
Where Were Big Tech's CEOs on Tariffs?
If you logged on to X or Bluesky this past week, you were likely swept up in the onslaught of posts about Trump's reciprocal tariffs and the plunging stock market. And, if you follow the tech industry as closely as I do, you probably also noticed who wasn't posting about the tariffs: many of the same tech founders and CEOs who flanked Trump on Inauguration Day in January. Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, and Mark Zuckerberg have kept mum on the topic of tariffs (although both Pichai and Zuckerberg have continued posting about AI). Meanwhile, Elon Musk—well, we'll get to that.
This is an essay from the latest edition of Steven Levy's Plaintext newsletter.
SIGN UP for Plaintext to read the whole thing, and tap Steven's unique insights and unmatched contacts for the long view on tech.
The silence was deafening, considering that the 'magnificent seven' collectively lost trillions of dollars in market value following Trump's tariff announcement last week. But there's a cold logic behind these tech leaders holding their tongues in public—particularly for those who sell hardware. The US has become a highly volatile nation where the whims of the president must be taken into consideration before using any political chip or making a public statement, especially in an environment where that statement could be irrelevant an hour later.
'The sand doesn't stop shifting long enough to make a cogent statement,' one top communications executive, who has worked closely with two Big Tech CEOs, tells me.
Tech CEOs aren't actually staying silent. They're simply lobbying behind the scenes on their own behalf. Niki Christoff, a Washington, DC, political strategist and former aide to Senator John McCain during his 2008 presidential campaign, says most of the strategizing around trade rules—and conversations with Trump's staff—are happening through back channels right now. 'There's a lot of personal dialing and trying to get deals done,' she claims.
During Trump's first term, Cook carefully cultivated a direct relationship with the president in order to lobby him on issues like trade and immigration. I have a hard time imagining Cook isn't using that direct line now. Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang, who did not attend the inauguration ceremony, reportedly went to a $1-million-a-head dinner at Mar-a-Lago last week. Shortly afterward, the White House walked back plans to implement export controls on some chips that Nvidia sells to China.
Private back channels allow each tech leader to lobby for specific tariff exemptions. The kind of exemptions that would benefit Nvidia, such as more lenient policies on semiconductor imports for GPUs, differ from what Apple might be angling for, considering the company's supply chain complexity and its reliance on China. 'Broadly opposing tariffs is not useful if business leaders can get exemptions on their own products,' Christoff points out.
At the same time tech CEOs are letting trade organizations, like Business Roundtable, which represents a number of big tech firms including Alphabet and Amazon, do some of their lobbying for them, sources tell WIRED. Business Roundtable CEO Joshua Bolten put out a statement urging the administration to 'swiftly reach agreements' with its trading partners and to implement 'reasonable exemptions.' The CEOs have also been able to hang back while bankers like JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon make public assertions about the lasting negative impact of tariffs on the economy, and while billionaire hedge funder Bill Ackman keeps tweeting through it. (And really, what tech CEO wants to be part of a roundup story that also includes the market-cratering tweets of an anonymous X user named 'Walter Bloomberg'?)
There have been a few outliers. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said he believes Amazon's vast network of third-party sellers might end up passing the cost of tariffs on to consumers. Last week Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sat alongside Bill Gates and former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer for an interview with CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin, who asked about tariffs. Ballmer told Sorkin he 'took just enough economics in college to [know that] tariffs are actually going to bring some turmoil' and that the 'disruption is very hard on people.'
Nadella was more circumspect and took Sorkin's probing as an opportunity to tout artificial intelligence. 'In the short term, I look at it and say, whatever happens, whatever readjustment happens, we are for the first time really supplying what is the essential, nondurable commodity called intelligence,' Nadella said. He went on to say that his second consideration right now is how much compute power the world will need in 25 to 50 years. 'I want to keep those two thoughts and then take one step at a time, and then whatever are the geopolitical or economic shifts, we will adjust to it.'
If that doesn't work out, Nadella has a promising second career in dodgeball.
