logo
‘Involution': China's problem with competition is there's too much of it

‘Involution': China's problem with competition is there's too much of it

Straits Times4 days ago
China's efforts to tackle domestic overcompetition face new urgency in the face of Trump's tariffs.
TIANJIN, China – It's the circle of life in China's business world.
A promising technology or product emerges. Chinese manufacturers, by the dozens or sometimes the hundreds, storm into that nascent sector. They ramp up production and drive down costs. As the overall market grows, the competition becomes increasingly cutthroat, with rival companies undercutting one another and enduring razor-thin profit margins or even losses in the hope of outlasting the field.
Adding to the competitive fervour, China's local governments, each with its own target for economic and job growth, back a homegrown champion and shower it with financial and bureaucratic support. Soon, the whole industry, awash in production capacity, is trapped in a race for survival.
While most governments encourage vigorous competition and low prices, China is going in the opposite direction. It is trying to rein in 'involution' - or 'neijuan' as it is widely used in the country to describe a self-defeating cycle of excessive competition and damaging deflation.
Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged to take steps to crack down on 'low price and disorderly competition' and eliminate outdated industrial capacity at a high-level economic policy meeting in July. At another recent gathering, on urban development, Mr Xi questioned whether every province needed to rush into sectors such as artificial intelligence and electric cars.
'Price wars and 'involutionary' competition will only encourage 'bad money driving out good money,'' wrote People's Daily, the official mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party. 'Simply 'rolling' prices downward will not result in a winner.'
China's efforts to tackle involution face new urgency as
President Donald Trump's tariffs discourage exports to the United States. Other countries are also wary of a flood of inexpensive Chinese goods redirected their way. These unsold goods, combined with a slowing domestic economy, have intensified competition, fueling a deflationary spiral.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump 'caught off guard' by Israel's strikes in Syria
Opinion Singapore's vaping crisis lays bare the drug addiction nightmare for parents
Singapore LTA seeks tailored solutions to improve Bukit Panjang LRT's maintenance inspections
Multimedia 'It's very sad': She comforts loved ones turned away by inmates
Opinion Sumiko at 61: 7 facts about facial skin ageing, and skincare ingredients that actually work
Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH
Opinion With Shatec cutting back operations, what's next for the hospitality sector?
World US not rushing trade deals ahead of August deadline, will talk with China, Bessent says
China's gross domestic product deflator, a broad measure of prices across the economy, has fallen for eight straight quarters – the most prolonged downturn on record. In June, the country's producer price index, a measure of the price of goods leaving factories, fell by its largest amount in nearly two years.
China has pledged to step up its regulation of companies driving down prices and to rein in subsidies and incentives from local governments that provide a lifeline to 'zombie' firms, or noncompetitive firms kept alive by outside support.
Fierce competition and overcapacity have plagued industries such as steel and cement. And newer, fast-growing sectors such as solar panels and electric vehicles have quickly become a race to the bottom. It has created an unusual dynamic: Chinese firms collectively dominate market share in an industry, but individual companies struggle to eke out a consistent profit.
During a meeting on July 16 of China's State Council, or Cabinet, officials pledged to regulate 'irrational competition' in the EV sector through investigations into costs and price monitoring.
The measures came after BYD, China's largest EV manufacturer, slashed prices on nearly two dozen models of electric and hybrid cars in May. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, a government-linked industry group, rebuked BYD and warned about the perils of 'price wars.'
Zhang Kai, a salesperson for Xpeng Motors, one of China's biggest EV makers, said pricing pressure would remain because of sluggish consumer spending and overcapacity in the sector. He said manufacturers had no choice but to maintain discounted prices for EVs, even after a popular government subsidy support program aimed at helping people buy energy-efficient cars and other goods comes to an end.
'This is a new normal,' he said. 'Once prices drop, they definitely won't go back up.'
To understand the challenges of excessive competition, consider Hebei province in northern China. Hebei, a region renowned for its mining, heavy industry and agriculture, has become notorious for cutthroat competition. One publication referred to the area's merchants as 'price butchers.'
At an industrial park in Hebei, more than 100 garment makers operate in rows of nearly identical storefronts, selling clothing that is so similar that it is hard to distinguish one from another. The complex caters to customers interested in finding factories to mass-produce T-shirts, sweatshirts and other pieces of outerwear.
The commercial zone was established about a decade ago by the Suning County government, after garment manufacturers started building factories on farmland in Hebei to meet the growing demand for inexpensive clothing from online shoppers.
The local province is opening an even-larger industrial park for 'knitting technology' adjacent to the existing one. Construction had been scheduled to finish in May, but the complex appeared only partly built in June. And the existing industrial park feels almost abandoned. Many storefronts were closed, and the lone restaurant was shuttered.
Zhang Cuihua is one of the small T-shirt manufacturers working in the complex. She said she produced about one million shirts a year for wholesalers across China. Since 2024, the competition has grown so intense that her business has been losing money.
'The involution is unbearable – people are driving themselves to death,' said Ms Zhang. 'The general market environment is poor, sales are stagnant and production capacity is overloaded.'
She said that customers were constantly asking her for price cuts, but that she had already reduced her margin per shirt more than 60 per cent in the past several years. Ms Zhang said some of her competitors were willing to sell items at a loss to turn inventory into cash. Then customers ask her to match the competition's low prices, leaving her in a no-win situation: Match the price and lose even more money, or don't match and lose the business entirely.
She said many factories had closed, but that had not alleviated the competitive pressures.
Tang Yongsheng, a T-shirt manufacturer in Guangdong, operates eight factories in Hebei. He said his competitors were willing to undercut one another endlessly, especially as many of China's dominant e-commerce platforms drive down prices.
Mr Tang said many factories in Hebei engaged in the race to the bottom because the local government encouraged continued investment. It is easier to borrow money from banks there than in other parts of the country. That drives factory owners to do whatever it takes to stay in business.
'The main goal is to survive,' Mr Tang said. 'They'll stubbornly persist.' NYTIMES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US judge reaffirms nationwide injunction blocking Trump executive order on birthright citizenship
US judge reaffirms nationwide injunction blocking Trump executive order on birthright citizenship

