logo
'I'm disabled and 99% bed-bound but live life to the full - why the assisted dying bill is wrong'

'I'm disabled and 99% bed-bound but live life to the full - why the assisted dying bill is wrong'

Wales Online14-05-2025
'I'm disabled and 99% bed-bound but live life to the full - why the assisted dying bill is wrong'
Nicki Myers has a condition which means she is barely ever able to leave her bed but says pressures from elsewhere could impact decisions on whether people live or die
Supporters of the "Not Dead Yet" campaign, previously protested outside the Houses of Parliament
(Image: Getty Images )
Nicki Myers has a condition which means she can barely leave her bed. The 52-year-old has pulmonary fibrosis which means she is 99% bed-bound.
But she says with the help of her local hospice she is still able to live life to the full. But she fears moves to introduce assisted dying to the UK could leave people in her position facing choices over whether to live or die.

Now she has joined with other disabled campaigners to argue the Westminster assisted dying Bill violates their rights under a United Nations (UN) convention. And they say their voices have been 'ignored' in the debate.

The move is being backed by campaign groups including Disabled People Against Cuts, Disability Rights UK and Not Dead Yet UK. Nicki, who lives in Cambridge, is making a complaint alongside Essex-based Nicola Waters, 51, calling on the United Nations to declare that the passage of assisted dying legislation violates the UN Convention on the Rights of Disabled People (UNCRPD).
Ms Myers said she was given five years to live seven years ago. She said: 'I was motivated to be a complainant in this case because I believe the way this legislation has been introduced, as a Private Members Bill, has meant the voices of people in my position (those who want to keep living as well as possible for as long as possible, and with good quality services) have been ignored.
'I also believe the timing of this Bill is wrong. When social security, fuel allowance, health, social care and palliative care services are all simultaneously under threat, it is not the right time for people to be asked if they want assistance from the state to end their lives.'
Article continues below
Ms Waters, who has the progressive neurodegenerative condition Motor Neurone Disease (MND), said she believes opportunities to make the Bill safer in recent months have not been taken. She fears people are being offered death rather than care.
She said: 'This Bill will see those of us who live with terminal illness being offered suicide rather than the care and treatments we need to live. Numerous amendments that would have made the Bill safer have been voted down. As a result, I could be offered assisted suicide at every medical appointment I have.'
The complaint contains multiple arguments, including a claim there has been a lack of pre-legislative consultation or scrutiny; the Bill has been rushed; a failure to publish accessible formats of the Bill and related material; a failure to recognise the importance of engaging with organisations run and controlled by deaf and disabled people; and inadequate arrangements for hearing from these groups at committee stage.

Silent Witness actor Liz Carr is a disability rights campaigner and a member of the Not Dead Yet group
(Image: Getty )
Actor and disability rights campaigner Liz Carr has backed the complaint, saying it feels as though the voices of disabled people have been 'sidelined' in the debate. She said: 'Considering the fact that this Bill is very much about disability (the majority of terminally ill people come under the Equality Act definition of disabled), it is shocking to me that the voices of disabled people's organisations have not been adequately heard so far.
'Varied groups of disability rights organisations should have been invited to give evidence at the committee and to do this effectively, sufficient time to prepare was needed and preparatory information in accessible formats should have been provided. Particularly during committee stage, the amount of information being shared, that we need to comment on is practically impossible to read through without the time to do this comprehensively and without the information being provided appropriately and accessibly. It also feels that our voices have been sidelined, marginalised even, as not particularly relevant to this Bill.'
Article continues below
Help in a crisis
If you're having thoughts about suicide, are harming yourself or have considered self-harm, it's important to tell someone. These organisations give immediate support:
Your local 24/7 NHS crisis line: at nhs.uk/urgentmentalhealth or visit 111.nhs.uk
Under 35? Visit papyrus-uk.org, call 0800 068 4141 (lines are open 24 hours every day of the year), text 88247 or email pat@papyrus-uk.org.
If you do not feel you can keep yourself or someone else safe, call 999.
The Bill is supported by MP and disability rights advocate Marie Tidball. She secured amendments to ensure the establishment of independent advocates to support people with learning disabilities, autism or mental health conditions and to set up a disability advisory board, and has confirmed she will vote yes again at the third reading, feeling assured safeguards have been strengthened.
She told reporters last month: 'I can say, as someone who has looked at legislative scrutiny over the course of the last 20 years, this is the most extraordinary, deliberative cross-party process I've ever seen.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'
Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'

The Princess of Wales openly discussed her 'life changing' cancer journey and 'rollercoaster' recovery on a visit to an Essex hospital. Speaking at Colchester Hospital, Kate Middleton revealed the toll cancer takes on family and friends. 'It is a life-changing experience both for the individual patient but also for the families as well and actually it sometimes goes unrecognised, you don't necessarily, particularly when it's the first time, you don't appreciate how much impact it is going to have,' the princess told a group of users, volunteers and staff at the Cancer Wellbeing Centre. The princess was diagnosed with an unknown form of cancer in March last year, in the same year as the King was also diagnosed with cancer. On her visit to the hospital, she praised the centre's 'holistic' approach to the support it offers patients, relatives and carers, which includes counselling and dietary advice. 'There is this whole phase when you finish your treatment that you, yourself, everybody expects you, right you've finished your time, go, you're better, and that's not the case at all,' she added. 'You have to find your new normal and that takes time.' After visiting the centre, the princess planted several coral-pink Catherine's Rose plants in the hospital's Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) wellbeing garden, which offers a restorative space for staff, patients and visitors.

