BRICS Pushes Back against US Policies, Trump Threatens Bloc with 10% Tariff
His remarks followed a joint declaration for BRICS leaders, condemning the increase of tariffs and other policies, in what seemed as a criticism directed at Trump, although it did not mention him or the US. Implicit Criticism of US Policies
Under the theme 'Strengthening Global South Cooperation for a More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance,' Brazil is hosting the 17th BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro from July 6-7, 2025.
In their joint declaration, the group's leaders voiced concern over the rise of tariffs and criticized unilateral economic sanctions, in what appeared to be an indirect criticism of the US policies under Trump.
'The proliferation of trade-restrictive actions, whether in the form of indiscriminate rising of tariffs and non-tariff measures, or protectionism under the guise of environmental objectives, threatens to further reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating existing economic disparities and affecting prospects for global economic development,' the statement said.
'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with (World Trade Organization) WTO rules,' the BRICS leaders noted, reiterating support for the 'rules-based, open, transparent, fair, inclusive, equitable, non-discriminatory, consensus-based multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core.'
The BRICS statement also slammed unilateral economic sanctions, calling them 'unlawful measures, which undermine international law and the principles and purposes of the UN Charter.' A Threat to BRICS
Early on Monday, Trump threatened countries that side with the policies of BRICS with an additional 10% tariff. In a post on Truth Social, the US President wrote: 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy.'
Trump did not clarify what policies he was referring to, but the US President previously threatened to impose a sweeping 100% tariffs on BRICS countries if they acted against the US dollar.
After winning the presidential election, Trump warned in November 2024 against creating a BRICS currency that could undermine the dominance of the US dollar. 'We require a commitment from these Countries that they will neither create a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty US Dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs, and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful US Economy,' he wrote on Truth Social at the time. Trump's Tariffs
On April 2, Trump sparked a trade war by announcing stiff tariffs on all imports to the US. Trump's move sparked fear across the world of an economic recession and higher inflation. As a result, Trump later suspended most of the tariffs for 90 days, set to expire on July 9.
The US President ruled out extending the pause beyond that date, saying that that his administration would notify countries of trade penalties unless they reach an agreement with the US.
Early on Monday, Trump confirmed that dozens of countries would start receiving letters from Monday, warning them that they would face higher tariffs on August 1, 2025.
'I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he posted on Truth Social. BRICS Summit
The BRICS group originally comprised Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa in a united bloc that promotes a multipolar economic world order and supports the growth and development of the Global South.
The group has expanded to include Iran, Egypt, the UAE, Ethiopia and Indonesia. The BRICS also has 10 strategic partner countries, including Belarus, Cuba, Vietnam, Nigeria and Thailand. Saudi Arabia has also received an invitation to the bloc, but has yet to confirm its membership.
The BRICS summit in Brazil saw the absence of China's President, Xi Jinping, and the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who delivered his speech through videoconference. Moreover, the Iranian President, Masoud Pezeshkian, and the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, were absent. Concerns over Iran and Gaza
The summit's joint declaration harshly criticized the recent attacks against Iran, voicing deep concern over the targeting of civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities in Iran.
'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and express grave concern over the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East,' the statement said.
The BRICS leaders also reiterated their grave concern over the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, amid the ongoing Israeli strikes on Gaza and the blockade of humanitarian aid. 'We also condemn attempts to politicize or militarize humanitarian assistance,' they said.
'We exhort the parties to engage in good faith in further negotiations to achieve an immediate, permanent and unconditional ceasefire, the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip and all other parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the release of all hostages and detainees held in violation of international law, and sustained and unhindered access and delivery of humanitarian aid,' the statement added.