Straits Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

US judge reaffirms nationwide injunction blocking Trump executive order on birthright citizenship

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media, after the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to the power of federal judges by restricting their ability to grant broad legal relief in cases as the justices acted in a legal fight over President Donald Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship, in the Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo WASHINGTON - A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled on Friday that a nationwide injunction he issued in February that blocked President Donald Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship should remain in place. In a written ruling, U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston said his earlier nationwide injunction was the only way to provide complete relief to a coalition of Democratic-led states that brought the lawsuit before him, rejecting the Trump administration's argument that a narrower ruling was warranted because of a June decision from the U.S. Supreme Court. Sorokin wrote that the evidence before him "does not support a finding that any narrower option would feasibly and adequately protect the plaintiffs from the injuries they have shown they are likely to suffer if the unlawful policy announced in the Executive Order takes effect during the pendency of this lawsuit." The White House and Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment. New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin, a Democrat, said in a statement that the states were thrilled with the decision. "American-born babies are American, just as they have been at every other time in our nation's history. The president cannot change that legal rule with the stroke of a pen.' The Supreme Court's June 27 ruling in litigation over Trump's birthright citizenship order limited the ability of judges to issue so-called "universal" injunctions -- in which a single district court judge can block enforcement of a federal policy across the country -- and directed lower courts that had blocked the Republican president's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore SMRT to pay lower fine of $2.4m for EWL disruption; must invest at least $600k to boost reliability Singapore MRT service changes needed to modify 3 East-West Line stations on Changi Airport stretch: LTA Singapore S'pore could have nuclear energy 'within a few years', if it decides on it: UN nuclear watchdog chief Asia 'Nothing like this has happened before': At least 16 dead as Thai-Cambodian conflict continues Life 'Do you kill children?': Even before independence, S'pore has always loved its over-the-top campaigns Singapore Lung damage, poor brain development, addiction: What vaping does to the body Singapore Tipsy Collective sues former directors, HR head; alleges $14m lost from misconduct, poor decisions Singapore Kopi, care and conversation: How this 20-year-old helps improve the well-being of the elderly But the ruling contained exceptions allowing courts to potentially still block it across the country again. That has already allowed a judge in New Hampshire to once again halt Trump's order from taking effect by issuing an injunction in a nationwide class action of children who would be denied citizenship under the policy. A federal appeals court in California on Wednesday said Trump's executive order violated the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment by denying citizenship to many persons born in the U.S., and blocked its enforcement nationwide. Trump signed the executive order on January 20, his first day back in office, as part of his crackdown on immigration. The executive order directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it was unconstitutional. Last week, the states had argued at a hearing before Sorokin that a nationwide injunction was essential. They said restricting birthright citizenship in some states but not others would make it difficult to administer federal benefits programs like Medicaid. A patchwork approach would also lead to confusion among immigrant parents and a surge of people moving to states where Trump's executive order is on hold, straining resources, they argued. The Justice Department had countered that the states, by continuing to advocate for universal relief, had failed to come to grips with the Supreme Court's decision. REUTERS

