President Murmu seeks clarification from Supreme Court on its judgment imposing time frame to give assent to bills
The Presidential Reference has also asked for the Supreme Court's opinion on whether timelines can be imposed on the President through judicial orders when Bills are reserved by Governors for Presidential assent.
The President's Reference said there are conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court as to whether the assent of the President under Article 201 was justiciable or not.
The Reference, dated May 13, has also sought the opinion on the contours a and scope of Article 142 of the Constitution.
Questions asked by President
What are the Constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented to him under Article 200 for assent?
Is the Governor bound by the aid and advice tendered by the Council of Ministers?
Is the exercise of Constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 justiciable?
Is Article 361 of the Constitution (immunity given to President and Governors from legal action while in office) an absolute bar to judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200?
In the absence of any Constitutionally prescribed time limit or manner of exercise of powers by a Governor, can time limits be imposed and manner of exercise of powers be prescribed through judicial orders?
Is the exercise of Constitutional discretion by the President under Article 201 (dealing with Bills reserved by a Governor for consideration by the President) justiciable?
Can judicial orders impose timelines and manner of exercise of powers by the President under Article 201?
Is the President required to take advice from the Supreme Court when a Bill is reserved by a Governor for the President's assent?
Are decisions of the Governor and the President under Articles 200 and 201, respectively, justiciable at a stage prior to even the Bill in question becoming a law. Is it permissible for the courts to undertake judicial adjudication over the contents of a Bill, in any manner, before it becomes law?
Can the Constitutional powers of the President/Governors be substituted by a judicial order exercising Article 142?
Is a law made by the State Legislature a law in force without the assent of the Governor?
Is it not mandatory for a Supreme Court Bench to examine if a case involved substantial questions of law regarding interpretation of the Constitution and refer the case to a Bench of a minimum five judges under Article 145(3)?
Is Article 142 limited matters of procedural law or does it extend to issuing directions 'contrary to or inconsistent with existing substantive or procedural provisions of the Constitution'?
Is there a bar on the Supreme Court from deciding between the Centre and States other than by way of filing an original suit under Article 131?
In a reference to the Tamil Nadu Governor judgment of the apex court, the Presidential Reference said the 'concept of deemed assent of the President and the Governor is aline to the Constitutional scheme and fundamentally circumscribed the power of the President and the Governor'.
The apex court judgment in the Tamil Nadu Governor's case had held that assent to Bills would be deemed if no action was taken on them by the President or Governor within the prescribed timeline of three months.
The Presidential Reference highlighted that States are resorting to approach the apex court under Article 32, and not Article 131, to raise issues 'which by their very nature are federal issues involving interpretation of the Constitution'.
President Murmu has listed a series of 14 questions for the Supreme Court to consider and give an opinion under Article 143.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
Do not use names of living personalities in govt ads: Madras HC
The Madras high court has said that political parties cannot use names or images of any living personality, including chief ministers and ideological leaders, as well as party insignia or symbols, in government advertisements for welfare schemes. Do not use names of living personalities in govt ads: Madras HC A bench of chief justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and justice Sunder Mohan barred the inclusion of 'the name of any living personality, photographs of former chief ministers or ideological leaders,' and 'party symbols, emblems, or flags of political parties,' including those of the ruling DMK in Tamil Nadu, in advertisements for government welfare schemes. The bench passed the order on July 31 while hearing a petition filed by AIADMK Member of Parliament C Ve Shanmugam, who had sought an injunction against the DMK government's use of chief minister MK Stalin's name and image, as well as the images of other DMK leaders, in the State's public grievance redressal scheme 'Mudhalvarin Mugavari.' Senior counsel Vijay Narayan, who appeared for Shanmugam, told the court that using the chief minister's name and party images in a state-funded scheme violated Supreme Court directives and the Government Advertisement (Content Regulation) Guidelines, 2014. The court said that the use of such references in state-sponsored promotions did 'prima facie' violate multiple apex court rulings, including the latter's clarification issued in 2016 on the review petition filed in the case of State of Karnataka vs Common Cause. In such order, the Supreme Court had clarified that while the photograph of an incumbent chief minister may be used in official government advertisements, photographs of ideological leaders or former chief ministers will prima facie violate its earlier directives aimed at curbing political misuse of public funds, the high court said. 'It would not be permissible to mention the name of the living political personality in the nomenclature of the government scheme. Moreover, using the name of any ruling political party, its insignia/logo/emblem/flag also appears to be prima facie against the directives of the Supreme Court and the Election Commission of India,' the high court said. It said that keeping in mind the above, it was passing an order 'to the effect that while launching and operating government welfare schemes through various advertisements, the name of any living personality, photograph of any former Chief Minister/ideological leaders or party insignia/emblem/flag of respondent No.4 (DMK) shall not be included.' Opposing the plea, the state's counsel, Advocate General P S Raman, had argued that the petition relied on unauthenticated materials such as unofficial printouts, which did not represent official government publications. Raman assured the court that the government had not used the photographs of any political leaders or party symbols in its promotional materials and requested time to file a detailed affidavit along with authentic records. Senior advocate P Wilson, who was representing the DMK, told the court the petition was politically motivated. Wilson pointed out that the petitioner belonged to the opposition and alleged that the plea was an attempt to 'malign' the ruling party's image 'under the guise of public interest.' While recording that the State denied the petitioner's claims, the court emphasised the importance of adhering to the legal framework governing government publicity. The Bench said it was 'inclined to pass an interim order' given the petitioner's apprehension that more such schemes were in the pipeline. However, the court clarified that its present order did not interfere with the actual launch or implementation of any welfare scheme. 'We have not passed any order against launching, implementation or operation of welfare schemes of the government,' the bench said. The court also made it clear that the pendency of the petition will not restrain the Election Commission of India or other competent authorities from taking action on the basis of the petitioner's complaint. The court is likely to hear the matter further on August 13.
