accusing the band of using antisemitic hate speech and praising Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Belfast-based Kneecap, who regularly display pro-Palestinian messages during their gigs, have caused controversy elsewhere, including in June at Glastonbury Festival in southwest England where their frontman - known by the stage name Mo Chara - accused Israel of committing war crimes.
Israel has denied such accusations.
"Hungary's government has moved to ban Kneecap from entering the country and performing at Sziget (Festival) ... citing antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah as justification," government spokesperson Zoltan Kovacs wrote on X.
Kovacs later posted official letters from immigration authorities banning the band for three years and saying their entry would "seriously threaten national security".
In May, Mo Chara was charged with a terrorism offence in Britain for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed Hezbollah.
He denies the offence.
In a post on X critical of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and what it called his "authoritarian government", Kneecap said the decision to ban them was outrageous and a political distraction.
"There is no legal basis for his actions, no member of Kneecap has ever been convicted of any crime in any country," they said.
The band has said previously that its members do not support Hamas or Iran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, and that it condemns "all attacks on civilians, always".
Hungary's government had previously asked festival organisers to drop Kneecap from the line-up at the week-long event, which draws several hundred thousand music lovers to an island in the River Danube each year.
More than 150 artists and cultural figures, including Academy Award-winning director Laszlo Nemes Jeles, had signed a petition protesting against Kneecap's planned performance on August 11.
The festival organisers issued a statement calling the government's ban "an unprecedented move which we believe is both unnecessary and regrettable".
"Sziget Festival's values mean we condemn hate speech, while guaranteeing the fundamental right to artistic freedom of expression for every performer. Cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution," they said.
Performers at this year's festival include Post Malone, Shawn Mendes and Charli XCX.
Hungary has banned Irish rap group Kneecap from entering the country to perform at a music festival, accusing the band of using antisemitic hate speech and praising Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Belfast-based Kneecap, who regularly display pro-Palestinian messages during their gigs, have caused controversy elsewhere, including in June at Glastonbury Festival in southwest England where their frontman - known by the stage name Mo Chara - accused Israel of committing war crimes.
Israel has denied such accusations.
"Hungary's government has moved to ban Kneecap from entering the country and performing at Sziget (Festival) ... citing antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah as justification," government spokesperson Zoltan Kovacs wrote on X.
Kovacs later posted official letters from immigration authorities banning the band for three years and saying their entry would "seriously threaten national security".
In May, Mo Chara was charged with a terrorism offence in Britain for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed Hezbollah.
He denies the offence.
In a post on X critical of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and what it called his "authoritarian government", Kneecap said the decision to ban them was outrageous and a political distraction.
"There is no legal basis for his actions, no member of Kneecap has ever been convicted of any crime in any country," they said.
The band has said previously that its members do not support Hamas or Iran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, and that it condemns "all attacks on civilians, always".
Hungary's government had previously asked festival organisers to drop Kneecap from the line-up at the week-long event, which draws several hundred thousand music lovers to an island in the River Danube each year.
More than 150 artists and cultural figures, including Academy Award-winning director Laszlo Nemes Jeles, had signed a petition protesting against Kneecap's planned performance on August 11.
The festival organisers issued a statement calling the government's ban "an unprecedented move which we believe is both unnecessary and regrettable".
"Sziget Festival's values mean we condemn hate speech, while guaranteeing the fundamental right to artistic freedom of expression for every performer. Cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution," they said.
Performers at this year's festival include Post Malone, Shawn Mendes and Charli XCX.
Hungary has banned Irish rap group Kneecap from entering the country to perform at a music festival, accusing the band of using antisemitic hate speech and praising Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Belfast-based Kneecap, who regularly display pro-Palestinian messages during their gigs, have caused controversy elsewhere, including in June at Glastonbury Festival in southwest England where their frontman - known by the stage name Mo Chara - accused Israel of committing war crimes.
Israel has denied such accusations.
"Hungary's government has moved to ban Kneecap from entering the country and performing at Sziget (Festival) ... citing antisemitic hate speech and open praise for Hamas and Hezbollah as justification," government spokesperson Zoltan Kovacs wrote on X.
Kovacs later posted official letters from immigration authorities banning the band for three years and saying their entry would "seriously threaten national security".
In May, Mo Chara was charged with a terrorism offence in Britain for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed Hezbollah.
He denies the offence.
