Conservative activists gave Alberta government list of ‘inappropriate' books in school libraries
Social conservative activist groups provided Alberta government officials with lists of books now facing prohibition under new provincial content guidelines for school libraries, the IJF has learned.
On May 26, Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides announced the province is bringing in new rules for school libraries after investigations by his office found materials containing depictions of sexual acts, nudity, drug and alcohol use, profanity and other mature content on the shelves in Alberta K-12 schools.
Alberta currently has voluntary guidelines for library books, but school boards follow their own processes for selecting age-appropriate and relevant materials for students. Because of the inconsistent standards between school divisions, 'sexually explicit material has made their way onto school library shelves,' Nicolaides said, and so public, separate, francophone, charter and independent schools will be required to follow province-wide guidelines starting in the 2025-26 school year.
While the province said it identified multiple books with sexually explicit and inappropriate content, it has so far only named four coming-of-age graphic novels: Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, Fun Home by Alison Bechdel, Blankets by Craig Thompson and Flamer by Mike Curato. Three of the four books focus on 2SLGBTQ+ characters and themes.
Nicolaides told reporters in Calgary on Monday he was alerted to the issue by a group of parents who provided him with excerpts from 'many of these books and other materials' and showed him information suggesting they were available in different schools.
However, members of the groups Parents for Choice in Education (PCE) and Action4Canada have since taken credit for supplying Nicolaides with the names of books they wanted removed from school libraries.
In an email sent to followers, PCE celebrated the launch of Alberta's public consultation on 'sexually explicit' books in K-9 schools, telling members 'your efforts helped make this happen.
'PCE has worked with concerned parents for the past two years to expose this issue. Using a list prepared by Action4Canada, one of our dedicated volunteers submitted examples of graphic books to government officials—proof that titles like Gender Queer and Fun Home are available to children in Alberta schools. This consultation is a direct result of that work," the email newsletter reads.
PCE is an Alberta-based parental rights group that has previously taken issue with sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) education in schools, gay-straight alliance laws and other 2SLGBTQ-related policies.
Action4Canada is a conservative Christian group with more than 60 chapters across Canada. The group promotes deeply conspiratorial beliefs, claiming the Canadian government and education system have been 'infiltrated by radical LGBTQ activists' and that SOGI education and sexually explicit books are part of a 'global agenda to sexualize children, interfere with parental rights, eliminate the natural family and normalize pedophilia.'
After Alberta announced its new library guidelines on Monday, Action4Canada posted on its website, thanking Nicolaides for meeting with their team and responding to their concerns about sexually explicit materials in Alberta schools.
In the post, the group said its Calgary chapter has been communicating with government officials over several months, providing evidence of inappropriate books in schools and a 'comprehensive binder' that outlines supposed harms of SOGI education.
Nicolaides told the IJF in an email he met with PCE and 'other concerned parents.' He did not respond to questions about whether he met separately with Action4Canada or when these meetings took place.
Action4Canada has led campaigns to have sexual education and 2SLGBTQ+ themed books removed from public and school libraries in several provinces. A 36-page list of 'sexually explicit and pornographic books' available in Canadian libraries published by the group includes the novels Gender Queer and Fun Home.
The list includes excerpts of text and images from the novels. Many of the same excerpts are found in a document the government of Alberta provided to reporters on Monday showing examples of sexually explicit and graphic content found in library materials.
'Misrepresentation' of meetings by education minister
Corinne Mason, professor of women's and gender studies at Mount Royal University, said Nicolaides' initial claim that complaints about school library books had come from parents concerned about books their kids had access to in schools is a 'total misrepresentation of the facts.'
'It's a blatant lie from the minister about what's happened,' they said.
Both Action4Canada and PCE are highly organized and well-funded lobby organizations, Mason said. And in the case of PCE, one with strong ties to the UCP government and Alberta's conservative movement.
PCE executive director John Hilton-O'Brien was a founding board member and past president of the Wildrose Party of Alberta. During the 2022 UCP leadership race, Danielle Smith and other candidates participated in a forum on education hosted by PCE.
Mason said that Action4Canada's campaigns have targeted 2SLGBTQ+ communities as ideological indoctrinators and dangerous to children in a time when the community is being violently harassed by hateful actors as pedophiles and groomers. And that it's problematic if the UCP government has been looking to them for frameworks around what is and isn't appropriate in schools.
'The fact that Parents for Choice in Education and Action4Canada, both of those organizations claim this as a win, I think that should be really, really concerning for folks like myself, who are very concerned about the influence of the parental rights movement generally in Alberta,' Mason said
Nicolaides said in an email the actions being taken by the UCP government have nothing to do with the LGBTQ+ community.