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
Vice-President election : A must-know for UPSC aspirants
Take a look at the essential concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget on the Vice-Presidential election. (Relevance: UPSC has asked questions in Prelims and Mains on the office of the Vice-President. In 2022, in General Studies II, a question was asked on the role of the Vice-President (VP) as the chairman of the Rajya Sabha. Since the VP election is scheduled next month after Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation, this topic becomes very important for your Prelims and Mains examination.) The election for the post of Vice President will be held on September 9, as announced by the Election Commission (EC) on Friday (1st August). The post fell vacant with the sudden resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21. As per the schedule announced by the EC, the notification would be issued on August 7, starting the period for filing nominations. The last date for filing nominations is August 21. The polling and counting would be held on September 9. 1. Jagdeep Dhankhar assumed office as the 14th Vice President in August 2022. He is only the third Vice-President in India's history to resign before completing his term, after V.V. Giri and R. Venkataraman —both of whom stepped down to contest presidential elections and were succeeded by Gopal Swarup Pathak and Shankar Dayal Sharma, respectively. 2. The office of the Vice-President is a unique feature of India, which follows a parliamentary system, and has no exact parallel in other democratic countries, including the Commonwealth. 3. The second-highest constitutional authority after the President, the Vice-President draws his or her powers from Article 63 of the Constitution, which states that 'there shall be a Vice-President of India'. 4. Article 64 goes on to confer upon the post the power to be 'ex-officio Chairman of the Council of States (the Rajya Sabha)'. In effect, the Vice-President discharges duties of both the Vice-President and Rajya Sabha chairperson. 5. Under Article 64 (2), the Vice-President also discharges presidential functions when the President is unable to do so 'owing to absence, illness or any other cause'. In this case, the Vice-President will 'have all the powers and immunities of the President and be entitled to… (the) emoluments, allowances and privileges'. 6. As per Article 65, the Vice-President can act as the President, 'in the event of the occurrence of any vacancy in the office of the President by reason of his death, resignation, or removal,' or 'until the date on which a new President…enters upon his office.' 7. There is no direct provision in the Constitution on who performs the duties of the Vice-President if the office falls vacant before the expiry of his/her term or when the Vice-President is discharging the duties of the President. 8. However, the Constitution does have a provision on what happens if the chairperson of the Council of States falls vacant: the Deputy Chairman or any other member of the Rajya Sabha authorised by the President can perform the chairperson's duties. 1. Any citizen of India who is at least 35 years of age and a registered voter in a state or Union Territory can be a candidate for the post. At least 20 MPs need to propose the nomination and 20 other MPs need to second it. As per Article 66 (2), the Vice-President cannot be a member of either House of Parliament or of the Legislature of any state. 2. Article 67 says that the Vice-President will hold office for a term of five years from 'the date on which he enters upon his office'. However, according to the same provision, the Vice-President can continue to hold power 'notwithstanding the expiration of his term' until his 'successor enters upon his office'. 3. The Vice-President may leave mid-term by submitting a resignation letter to the President, and can also be removed from office by a resolution in the Rajya Sabha, passed by a majority of its members at that time and agreed by the House of the People (Lok Sabha). 4. The electoral college for the election scheduled on September 9 will comprise 782 members of Parliament – 233 elected members of Rajya Sabha (five seats are currently vacant), 12 nominated members of Rajya Sabha, and 542 elected members of the Lok Sabha (one seat is vacant), the EC said. The electoral college doesn't include members from state legislatures. 5. Voting is held by secret ballot, using the system of proportional representation with a single transferable vote. Each MP casts a vote by ranking candidates in order of preference. All votes carry equal value as there is no weightage system (followed in the President election). 6. To be declared elected, a candidate must reach a required minimum number of votes — called the quota. This is calculated by dividing the total number of valid votes by two and adding one (fractions, if any, are ignored). 7. If no candidate crosses the quota in the first round, the one with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the remaining candidates based on second preferences. The process continues until one candidate crosses the quota. S Radhakrishnan, the first Vice-President, served two terms in office, 1952-62. He was subsequently elected as the President in 1962. Other Vice-Presidents who went on to become presidents were Zakir Hussain (1967-69), V V Giri (69-74), R Venkataraman (87-92), Shankar Dayal Sharma (92-97) and K R Narayanan (97-2002). 