US ambassador to Israel tells Ireland to ‘sober up'
He went on to criticise Ireland's proposed Occupied Territories Bill (OTB)—legislation that would ban trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The bill, introduced by Independent Senator Frances Black and under scrutiny in the Oireachtas since 2018, has gained new momentum amid Israel's ongoing war in Gaza.
If passed, it would make Ireland the first EU member state to prohibit trade with goods produced in Israeli settlements deemed illegal under international law.
Mike Huckabee, an avowed Christian Zionist and former Arkansas governor, took to social media this week to criticise the bill, calling it 'so stupid' and accusing Ireland of 'diplomatic intoxication.'
In a post on X, Huckabee wrote:
'Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness and propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to an act of diplomatic intoxication? It will harm Arabs as much as Israelis. Sober up Ireland!'
The remarks have drawn immediate backlash for their stereotypical reference to Irish drinking culture.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin condemned the ambassador's comments as not only offensive but also dangerously dismissive of the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza.
'I reject the comments made by the ambassador,' Martin said in a press conference.
'This kind of row is ridiculous, given the enormity of the killing and destruction that's happening in Gaza. The slaughter of children must stop. The time for this war to end has long passed.'
The Occupied Territories Bill, officially titled the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025, aims to prohibit the import of goods and services produced in illegal settlements in the West Bank.
The Irish Government has cited international law, including findings by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which state that Israel's settlement activities and exploitation of Palestinian land are violations of international humanitarian law.
TD Duncan Smith highlighted that Israel's actions are not uniquely targeted by Irish foreign policy.
He pointed out that Ireland previously passed a similar ban in 2014 regarding trade with Russian-occupied regions in Ukraine.
Independent TD Catherine Connolly called on the government to fully implement all aspects of the bill: 'The violation of international law puts an obligation on us to do all we can in the face of genocide and slaughter.'
Ireland has a long history of solidarity with the Palestinian people.
This was reaffirmed in May 2024 when Ireland formally recognised the State of Palestine.
In response, Israel closed its embassy in Dublin and called Ireland's policies 'extremely anti-Israel.'
Opposition to the bill has not only come from the US envoy and Israeli officials but also from some figures within Ireland itself.
Former Minister for Justice Alan Shatter described the bill as reminiscent of Nazi-era laws, calling it 'the first Boycott Jews bill by a European government since 1945.'
However, Committee Chair John Lahart rebuked this accusation, calling it 'hugely hurtful and slanderous.'
Irish lawmakers insist that the bill is aimed not at Israel or Jewish people, but rather at illegal settlement's that violate international law.
Maurice Cohen, chair of the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland, criticised the bill as a 'performance of misguided effort' that could alienate Jewish communities within Ireland.
While largely symbolic, as Taoiseach Martin noted, the bill's passage could strain Ireland's diplomatic relationships, particularly with the US.
For many in Ireland, the legislation is a moral imperative in the face of what they see as war crimes and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.
Nearly 60,000 people have reportedly been killed in Gaza since October 2023.