'The fact that our actions of protecting young students from seeing porn, child molestation, self-harm and other sexual material in school libraries are being labelled as anti-LGBTQ is frankly irresponsible,' he said.
Alberta Teachers' Association President Jason Schilling also expressed concern that the government was willing to meet with special interest groups about library materials, but not educators.
'Parents for Choice in Education and Action4Canada are special interest groups who frequently target the 2SLGBTQIA+ community. Their claims that the provincial government is taking direction from them and not educators is questionable and alarming,' Schilling said.
PCE told the IJF that its interest 'is in the reasonable rights of parents. Nobody who attacks those rights can expect to escape our criticism. Those claiming that we are discriminating against them are merely using the LGBTQ+ community to excuse their egregious actions.'
Edmonton Public Schools, the Calgary Board of Education, and the Library Association of Alberta have all said the province hadn't contacted them about the issue of age-inappropriate books in libraries before Monday's announcement.
'Unprecedented' restriction of school library books
All provinces provide general orientations about library content, but it remains the business of school boards to decide what books it uses, said James L. Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University. Setting guidelines that block certain types of books from being in any school libraries is 'really unprecedented,' he said.
'What they're doing is censoring books,' Turk said. 'It's an absolute break from whatever any other province has done. It's following the lead of Florida and Texas and Utah and some American states that are moving in this direction.'
The Florida Department of Education has removed over 700 books from K-12 school libraries. The agency maintains that no books have been banned in the state and the materials are 'sexually explicit' and don't belong in schools.
The number of banned books in Florida spiked after a 2023 law was passed requiring school districts to have a policy for challenging materials that 'depicts or describes sexual conduct, is not suited to student needs and their ability to comprehend the material presented, or is inappropriate for the grade level and age group for which the material is used.'
The four books named by Alberta's government have been frequently targeted by censors throughout North America. Gender Queer has the distinction of being the most banned book in the U.S. in 2021 and 2023, and the graphic novel shared the title of the most banned book in U.S. schools in 2022 with Curato's Flamer.
These novels have also received multiple literary awards and continue to be selected for library catalogues by educators because of their ability to grapple with difficult subjects young adults are coping with in their lives, Turk said.
'They do raise challenging issues, but young adults deal with challenging things in their lives, and nobody is forcing anyone to read any of these books when they're in school libraries,' he said.
Turk said these books may have been found in K-9 schools in Alberta because for students in grade nine and up they are appropriate. He added that he would be surprised if they appeared in the library catalogues of elementary schools.
Nicolaides told the IJF these materials were found in schools across the province, but said they are not naming the individual schools to ensure the safety and security of teachers, staff and students at these libraries.
The only specific school that has been identified as part of the province's investigation is an Edmonton public school for students in grades 4-9. Garrett Koehler, press secretary to the minister of education, shared images on social media of Flamer and Gender Queer on the shelves of the school, commenting 'these problematic books were found in and around books like Goldilocks…'
Gender Queer has been awarded the American Library Association's Alex Award, given to books written for adults that have special appeal to young adults, ages 12 to 18.
The Government of Alberta's press release for its age-appropriate book guidelines policy states the recommended reading age for Flamer is 14 and up, or younger with adult guidance.
