Senate to hold hearing on online gambling
Tulfo, chairman of the Senate games and amusement committee, said that he will invite the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) and Department of Finance (DOF) to the hearing which may begin early next week.
He also said he wants to hear the stance of his fellow senators and other stakeholders regarding online gaming, as some have been pushing for its total prohibition, while others only want its strict regulation.
'But if I can have it my way, kung ako ang tatanungin personally, I want this online gambling stopped. Kung ako po ang masusunod, ora mismo, dapat itigil na ang online gambling because of the fact na masama na po ang nangyayari,' Tulfo said in a press conference.
(But if I can have it my way, if I'm asked personally, I want this online gambling stopped. If I am the one to be followed, then we should ban online gambling right now because what is happening right now is bad.)
The first-termer senator also expressed disappointment with the congressman who was seen watching e-sabong on his phone while members of the lower chamber were voting for House Speaker during Monday's session.
The younger Tulfo said that the congressman should apologize or explain why he was doing such while the House session was ongoing.
'Tapos the Congress should ask for an explanation. Why? Imbes na magtrabaho sila, nagbobotohan sila, serious business 'yung araw na 'yun diba, nagbobotohan ng Speaker. Bakit ka nagsusugal? Number two, bawal naman 'yun. First place, bawal talaga 'yung sugal. Ano explanation? There's no explanation,' Erwin Tulfo said.
(Then the Congress should ask for an explanation. Instead of working since that day was a serious business, why were they gambling? Number two, that's not allowed. In the first place, gambling is really not allowed. What's the explanation? There's no explanation.)
'Gambling capital of Asia'
In his privilege speech during Wednesday's session, Senator Juan Miguel 'Migz' Zubiri also put on record that he was 'extremely disappointed' that President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. did not mention anything about the ills of online gambling during his fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) on Monday, July 28.
'Shame on you PAGCOR, shame on you operators of online gambling. Kung may isang Pilipino tayong tinutulungan dahil sa kinikita ng bayan dahil sa online gambling, panigurado ako na libo libong Pilipino ang nagdurusa ngayon at lubog sa utang dahil nalulong sa gambling,' he said.
(Shame on you PAGCOR, shame on you operators of online gambling. If we're helping one Filipino because of the benefits of online gambling, I'm sure that thousands of Filipinos are suffering now and drowning in debt because they are addicted to it.)
To recall, Zubiri filed a bill seeking an outright ban on all forms of online gambling, including digital betting platforms, mobile applications, and websites that allow users to place wagers through electronic devices.
He said that the Philippines is now the 'gambling capital of Asia,' besting Macau and Cambodia.
Several senators such as Loren Legarda, Raffy Tulfo, Risa Hontiveros, and Francis Pangilinan expressed manifestations of support for the total ban of online gambling during the ongoing plenary session.
Flood control
Further, Erwin Tulfo also filed a resolution directing the appropriate Senate committee to conduct an investigation, in aid of legislation, into the reported abuse of flood control programs and related projects, in a bid to address the country's flooding problem.
In proposed Senate Resolution No. 31, the younger Tulfo emphasized that despite the continuous implementation of flood control projects funded under the General Appropriations Act (GAA), widespread and severe flooding continues to affect many areas.
'Considering the persistent and widespread occurrence of flooding nationwide, despite significant budgetary allocation, there exists a compelling and immediate necessity to develop and execute a comprehensive, integrated flood control master plan,' the resolution read.
'Moreover, it is imperative to assess and determine flood control projects that are inconsistent with the administration's infrastructure priorities, with due regard to the urgency of need, implementation readiness, and the absorptive capacity of DPWH (Department of Public Works and Highways) and other concerned agencies,' it added.
During his fourth SONA, Marcos ordered the DPWH to submit a list of flood control projects in the last three years.
The President said there will be a regional monitoring committee that will examine the projects to see their progress and if they exist.
"We will publish this list so that the public can see it," Marcos said. "At the same time, there will be an audit and performance review of these projects to check and make sure and to know how your money was spent."
"Sa mga susunod na buwan, makakasuhan ang mga lalabas na maysala mula sa imbestigasyon pati na ang kasabwat na kontratista sa buong bansa. Kailangan malaman ng taumbayan and katotohanan, kailangan may managot sa matinding pinsala at katiwalian," the President added.
