King and Queen brave summer downpour to honour Kirkcaldy's war dead
Former prime minister Gordon Brown later joined the King at a solo event, while wife Sarah Brown met the Queen when she visited a cancer centre run by Maggie's – an organisation both women officially support.
Charles's first task was to unveil a cairn commissioned to mark the 100th anniversary of the Kirkcaldy War Memorial Gardens and designed as a time capsule for future generations.
He chatted to pupils from local Viewforth High School who had helped fill the capsule with school mementos and memory sticks filled with photos, and quipped about the rain: 'I keep telling myself it's a blessing.'
Camilla said: 'It's a bit damp,' adding: 'We've been used to the heatwave.'
The royal couple, who are spending their official week in Scotland known as Holyrood Week, arrived in Fife as the heavy showers began and met dozens of well-wishers waiting behind barriers.
Holding umbrellas, they shook hands with the public but at one point a lone protester stood a few feet from the King and shouted his apparent opposition to Israel's war in the Gaza Strip, alleging 'weapons that we sell contribute to genocide'.
After the brief wreath-laying service, Camilla left to visit Maggie's Fife while Charles toured the nearby Kirkcaldy Art Gallery.
The King chatted to representatives of Fife-based charities and organisations which included Fife Multibank, an initiative founded by Mr Brown that provides essential goods to low-income families and now has five other organisations across the country.
Mr Brown said afterwards: 'The biggest problem in Britain today is the divisions caused by child poverty and we're doing something about it, in the way that we can.
'We saw that goods surplus to companies were not being repurposed into a circular economy, and we thought we could solve some of the problems of pollution and poverty at the same time.
'We've got 90 companies now and we're working with 1,000 organisations in Fife. So we work with all the schools, social workers, health visitors, foodbanks and charities – we have given out in total, around the UK in the last year or two, eight million goods worth about £80 million.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Why wealth taxes don't work
The nation owes the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock an eternal debt for losing the 1992 general election when he was clear favourite to win it, thereby sparing us whatever socialist folly he might have brought to Downing Street. I salute him again for popping up to propose a 2 per cent wealth tax on fortunes above £10 million that might raise a supposed £11 billion for the hard-pressed Chancellor – thereby bringing into sharp focus the vague threat that several cabinet ministers have studiously refused to rule out. Pressure is building on Rachel Reeves from backbenchers, unions and anti-poverty campaign groups to mount a raid on the rich in her autumn Budget. But Kinnock of all people, a firebrand backbencher at the time, should remember that Labour's 1974 manifesto included the promise of 'an annual Wealth Tax on the Rich [and] a new tax on major transfers of personal wealth' – which was dead within two years. Why? Because of concerns in the Treasury, and among worldly Labour voices such as the (millionaire) cabinet fixer Harold Lever, that at a time of dire UK economic performance, such a confiscatory measure would provoke an exodus of capital and a crisis of business confidence. Sound familiar? Once upon a time, wealth taxes were in fashion in a dozen OECD countries, as bien pensants bought Thomas Piketty's thesis, in his absurdly bestselling tome Capital, that a global levy was the moral solution to the fact that the rich were getting richer even while ordinary folks' real incomes were squeezed. But one by one, most of those taxes were scrapped as being difficult to collect, economically counter-productive and an incentive to entrepreneur flight. In Europe, only Norway, Spain and Switzerland still have them – and further afield, Colombia, presumably in pursuit of cocaine loot. Spain is reckoned to have lost 10,000 of its richest since the higher rate was raised to 3.5 per cent in 2022. In short, the tired old wealth tax concept is a classic red flag of envy politics – and we must thank Lord Kinnock for waving it. Not with a bang Meanwhile, Reeves's 'Leeds reforms' ahead of her Mansion House speech on Tuesday made great play of slashing City red tape. But after a backlash from the sector she has U-turned on her well-advertised plan to cut the £20,000 tax-free cash Isa limit in the hope of pushing savings towards UK equities. Spin ahead of the day's speeches talked of a new 'Big Bang'. But until there's a tidal shift of capital towards high-growth UK companies – and valuations rise accordingly, driven by a revival of international confidence in UK prospects generally – all other City reforms risk being dismissed (to misquote T.S. Eliot) not as bangs but as whimpers. Rose among clowns Congratulations and an overdue apology to Cindy Rose, the senior London-based Microsoft executive who has been headhunted to revive WPP, the advertising and PR conglomerate that has never fully recovered from the acrimonious departure of its creator Sir Martin Sorrell in 2018. One of the few world-scale businesses built in Britain in the past 40 years and a long-time constituent of the FTSE 100 index, WPP stands accused of running adrift in the era of social media marketing. Torn by internal strife, it has lost clients and seen its shares plunge; another sharp fall followed the resignation of the current chief executive Mark Read and a profits warning last week. Some analysts say the best hope is a break-up into its constituent agencies, while Sorrell himself declares unhelpfully that WPP may be 'too far gone' to be turned around, even by Rose. Who is she? A New York-trained lawyer, she has also worked for