The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened
The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened

Business Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Times

The EU-China Summit That Barely Happened

WHEN expectations are at rock bottom, simply showing up counts as progress. That is the story of this week's EU-China summit in Beijing – a hastily truncated, one-day event after China's President Xi Jinping declined to travel to Brussels. The absence of a formal joint communique and the palpable lack of deliverables should not obscure a critical fact that this meeting still matters. The reality of interdependence Despite rising tensions, the European Union (EU) and China together account for roughly a third of global gross domestic product and 30 per cent of world trade. Their economies are intertwined, and their geopolitical futures increasingly entangled. Whether on trade, climate action, or global security, EU-China relations have outsized consequences that go far beyond the boundaries of Brussels and Beijing. That is why, even in a climate of mistrust and mutual suspicion, face-to-face dialogue at the highest level is a meaningful step forward. Given how close the summit came to not happening at all, Xi's confirmation – reportedly just days before – signals a reluctant but essential recognition: disengagement is not a viable strategy. Fractured trust and strategic calculus The optics were clear. A shortened visit, no banquet, and icy body language contrast sharply with the six-day red-carpet treatment extended to Australia's prime minister just a week ago. The EU is not currently in Beijing's diplomatic good books, and the reasons are manifold. First and foremost is Ukraine. China's tacit support for Russia's war has alarmed European policymakers. Beijing's reported position that a Russian loss could embolden US pressure in Asia, reflects a calculus starkly misaligned with European values. The EU's recent sanctions on two Chinese banks linked to Russian military supply chains have further strained ties. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China's restriction of rate earth exports to Europe, after easing them for the US, has inflamed tensions across the EU industry. Though fast-tracked licences have been promised, details remain opaque. And for industries already grappling with competitiveness in areas like clean tech, automotive and computing, the uncertainty is as damaging as the restrictions themselves. Caught between powers Europe's dilemma is exacerbated by the looming presence of the US. Even absent from the summit table, Washington was very much 'in the room'. Both China and the EU are calibrating their moves with one wary eye on US trade policy. China fears a transatlantic deal that will shut it out while the EU fears becoming the dumping ground for excess Chinese goods that can no longer enter American markets. Also, the timing of this summit could not have been worse. With the US trade deadline looming on Aug 1, the incentive on all sides is to avoid provocation. But long-term alignment remains murky. The EU's attempt to 'de-risk' from China, as EU President Ursula von der Leyen has framed it, involves walking a tightrope: reducing strategic dependencies without provoking confrontation. That is a hard sell in both Beijing and Washington. The search for leverage elsewhere China is not the only partner the EU is looking at. Negotiations with Australia, South-east Asia and Mercosur signal a concerted push to diversify trade partnerships. While these will not fully offset dependence on China, they send a clear message: Europe is broadening its options. Climate change might seem like one area ripe for cooperation. Both the EU and China have deadlines approaching for commitments ahead of COP30 in Brazil. Yet even here, progress is stymied. The EU refuses to endorse any joint declaration unless China offers firmer pledges on emission reductions. The concern? That aligning too closely with Beijing could strain transatlantic ties. Small steps, significant implications So, will this summit be deemed a success? That depends on the yardstick. If the expectations are major breakthroughs or a reset in bilateral relations, then ultimately it will be a disappointment all around. But in geopolitics, showing up can sometimes be half the battle. In a world becoming more fragmented and multipolar, structured engagement, however imperfect, is still our best hope. The EU and China may not trust each other much, but they understand that coexistence, and even cooperation, are inescapable. And that, in today's world, is reason enough to keep talking. The writer is senior partner at Penta, based in Brussels

Trump's self-defeating trade agenda
Trump's self-defeating trade agenda

Business Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Trump's self-defeating trade agenda

