logo
Where Were Big Tech's CEOs on Tariffs?

Where Were Big Tech's CEOs on Tariffs?

WIRED11-04-2025
Apr 11, 2025 10:00 AM Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg, and other tech leaders refrained from making public statements while their companies collectively lost trillions. Their silence was both deafening and strategic. Jeff Bezos attends the 2025 Vanity Fair Oscar Party Hosted By Radhika Jones at Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on March 02, 2025 in Beverly Hills, California. Photograph: Getty Images
If you logged on to X or Bluesky this past week, you were likely swept up in the onslaught of posts about Trump's reciprocal tariffs and the plunging stock market. And, if you follow the tech industry as closely as I do, you probably also noticed who wasn't posting about the tariffs: many of the same tech founders and CEOs who flanked Trump on Inauguration Day in January. Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, and Mark Zuckerberg have kept mum on the topic of tariffs (although both Pichai and Zuckerberg have continued posting about AI). Meanwhile, Elon Musk—well, we'll get to that.
This is an essay from the latest edition of Steven Levy's Plaintext newsletter.
SIGN UP for Plaintext to read the whole thing, and tap Steven's unique insights and unmatched contacts for the long view on tech.
The silence was deafening, considering that the 'magnificent seven' collectively lost trillions of dollars in market value following Trump's tariff announcement last week. But there's a cold logic behind these tech leaders holding their tongues in public—particularly for those who sell hardware. The US has become a highly volatile nation where the whims of the president must be taken into consideration before using any political chip or making a public statement, especially in an environment where that statement could be irrelevant an hour later.
'The sand doesn't stop shifting long enough to make a cogent statement,' one top communications executive, who has worked closely with two Big Tech CEOs, tells me.
Tech CEOs aren't actually staying silent. They're simply lobbying behind the scenes on their own behalf. Niki Christoff, a Washington, DC, political strategist and former aide to Senator John McCain during his 2008 presidential campaign, says most of the strategizing around trade rules—and conversations with Trump's staff—are happening through back channels right now. 'There's a lot of personal dialing and trying to get deals done,' she claims.
During Trump's first term, Cook carefully cultivated a direct relationship with the president in order to lobby him on issues like trade and immigration. I have a hard time imagining Cook isn't using that direct line now. Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang, who did not attend the inauguration ceremony, reportedly went to a $1-million-a-head dinner at Mar-a-Lago last week. Shortly afterward, the White House walked back plans to implement export controls on some chips that Nvidia sells to China.
Private back channels allow each tech leader to lobby for specific tariff exemptions. The kind of exemptions that would benefit Nvidia, such as more lenient policies on semiconductor imports for GPUs, differ from what Apple might be angling for, considering the company's supply chain complexity and its reliance on China. 'Broadly opposing tariffs is not useful if business leaders can get exemptions on their own products,' Christoff points out.
At the same time tech CEOs are letting trade organizations, like Business Roundtable, which represents a number of big tech firms including Alphabet and Amazon, do some of their lobbying for them, sources tell WIRED. Business Roundtable CEO Joshua Bolten put out a statement urging the administration to 'swiftly reach agreements' with its trading partners and to implement 'reasonable exemptions.' The CEOs have also been able to hang back while bankers like JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon make public assertions about the lasting negative impact of tariffs on the economy, and while billionaire hedge funder Bill Ackman keeps tweeting through it. (And really, what tech CEO wants to be part of a roundup story that also includes the market-cratering tweets of an anonymous X user named 'Walter Bloomberg'?)
There have been a few outliers. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said he believes Amazon's vast network of third-party sellers might end up passing the cost of tariffs on to consumers. Last week Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sat alongside Bill Gates and former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer for an interview with CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin, who asked about tariffs. Ballmer told Sorkin he 'took just enough economics in college to [know that] tariffs are actually going to bring some turmoil' and that the 'disruption is very hard on people.'
Nadella was more circumspect and took Sorkin's probing as an opportunity to tout artificial intelligence. 'In the short term, I look at it and say, whatever happens, whatever readjustment happens, we are for the first time really supplying what is the essential, nondurable commodity called intelligence,' Nadella said. He went on to say that his second consideration right now is how much compute power the world will need in 25 to 50 years. 'I want to keep those two thoughts and then take one step at a time, and then whatever are the geopolitical or economic shifts, we will adjust to it.'
If that doesn't work out, Nadella has a promising second career in dodgeball.
Among Trump's inauguration crowd, Musk is now the exception. He, too, has made direct appeals to Trump to drop the tariffs but has also loudly called Trump's top trade adviser Peter Navarro a 'moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks.' Musk later apologized, adding that the comparison 'was so unfair to bricks.' This was after Navarro called Musk a 'car assembler'—not a car manufacturer—whose business relies heavily on cheap parts sourced outside of the US. Musk has maintained that Tesla sells the 'most American-made cars.'
At least Trump's buddy-in-chief is willing to stick his neck out, even if the other CEOs aren't. Except, Musk's remarks on tariffs are so obviously self-serving. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that he doesn't care about the health of the average citizen's retirement account, considering how ruthlessly he's championing the firing of federal employees and the dismantling of government agencies. If Musk's not tiptoeing around the president's volatility, perhaps it's because he's a purveyor of his own unique brand of chaos.
Not that long ago, Big Tech leaders might have taken to the public square to issue statements about major social and political issues that affected their employees and the public at large. But these remarks were mostly performative, and we should never have pretended, or allowed ourselves to be convinced, otherwise. Behind the curtain, they were always working the gears of a brutally capitalistic machine. Now, for them, public silence is golden, and private lobbying is worth the world's stores in gold, especially when faced with an injuriously erratic president.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side
Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side