In a post on X critical of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and what it called his "authoritarian government", Kneecap said the decision to ban them was outrageous and a political distraction.
"There is no legal basis for his actions, no member of Kneecap has ever been convicted of any crime in any country," they said.
The band has said previously that its members do not support Hamas or Iran-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, and that it condemns "all attacks on civilians, always".
Hungary's government had previously asked festival organisers to drop Kneecap from the line-up at the week-long event, which draws several hundred thousand music lovers to an island in the River Danube each year.
More than 150 artists and cultural figures, including Academy Award-winning director Laszlo Nemes Jeles, had signed a petition protesting against Kneecap's planned performance on August 11.
The festival organisers issued a statement calling the government's ban "an unprecedented move which we believe is both unnecessary and regrettable".
"Sziget Festival's values mean we condemn hate speech, while guaranteeing the fundamental right to artistic freedom of expression for every performer. Cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution," they said.
Performers at this year's festival include Post Malone, Shawn Mendes and Charli XCX.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
41 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
'A question of when, not if': What happens if Australia recognises a Palestinian state?
The recognition of a Palestinian state offers prospects of "a future recovery", experts say, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faces pressure to accelerate Australia's position. Hardening its resolve in recent days, the Albanese government has stated its intention to recognise Palestinian statehood but has laid out several preconditions, including the demilitarisation of Hamas, before committing. On Wednesday, several frontbenchers, including Anika Wells and Julian Hill, said it was "a question of when, not if". Ben Saul, United Nations special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, said growing calls are the result of two years of international law violations by Israel. "I think it indicates the growing impatience of the international community with Israel's failure to support the conditions necessary for a Palestinian state," he told SBS News. The Coalition argues recognition of a Palestinian state needs to come at the end of a peace process. "We're worried he's putting the cart before the horse. We need a peace agreement, we need to see the hostages released, we need to see Hamas dismantled. Hamas cannot be part of a Palestinian state," Opposition defence spokesperson Angus Taylor said. So what would recognition mean in practice, including for the people of Gaza? The significance of recognising a Palestinian state Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh, director of the Middle East Studies Forum at Deakin University, says Australia recognising a Palestinian state would send a strong message to the United States that the "global dynamic is changing". In April 2024, the United States vetoed a resolution that would have granted Palestine's bid to become a full member of the United Nations. He told SBS News that the US needs to "exert its leadership role and exert pressure on Israel to push along the two-state solution". Akbarzadeh argues that "international sympathy for Israel after October 7" has turned into "international sense of disbelief that any state could behave this way", resulting in the likes of the UK and France changing their policies. "To put a total population under military control, blockading a total population and depriving them of food, of medicine, of water. It is a sense of global disbelief." Israeli officials, including its embassy in Canberra, deny that starvation is occurring in the Gaza Strip, stating reports of the deaths of malnourished children are a "false campaign" from Hamas. Saul said Palestinian statehood is not entirely dependent on the United States as long as international law criteria is met, including a population, a territory and an effective independent government. On Wednesday, Australia joined 14 other nations and signed a joint statement committing to a pathway for Palestinian statehood. It includes the Palestinian Authority's calls for the disarmament of Hamas, release of all remaining hostages, and the undertaking of elections within a year. The vote represented a shift in position after abstaining on similar motions for two decades, and Labor ministers said it was an important step towards a two-state solution. What are the practical implications? Beyond symbolism, Saul said Palestinians are legally entitled to having their a state under international law, labelling recognition "a win-win" which would allow Australia "full-blown diplomatic relations with Palestine". "It also means Palestine gets certain rights under Australian domestic law as well, in terms of diplomatic and state immunities of Palestinian officials," Saul said. However, Shahram says practical consequences are "quite limited" until the UN Security Council allows Palestine to become a full member. These full member benefits include having its armed forces under the protection of a state, conducting diplomacy, establishing relations with other countries like trade ties and mounting legal claims against Israel in all international bodies under state sovereignty. "But legal sovereignty is managed and basically curtailed by the political power and military power of the United States and Israel, so that the reality of power overrides the legality of the future Palestinian state," he said. What is the impact on Palestinians in Gaza? Akbarzadeh said Palestinian statehood opens up "prospects for future recovery and reconstruction". "The impact on the daily life of Gazans is nothing because Gaza is still under military occupation and blockaded by Israel," he said. While the opening up of borders to allow food and medicine aids the starving population, Akbarzadeh