Vodafone and Virgin and been called 'the most powerful woman in UK tech'. And I'd guess she's well skilled at deflating the overblown male egos that tend to disrupt 'talent-led' firms such as WPP – which takes me neatly to my apology, for an episode long ago when Rose, newly arrived to work for a top London law firm, found herself among Englishmen behaving riotously at a dinner party that might have been a rejected scene from Laura Wade's play Posh. This being the pre-internet age, an exchange of barbed letters followed, mine on crudely faked US Supreme Court letterhead purporting to offer consoling advice from Justice Clarence Thomas. While I guffawed at my own ungallant wit, she evidently concluded that if this drunken 'peanut gallery' (I think that was her phrase) was the best an expensive British education could produce, she'd have no difficulty overtaking us to build a top-level corporate career on this side of the pond. As indeed she has: so not only is moral victory hers but I suspect our buffoonery hardened her ambition. And I'll happily offer her tea at the Ritz to celebrate that positive outcome. Korea from here? How do we achieve a revaluation not just of London-listed stocks but of the UK as a whole in the eyes of the world? The question came to mind twice this week. First, contemplating (but not actually ordering) a 'Korean Crunch Burger' on the room-service menu of a Premier Inn, I wondered how the austere industrial powerhouse of South Korea I knew in the 1980s became so fashionable in fast food, pop music and cinema that the prefix 'K-' will these days sell almost any gimmick. Next, enjoying pierogi and vodka at the Ognisko restaurant in South Kensington's Polish Hearth Club, I recalled the downbeat post-communist Poland of the early 1990s, now a rising star of European diplomacy, tourism and even Wimbledon tennis. In both cases, a generation-long release of creativity and animal spirits has wrought startling transformation. How do we get there from here? Certainly not by following the flickering torch of Reeves and our visionless Prime Minister. But still the question should be writ large on every Westminster whiteboard.
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
Florida attorney general reports wrongful charges under halted immigration law
ORLANDO, Fla. — At least two people have been wrongly charged under a Florida law that outlaws people living in the U.S. illegally from entering the state since a federal judge halted its enforcement, according to a report Florida's attorney general is required to file as punishment for defying the judge's ruling. Both men were arrested in late May by deputies in northeast Florida's St. Johns County, more than a month after U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami issued an order freezing the enforcement of the state statute. The law makes it a misdemeanor for people who are in the U.S. without legal permission to enter Florida by eluding immigration officials. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said in his report filed at the beginning of July that he only became aware of the two cases at the end of June after requesting information from state and local law enforcement. As punishment for flouting her order and being found in contempt, the judge requires Uthmeier to file bimonthly reports about whether any arrests, detentions or law enforcement actions have been made under the law. On May 29, St. Johns County Sheriff's Office deputies arrested a man with an active immigration detainer from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and another man on counts of illegal entry and driving without a valid driver's license, according to the status report. As corrective action, the charge involving the man with the ICE detainer was dismissed in state court, and prosecutors filed a motion that was granted to vacate the charge for illegal entry in the second case, R.J. Larizza, state attorney for the jurisdiction that covers St. Johns County, said in a separate filing. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the legislation into law in February as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. Immigrants rights groups filed a lawsuit on behalf of two unnamed, Florida-based immigrants living in the U.S. illegally shortly after the bill was signed into law. The lawsuit said the new legislation violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution by encroaching on federal duties. Williams issued a temporary restraining order and injunction that barred the enforcement of the new law statewide in April. The attorney general's office then unsuccessfully petitioned the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to override that decision. Uthmeier has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. After Williams issued her original order, Uthmeier sent a memo to state and local law enforcement officers telling them to refrain from enforcing the law, even though he disagreed with the injunction. But five days later, he sent a memo saying the judge was legally wrong and that he couldn't prevent police officers and deputies from enforcing the law. The judge last month found Uthmeier to be in civil contempt of her ruling. Besides championing the new law, Florida officials have helped Trump's immigration crackdown with the construction of a new immigration detention center named "Alligator Alcatraz" at an isolated airstrip in the Florida Everglades. DeSantis said at a news conference Wednesday that a request has been developed for proposals for a second migrant detention facility at Camp Blanding in northeast Florida but no work has begun. Alligator Alcatraz has "grown quickly" but is not yet at the 3,000 to 4,000 detainees originally envisioned, DeSantis said in Tampa. "I'm willing to do Blanding once Alligator Alcatraz is filled," the governor said. "Once there's a demand, then we would be able to go for Camp Blanding."