Labour urged to ‘have courage' to trigger vote on Chagos deal
Labour urged to ‘have courage' to trigger vote on Chagos deal

Western Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Labour urged to ‘have courage' to trigger vote on Chagos deal

The Government won a vote in the Lords on Monday, when 205 peers struck down a Tory bid to reject the treaty which cedes control of the archipelago to Mauritius. But the Conservative Party's shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti has called for a similar vote in the Commons. 'With the 21-day Crag (Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010) process about to conclude, it is a disgrace that Labour have breached the parliamentary conventions and denied this House a meaningful debate and vote on ratification,' she told MPs. To accompany the treaty, MPs will need to sign off on a Bill to wind up the current governance of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT). The treaty will only come into force once the legislation is 'in place', according to the Government. Yesterday dozens of Chagossians came to Parliament to tell us how they feel let down, neglected and betrayed by Labour's £30bn Chagos Surrender Treaty. Labour are denying them their rights and blocking the House of Commons from a meaningful debate and vote! @CllrABClarkson — Priti Patel MP (@pritipatel) July 1, 2025 Dame Priti added: 'Having a vote on the Bill is not the same as voting on the treaty under Crag. Earlier this week, the House of Lords – the other place – had a debate and vote where the Lib Dems sided with Labour in backing this £30 billion surrender treaty, which is subsidising tax cuts in Mauritius. 'So, why can't we have a debate and vote in this House? What are ministers afraid of? 'Are they afraid that their backbenchers, now worried about benefit cuts and the impact of unpopular tax rises, will question why so much money is being handed over for a territory that we own and force them into another embarrassing U-turn?' Dame Priti urged ministers to 'scrap this treaty or at least have the courage to bring it here for a proper debate, full scrutiny, and finally, a vote in this House'. Treaties are laid before Parliament before they are ratified, but there is no requirement for a debate or vote. Peers in their vote, which Conservative shadow Foreign Office minister Lord Callanan triggered, agreed not to reject the treaty by 205 votes to 185, majority 20. Stephen Doughty said he was disappointed by the shadow foreign secretary's tone (House of Commons/UK Parliament) Responding, Stephen Doughty told the Commons he was 'disappointed by the tone' of Dame Priti's comments. 'I don't know who writes this stuff,' the Foreign Office minister said. 'I don't know whether it's just performative politics or rhetoric, I don't know what. 'But I should point out that I have received and answered over 100 written parliamentary questions from (Dame Priti), I've answered over 250 questions on this deal and the process in total. 'We've had no less than six urgent questions in this House. We have had two statements from this Government by the Foreign Secretary (David Lammy) and the Defence Secretary (John Healey). 'I personally briefed (Dame Priti) and answered many of her questions in my office just a couple of weeks ago in good faith and in detail, and indeed, I was subjected – quite rightly – to robust scrutiny not only from the Foreign Affairs Committee of this House, but also from the International Relations and Defence Committee in the other House, and indeed the International Arrangements Committee in great detail on these issues.' Mr Doughty said a Bill would follow 'in due course' but added the deal with Mauritius, presented to Parliament in May, 'secures' the UK-US military base on Diego Garcia, 'secures our national security and that of our allies'.

Gwynedd and Anglesey MPs vote against ‘cruel' welfare bill
Gwynedd and Anglesey MPs vote against ‘cruel' welfare bill

North Wales Chronicle

time31 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Gwynedd and Anglesey MPs vote against ‘cruel' welfare bill

MPs voted through the government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Bill by 335 votes to 260 yesterday, but only after offering late concessions to Labour rebels. The government also revealed another U-turn by saying it would not change PIP rules until it had time to consider recommendations and conclusions made by an impending review. Llinos Media (Ynys Môn) and Liz Saville Roberts (Dwyfor Meirionnydd) were among the 260 MPs who voted against the bill in Parliament yesterday. Ms Medi also highlighted her disappointment that only one Welsh Labour MP (Steve Witherden, Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr) voted against the bill. She said: 'We must do more to help disabled people to play their fullest possible role in society. Cutting support is not the way to do that. 'Last night's chaos in Parliament proved the government should have pulled the welfare bill and paused. You can't build durable policy by making it up as you go along. 'Disabled people were outside pleading to be heard - but only one Welsh Labour MP voted against. Many will feel disappointed.' All 335 MPs who voted in favour of the bill were from the Labour party, while 55 abstained. PIP is paid to England and Wales residents who have difficulty completing everyday tasks due to a long-term physical or mental health condition. It is not means-tested and is available to people who are working, but its eligibility criteria is proposed to be tightened from November 2026. MPs will continue to scrutinise the bill when it returns to the House of Commons on July 9. Ms Saville Roberts added: 'Plaid Cymru MPs listened to disabled people and voted against the welfare bill last night. This bill was cruel from the outset and remains unfit for purpose. 'Shambolic is the only word to describe yesterday's debate. A panicked U-turn midway through the debate exposed Labour's complete lack of direction. 'These measures will hit Welsh communities hardest - yet the vast majority of Welsh Labour MPs nodded them through. 'Plaid Cymru have consistently opposed these cruel welfare reforms, recognising that targeting the most vulnerable is both morally indefensible and economically short-sighted.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store