logo
People's Alliance for Change launched in Kashmir to speak same language in Srinagar, Jammu and Delhi

People's Alliance for Change launched in Kashmir to speak same language in Srinagar, Jammu and Delhi

Time of India2 days ago
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Srinagar: Three Kashmir-based political parties -- Jammu and Kashmir People's Conference (JKPC), People's Democratic Front (PDF) and the recently formed Justice and Development Front (JDF) -- on Monday announced the formation of People's Alliance for Change (PAC).Describing the PAC as an alternative platform representing the oppressed people of the region, they said it will strive for restoration of statehood, Article 370 and 35 (A) with justice and dignity.JKPC president Sajad Gani Lone announced the formation of the PAC at his official residence in the presence of PDF president Hakeem Mohammad Yaseen, JDF president Shamim Ahmad Thokar and former minister Abdul Gani Vakil. The JDF was formed by select members of the banned Jamaat-e-Islami who also unsuccessfully fought the recent assembly election in J&K.'We have experienced pain and not inflicted it. This alliance addresses the barrenness of the political landscape of J&K and provides an alternative electoral platform to the people,' Lone said at a presser in Srinagar. The leaders signed a joint 'declaration of change' which they said would be the roadmap for the alliance.The JKPC chief said there had been no closure to the decades of pain 'because those who inflicted it still rule'. 'That must end. The real victims must now represent the pain they carry,' he asserted.The PAC called for general amnesty for political prisoners and conflict-affected youths, the reintegration of the marginalised and an end to exclusionary politics.'Up to 90 percent of new government job appointments have gone to the Jammu region as the reservation is systematically biased against Kashmiris and traditional political parties are enabling injustice through inaction,' Lone said.He also targeted chief minister Omar Abdullah, referring to him as the 'BJP's chief minister' who often goes to pay 'deferential respects' and gift Kashmiri shawls to BJP leaders.Lone urged the central government to give 'compassion and magnanimity' a chance and to give up the policy of 'vindictiveness'.JDF president Thokar said that despite ideological differences among its constituents, the PAC shares a vision, value and goal. 'Those who have inflicted pain cannot claim to represent us. We realised we cannot move ahead alone. We invite all like-minded parties to join this platform,' he said. 'Pain is not a commodity to be traded in the marketplace; it is something one must live through to truly comprehend.'PDF chairman Yaseen asserted that the PAC stands firmly on the foundation of transparency and an unwavering commitment to restoring the dignity of the people.'Our resolve is clear: we will not indulge in double-speak, saying one thing in Kashmir, another in Jammu and something entirely different in New Delhi. This alliance is built on a unified, people-centric agenda, crafted through consensus and aimed particularly at the vast majority who have borne the brunt of decades of suffering. That chapter of pain must end — and it will,' he said.JKPC general secretary Molvi Imran Reza Ansari said that the alliance is rooted in justice and equality which, he said, have become essential in the present times. 'Today, the rights of the people are being obliterated. Had the present government — and those before it — been truly committed to public welfare and sincerely addressed the grievances and aspirations of the people, there would have been no need for the formation of this alliance,' he said, adding that 'whosoever speaks the truth here is jailed'.Meanwhile, the ruling National Conference and opposition BJP hit out at the PAC. The NC labelled it as the BJP's proxy while the BJP subbed it for demanding restoration of Article 370 and befooling people.The NC legislator Tanvir Sadiq in an oblique reference to the PAC wrote, "Look who's back, the BJP's loyal 'B-Team,' freshly repackaged as an alternative. Rejected by the people, resurrected by remote. When ideology fails, desperation unites." Sadiq further wrote on X, "Let's just call them Party B Pro Max, Now with Extra Obedience."The BJP's general secretary in J&K, Ashok Koul, said that demanding restoration of Article 370 is day dreaming. "They are misleading people. No power can restore Article 370," Koul told reporters here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Message conveyed with great clarity: Jaishankar on objective of Operation Sindoor
Message conveyed with great clarity: Jaishankar on objective of Operation Sindoor

Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Message conveyed with great clarity: Jaishankar on objective of Operation Sindoor

Operation Sindoor conveyed to the world with great clarity that India will act against terrorism, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said in a statement in line with the UN Security Council calling for those responsible for the Pahalgam attacks to be brought to justice. 'What is important for us in the Quad statement, as also the statement that the Security Council had issued on April 25, is that the perpetrators of terrorism must be held accountable. They must be brought to justice,' Jaishankar said during a press conference in Washington on Wednesday. 'And that's important because we then have to communicate to the world what we did. On May 7, the objective of Operation Sindoor is that if there are terrorist attacks, we will act against the perpetrators, the supporters, the financiers, and the enablers. So that message, I think, was conveyed with great clarity,' he said. A joint statement issued by Quad Foreign Ministers — Jaishankar, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Foreign Minister of Australia Penny Wong, and Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya — unequivocally condemned all acts of terrorism and violent extremism in all their forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism. The Quad foreign ministers condemned in the 'strongest terms' the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which left 26 people dead. 'We call for the perpetrators, organisers, and financiers of this reprehensible act to be brought to justice without any delay and urge all UN member states, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant UNSCRs (UN Security Council resolutions), to cooperate actively with all relevant authorities in this regard,' the joint statement said. The UN Security Council press statement condemned the Pahalgam attack, with members of the Security Council underlining the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice. The council members stressed that those responsible for these killings should be held accountable. India had launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack, whose responsibility was claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF), a front for Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Jaishankar said he shared with his counterparts, in the Quad as well as globally, the nature of the terrorism challenge that India faces and has confronted over multiple decades, and 'that we are very resolved today to respond to it very firmly and that we have the right to defend ourselves'. Apart from the Quad discussions, Jaishankar said he had a good bilateral meeting with Rubio and the two leaders 'essentially did a stock-taking of the last six months' and the path looking ahead. 'This included a discussion on trade and investment, technology, defence and security, energy and on mobility,' he said, adding that he had separate meetings with Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. To a question on the US plan to impose a 500 per cent tariff on imports from countries buying Russian oil under a bill by Senator Lindsey Graham, Jaishankar said that any development happening in the US Congress is of interest to India 'if it impacts our interest or could impact our interest'. The Indian Embassy and officials have been in touch with Graham over the issue, he said. 'I think our concerns and our interests in energy security have been made conversant to him. So we'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it,' Jaishankar said.

India Re-Blocks All Pakistani X Accounts, YouTube Ban Stays Amid Terror Tensions
India Re-Blocks All Pakistani X Accounts, YouTube Ban Stays Amid Terror Tensions