Short link :
Post Views: 43
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
16 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
A Surprise irs move on political endorsements leaves faith leaders and experts divided
A surprise move by the IRS that would allow pastors to back political candidates from the pulpit without losing their organizations' tax-exempt status is drawing praise from conservatives and even some progressive religious groups but concern from other leaders of faith along with tax and legal experts. A 1954 provision in the tax code called the Johnson Amendment says churches and other nonprofits could lose their tax-exempt status if they participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. The rule was rarely enforced. While the IRS did not go as far as calling for the repeal of the Johnson Amendment, it said in court documents Monday that communications in good faith by a church to its flock does not amount to intervening or affecting the outcome of a political campaign. Communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted, the IRS said. The new IRS interpretation came after decades of debate and most recently lawsuits from the National Religious Broadcasters association and other conservative churches complaining that the amendment violates their First Amendment rights, among other legal protections. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, President Donald Trump called the IRS assessment 'terrific.' 'I love the fact that churches can endorse a political candidate,' he said. 'We have a lot of respect for the people that lead the church.' While some congregations see a new freedom to speak openly about preferred candidates, others see openings for campaign finance corruption, new pressures on religious leaders, and an overall entanglement between church and state. Praises to the IRS Robert Jeffress, pastor of a Baptist megachurch in Dallas and a Trump ally, called it 'the right decision.' He said his church's tax-exempt status was threatened because of an IRS investigation into their political endorsements, costing the megachurch hundreds of thousands in legal fees. 'The IRS has no business dictating what can be said from the pulpit,' he said. 'They need to stay the heck out of our churches.' Calvary Church Chino Hills, a Southern California megachurch led by Jack Hibbs, has been endorsing candidates for years, particularly in local elections. Gina Gleason, director of the church's political engagement team, said she hopes the move will encourage smaller churches previously hesitant for fear of triggering an IRS response. 'I'd have thought if the IRS had targeted any church it would've been us,' she said. 'But we got sound legal advice from lawyers and religious liberty organizations that explained we were within our constitutional rights.' For Democrats trying to connect with people of faith, this decision is timely, said Doug Pagitt, pastor and executive director of Vote Common Good, a progressive and evangelical Christian organization. Conservative pastors who have been blatantly endorsing candidates regardless of the Johnson Amendment over the years created a disadvantage, causing Democrats to step away from faith voters, he said. 'There was a true imbalance between how many more opportunities there were for Republican voters.' The IRS statement, Pagitt says, also puts an end to the delicate dance pastors and congregations were forced to do. 'You could talk about politics in the church gymnasium but not in the sanctuary or from the pulpit,' he said. 'Pastors could express political opinions on their personal Facebook page but not on the church's website. It's just silly.' Church politicking concerns Tax and constitutional law experts, meanwhile, are wary of what entanglements could arise from the IRS's new position. Philip Hackney, a University of Pittsburgh School of Law professor who studies the relationship between churches and tax authority, said the decree could allow churches to push new boundaries. 'It's essentially creating a political intervention tax shelter for churches,' Hackney said. 'It has the potential to corrupt their mission more toward politics and away from their true beliefs.' Other religious groups, particularly in faith communities of color, are viewing it with skepticism. The Rev. Mark Whitlock, senior pastor at Reid Temple African Methodist Episcopal Church in Glenn Dale, Maryland, said it raises more questions than answers. 'From those of us in the Black church, this decision is being viewed with caution, apprehension, and skepticism,' he said. 'The question we're asking is: Why now?' Whitlock said he will continue to do what the Black church has always done–educating and civically engaging parishioners. His congregants' political views vary, too. 'If I do say something in church, it needs to be God-centered, God-focused, and a revelation that God gave you,' Whitlock said. 'You can't go to the pulpit as a campaign manager.' Raymond Chang, president of the Asian American Christian Collaborative, warned that a repeal of the Johnson Amendment could help tether some congregations to certain parties or candidates. 'This can lead to a partisan identity becoming the primary marker of a church or congregation over a commitment to the Gospel, which cuts against both existing major parties,' he said. Church leaders may also face pressure to make political endorsements. What comes next Nearly 80 percent of US adults believe churches and other houses of worship should not come out in favor of one political candidate over another during elections, a Pew Research Center survey conducted in 2022 found. White evangelicals and Black Protestants were a little more divided on the matter, with about one-third in each group favoring political endorsements. But in every other religious group surveyed, there was a strong consensus against political involvement by houses of worship. Others are more optimistic that the IRS statement puts to bed unfounded criticisms against the agency for a rarely enforced rule. Terry Lemons, a former IRS official who began at the agency under Democratic President Bill Clinton, called it a 'common sense' approach through a narrowly written filing. Roger Colinvaux, a Catholic University of America law professor, said he would caution churches against overinterpreting the IRS statement. He points out that the word 'endorse' does not appear anywhere in it and said his biggest concern is religion being used as a partisan tool in campaigns. Pagitt at Common Good said not all pastors will seize the opportunity because they might be ministering to a divided congregation or might not be comfortable mixing politics and religion. Chieko Noguchi, spokesperson for the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, said Tuesday that the IRS statement doesn't change how the Catholic Church engages in public debate. 'The Church seeks to help Catholics form their conscience in the Gospel so they might discern which candidates and policies would advance the common good,' Noguchi said. 'The Catholic Church maintains its stance of not endorsing or opposing political candidates.'
