logo
‘I was completely singled out': Sussan Ley's past fuels her determination to fix party's future

‘I was completely singled out': Sussan Ley's past fuels her determination to fix party's future

The Age2 days ago

A former shearer, a pilot and a mother of three children with a dark past as a punk in Canberra. For 10 years, Sussan Ley has been one of the few women in the room in successive Liberal cabinets. Now, she's the federal opposition leader, and one of her first acts has been peeling back the existential scabs of the party itself. But who is Ley, really?
Speaking with host Jacqueline Maley and chief political commentator James Massola in a new Inside Politics podcast episode, Ley opens up about the personal experiences fuelling her to fix the Liberal Party's infamous 'woman problem' from the top, to ultimately tackle the gender-based problems her constituents face with legislation.
Click the player below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation.
Maley: Y ou say that the modern Liberal Party needs to represent all Australians, and it's, you know, that you have a diversity there, but very famously, it hasn't really represented women to the extent that it could have, which is why the Liberals' female vote has been declining so precipitously over the last few decades. Just first of all, before we get into that, would you call yourself a feminist?
Ley: Well, yes, I would. And it's interesting, because the word feminist isn't used much. It was used a lot when I was trying to get into the... and I'll tell you what I mean by feminist, because I used it in the era when, you know, the people who own corporate jets didn't want me flying them, who said to me, quietly, 'We don't have a job for you because... it's not us, Sussan, it's just that the travelling public doesn't really want to see a woman up the front,' and, you know, 'Come back next year.'
Loading
Sure, that was something that, you know, burned in me, how I was completely singled out. Never mind my qualifications, my licence, all of the things I'd done... it was simply because of my gender. So, we didn't do well with women. I just want to confront that. I want to acknowledge that. I want to say that since in 2001 when I came into parliament, more women in Australia voted for us than they did anyone else, and that number has been declining ever since, which is why I am so determined and so insistent that we fix this women's problem.
Maley: You gave an address to the National Press Club this week, which was really strong, and we both were really interested in it. You talked in that address about coercive control and domestic violence, and you said that you knew what coercive control felt like. Do you want to elaborate on that at all? Have you had personal experience with it?
Ley: Look, I have had personal experiences, and I don't choose to share them publicly, but I want the women of Australia to know that I know, and that I'm with them, and that I understand how it feels and what it's like, and how sometimes, only looking back, can you really understand what went on.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social media ban must look to future teen trends
Social media ban must look to future teen trends

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Social media ban must look to future teen trends

The federal government plans to introduce its social media ban for under-16s by December. Announced to mixed reviews last year – parent groups were ecstatic, while mental health organisations have warned about the risk of isolating vulnerable teens and tech commentators questioned the data security trade-offs – the ban would eventually require all Australians to complete an age verification process to use Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and other social media apps. The exact parameters of the ban remain to be seen, and will need to pass parliament, but last week, the Herald reported eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant had advised the government to not restrict its new rules to specific social media platforms. Inman Grant is specifically seeking to include video platform YouTube in the ban, after it previously received an exemption due to its 'significant educational purpose'. According to the eSafety Commission's research, four in 10 young teenagers have been exposed to harmful content, such as eating disorder videos, misogynistic or hateful material, or violent fight videos, while watching YouTube. As the Albanese government finalises the details of its attempt to restrict social media on a national scale, the Sun-Herald believes it is extremely prudent to not include a discrete list of platforms the rules cover. Indeed, as Emily Kowal reports in today's Sun-Herald, there are emerging forms of online engagement driven by artificial intelligence, for which regulation should also be considered. Companion chatbots such as Replika and allow users to converse, call and exchange photos and videos with an AI 'friend'. The user can style this friend as their favourite character from a movie, a celebrity, or someone they know in real life. Loading It is not hard to see why child safety experts are concerned. The eSafety Commissioner said she had received reports of children as young as 10 spending hours on chatbots, which AI researchers say learn from their user, evolving to respond in ways to keep them talking for longer. Some bots are designed to be mean, others tend towards pornographic or other forms of conversation inappropriate for children. All collect information about their user, and few have any real mechanism to validate their user's age.