Martin reiterated Ireland's commitment to peace and international law: 'Ireland stands for peace and a political pathway forward… Israel needs to focus on ending the war that is slaughtering innocent civilians.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
19 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Trade war leaves Ireland's booming aviation sector vulnerable
US president Donald Trump's threat of a 30% tariff on EU goods from August 1 puts Ireland's continued growth narrative at risk. Exporters of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, food and drink, and aviation services consider a 30% tariffs on their sales to the US would be very damaging and, in many instances, make supplying their customers across the Atlantic unsustainable. However, having been caught off guard by a letter threatening the 30% duty on EU goods the weekend before last, the European Commission last week quickly tabled a plan to put counter tariffs worth €72bn on imports of US goods. Inevitably, this will hit the European Union's own economy, with Ireland potentially being one of the most impacted. The proposed EU retaliatory tariffs target imports of industrial goods from the US, including aircraft and aircraft parts, machinery, automotives, chemicals and plastics, and medical devices and equipment. Potential EU countermeasures on aircraft imports, coupled with retaliation from the US administration, could risk Ireland's position as a world-leading hub in aviation. Aviation is a highly important part of the Irish trading base, covering aircraf and parts and set to be heavily impacted by EU countermeasures. Potential EU import restrictions on these goods, worth nearly €14bn, according to a document from the Central Statistics Office, would be very damaging to many companies in the sector, including the lucrative aircraft leasing sector. A recent report by aviation investment group Irelandia said the industry in Ireland accounts for 37% of the global commercial fleet, making Ireland a central player in the world's air transport infrastructure. Within the EU member states, the country with the biggest US aircraft imports in 2024 was Ireland, followed by France, the Netherlands, and Germany. Ryanair, Europe's largest airline, imports new aircraft on a regular basis. A 30% import duty would significantly increase the cost of acquiring these new planes. Increased import costs would also likely lead to higher operating expenses for Ryanair. This could affect their ability to maintain their low-cost model and potentially lead to fare increases or reduced profitability. If the cost of new aircraft becomes prohibitive, it could also delay Ryanair's expansion plans, potentially affecting the addition of new routes and increased flights on existing routes. Furthermore, increased costs might lead to a reduction in the number of aircraft available for service, potentially impacting their operational efficiency. Ryanair has already threatened to cancel orders for hundreds of Boeing aircraft if a US tariff war leads to materially higher prices, and said it could look at alternative suppliers, including Chinese plane maker COMAC. However, this will still leave Ryanair exposed to higher costs on Boeing-related maintenance, repair, and overhaul, all increasingly critical with the growth of their fleet. A new import tariff would add to these challenges, potentially exacerbating existing operational difficulties. Aviation between the US and EU is a highly interconnected sector. French multinational aerospace and defence company Thales with a manufacturing base in Northern Ireland, and supplies US-based Boeing and European competitor Airbus with flight management systems and cockpit displays. In exchange, US aerospace giant Honeywell provides flight management systems for Airbus. Hence, the EU's potential retaliatory tariffs on US-made aircraft could escalate the trade war to impact a wider range of aviation products exported to the US. Eurostat figures show Boeing earned €7.5bn of its revenues from Europe in 2024. Airbus had sales of €16bn to the US last year. Future sales would likely be caught in the crossfire. Ireland is already facing a serious hit to its economy due to potentially high tariffs on exports to the US after the August 1 deadline. After Germany, Ireland could be the most affected economies in the EU. Retaliatory actions by the EU could then be more damaging than increased US tariffs on exports. Brussels says it is still seeking a deal to avoid a tit-for-tat escalation in the trade war but is poised to retaliate if needed. Preparations for retaliation are underway. Some commentators believe it is time for the EU to put its guns on the table in the tariff spat and show strength and determination. But there may be extensive consequences. Brussels-based think tank Bruegel has estimated that Ireland's cumulative real GDP loss, due to the total impact of US tariffs, could be 3% by 2028.
Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
Controversy flares over recent deportation of families and young children
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan was told to emphasise the 'nous and soft skills' of gardaí as controversy flared over the recent deportation of families and young children from Ireland. In a briefing on the removal of school-going children to Nigeria, the minister was told families could have avoided this outcome and returned voluntarily to their country. A Q&A prepared for Mr O'Callaghan said he was 'very conscious' of questions over whether Irish people would be comfortable with the enforced removal of Irish-born children. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan. Pic: Leah Farrell/ When asked about it, a suggested answer for him said: 'It's one of the reasons that we are very lucky to have people in An Garda Síochána with the nous and the soft skills to manage what can be a difficult human experience for all the people concerned.' The details were contained in a series of briefings for the Justice Minister on how to tackle tricky questions about expensive deportation charter flights to Nigeria and Georgia. The briefing said he should also be prepared for questions on whether the three charter flights – which together have cost at least €530,000 – were just for 'optics.' On how to respond, the minister was told: 'Forced deportations like these are the last option, not the first.' If asked about whether it was a good use of scarce Garda resources, Mr O'Callaghan was advised to emphasise how such operations needed to be done safely and with 'respect for the dignity' of those removed. The Q&A said: 'This may well be a difficult experience for the people being deported, which may include families with young children.' On value-for-money issues, the minister was given talking points saying that costs were 'relatively comparable' to removals on commercial flights. One suggested answer said: 'No specific cost-benefit analysis was carried out for the use of charters.' For a deportation flight to Nigeria, it said that one of the people on the flight had no fewer than 25 convictions. These were for theft, making gain by loss or deception, possession of drugs and numerous driving offences. On another deportation jet travelling to Georgia, one person had 63 convictions including money laundering, theft, and also the organisation of illegal immigration. Justice Minister Jim Callaghan. Pic: Leah Farrell/ Internal briefing documents said the absence of a human rights observer on a flight to Nigeria was 'deeply regrettable' but 'unavoidable.' Mr O'Callaghan was advised to expect queries on why a human rights report on the charter was not released publicly. If questioned, he was told to say he was 'happy it reflects very well on the operation.' The briefing added: 'I'm considering the question of publication but need to be sure that it won't have any operational implications.' Mr O'Callaghan was also told to be prepared for questions on the detention of unsuccessful asylum applicants in often overcrowded jails ahead of the deportation flights. A Q&A document said: 'The simple fact is that if people know that they are going to be removed, they may abscond.' He said this was based on garda intelligence and that while people could be held for up to 56 days, it was usually 'significantly less.' On whether women had been imprisoned, Mr O'Callaghan was told two were held in jail but that they were not mothers of children aged under 18. Asked about the documents, a department spokesman said: 'The Minister recognises that an enforced removal is an unfortunate and challenging experience for a child, which is why they are carried out only as a measure of last resort when the family concerned has not removed themselves from the State as they are legally required to. 'Children have only been returned as part of family units. The preferred option is to return people voluntarily.'
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Government plans to inject up to €30bn extra into Ireland's infrastructure
THE GOVERNMENT IS finalising plans to inject up to an additional €30bn into Ireland's infrastructure between 2026 and 2030. Fianna Fáil Minister for Public Expenditure, appearing on RTÉ's This Week radio programme today, said that the plan is to be published on Tuesday, and that the coalition party leader met last night. 'This really gives an opportunity for transformational investment within the Irish economy. 'Over the next five to 10 years we'll be providing up to €30bn in additional capital expenditure… that's for the National Development Plan, the roads, the schools, the health infrastructure, and the homes that are critical to ensuring Ireland's prosperity and growth over the medium term,' Chambers said. He said that the plan will also present a long term commitment to €200bn in capital investment, which he said will help to 'bridge the infrastructure deficit' we have in the country. Advertisement He was questioned on where an additional €10bn has come from, as before today it was expected that the figure would be an additional €20bn, rather than the thirty that has been announced. Chambers said that of the additional €30bn, ten is being set aside for 'specific strategic investment', and that the money will be 'ring fenced for our grid, our water infrastructure and also the necessity to provide that medium to long term funding for the metro project, as an example.' He said that while the Government was making these plans it didn't want to see the likes of public transport and road infrastructure competing for funding. Chambers said that the purpose of the plan being announced this week is to provide 'funding certainty' which has been an issue 'in the last number of years'. Chambers said that the Government is not planning to publish its new housing plan until Autumn time, as part of the National Development plan. Responding to Mary Hanafin's comments about how it would be a 'disgrace' if Fianna Fáil didn't run an election candidate in the presidential race, Chambers said that the party is engaging on the matter 'internally' and that it will set out its position 'in the early autumn'. He also said that he is not aware of any engagements between Fianna Fáil and the former Chief Medical Officer of Ireland Tony Holohan on a potential presidential bid. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