Among Trump's inauguration crowd, Musk is now the exception. He, too, has made direct appeals to Trump to drop the tariffs but has also loudly called Trump's top trade adviser Peter Navarro a 'moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks.' Musk later apologized, adding that the comparison 'was so unfair to bricks.' This was after Navarro called Musk a 'car assembler'—not a car manufacturer—whose business relies heavily on cheap parts sourced outside of the US. Musk has maintained that Tesla sells the 'most American-made cars.'
At least Trump's buddy-in-chief is willing to stick his neck out, even if the other CEOs aren't. Except, Musk's remarks on tariffs are so obviously self-serving. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that he doesn't care about the health of the average citizen's retirement account, considering how ruthlessly he's championing the firing of federal employees and the dismantling of government agencies. If Musk's not tiptoeing around the president's volatility, perhaps it's because he's a purveyor of his own unique brand of chaos.
Not that long ago, Big Tech leaders might have taken to the public square to issue statements about major social and political issues that affected their employees and the public at large. But these remarks were mostly performative, and we should never have pretended, or allowed ourselves to be convinced, otherwise. Behind the curtain, they were always working the gears of a brutally capitalistic machine. Now, for them, public silence is golden, and private lobbying is worth the world's stores in gold, especially when faced with an injuriously erratic president.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
10 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Apple's latest message to Trump: We're buying American magnets
American manufacturing is getting a half-billion-dollar boost from Apple. The Cupertino-based iPhone maker said Tuesday it has reached a $500 million deal with MP Materials to buy US-made rare earth magnets. "Rare earth materials are essential for making advanced technology, and this partnership will help strengthen the supply of these vital materials here in the United States," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in a statement. Rare earths are used in the production of high-powered magnets that enable a wide range of electronic functions, ranging from electric motors and generators to wireless charging and haptic touch responses in mobile devices. While new supplies of rare earths continue to be mined, Apple's initiative with MP Materials focuses on reclaiming and recycling neodymium magnets specifically for Apple devices from used consumer electronics and post-industrial scrap. News of the deal sent MP Materials' stock price soaring more than 25% on Tuesday morning, topping a prior price high reached in April 2022. The gains extend a run that started last week when MP Materials inked a multibillion-dollar deal with the US Department of Defense that guarantees a price floor for two of the most popular rare earth metals that is nearly twice as high as the Chinese market level, Reuters reported. The move also sends a message to President Donald Trump, who has pressured Apple to make more of its products in the US. "I said to Tim, I said, 'Tim, look, we treated you really good, we put up with all the plants that you build in China for years, now you got build us," Trump said in May. Apple said in its release that this purchase commitment is part of a larger pledge to spend more than $500 billion in the US over the next four years. The company also said that MP Materials will provide "extensive" training at its new factory in Texas to build a new specialized workforce for magnet manufacturing.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia calls Trump's demand for Ukraine ceasefire in 50 days unacceptable
Russia has rejected President Trump's "ultimatum" for Moscow to sign a ceasefire deal to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days on Tuesday as "unacceptable," calling for continued negotiations and insisting that the invasion ordered by President Vladimir Putin would continue until its goals are achieved. In response to President Trump's threat to impose 100% secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia if Putin's government does not agree to a deal to end the war in that timeframe, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said Tuesday that "any attempts to make demands, especially ultimatums, are unacceptable to us," according to Russia's state-run TASS news agency. "We need to focus on political and diplomatic work. The President of the Russian Federation has repeatedly said that we are ready to negotiate and the diplomatic path is preferable for us," Ryabkov was quoted as saying. "If we cannot achieve our goals through diplomacy, then the SVO (war in Ukraine) will continue… This is an unshakable position. We would like Washington and NATO as a whole to take it with the utmost seriousness." Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov separately called Mr. Trump's announcement "quite serious." "Some of it is addressed personally to (Russian) President Putin. We definitely need time to analyze what was said in Washington," Peskov said during his daily briefing on Tuesday. "If and when President Putin deems it necessary, he will definitely comment on it. I would not want to get ahead of ourselves, so let's wait for Putin's decision on whether he will comment on it himself." Russia's former President Dmitry Medvedev, who is close to the Kremlin, called Mr. Trump's remarks "a theatrical ultimatum" in a post on social media, adding that "Russia didn't care." Speaking Monday in the Oval Office alongside visiting NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Mr. Trump said: "We are very unhappy, I am, with Russia." He also announced a deal for the U.S. to sell additional weapons to its NATO allies, with the understanding that they will then send the weapons to Ukraine. "We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it," Mr. Trump said. "This is really big," Rutte said. "And the decision is that you want Ukraine [to have] what it needs to have to maintain, to be able to defend itself against Russia, but you want Europeans to pay for it, which is totally logical." Mr. Trump again expressed his frustration with Putin, whom he recently called "absolutely crazy" for ordering strikes on civilian areas in Ukraine. On Monday, Mr. Trump suggested the Russian autocrat had a habit of saying one thing and then doing another. "I always hang up, say, 'Well, that was a nice phone call.' And then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city and I say, 'That's strange.'" Mr. Trump said. "After that happens three or four times, you say, the talk doesn't mean anything." When asked in an interview with CBS News partner BBC News if he was done trying to deal with the Russian leader, Mr. Trump said: "I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him." In a social media post on Monday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he had spoken with Mr. Trump and thanked his American counterpart, "for the willingness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace." "It's important that we have such a good relationship, and that the Alliance countries are working to increase defense spending," Zelenskyy said, adding that he and Mr. Trump had made plans to speak again. "We agreed to catch up more often by phone and coordinate our steps in the future as well," he said. "Thank you, Mr. President! Thank you, America!" Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The attack, involving tens of thousands of uniformed soldiers and barrages of missiles, came after Russia unilaterally annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula after backing separatist forces in the region. While Russia has maintained control over Crimea and installed its own administration there — along with a huge swathe of eastern Ukraine seized over the last three years — its dominion over those regions is not recognized by the U.S., the United Nations, or the majority of the international community. One of Putin's key demands for a ceasefire in the ongoing war is that Ukraine, and its international backers, should recognize Russian ownership of at least some of that occupied territory. Sen. Lindsey Graham says "a turning point regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine is coming" Trump pushes senators to make $9.4 trillion in spending cuts Exclusive discounts from CBS Mornings Deals


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Senate committee urged to reject Emil Bove's judicial nomination
Over 75 former federal and state judges signed a letter urging lawmakers to reject the "deeply inappropriate" nomination of President Trump's former attorney Emil Bove to serve as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Why it matters: The letter sounds the alarm over Bove's "egregious record" amid mounting controversies. Former Department of Justice attorney Erez Reuveni and a whistleblower identified as a fired DOJ lawyer told the department's internal watchdog and lawmakers in a letter last month that Bove told department attorneys to ignore court orders barring Trump from deporting immigrants. Bove, who represented Trump in both his classified documents and election obstruction cases, was also among the DOJ officials who pushed to drop bribery and fraud charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. What they're saying: The former judges described Bove's role in the mass firing of Justice Department prosecutors who investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack as "disqualifying" and his refusal to denounce the attack as "reprehensible." Also disqualifying, they said in the letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), was his leadership in the effort to drop the DOJ's prosecution of Adams, prompting several prosecutors to resign. "These are not actions of someone committed to equal justice under the law," the judges wrote. "Rather, they reflect a troubling pattern of abusing prosecutorial discretion to shield political allies." The DOJ did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. Zoom out: Beyond his record, the judges say it is "deeply inappropriate" for a president to nominate their own criminal defense attorney for a federal judgeship. They pointed to the president's Truth Social post announcing Bove's nomination, in which Trump wrote his former attorney would "do anything else that is necessary to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN." The former judges argued, "That statement underscores the peril of confirming a nominee whose principal qualification appears to be personal loyalty to the president." Context: Among those who signed the letter was former Circuit Judge J. Michael Luttig, who was put on the bench by former President George H.W. Bush and advised former Vice President Mike Pence. What we're watching: Proceeding with Bove's nomination, they write, " would be a disservice to the constitution, to law enforcement, and to the rule of law."