Social media ban must look to future teen trends
Social media ban must look to future teen trends

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Social media ban must look to future teen trends

The federal government plans to introduce its social media ban for under-16s by December. Announced to mixed reviews last year – parent groups were ecstatic, while mental health organisations have warned about the risk of isolating vulnerable teens and tech commentators questioned the data security trade-offs – the ban would eventually require all Australians to complete an age verification process to use Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and other social media apps. The exact parameters of the ban remain to be seen, and will need to pass parliament, but last week, the Herald reported eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant had advised the government to not restrict its new rules to specific social media platforms. Inman Grant is specifically seeking to include video platform YouTube in the ban, after it previously received an exemption due to its 'significant educational purpose'. According to the eSafety Commission's research, four in 10 young teenagers have been exposed to harmful content, such as eating disorder videos, misogynistic or hateful material, or violent fight videos, while watching YouTube. As the Albanese government finalises the details of its attempt to restrict social media on a national scale, the Sun-Herald believes it is extremely prudent to not include a discrete list of platforms the rules cover. Indeed, as Emily Kowal reports in today's Sun-Herald, there are emerging forms of online engagement driven by artificial intelligence, for which regulation should also be considered. Companion chatbots such as Replika and allow users to converse, call and exchange photos and videos with an AI 'friend'. The user can style this friend as their favourite character from a movie, a celebrity, or someone they know in real life. Loading It is not hard to see why child safety experts are concerned. The eSafety Commissioner said she had received reports of children as young as 10 spending hours on chatbots, which AI researchers say learn from their user, evolving to respond in ways to keep them talking for longer. Some bots are designed to be mean, others tend towards pornographic or other forms of conversation inappropriate for children. All collect information about their user, and few have any real mechanism to validate their user's age.

State Liberals hit back at critics and launch campaign
State Liberals hit back at critics and launch campaign

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

State Liberals hit back at critics and launch campaign

Embattled Premier Jeremy Rockliff has hit back at growing criticism of his government's budget management as he formally launches his campaign to recapture the hearts, minds and votes of Tasmanians. The island state heads to the polls next month after parliament declared no confidence in the Liberal minority leader in early June. It will be Tasmania's second election in successive years and the fourth since 2018. Debt is the number one issue, with the dissenting opposition and crossbench lashing Mr Rockliff over his handling of the state's finances. Figures released last week by treasury forecast a worse position than estimated in the May 2025/26 state budget, with net debt to reach $13 billion in 2027/28, above the budget forecast of $10.2 billion. It called for "explicit policy choices", warning the rate of debt growth was unsustainable. Mr Rockliff will head to Tasmania's north on Sunday to officially hit "go" on his re-election bid. However, in an attempt to beat him to the punch, Labor leader Dean Winter on Saturday unveiled plans to immediately find $1 billion in savings if he wins power and to put any windfall tax revenue gains towards debt reduction. Mr Rockliff immediately dismissed the move as "a recycling of a number of policies already in existence". "His plan to 'maximise government business profits' means higher charges, including increased car rego and power prices," he said. "The truth is Mr Winter will increase taxes." The major parties also traded barbs on Saturday on support for the proposed Marinus Link project. The undersea electricity and data connector would link Tasmania's northwest with Victoria's Latrobe Valley and allow the smaller state to import surplus solar while exporting hydropower to the mainland grid where it could help reduce the risk of brownouts. "After promising the project for 11 years - and delivering nothing - Jeremy Rockliff is now unsure whether he supports it," according to opposition energy spokeswoman Janie Finley. Government counterpart Nick Duigan accused Mr Winter of wanting to "trade away" Tasmania's economic future by forfeiting a seat at the Marinus table and leaving Victoria to call the shots in any deal. The Liberals (14 seats) and Labor (10) face an uphill battle to reach the 18-seat mark required to govern in majority. Tasmanians head to the polls on July 19.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store