CNBC

time8 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side

The European Union has been left scrambling after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would slap a 30% tariff on goods imported from the bloc beginning Aug. 1. European leaders were quick to respond, saying they would still work to strike an agreement with the U.S. before the start of August. The EU also further delayed countermeasures which were set to come into effect this week and warned that preparations for additional retaliatory moves were underway. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic on Monday told reporters that the letter had been received with "regret and disappointment ... especially considering the advanced stage of our ongoing negotiations." Sefcovic stressed that the EU was still focused on finding a negotiated solution, but was preparing for all possible outcomes — which could include countermeasures. He also said that he would speak to his U.S. counterparts later in the day. "I cannot imagine walking away without genuine effort," the trade commissioner said. With less than a month before Trump's new deadline, the European Union will have to act fast to prevent the tariffs from coming into effect or risk further escalation. While EU leaders remain determined to strike a deal, economists and analysts warned that the threat of a 30% tariff rate has nevertheless added fresh pressure to the 27-member block. "It's very bad news for Europe," Alicia Garcia-Herrero, senior fellow at Bruegel and chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. "Trump is pushing the commission to really come up with a better deal," she added. Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, and Inga Fechner, a senior economist at ING who focuses on global trade, struck a similar tone. "Trump's letter to the EU is not a love letter but also not a hate letter. It's a letter to increase pressure in the ongoing negotiations," they said in a note on Sunday. The EU however still has options, the economists said, suggesting that one approach could be for the EU to offer to boost its purchasing of U.S. products ranging from soybeans to military equipment. Brussels could also reduce existing tariffs and other trade hurdles on items such as U.S. cars, or introduce export bans on products that are important to the U.S. such as European-made pharmaceuticals, Brzeski and Fechner said. "The fourth and final option would be to go into outright retaliation with either increasing tariffs on US goods or the nuclear option in trade: tariffs on digital services but also tighter regulations on US tech firms," the economists suggested, noting, however that this would likely trigger a full blown trade war. Despite the additional pressure for the EU, the expectation remains that the bloc and Washington D.C. will strike a agreement in the coming weeks. "I think both sides will strike a compromise. This is in the best interest of both the U.S. and the European Union," said Joerg Kraemer, chief economist at Commerzbank. "I expect in the end, a kind of average tariff rate for the European Union for exports to the U.S. in the area of 15%," he told CNBC'S "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. Notably, this rate would be higher than the 10% that had previously been anticipated by many and is in line with the deal that has been agreed upon by the U.K. and U.S. Berenberg Economist Salomon Fiedler meanwhile appeared more optimistic, saying in a note that the bank was still expecting 10% duties even as "the risks are now strongly skewed towards higher rates." One reason for optimism is that Trump has repeatedly taken extreme positions initially, and then later compromised, Fiedler argued. "The fact that Trump only threatened the new 30% rate for 1 August, instead of implementing it more quickly, suggests he is still looking to negotiate," he said. Trump may also shy away from further tariffs as businesses start passing on higher import costs to consumers, Fiedler suggested. The domestic political backdrop may also change, which could make it less important for the U.S. president to try and keep public attention on trade, he added. On the flipside, risk factors for higher levies include the unlikelihood that the U.S.' trade deficits — which Trump has often used as an argument for tariffs — will disappear, and the U.S. administration's reliance on tariff incomes to supplement its budget, according to Fiedler. "The always remote hope of a good negotiation outcome — the bilateral removal of all tariffs and some other trade barriers between the EU and the US — has all but disappeared from view by now," he noted.