By Brett McKay, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Investigative Journalism Foundation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
37 minutes ago
- CTV News
Motion calls for forensic audit of North Bay mayor's expenses
A motion headed to North Bay city council July 8 calls for an outside auditor to be hired to review Mayor Peter Chirico's expenses. (File) A motion headed to North Bay city council July 8 calls for an outside auditor to be hired to review Mayor Peter Chirico's expenses. The motion also calls on the mayor to step down from the city's police services board until the audit is complete. Chirico has been under fire since it emerged that he charged $16,000 in personal expenses on the corporate credit card in 2023 and 2024. Peter Chirico North Bay Mayor Peter Chirico said last week he won't resign, despite the expenses controversy. (File) He said in June that all expenses that were deemed personal, including some that fell into a 'grey area,' were fully repaid. And on June 26, he held a last-minute news conference to call on the city integrity commissioner to investigate the expenses, at the same time insisting that he won't resign over the controversy. However the motion that will be heard at the July 8 city council meeting -- moved by Coun. Jamie Lowery and seconded by Coun. Sara Inch -- goes much further. It calls for the city to hire 'an independent auditing firm with forensic experience to conduct a review the mayor's expenses and business development opportunities to ensure compliance with applicable rules, policies and best practices.' Results would be made public Lowery's motion would include a review of how the personal expenses were approved 'or overridden' and 'clarification of the roles and responsibilities of city staff involved in authorizing or processing reimbursements.' Once the review is complete, the auditor would also be asked to provide an 'opinion on whether any aspect of the conduct warrants further review by appropriate oversight or law enforcement agencies.' The findings of the audit would then be brought to an open committee, where the public could ask questions. In addition, Lowery's motion calls for Chirico to step down from the police services board 'until the completion of the independent review and the findings have been brought forward to council.' It would be a 'temporary adjustment not be interpreted as a presumption of wrongdoing, but rather a proactive step to protect the integrity of the city's institutions and reassure the public of council's commitment to open and accountable government.' NB police budget Pictured are North Bay Mayor Peter Chirico and deputy mayor and budget chief Maggie Horsfield. (Eric Taschner/CTV News) Finally, the motion calls for a committee to be struck to examine the bylaw that allows council to hold closed-door meetings. Read the full motion here. Chirico declined to comment Thursday. 'He has indicated that he will not be making any further comments at this time,' North Bay spokesperson Gord Young said in an email. 'He has referred the matter to the Integrity Commissioner and will await the outcome of that review before providing any additional statements.' A separate motion that will also be heard July 8 instructs city staff to bring forward a transparency and accountability bylaw, requiring council and mayoral expenses to be published online every quarter. 'The report will include detailed transactions, including payee, date paid, amount, and a general description of the nature of the expense as it relates to city business,' the motion said. Moved by Coun. Lana Mitchell and seconded by Coun. Gary Gardiner, if passed, the bylaw would be ready by September.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canadian exports to U.S. continue to drop, reach one of lowest proportions on record
A refinery is seen in Burnaby, B.C., on Monday, June 30, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck Amid a protracted trade war, Canadian exports to the United States are at one of the lowest proportions on record, while exports to other countries have reached a record high, according to the latest numbers from Statistics Canada. Data show Canadian exports to the U.S. have decreased for the fourth consecutive month, seeing a 0.9 per cent drop in May. The average share of total Canadian exports to the U.S. is also down, from 75.9 per cent last year, to 68.3 per cent in May, a near-record low. Imports from the U.S. have also been on the decrease for the third consecutive month. The shifts come amid an ongoing trade war with the United States, which began in February when President Donald Trump began implementing a series of significant and stacked tariffs on Canadian goods. A slate of Canadian countermeasures is also in place, while the self-imposed deadline to reach a new economic and security deal is fast approaching. Following the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., last month, a readout from a meeting between Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney stated the two leaders are working toward an agreement by July 21. Prime Minister Mark Carney, meanwhile, has pledged to diversify Canada's trade markets, in part to insulate the economy from the effects of Trump's tariffs, and also to find ways to reduce reliance on the United States. According to Statistics Canada data from May, Canadian exports to countries other than the U.S. increased by 5.7 per cent, a record high. Those came largely in the form of higher unwrought gold exports to the United Kingdom, crude oil to Singapore, and unwrought aluminum and pharmaceutical products to Italy, offset by lower canola and crude oil exports to China, according to the government agency. With files from CTV News' Rachel Aiello
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
‘Honestly, it's gotten a lot worse': Teen girls on the Hockey Canada trial and life after #MeToo
