US envoy expects Trump, Erdogan to resolve arms sanctions on Turkey this year
The US ambassador to Turkey said he expects Donald Trump and Recep Tayyip Erdogan to resolve long-standing defense-related sanctions on Turkey by year end, according to an interview with state owned Anadolu Agency.
Thomas Barrack, the envoy, said the two presidents could give directions to settle the issue of sanctions, which the US imposed in 2020 over Turkey's purchase of Russian S-400 missile defense systems.
'In my view, President Trump and President Erdogan will tell Secretary (Marco) Rubio and Foreign Minister (Hakan) Fidan to fix this, find a way, and a resolution is possible by year-end,' he was quoted as saying on Sunday.
The CAATSA sanctions, referring to the 'Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act,' also removed NATO member Turkey from the F-35 program where it was both a buyer and manufacturer of the fighter jets.
Ankara, which has closer US ties since Trump's return to the White House, has said its removal from the program was unjust and has demanded to be reinstated or reimbursed.
'We all believe there's a tremendous opportunity here, as we have two leaders who trust each other,' said Barrack, who is also special envoy to neighboring Syria.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
World needs to rediscover the optimism of UN's founding
The world was last week on the brink of something akin to a mini-catastrophe or a major war, which could have easily slipped into a nuclear confrontation. Amid the missiles and dust, everyone seemed stunned into inaction, despite the repeated mantras of the need for calm and restraint and to let diplomacy take its course. It was evident that all international powers lacked the desire, interest or even basic human empathy to work for peace in an optimistic way. All this coincided with the 80th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter — a collaborative dream that became reality from the ashes of the Second World War. However, we all agree that there was little to celebrate. In an increasingly contentious and fragmented world, people, nations and global actors need to dig deep to revive collaboration and multilateralism. Above all, they need to find the optimism and moral resolve to work together and build common ground as nation states, either within or outside the UN, as they have done for the past 80 years. When the UN was born in San Francisco on June 26, 1945, the overriding goal of the 50 participants who signed the charter was stated in its preamble: 'to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.' US President Harry Truman explained that the 'job will tax the moral strength and fiber of us all,' pointing out that the UN Charter would be useless without the leadership required to uphold it. Many have long ago condemned the UN to the margins and dismissed it as irrelevant. They say it is like an international group of employees that long ago stopped being productive; instead, they are simply concerned about their own fat salaries, pensions and short-term benefits. But this is unfair to the organization, as well as the spirit of those who lost their lives working to promote its ethos or those who have been saved and given another chance in an increasingly cruel and uncertain world. In an increasingly contentious and fragmented world, people, nations and global actors need to dig deep to revive collaboration Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Yes, its clout has been diminished, but that is due to many reasons, including the veto-wielding members of its Security Council's own involvement in wars. The UN, like other nonprofit organizations around the world, is also struggling with major funding cuts, particularly since the return of President Donald Trump to the White House. It has been trying to reform itself for years, but it has failed and is now shedding jobs due to scarce funding. What is at stake and should keep every caring human being awake at night is the fact that the UN and its multilateralism is under siege. Its most powerful body, the UNSC, has been blocked from taking action to end the major wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And that is maybe why it watched from the sidelines as the latest conflict between Israel, Iran and the US flared. In today's world, adversities continue to multiply not just due to conflicts, with tens of millions of people caught up in the fighting. There is also inequality, global warming, migration and poverty, which continue to feed the system of discontent. Meanwhile, rich donors dwindle in number and aid and development budgets are axed so that governments can spend more on security, defense and wars. The UN marked its 80th anniversary with an exhibition about the San Francisco meeting of 1945. It included a rare centerpiece: the original UN Charter — ironically on loan from the US National Archives in Washington. But due to the events of the week elsewhere, hardly anyone took any notice. Since its establishment, the UN's membership has nearly quadrupled to 193. The UN system has also expanded enormously from its origins, which focused on peace and security, economic and social issues, justice and trusteeships for colonies. Today, its numerous funds, agencies and entities work on improving the lives of children and refugees, in addition to 71 peacekeeping operations and other efforts aimed at protecting people's human rights. What should keep every caring human being awake at night is the fact that the UN and its multilateralism is under siege Abdulrahman Al-Rashed It is easy to sweep the UN aside, especially amid the current superpower discord and confrontations on nearly every topic. However, it is impossible to find another forum or institution where any nation can talk directly at or against any other. At least they talk and do not rely on bombs or some dry, algorithm-fueled cryptic message to attempt conflict resolution. We ought to celebrate the UN and support it, throughout the endless talk and even the peculiar and sometimes boring details, as long as the common good and conflict resolution are of paramount importance. And it is worth underlining the words of its second secretary-general, Dag Hammarskjold, who once said that 'the United Nations was not created in order to bring us to heaven, but in order to save us from hell.' The organization was clearly born from a consensus to save the world from authoritarianism. It is not surprising, therefore, to see it so marginalized by some of its most powerful members, who shrug off what they see as the constraints of the rule of law. The adversities of today call simply for the global moral resolve, optimism and strength to face them. In every crisis, like every business deal, things only advance when people find common interests anchored in fairness and justice. Above all, they must build trust and find the optimism that drives all sides toward better results. The UN has been that forum. Certainty is currently in short supply and might is increasingly making right. This is what 80 years of the UN has tried to help humanity and nations avoid. We ought to find that optimism once more, along with Truman's moral strength, to steer us toward more peace and fewer conflicts.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump's administration finds Harvard violated students' civil rights, WSJ reports
US President Donald Trump's administration informed Harvard University that its investigation found the university violated federal civil-rights law over its treatment of Jewish and Israeli students, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. 'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government,' the report quoted a letter sent to Harvard President Alan Garber on Monday and viewed by the Journal. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard- and other top-level universities across the US-because in his view they have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The administration warned Harvard that failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Supreme Court Takes Up A Republican Appeal To End Limits On Party Spending In Federal Elections
The Supreme Court will take up a Republican-led drive backed by President Donald Trump's administration to wipe away limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president. The justices said Monday they will review an appellate ruling that upheld a provision of federal election law that is more than 50 years old, ignoring pleas from Democrats to leave the law in place. The Supreme Court itself upheld it in 2001. But since Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court in 2005, a conservative majority has upended a variety of congressionally enacted limits on raising and spending money to influence elections. The court's 2010 Citizens United decision opened the door to unlimited independent spending in federal elections. Without the limits on party spending, large donors would be able to skirt caps on individual contributions to a candidate by directing unlimited sums to the party with the understanding that the money will be spent on behalf of the candidate, supporters of the law say. The case will be argued in the fall. Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California at Los Angeles law school, has predicted the court will strike down the limits. 'That may even make sense now in light of the prevalence of super PAC spending that has undermined political parties and done nothing to limit (and in fact increased) corruption and inequality,' Hasen wrote on the Election Law blog. The Justice Department almost always defends federal laws when they are challenged in court. But the Trump administration notified the court that this is the rare case that warrants an exception to that general approach because it believes the law violates free-speech protections in the First Amendment. The Republican committees for House and Senate candidates filed the lawsuit in Ohio in 2022, joined by two Ohio Republicans in Congress – then-Sen. J.D. Vance, who's now vice president, and then-Rep. Steve Chabot. In 2025, the coordinated party spending for Senate races ranges from $127,200 in several states with small populations to nearly $4 million in California. For House races, the limits are $127,200 in states with only one representative and $63,600 everywhere else.