WHILE US President Donald Trump pursued a range of protectionist policies during his first term, the economic chaos and uncertainty he has unleashed since returning to the White House and launching his global trade war make those earlier efforts look mild by comparison. Railing against countries that run trade surpluses with the US, Trump has vowed to impose 'reciprocal tariffs' until all of America's trade deficits are eliminated. Yet he has imposed sweeping tariffs even on countries with which the US runs a trade surplus, such as Australia. The Trump administration has cited a wide range of reasons for its tariff hikes beyond reducing bilateral trade deficits, including national security, job creation and raising government revenue. The president and his advisers claim that other countries will be forced to negotiate and ultimately lower their own tariffs on US goods. But the recent deal between the US and the United Kingdom, which imposes a 10 per cent levy on most British exports, shows that even Trump's 'reduced' tariffs remain historically high. The unpredictability of his trade policies poses a grave threat to the global economy. Trump's tariff announcements have been followed by numerous delays and revisions, and his deadlines for finalising new trade deals have come and gone, only to be extended again. This erratic trade policy, combined with his apparent reluctance to follow through on his threats, has given rise to the nickname 'Taco', or 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up So far, the Trump administration has secured new trade agreements with only a handful of countries, and even those have come with unexpected conditions. Earlier this month, for example, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that imposes a 20 per cent tariff on Vietnamese imports, but only if Vietnam eliminates its own tariffs on US goods and its exports contain no Chinese components; otherwise, the rate jumps to 40 per cent. While that's lower than Trump's original rate of 46 per cent, it's still far higher than the 11 per cent that Vietnamese policymakers reportedly believed they had negotiated. Indonesia, for its part, accepted a 19 per cent tariff in exchange for granting most US goods duty-free access to its domestic market. So much for fairness and reciprocity. Similarly, tariffs on Chinese goods jumped from 10 per cent to 145 per cent, then were returned to 10 per cent – at least temporarily. But the average US tariff on Chinese imports still stands at 51.1 per cent, and Trump could raise it again if the two countries fail to reach a trade deal by Aug 12. Trump has also threatened to impose 30 per cent tariffs on the European Union (EU) and Mexico. While EU policymakers are hoping to avoid the tariffs through negotiations, they are reportedly considering retaliatory 'anti-coercion' measures of their own. Adding to the uncertainty are the president's tariff hikes and new restrictions on commodity imports. Since January, the US has raised steel, aluminium and copper tariffs to 50 per cent and imposed a 25 per cent tariff on auto parts. Although he claims that his deal with China will ensure US access to rare earth minerals, their status remains in limbo amid ongoing trade tensions. More than one million different tariff rates The entire process has been marked by confusion and inconsistency. For example, the administration imposed tariffs on imported urea – a key fertiliser input – from Qatar and Algeria, but not from Russia. As a result, by May, Russia was supplying 64 per cent of urea imports to the US, double its previous share. As if that weren't enough, some of Trump's actions serve no discernible economic purpose. Most notably, he has threatened to hit Brazil with 50 per cent tariffs to pressure its government not to prosecute former president – and Trump ally – Jair Bolsonaro. Likewise, he reimposed tariffs on aluminium and steel imports, despite clear evidence that job losses due to increases in input costs were far greater than the employment gains in protected industries during his first term. When tariffs vary by country and can change at a moment's notice, chaos is inevitable. There are currently more than 10,000 tariff classifications covering imports from over 160 countries. This means there could be more than one million different tariff rates, leaving customs officials and shippers to navigate an increasingly unmanageable system. Many of Trump's tariffs are ostensibly intended to strengthen national security, but it's difficult to see how targeting allies like Canada helps achieve that goal, especially since cutting off foreign suppliers would only drive up the cost of defence procurement. Moreover, allied countries could help the US increase production of certain goods when necessary, thereby supporting domestic capacity. Trump's tariffs will harm the US economy in several significant ways. For starters, contrary to his claims, raising tariffs does not reduce trade deficits. In fact, it undermines investment and trade, as well as increases the real cost of imported goods and provokes retaliation – hurting exports. The irony is that increased domestic production, spurred by protectionist policies, reduces the volume of imports – and with it, tariff revenues. In some cases, tariffs work at cross purposes: steel tariffs, for example, raise input costs for automakers. Consequently, tariff revenues will likely fall far short of the administration's expectations. As for job creation, some firms benefiting from tariff protection may invest in automation to replace human workers, especially in industries that rely on low-skilled labour. By contrast, firms in import-competing or export-oriented sectors are likely to respond to ongoing uncertainty over future tariffs by delaying capacity expansion. Another troubling consequence of the current tariff regime is the increasingly visible rise of crony capitalism, as a steady stream of foreign officials and American business executives descends on Washington to lobby for tariff exemptions and protections. Six months into his second presidency, it is abundantly clear that there is no coherent rationale behind Trump's tariffs. They are costly and haphazard, undermining economic growth and turning the free market that once drove US productivity into a breeding ground for rent-seeking and corruption. PROJECT SYNDICATE The writer, a former World Bank chief economist and former first deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, is senior research professor of international economics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and senior fellow at the Center for International Development at Stanford University

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store