argues, "you want to give them [Palestinians] hope". "You want to give Palestinians an avenue for self-expression and autonomy. So that's when statehood and sovereignty come in. The two are related, but recognising Palestinian sovereignty does not give Palestinians in Gaza food," he said. Saul agrees that statehood won't fix the "humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza", stating only Israel can offer a solution that includes allowing the flow of humanitarian aid. "Israel has to respect its obligations under humanitarian law. It has to respect human rights law," he said. He highlighted that countries supporting Israel, like the United States and Germany, have to respect their obligations too. Two-year-old Yazan Abu Foul with his mother Naima. Yazan suffers from severe malnutrition due to the acute shortage of food caused by the blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip and the closure of border crossings. Source: EPA / Haitham Imad "Obligations under international law is not to transfer weapons or ammunition to a country that would use them to commit war crimes," Saul added. Where do other Western nations stand Overnight, the UK warned Israel it would follow France, and more than 140 United Nations members, to recognise Palestinian statehood, unless it takes immediate action to relieve suffering in Gaza. Germany said on Friday it was not planning to recognise Palestinian statehood in the short term; rather, its priority was to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution — Israel and a Palestinian state co-existing in peace. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said on Saturday that recognising the State of Palestine before it is established could be counterproductive. Last year, Ireland, Norway and Spain recognised a Palestinian state with its borders to be demarcated as they were before the 1967 Middle East war, when Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. However, they also recognised that those borders may change in any eventual talks to reach a final settlement, and that their decisions did not diminish their belief in Israel's fundamental right to exist in peace and security.
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
Australia to take teen social media ban plan global, despite Wiggles' complaints
Australia will take its social media ban to New York to push world leaders to protect children online despite the Trump administration's defence of US tech companies and attacks on digital censorship. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed on Wednesday he would hold an event in New York in September to coincide with a United Nations meeting, after the government defied threats from YouTube's parent company to sue if the site was included in the ban. Communications Minister Anika Wells confirmed the chief executive of children's music superstars The Wiggles, Kate Chiodo, was brought in to advocate against barring children under 16 from logging in to the platform. 'For clarity, it was the black skivvies, Wiggles Inc, Wiggles management, not individual members of our cherished national icon the Wiggles,' Wells said on Wednesday. The prime minister added: 'We're not here to sledge the Wiggles. Let's be very clear, my government is pro-Wiggle'. YouTube Kids will escape the social media ban, but the main platform will be included in the ban along with sites such as Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X and Snapchat. The ban is set to start on December 10. The prime minister said advocacy groups that campaigned for the ban, including 36 Months and Let Them Be Kids, would be part of the event in New York in September. 'We will continue to advocate, this is our position, it is up to other nations what they do, but I know from the discussions I have had with other leaders, that they are looking at this,' he said. Albanese remained unfazed when asked about US President Donald Trump's close relationship with the tech giants, confirming the social media ban had not come up in conversations between him and the president.
7NEWS
6 hours ago
- 7NEWS
UK denies recognising Palestinian state rewards Hamas
Britain rejects Israeli criticism that it is rewarding militant group Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel takes steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline, prompted an immediate rebuke from Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of the fighters' 2023 attack that triggered the war. US President Donald Trump also said he did not think Hamas 'should be rewarded' with recognition of Palestinian independence. But British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander — designated by the government to respond to media questions on Wednesday — said: 'This is not a reward for Hamas. 'Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' Starmer's decision follows that of French President Emmanuel Macron, who announced last week that Paris would recognise Palestinian statehood in September, becoming the first major Western power to do so, because of the dire humanitarian conditions in the enclave. Previously, Britain and France, like other Western powers, had been committed to Palestinian independence, but as a goal that would best be achieved only at the conclusion of negotiations with Israel. In a televised address on Tuesday, Starmer said it had become necessary to act because the prospect of such a two-state solution was under threat. Britain would make the move at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid into Gaza, made clear it would not annex the West Bank and committed itself to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution, Starmer said. The Board of Deputies of British Jews, Britain's biggest Jewish advocacy group, raised concerns that similarly clear conditions had not been set out for Hamas, which is still holding 50 hostages it seized in its October 2023 attack. The Muslim Council of Britain, the country's largest Muslim umbrella organisation, said making recognition conditional contradicted the government's stated position that statehood was the inalienable right of the Palestinian people.