Eight years ago, at the peak of the #MeToo movement, it seemed, for a brief moment, like progress was imminent. Women from around the world were sharing their extensive – and oftentimes painful – experiences of sexual abuse and violence, and lawmakers and corporations alike were pledging to make change. But in the years since, that progress has been stuttered. Harvey Weinstein, the film mogul whose case served as the rallying cry for the #MeToo movement, saw one of his convictions overturned. Donald Trump, who in 2023 was found liable for rape, was re-elected as President of the United States. And here in Canada, the recent Hockey Canada trial has reignited a conversation around what constitutes consent. The Globe and Mail spoke with a group of five teenaged girls, all of them 12th-graders from Kitchener, Ont., to get their thoughts on the current state of things: what it's like to be a young woman growing up in the post-#MeToo era, what sexual harassment looks like today and what they wish they'd been taught about consent. Have you all been following the Hockey Canada trial? [All of them shaking their heads no] Samira Nur, 17: It wasn't on my radar. But it does sound similar to a lot of stories I've heard, whether it's from people I know, or stories from the news. The case centres around consent – whether the young woman at the centre of it felt pressured and coerced into a situation she couldn't handle. How does that land with all of you? Have any of you had experiences where you felt pressured into uncomfortable situations? Samira: I work at a grocery store, so I encounter a lot of creepy men. There are a lot of older guys who are like, 'Oh, how old are you?' 'Let me take you home.' Or comment on my body while I'm picking something up from the floor. I've had a couple guys follow me home. I had another man ask me my ethnicity. When I said I was Somali, he was like, 'Oh, girls your age are married with kids by now. I'm going to ask your mom for your hand in marriage.' Technically speaking, I'm at work, and under the expectation that I still have to treat these people with kindness, despite the fact that I'm being, like, fully disrespected. Anna De Sousa, 18: I've been working since I was 12 at a bakery. There's this one [older male] customer I encounter every year. He comes in every summer, and asks me my age. And he always says, 'Oh, don't worry, I'll wait until you're 18.' Last year, he was like, 'You're 17 now. Next year, I'll be back. We're gonna go out.' I know he's going to show up this summer. Every time I see his face, my body literally starts shaking. As a teenager in the 1990s, I don't remember learning about consent or body safety in high school. What kind of sexual education were you given? Nishtha Tomer, 18: In Grade 9 health class, I think we only had, like, one or two classes about sex ed, and that's about it. It was mostly just sexual health – pregnancy, STDs and a lot about that. I also heard we learned a lot more than the guys did. A mistrial, jury dismissal, excluded evidence: Key moments in the Hockey Canada trial What about consent? Loyd Gebreselassie, 18: I know that they mentioned briefly things about consent – like what are your personal boundaries? And how do we make sure that's expressed? But it wasn't very in-depth. Samira: I think they used the 'tea' scenario. Like, if you don't want tea, you say you don't want tea. [Everybody laughs] It was like a YouTube video. It wasn't really treated very seriously. What do you wish you'd been taught? Samira: I wish we could have learned more about how much of a grey area consent can be. Consent can be removed. It can be coerced. It can be [the result of] abuse. Consent isn't as simple as yes or no. Not in terms of sexual situations, but I think a lot of us have said yes [to things] because of pressure, and not because we felt freedom or liberation to choose. I think that can apply in a lot of young women's sexual encounters – like because they're scared of losing someone. Anna: That's one thing I wish we explored more at school: Being able to say no in a way where you feel protected, you feel safe, but it's also respectful. So where do you turn to for advice on handling these situations? Shantelle Carrion, 18: I learned more from my mom. But it's kind of scary knowing that my knowledge of consent and relationships – everything comes from my parents. Thankfully, I'm in a very loving family, but that's not the case for everyone. Nishtha: I do have a close relationship with my parents. But it's still a brown household, and an immigrant household [Nishtha's parents are immigrants from India]. So it is a very stigmatized topic. So I mostly learned, like, from my amazing friend group about these things – and online as well. What about the role of alcohol or other substances when it comes to consent? What kinds of conversations are you girls having with your friends and families about that? Shantelle: Underage drinking is so normalized. I've had a personal experience where I went to a party [inebriated] my very first time – my only time. I regret it a lot. Thankfully I had a bunch of my girls with me. I bring this up because this is what happened in the Hockey Canada trial. It gives me chills, imagining the situation I could have gotten into if nobody else was there. It's so scary. We've been talking about it a lot [as friends], because we're going to be freshmen soon – how there's going to be a big party culture at university. As a teenager in the 90s, sexual harassment meant, for the most part, harassment on the street, or at school. What does it look like for you today? Nishtha: Honestly, I think it's gotten worse. With Instagram and Snapchat, it gives guys the ability to be anonymous when they're saying things. It switched from, like, being in the hallways to, like, texting your account, adding you to group chats. They will not say a word to you in real life, but online, it's the meanest things. And what does it look like when you try to have conversations about this stuff with your male peers? Loyd: I think this trend is growing with younger men – this Andrew Tate, red-pill sort of mentality. 'You have to be jacked. Your woman has to be submissive.' All these ideologies they've gathered and almost try to force onto women – and especially teenagers. Samira: It's gotten more hostile with the digital era. A lot of men do take women speaking out about these situations as hatred. I see that a lot. At the height of the #MeToo movement, many of us had hoped that things would be better, and safer for the next generation of young women. Has that been the case? Shantelle: I feel like the #MeToo era was amazing in the sense of spreading awareness, and bringing solidarity between women. More so that than actually really solving anything. Nishtha: It removed a lot of stigmatization, and helped to destigmatize conservations around sexual assault. And it helped remove a lot of shame that women carry. But I feel like legally, or even politically, there hasn't been real recognition or actual change for victims. Women did learn to cope with that together, and did build more of a sense of community. But also, it's something we shouldn't be having to cope with. There should be consequences.