1. The President is elected by an electoral college consisting of MPs of both Houses of Parliament and MLAs of the states and Delhi and Puducherry. Nominated members of Rajya Sabha, Lok Sabha, and the Assemblies, and members of state Legislative Councils, are not part of the electoral college. 2. The votes are weighted, their value determined by the population of each state as per the Census 1971. The value of each MLA's vote varies from a high of 208 in Uttar Pradesh to a low of 7 in Sikkim. This means that UP's 403 MLAs contribute 208 × 403 = 83,824 votes to the electoral pool, while Sikkim's 32 MLAs contribute 32 × 7 = 224 votes. The weighted votes from all the Assemblies add up to 5.43 lakh. 3. The process demands that the 776 MPs (543 in Lok Sabha, 233 in Rajya Sabha) should contribute the same total of votes as the MLAs. Thus, the value of each MP's vote is 5.43 lakh divided by 776, rounded off to 700. The combined electoral pool from the Assemblies and Parliament adds up to 10.86 lakh. (1) Consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2013) 1. The Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha are not members of that House. 2. While the nominated members of the two Houses of the Parliament have no voting right in the presidential election, they have the right to vote in the election of the Vice President. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 (2) Who among the following have held the office of the Vice President of India? (UPSC CSE 2008) 1. Mohammad Hidayatullah 2. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed 3. Neelam Sanjiva 4. Shankar Dayal Sharma Select the correct answer using the code given below:- (a) 1,2,3 and 4 (b) 1 and 4 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 3 and 4 only (Source: EC sets September 9 as date for Vice Presidential poll after Dhankhar's surprise exit, Vice-President: The post, the provisions, and the past, UPSC Issue at a Glance | Office of Vice-President of India, Explained: What happens when the Vice-President resigns mid-term, Explained: How the President of India is elected) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at
Hans India
a minute ago
- Hans India
Madiga community stages statewide half-naked protest
Bengaluru: In a powerful display of anger and frustration, members of the Madiga community under the banner of the Karnataka Federation of Madiga Organisations staged statewide protests on Thursday, demanding the immediate implementation of internal reservation for Scheduled Castes. Led by former Union Minister A. Narayanaswamy, a large group of protesters gathered at Freedom Park in Bengaluru and held a half-naked protest, raising slogans against the Congress-led Karnataka government. Speaking at the protest, A. Narayanaswamy issued a stern warning: 'If the government does not implement internal reservation immediately, the Madigas will launch a full-scale civil disobedience movement. We will no longer wait, we will not bow to false promises, and we will not wait until the next election.' He added, 'Protests are being held in all districts of Karnataka today. This is a united fight that transcends political lines. This is not a BJP agitation — it is the collective voice of the oppressed. Is the Karnataka government more concerned about power or about solving the problems of the people? Madigas have not received justice, and our patience has run out. If we hit the streets, we will send this government packing.' Criticizing the bureaucracy, Narayanaswamy further lashed out, saying, 'Since 1976, we have demanded justice. But when we ask the Chief Secretary for a report on this long-standing injustice, he doesn't even bother to call a meeting. Is this what governance looks like?' He rejected the idea of basing reservation merely on population. 'This is about correcting historical injustice — about the oppression we've faced for over 40 years. If this backlog of injustice isn't cleared, we will intensify our agitation.' Protests were held in front of Deputy Commissioner offices in 26 districts across the state. 'This shows the political awakening of the Madigas,' Narayanaswamy declared. 'Many MLAs in this state would never have been elected without Madiga votes. Now that they're in power, they've forgotten us. If you don't speak for us, what moral right do you have to ask for our votes?' Angrily questioning the denial of fair representation, he said, 'Is there a rule in this country that Madigas must never get proper reservation? During elections to Zilla Panchayats and other local bodies, the government keeps pushing it to 'tomorrow'. The same Constitution that allowed for a national emergency to help a Prime Minister cling to power is now silent about the injustice to Madigas.' Highlighting the struggles faced by students in the community, he added, 'Many talented Madiga children cannot afford to pursue MBBS or higher education due to lack of support. Do you understand this pain? Does the government even care?' The protest ended with a collective resolve to continue the agitation until the internal reservation is implemented, with leaders vowing to bring the fight to the government's doorstep.