(In the next few months, those found guilty based on the investigation will be charged, as well as their accomplice contractor. The people need to know the truth, someone needs to be held accountable for their consequences and corruption.) —LDF, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
1Sambayan, others ask SC to pause action on Sara impeachment, allow arguments
Political coalition 1Sambayan and others on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court (SC) to issue a status quo ante order that will pause the proceedings of the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, a day before the Senate is expected to decide whether to abide by the High Court's ruling that barred the trial. The petitioners filed a motion to be allowed to intervene in the impeachment cases as well as to admit their motion for reconsideration, where they asked the SC to issue a status quo ante order and to set the case for oral arguments. A status quo order is intended to maintain the last, actual, peaceable and uncontested state of things which preceded the controversy, according to the SC. '[I]t is judicially wise for this Honorable Court to grant a Status Quo Ante Order that prevents the Senate of the Philippines from taking concrete action such as to dismiss the Articles of Impeachment considering the pending constitutional issues that have yet to be resolved by this Honorable Court,' the petitioners said in their 52-page motion. Among the petitioners were retired Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and retired Associate Justice Conchita Carpio Morales. Petitioner Howard Calleja, meanwhile, called on the Senate to hold off from deciding on the impeachment due to the pending petition. 'That's why, precisely, we are knocking on the Senate na sana pakinggan muna itong mga issues. Let us thresh out all the issues bago tayo mag desisyon kung idi-dismiss or whatever 'yung gagawin natin,' he said. (That's why, precisely, we are knocking on the Senate, hopefully they will first listen to these issues first. Let us thresh out all the issues before we decide whether to dismiss or whatever action we will take.) Calleja said that the Senate impeachment court should also continue the trial. 'Pero kung hindi nila maisip na gawin 'yun siguro hingin atin kumbaga mag status quo ante muna tayo. Huwag tayong ora-orada na gagawa ng desisyon kasi nga meron pang pending na ito na pwede mag bago,' he said. (But if they don't think of doing that, we will ask for a status quo ante. Let's not rush into making a decision because this is still pending and could change things.) 'Na sana kung gusto nila galangin ang Korte Suprema, galangin din nila ang proseso at sa pag galang ng proseso, eh medyo—sabi ko nga status quo muna. Hinay-hinay kasi ang proseso hindi pa tapos,' he added. (That hopefully, if they want to respect the SC, they should also respect the process, and in respecting the process—like I said, status quo for now. Let's take it slow because the process isn't over yet.) In its ruling, the SC declared that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. To recall, three impeachment complaints were filed against Duterte in December 2024, all of which were connected with the alleged misuse of confidential funds. It was the fourth impeachment complaint that was endorsed by over one-third of lawmakers from the House of Representatives, and was later transmitted to the Senate as the Articles of Impeachment. However, the SC ruled that the one-year ban is reckoned from the time an impeachment complaint is dismissed or is no longer viable. It ruled that the first three complaints were deemed terminated or dismissed when the House endorsed the fourth complaint. In their MR, the petitioners said that the SC ruling overturned the Francisco Jr. ruling, where the SC previously said that an impeachment proceeding is deemed initiated upon the filing of the impeachment complaint and referral to the House Committee on Justice, or when an impeachment complaint is filed and verified by at least one-third of the membership of the House. The petitioners argued that the fourth impeachment complaint was filed and acted upon before the House adjourned. They argued that the first three complaints cannot be deemed to have attained the status of being 'initiated.' 'It is respectfully emphasized that the Fourth Complaint had already been approved prior to the adjournment of Congress; hence the effectivity of the one-year ban rule upon adjournment does not affect it,' they said. Aside from this, the petitioners argued that the ruling on the reckoning of the one-year ban will lead to grave consequences. 'Such a rule creates a perverse incentive for an impeachable officer to inoculate himself from accountability simply by causing the filing of sham complaints, because whether the Congress acts on them, the mere filing would already trigger and consume the one-year ban, a result inconsistent with the Constitution,' they said. The petitioners also stressed that the first three complaints never reached the House committee. This is the third motion for reconsideration filed with the SC against its ruling. Last week, some of the individuals behind the first impeachment complaint against Duterte filed a motion for reconsideration ad cautelam, where they asked the High Court to declare the fourth impeachment complaint as constitutional. Meanwhile, the House of Representatives on Monday filed its own motion for reconsideration, arguing that it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
House to prioritize agency-backed amendments in 2026 budget