US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns
US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns

According to the CNBC/NRF Retail Monitor, US clothing and accessory stores sales decreased by 0.22% in June after seasonal adjustments. Without seasonal adjustments, sales in these categories grew 2.71% compared to the same month in the previous year, however, this growth is less than the 3.21% year-on-year increase recorded in May 2025. NRF president and CEO Matthew Shay said: 'This was the first monthly decline since February, and spending was down across almost all sectors. Economic fundamentals haven't been disrupted yet and shoppers still have the ability to spend on priorities, but the economy is gradually slowing and there has been an impact on the psyche of consumers. While passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' is clearly supportive of economic growth, unresolved and restrictive trade policies remain a significant headwind.' The Retail Monitor, which is powered by Affinity Solutions, also shows that overall retail sales, excluding automobiles and gasoline, dropped by 0.33% seasonally adjusted month over month but increased by 3.19% unadjusted year over year in June this year. This contrasts with the increases of 0.49% month over month and 4.44% year over year in May. Core retail sales, which includes categories except restaurants, automobile dealers and gasoline stations, fell by 0.32% month over month in June but rose by 3.36% year over year. These figures compare with increases of 0.23% month over month and 4.2% year over year in May. For the first half of the year, total sales were up by 4.66% year over year, while core sales increased by 4.93%. The monthly declines were the first since February when both total and core sales saw a decrease of 0.22% from January. On an annual basis, June sales increased in seven out of nine categories, led by digital products, sporting goods stores, and health and personal care stores; however, on a monthly basis, sales were down in all but one category. NRF chief economist Jack Kleinhenz recently cautioned that US tariff disputes and policy changes are causing 'anxiety and confusion,' contributing to economic uncertainty. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has 'threatened' fresh tariffs of 30% on imports from Mexico and the EU, starting 1 August 2025. Trump justified these measures on social media by pointing to drug trafficking issues with Mexico and longstanding trade imbalances with the EU. This announcement followed earlier warnings issued by Trump to more than 20 countries regarding potential tariffs ranging from 25% to 40%, set to take effect from August unless new bilateral trade agreements are reached. The countries affected include Japan, South Korea, and South Africa. "US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns" was originally created and published by Just Style, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Deutsche Bank warns of sharp market reaction if tariff decision surprises
Deutsche Bank warns of sharp market reaction if tariff decision surprises

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Deutsche Bank warns of sharp market reaction if tariff decision surprises

-- Deutsche Bank is cautioning investors about a potential wave of market volatility as the August 1 tariff deadline looms, warning that financial markets have yet to fully price in the risk of steep new tariffs. 'Markets are clearly not pricing in these higher tariffs, and we may only know the outcome in the final hours,' analysts wrote, adding that the result could be 'a very sharp market reaction and heightened volatility.' The tariff deadline, coupled with a U.S. jobs report on the same day, presents a dangerous setup, the bank said, reminiscent of the market turmoil seen in late July and early August 2024. After the expiration of a 90-day reciprocal tariff extension on July 9, new duties are set to rise sharply, 30% on EU goods, 35% on Canadian imports, and 50% on Brazilian products. 'Trump himself posted last week that 'No extensions will be granted,'' Deutsche Bank noted. The risks are said to be compounded by the fact that long-term U.S. Treasury yields are already elevated. 'It would take less of a jump before we move into problematic territory that re-ignites fears around fiscal policy,' the analysts wrote. Yields on the 30-year Treasury have climbed from 4.52% on April 1 to 4.97%. Deutsche Bank stressed that if the new tariffs are followed by a weak jobs report, 'that would easily resurrect fears around a US recession.' The firm also flagged additional catalysts for volatility, including a Fed decision, the U.S. Treasury's refunding announcement, and the second-quarter GDP print, all set for the same week. 'Given how much the new tariff deadline is being discounted by markets,' Deutsche Bank concluded, 'this is setting up a key period of event risk at the end of the month.' Related articles Deutsche Bank warns of sharp market reaction if tariff decision surprises NIQ Global targets $7.1 billion valuation in U.S. IPO Goldman Sachs starts Nebius at 'buy,' cites AI infrastructure strength Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store