India.com

time28 minutes ago

  • India.com

India Re-Blocks All Pakistani X Accounts, YouTube Ban Stays Amid Terror Tensions

All Pakistani accounts on X have been blocked in India after briefly being accessible in the past few days, official sources confirmed on Thursday. The move comes in continuation of India's escalating digital and diplomatic restrictions against Pakistan following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 tourists were killed by terrorists affiliated with the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba's proxy, The Resistance Front. After the attack, India responded with a series of retaliatory measures, including the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty and the launch of Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terror launch pads inside Pakistan. Among the measures was a wide-reaching crackdown on Pakistani media and social media content -- encompassing accounts of actors, cricketers, and internet influencers -- across Instagram, X, YouTube, and other platforms. Although several of these accounts had recently become accessible again, prompting criticism and questions about their restoration, they are now re-blocked. When users in India try to access these profiles, they are met with a message stating: "Account Withheld. (Name of the account) has been withheld in India in response to a legal demand." On Wednesday, users briefly gained access to X and Instagram accounts of several Pakistani actors and internet personalities, including Mawra Hocane, Saba Qamar, Ahad Raza Mir, Yumna Zaidi, and Danish Taimoor, as well as YouTube channels run by former cricketers Shahid Afridi and Shoaib Akhtar. However, accounts belonging to Mahira Khan, Fawad Khan, and Hania Aamir remained blocked throughout. Additionally, the ban on YouTube also remains, sources said. Earlier in May, the Indian government issued an advisory directing all OTT platforms and digital intermediaries to discontinue content originating from Pakistan. The advisory, dated May 8, 2025, and issued under the IT Rules, 2021, stated that "content hosted or streamed must not threaten India's sovereignty, integrity, national security, or public order." It explicitly instructed media platforms to remove "web-series, films, songs, podcasts and other streaming content" produced in Pakistan, whether on subscription-based or free platforms. Following the brief restoration of access to some Pakistani accounts, the All Indian Cine Workers Association (AICWA) made an urgent appeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, demanding a total blackout of all Pakistani social media presence in India. The association called the visibility of such accounts an "insult to the sacrifice of our martyred soldiers" and an "emotional assault" on Indians who have lost loved ones to terror attacks orchestrated by Pakistan. Citing major terror incidents like 26/11, Pulwama, Uri, and the recent Pahalgam attack, AICWA labelled Pakistan a "terrorist nation" and condemned Pakistani artists who, according to them, have "shamelessly spoken against India instead of showing remorse." In their appeal, AICWA put forth three specific demands -- a complete digital blackout of all Pakistani accounts and media channels in India; a ban on all future collaborations or promotions involving Pakistani nationals; and a permanent cultural disconnect from Pakistan as a tribute to the Indian Armed Forces and the families of martyrs.

Israel-Iran war: Tel Aviv did not achieve all its aims, says report; did Netanyahu's gamble backfire?
Israel-Iran war: Tel Aviv did not achieve all its aims, says report; did Netanyahu's gamble backfire?

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Israel-Iran war: Tel Aviv did not achieve all its aims, says report; did Netanyahu's gamble backfire?

AP photo A US-based magazine has described the recent 12-day Iran-Israel war as a "failed gamble" by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu . According to the Foreign Policy magazine, Israel did not achieve its stated objectives in the conflict and shattered the myth that Iran would collapse if attacked by another country. It further stated that though Netanyahu launched the war aiming to eliminate the Islamic Republic's strategic threat to his country, the conflict exposed the Jewish State's own vulnerabilities. The war resulted in strengthening Iranian nationalism and failed to destroy Tehran's core military or nuclear capabilities. The magazine also estimated that the war caused serious damage on both sides. For instance, despite Netanyahu's promise to dismantle Iran's missile and nuclear programmes with a hope to bring regime change, Tehran retaliated successfully by firing missiles at Israeli cities and strategic targets. Also, even after the United States entered the conflict, Iran escalated by attacking Al-Udeid airbase of the US in Qatar. Analysts suggests that this demonstration of force by Iran can help in strengthening its regional and diplomatic position. Iranian attacks were described as "precise and well-planned". Following Israel's strikes on Iran's South Pars oil refinery, the latter targeted the Haifa refinery in retaliation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Adidas Three Shorts With 60% Discount, Limited Stock Available Original Adidas Shop Now Undo Similarly, after Israeli attacks on its rival's research centres, Iran hit the Weizmann Institute. The retaliation was intended to demonstrate Iran's deterrence capability. Shortly, attacks on energy infrastructure ceased. Meanwhile, Israeli attacks targeting residential areas, media outlets, prisons and police stations were seen as a part of broader strategy to cause internal unrest in Iran. Civilian casualties has fuelled perceptions that the war aimed not at 'liberating' Iranians but at destabilizing the country. Internally, the war had serious social and political repercussion on Iran. However, instead of weakening the government, it became a rallying point that boosted nationalist sentiment. Many Iranians, including members of the younger generation, mobilized in defence of the country against what was widely seen as foreign aggression. Though fighting stopped, the underlying conflict remains unresolved. The US is no longer demanding that Iran completely shut it's nuclear programme down. Instead, it is willing to ease tensions through talks and economic offers. Iran, in turn, is keeping its nuclear program secretive to avoid any conflict. This practical approach might help calm things down for now, but it doesn't actually solve the main nuclear problem and it could make it even more dangerous in the future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store