The House of Representatives will prioritize the inclusion of amendments backed by government agencies in the proposed 2026 national budget while also hearing out parochial concerns, House appropriations panel chairperson Mikaela Suansing said Tuesday. Suansing said it is understandable for House members to push for government projects to address the needs of their constituents "but on the part of the House, given the limited fiscal space, what we [will] prioritize are institutional amendments." "Parochial amendments are for the needs of a particular locality, while institutional amendments emanate from the [government agencies] themselves. That is what we are looking at,' she told reporters. However, she said, it does not mean that the amendments to be put forward by House members will be readily dismissed. The presence of budget watchdogs and public availability of committee level proceedings, Suansing said, will ensure that the amendments to be included in the national budget will be meritorious whether they are suggested by government agencies or members of Congress. "The deliberation on the new House subcommittee on budget amendments review will be available to the public, including via livestream. So anybody who will sit on this committee and put forward amendments and how will it be resolved will be known by the public,' the lawmaker said. She was referring to the new House appropriations subpanel in charge of budget amendments, replacing the small committee which used to be a tight-knit unit composed of lawmakers collating amendments proposed by House members after the budget is approved at plenary level. 'Because the deliberations are transparent, maiiwasan na po talaga natin 'yung pagkakaroon ng mga insertions na iintindihan naman namin na 'yun 'yung pinagmumulan ng pangamba ng ating mga kababayan,' Suansing added. (Because the deliberations are transparent, we will be able to avoid insertions that cause distrust among the public.) In the same interview, Suansing said President Ferdinand Marcos,Jr.'s statement during his fourth State of the Nation Address that he is willing to delay the signing of the proposed national budget if it does not align with the administration's priorities should not be viewed as an attempt to clip Congress' power of the purse. 'The statement of the President does not undermine the power of the purse of Congress because the the President has very specific priorities in terms of what social services, what projects he would like prioritized. That is the alignment that the President is asking Congress to focus on,' she said. 'I believe it is not undermining the House but rather its a please, ensure that the administration's priority programs are taken cared of. And we saw that the President's priority is human capital development, including education, labor, and health. For our part, those are also the programs that we will support because human capital development is very important in ensuring our country's economic future for many many generations,' she added. In a separate statement, Navotas Rep. Tobias Tiangco welcomed the abolition of the small committee which he earlier flagged for supposed unlawful intervention in the budget process. 'We thank the House committee on appropriations for heeding our call. The small committee was not transparent, so we must abolish it. The fact that they agreed to abolish the small committee proves that I was correct,' he said. Still, Tiangco insisted that all individual amendments of the House members should be discussed in a plenary session. However, he emphasized that the removal of the small committee is just the first step toward promoting transparency in budget deliberations. 'All individual amendments must be discussed in plenary before the approval of the House General Appropriations Bill on second reading. A lengthy line item list [of amendments] is not an excuse. If that is the case, we must work overtime,' Tiangco said in a statement. 'Trabaho namin 'yan. Kahit gaano kahirap, dapat naming gampanan (That is our job so we must do it no matter how hard it is). No ifs and buts," he added. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate bill eyes imprisonment, fines for malicious use of AI
A measure seeking prison term and a fine of up to P1 million has been filed in the Senate in a bid to protect individuals against the wrongful and improper use of artificial intelligence (AI). Under Senate Bill No. 782, also known as the Physical Identity Protection Act, filed by Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero, any person responsible for creating, generating, reproducing, duplicating, simulating, distributing, disseminating, or publishing any person's physical attributes without their consent in any media content—-regardless of the medium, platform, or point of access used—-will be held criminally liable. 'While this generative Al technology offers tremendous potential particularly in the fields of business, education and communications, it also presents a profound risk to individuals' rights, privacy and identity. With malicious intent and the help of AI and other similar technology, media content could be exploited in efforts to cause personal harm or undermine public trust,' Escudero said in the explanatory note. The bill prescribes the penalty of imprisonment of one to two years or a fine not exceeding P200,000, or both, for individuals who create, generate or share content containing a person's physical attributes without prior consent or legal basis. If the intention of the illegal content is to acquire financial gain or profit, the penalty shall be jail time of two to four years or a fine of P200,000 to P400,000, or both. The measure also imposes a higher penalty of four to six years imprisonment or a fine of P400,000 to P600,000, or both, for content designed to facilitate or commit crime or fraud. Meanwhile, if the act is done to acquire financial gain or profit and to facilitate or commit a crime or fraud, imprisonment of up to 12 years or a fine of P600,000 to P1 million, or both, will be imposed. If the offender is a public official or employee, he or she will be penalized with absolute perpetual disqualification from public office, on top of the maximum penalties prescribed under the bill. 'These interventions provide the government with the wherewithal to address emerging threats, ensure accountability in the use of Al technologies, and promote creativity and innovation without compromising personal rights and liberties, legitimate speech, journalism and news coverage, academic and educational research, documentary and historical piece and other similar works,' Escudero said in a statement. — Giselle Ombay/RSJ, GMA Integrated News