Al Arabiya
16 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump administration resumes sending some weapons to Ukraine after pentagon pause
The Trump administration has resumed sending some weapons to Ukraine a week after the Pentagon had directed that some deliveries be paused. The weapons now moving into Ukraine include 155 mm munitions and precision-guided rockets known as GMLRS, two US officials told The Associated Press on Wednesday. They spoke on condition of anonymity to provide details that had not been announced publicly. It's unclear exactly when the weapons started moving. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed the pause last week, which affected a specific recent shipment of weapons to Ukraine, to allow the Pentagon to assess its weapons stockpiles in a move that caught the White House by surprise. President Donald Trump announced Monday that the US would continue to deliver defensive weapons to Ukraine. He has sidestepped questions about who ordered the pause in exchanges with reporters this week. 'I would know if a decision is made. I will know,' Trump said Wednesday. 'I will be the first to know. In fact, most likely I'd give the order, but I haven't done that yet.' When asked a day earlier who ordered the pause, he said: 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?' Trump has privately expressed frustration with Pentagon officials for announcing the pause–a move that he felt wasn't properly coordinated with the White House, according to three people familiar with the matter. The Pentagon has denied that Hegseth acted without consulting the president. The US has sent more than 67 billion in weapons and military assistance to Ukraine since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Nobel: The prize for peace that leaders go to war for
LONDON: In what supporters have called a symbol of solidarity and detractors a humiliating act of fealty, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week revealed he had nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize — an award long sought by the US president. The decision by Netanyahu appears designed to help bolster ties between the two long-term allies and ease reported tensions over Israel's 21-month-long war in Gaza and its bruising 12-day conflict with Iran last month. Netanyahu presented the nomination letter to Trump at the White House on Monday, and was met with a look of surprise from the US president. 'It's nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well deserved, and you should get it,' Netanyahu said. 'Wow, coming from you, in particular, this is very meaningful. Thank you very much, Bibi,' Trump responded. Netanyahu is also seeking US guarantees relating to arms supplies, especially after Iran's ballistic missile barrages last month placed substantial pressure on Israeli air defense systems, Khatib said. 'He wants to show Trump that he is the best ally he can have; he also knows that Trump is really looking after getting the Nobel Peace Prize,' she added • The Nobel Peace Prize was founded by Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite. • Regret over his invention partly drove Nobel to create the prize to promote peace. • Carl von Ossietzky, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Liu Xiaobo, were imprisoned when awarded. • The youngest Nobel Peace laureate is Malala Yousafzai, who received it in 2014 at age 17. For Dania Koleilat Khatib, a specialist in US-Arab relations, Netanyahu's decision to nominate the president rests on his desire to 'do anything to court Trump.' She told Arab News that Netanyahu arrived in Washington with a set of demands covering almost every regional file of interest to Israel: Syria, Turkiye, Gaza, the West Bank and Iran. Trump has made no secret of his yearning for the prestigious prize, yet the nomination itself is only the first part of an extensive, secret process that winds up in the stately committee room of Oslo's Nobel Institute. The distinction and tradition of the Nobel name, however, is arguably a far cry from the reputation of Trump's nominator. Netanyahu, alongside former defense minister Yoav Gallant, is the subject of an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court over allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity relating to the conduct of Israel's military in Gaza. That fact would no doubt weigh on the minds of the five Norwegian Nobel Committee members who deliberate over the prize. For Khatib, the ICC arrest warrant alone means that Netanyahu's gesture is 'worthless.' • Only nominees put forward by qualified nominators are considered. • Self-nominations are not accepted. • The prize may be awarded to individuals or organizations. She told Arab News: 'I am not sure whether the nomination will be discarded but it is ironic that someone wanted by the ICC for alleged war crimes and potentially genocide nominates someone for the Nobel Peace Prize.' Upholding the reputation of the prize is a tall order, in part due to the strictness of its rules. The committee's choice for the annual award effectively ties the Nobel name to the future reputation of any recipient. The Nobel Foundation's Statutes also forbid the revocation of any award. Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese icon of democracy, fell from grace over her treatment of the Rohingya Muslim minority in the decades since she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991. Former US President Barack Obama was controversially awarded the prize just nine months into his first term, to the dismay of figures including Trump, who called on the institution to retract the award. The decision to award Obama for 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples' soon appeared foolish after it emerged the president had told aides, referring to his use of drone strikes: 'Turns out I'm really good at killing people.' The Nobel Committee's then secretary, Geir Lundestad, later expressed regret over the decision. 'Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake,' he said. 'In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for.' Khatib told Arab News that the most basic requirement of the prize is that the recipient contributes to peace. 'I personally don't know why Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' she told Arab News. 'What was the achievement for which he was awarded the prize?' The Obama controversy may well have sparked Trump's desire to win the prize. He has referred to the 2009 award numerous times since, and has regularly expressed frustration over an accomplishment that he feels has eluded him. Netanyahu's nomination of Trump, however, is only the most recent that the US leader has received. He was nominated separately by a group of House Republicans in the US and two Norwegian lawmakers for his work to defuse nuclear tensions with North Korea in 2018. In 2021, Trump was also nominated by one of the two Norwegian lawmakers and a Swedish official for his peace efforts in the Middle East, including the Abraham Accords, which established formal relations between Israel and several Arab states. Shinzo Abe, the late former prime minister of Japan, also nominated Trump in 2019. • Members of national assemblies and governments. • Members of international courts. • University rectors, professors, and directors of peace research or foreign policy institutes. • Past laureates and board members of laureate organizations. • Current and former Norwegian Nobel Committee members and former advisers. Earlier this year, Pakistan said that it had nominated Trump for the prize in recognition of his work to end the country's brief conflict with India. New Delhi later denied that Washington played a role in mediation. Trump is also working toward a diplomatic solution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has so far defied his negotiators. A day after Monday's White House meeting, Netanyahu's office released a copy of the nomination letter — dated July 1 — seen by Trump. 'President Trump has demonstrated steadfast and exceptional dedication to promoting peace, security and stability around the world,' it said. 'In the Middle East, his efforts have brought about dramatic change and created new opportunities to expand the circle of peace and normalization.' The prime minister's letter singled out the Abraham Accords as Trump's 'foremost achievement' in the region. 'These breakthroughs reshaped the Middle East and marked a historic advance toward peace, security and regional stability,' it said. The description of the region as having experienced a historic advance toward peace will raise eyebrows in many parts of the Middle East. Yet the strange circumstances of an alleged war criminal acting as a peace prize nominator has parallels with the Nobel name's own peculiar past. The prizes were established through the will of Alfred Nobel, a Swedish chemist, inventor and industrialist who amassed a fortune after inventing and patenting dynamite. The explosive was rapidly adopted for industrial use but was also soon prized for its utility as a tool of warfare. Caption The first awards bearing the Nobel name were handed out just after the turn of the century in 1901, five years after the Swedish visionary had died. They cover medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace. An economics prize was later established by the Swedish Central Bank in 1968, but it is not considered a Nobel prize in the same manner. Nobel's wishes were for the peace prize to go to 'the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.' The strict codification of Nobel's will resulted in the Nobel Statutes, a set of rules followed by the Nobel Foundation, which oversees the secretive process behind the five prizes. Judges are forbidden from discussing their deliberations for half a century after they take place. The peace committee is the sole Nobel prize body in Norway, and its five members are appointed by the country's parliament. Nominations for the revered prize can only be submitted by specific people and organizations, including heads of state, national politicians, academic professors and company directors, among others. It is forbidden for people to nominate themselves. Prominent Arab politicians have been awarded the peace prize. Yasser Arafat was given the award in 1994 for his efforts toward reaching a peaceful settlement to the Israel-Palestine conflict. In 1978, Egypt's Anwar Sadat was recognized for signing the Camp David Accords, which were witnessed by Jimmy Carter, the US president at the time, who was later awarded the prize in 2002 for his work to promote human rights after leaving office. For Trump, however, hopes for his long-desired prize will have to wait until next year; nominations must be submitted before February for the prize to be awarded in the same year. At the time of publishing, the Nobel Committee had not commented on Netanyahu's nomination, whether they had any reservations, or whether they would accept it.
