logo
Italian Referendum to Loosen Citizenship Rules Fails

Italian Referendum to Loosen Citizenship Rules Fails

New York Times09-06-2025
A referendum that sought to make it easier for foreigners to apply for Italian citizenship ended unsuccessfully on Monday when it failed to draw a majority of voters to the polls.
Polls closed at 3 p.m. with around 30 percent of eligible voters having cast a ballot — far below the turnout of 50 percent plus one person required for a referendum to be valid. The vote, which took place over Sunday and Monday, also sought to strengthen labor rights.
The result was a relief for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who had vocally opposed the referendum, which called for dropping to five from 10 the number of years a foreigner had to live in Italy before applying for citizenship.
Some of her coalition partners had called on people to abstain from voting. Ms. Meloni went to her polling station on Sunday evening but did not cast a ballot.
The referendum prompted nationwide discussion about who could be a citizen, and came as the issues of migration and birthright citizenship are hotly debated in the United States and Europe. Even if they are born in Italy, the children of lawful immigrants can apply for citizenship only when they turn 18 — and only if they have continuously lived in the country since birth.
Many economists believe that migration is critical to a country that is facing a steep demographic decline.
The referendum was championed by a major trade union, civil society groups and some center-left opposition parties. But it had little bipartisan support, and voter turnout was low on the first weekend after public schools closed in much of Italy. Since 1990, only three of 14 referendums managed to draw enough voters to be valid.
'We've been let down by Italy before, we knew it was an uphill battle,' Fioralba Duma, an activist for Italians Without Citizenship, one of the groups that supported the referendum, said of the low turnout.
On the positive side, she added, the referendum brought the citizenship issue into mainstream conversation, spotlighting the challenges faced by hundreds of thousands of foreigners who seek to be better integrated into Italian society.
Even though the referendum didn't pass, with about a quarter of the ballots counted, about 64 percent of those who voted did so in favor of reducing the number of years living in Italy required for citizenship to five from 10.
For many activists, she said, the defeat of the referendum was merely a setback, adding, 'We will continue to work.'
\
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here are the big questions that will appear on Maine's November ballot
Here are the big questions that will appear on Maine's November ballot

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Here are the big questions that will appear on Maine's November ballot

A voter deposits a ballot in a drop box at Portland's City Hall. (Photo by Jim Neuger/Maine Morning Star) When ticking through the statewide ballot in November, Maine voters will first see a question about changing election procedures before being asked about implementing a red flag law. This order was determined Thursday when Secretary of State Shenna Bellows held a public lottery to determine the order of the two citizen-initiated referendum questions for the upcoming election. Maine law requires that questions on the ballot be arranged in a specific order, with carry-over measures from a previous election listed first, followed by people's veto questions, initiated measures, bond issues, constitutional amendments and then other legislatively proposed referenda. The questions within each of those categories must be arranged in a random order. The first question will read: 'Do you want to change Maine election laws to eliminate two days of absentee voting, prohibit requests for absentee ballots by phone or family members, end ongoing absentee voter status for seniors and people with disabilities, ban prepaid postage on absentee ballot return envelopes, limit the number of drop boxes, require voters to show certain photo ID before voting, and make other changes to our elections?' The campaign for this question was launched in April 2024 by the Dinner Table PAC as an effort to require voters to show photo identification at the polls. However, the official five-page petition submitted to the state in January seeks to change additional aspects of Maine election law, such as absentee voting. The question posed to voters encompasses the multitude of election law changes included in the petition. Though there was pushback on the wording from the campaign and its proponents, Maine's highest court gave it the OK in mid-July. In addition to legal action, the referendum has also drawn big spending on both sides. The 'Voter ID for ME' ballot question committee has raised more than $550,000 with half a million of that coming from the national Republican State Leadership Committee PAC, which typically focuses on electing Republican candidates in down-ballot races. Dinner Table PAC was founded by state Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn) and Alex Titcomb, who now serves as 'Voter ID for ME' campaign manager, with the goal of electing local conservatives to the Maine Legislature. Those opposed to the voter ID referendum have collected even more with a group named 'Save Maine Absentee Voting' having raised more than $600,000. Additionally, the Democratic Governors Association and the Maine Democrat's House of Representatives campaign arm each contributed $50,000 to a progressive Washington-based law firm that specializes in voting rights. The second question on the ballot will read: 'Do you want to allow courts to temporarily prohibit a person from having dangerous weapons if law enforcement, family, or household members show that the person poses a significant danger of causing physical injury to themselves or others?' The question asks voters if they would like to implement a red flag law, officially called an Extreme Risk Protection Order, which would make it easier to temporarily confiscate one's guns if they are deemed to be a threat by law enforcement or their family members. Both gun safety advocates and owners in Maine have emphasized the need for such a law. The Maine Gun Safety Coalition spearheaded the efforts for this question by collecting more than 80,000 signatures in less than two months. Maine currently has a so-called yellow flag law, a weaker provision that allows law enforcement officials to take away guns from someone considered a safety risk to themselves or others after an evaluation from a mental health professional. If the referendum passes, it would not replace Maine's current law, but would be an additional tool police or the general public can use to temporarily confiscate weapons. A group opposed to the referendum connected with the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine reported it raised more than $12,000 as of mid-July. Currently, 21 states have adopted a red flag policy. A red flag proposal introduced in the Maine Legislature in the wake of the 2023 Lewiston mass shooting advanced out of committee but never was voted on by the full House or Senate. Though the question hasn't raked in as much cash as the voter ID initiative, it caused somewhat of a kerfuffle late in the legislative session. Before sending it to voters, lawmakers were required to hold a public hearing on the bill associated with the referendum. As adjournment neared, Republicans pushed for the hearing that was eventually held the final days of the session. Some gun rights proponents, including the Sportsman's Alliance, wanted to put a competing measure on the ballot that could potentially have drawn some voter support from the red flag question. However, that proposal, which sought instead to beef up the current yellow flag law, required a work session to be introduced, which the Judiciary Committee declined to hold before adjournment. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime
US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime

Associated Press

time3 hours ago

  • Associated Press

US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime

QUITO, Ecuador (AP) — The United States and Ecuador on Thursday signed a bilateral agreement aimed at strengthening their collaboration against transnational criminal networks. The agreement, signed during a visit of U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to the South American country, facilitates the exchange of information on suspected criminal offenders and risk assessments of cargo and travelers. Noem told reporters the efforts are 'crucial steps to improve security and ensure that migration is carried out within the framework of the law.' The deal with Ecuador comes as the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to bolster regional cooperation in its clampdown against immigration and transnational criminal groups, including Tren de Aragua, the Venezuelan gang designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the White House earlier this year. On Wednesday, Noem signed a similar agreement with Chile, which she visited as part of her latest tour of Latin America. That agreement allows Chilean officials to identify potentially dangerous migrants entering or exiting the country and share their fingerprints, iris scans and other biometric data with Homeland Security to prevent such individuals from traveling to the U.S. ____ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store