Metro
12 hours ago
- Metro
Giant Donald Trump baby blimp will float above London again when President visits UK
Activists are plotting to relaunch the Donald Trump baby balloon when the President jets to the UK for his historic second official visit in September, Metro can reveal. The blimp, a giant, six-metre-long inflatable depicting Trump as a baby in a nappy grasping a mobile phone, became a symbol of protests against the controversial leader on his first state visit as President in July 2018. It was flown in the skies above Parliament as tens of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets. During the parade, it was flanked by a group of campaigners in red flying suits who were dubbed 'Trump babysitters'. The balloon later spawned copycat versions of London Mayor Sadiq Khan and former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, which were flown in 2018 and 2019, as well as counterfeit merchandise, including t-shirts and bobblehead figures. Leo Murray, who came up with the idea of the blimp to mock the President, has now revealed he is considering re-launching the inflatable or commissioning another for the visit later this year. Leo, from north London, told Metro: 'We will consider getting the blimp up again. It was very effective last time. The way it made fun of him worked. It certainly was eye-catching and gave everyone a smile. But the danger of Trump is worse than ever now. 'The original one is now in the Museum of London so we would have to speak to them. We crowdfunded the first one so maybe we could do that again and get a new one. It's too early to say but we will have plans. 'It's more vital than ever to protest. He should not be coming for a second visit the way Britain's sucking up to him is not what people here want to see, it's very poor. 'His first presidency was bad enough but in the end he didn't get to do much. This time round he is much more dangerous- we have to oppose this visit and make ourselves heard.' To create the blimp, Leo worked with designer Matt Bonner. It was then built by Leicestershire-based company, Imagine Inflatables. While the majority of people praised the inflatable, it faced some criticism, including from the President himself. Trump said at the time the blimp made him feel unwanted, adding: 'I guess when they put out blimps to make me feel unwelcome, no reason for me to go to London. 'I used to love London as a city. I haven't been there in a long time. But when they make you feel unwelcome, why would I stay there?' Nigel Farage also described it at the time as 'the biggest insult to a sitting US President ever.' In response to the criticism, the office of London Mayor Sadiq Khan said the balloon was recognised as a legitimate form of demonstration, which is why it was allowed to fly. It was later flown in Ireland during protests in 2019 but plans to launch it over Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland that year were halted after the authorities refused permission. The Museum of London has since bought the original blimp and has it on display in its protest collection. It described the blimp as an 'extraordinary and imaginative idea' and a 'response from Londoners'. The Museum's director, Sharon Ament, said the blimp was an example of the British love of satire. She said: 'We use humour a lot. And we poke fun at politicians. This is a big – literally – example of that.' Leo added: 'Last time the blimp was very effective and could be again. 'The world is a much more dangerous place because of Trump winning the presidency again. We need to make our voices heard.' In February, Trump was invited to visit the UK for a second unprecedented state visit by King Charles. Buckingham Palace confirmed on Tuesday that Trump and his wife, First Lady Melania Trump, will be in the UK from 17 to 19 September and will be hosted at Windsor Castle. A full schedule for the visit is yet to be released. The House of Commons breaks up the day before so he will not be making an address to Parliament as is the usual protocol for a state visit. Trump said ahead of his visit: 'I think I want to have a good time and respect King Charles because he's a great gentleman.' He added that the UK was a 'great place'. check our news page.
