New MP's defiance against racist ex-PM
Giving her maiden speech in parliament, while Ms Ambihaipahar didn't make specific reference to Sir Edmund's policies to restrict immigration, not recognise Indigenous Australians and the promotion of white superiority, she vowed to 'stand up against racism, division and hate'.
The new MP also spoke about her Papua New Guinean and Tamil-Sri Lankan heritage while noting that Sir Edmund was the 'champion of the White Australia policy'. Ash Ambihaipahar delivered her maiden speech to parliament MP on Wednesday. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
Her references to Australia's contentious founding father follows recent calls to remove his statue from an Indigenous burial site in Port Macquarie, a regional NSW town.
In 2020, his great-granddaughter Anne Barton also backed the campaign, describing Sir Edmund as a 'man of his time and was deeply racist'.
Addressing her parliamentary colleagues, Ms Ambihaipahar said 'as the architect of Federation' Sir Edmund would have '(recognised) the work needed to forge not just a nation but a just nation'.
'While Barton championed the White Australia policy, I live and breathe multiculturalism,' she told parliamentary colleagues on Wednesday.
'I stand here because others lifted me. That's why I will always fight for antidiscrimination, for safety, for equity and unity.
'I know what it feels like to be different, to navigate different worlds. I've also seen how political tension can quickly mutate into real-world hate if not called out early.' Ms Ambihaipahar previously campaigned for the NSW state seat of Oatley with Jodie Haydon and Anna Minns. NewsWire/ Supplied Credit: NCA NewsWire
In comparison to Sir Edmund, Ms Ambihaipahar described her childhood growing up in the suburb of Hurstville.
She said she was 'that dark skinned little girl running through the streets of Barton who never felt out of place'.
Ms Ambihaipahar also paid tribute to former minister for Indigenous Australia, Ms Burney, who retired from politics ahead of the May 3 poll and urged fellow MPs to 'ensure' this parliament is 'defined by unity, by courage and by decency'.
'Your advocacy for First Nations peoples has shaped this country's moral conscience,' she said.
'I will walk in your footsteps with awe and admiration.'
Despite previously narrowly losing out on winning the NSW state seat of Oatley, Ms Ambihaipahar, who hails from the party's Left faction, was hand-picked by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to run for Barton.
While the move angered Labor's Right faction, Ms Ambihaipahar retained the Labor stronghold seat and increased the margin by 4 per cent to 12 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
3 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Eye-watering cost to negotiate Victorian Indigenous treaty revealed amid government push to expand powers of state Voice
The Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan Labor governments have invested almost $400 million on negotiating a treaty with Indigenous Australians, with experts warning the costs could continue to mount. The Victorian government's Yoorrook Justice truth telling inquiry handed down its final report in early July after four years of proceedings and claimed the state had been illegally occupied and that Victoria's First Peoples had been subjected to genocide. The commission also made 100 wide-ranging recommendations to the Victorian government including providing Indigenous Australians with tax relief, financial reparations and called on the state to finalise a treaty agreement. The treaty, which was previously in negotiation stages is now set to progress to parliament, with Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan and the state's First People's Assembly confirming that legislation to pass the agreement would be tabled after the winter break. However, a fresh investigation into Victorian government budget papers found that the former Andrews government and the current Allan government had spent a total of $382 million on treaty deliberations alone over the past ten years. The bulk of the hefty sum was spent establishing the Treaty Authority, which has been touted as an 'independent umpire' that adjudicates negotiations. Members of the Treaty Authority tasked with deliberating with First Nations elders and community leaders were raking in salaries as high as $388,000 per year according to The Herald Sun. It is believed the state government also spent significant amounts of cash in aiding Indigenous group to prepare for briefings and presentations to official forums. A Victorian government spokesperson refused to verify the Herald Sun's $382 million figure but reiterated that $308 million had been poured into treaty discussions since the 2020-2021 state budget. Analysis by the Institute of Public Affairs revealed that the near $400 million sum was in fact a conservative estimate, and that between July 2016 and June 2025 727 meetings had been held between the state government and Indigenous groups to get a treaty agreement off the ground. The think tank stated that if the current trajectory held the callosal number of meetings would climb to 968 by June 2026. This comes to an average of 100 meetings per year since July 2016, or a meeting being held every two to three business days. The IPA's investigation into Victoria's budget documents futher uncovered that the Andrews-Allan Labor governments combined spending into Indigenous related initiatives, including treaty, truth-telling and state Voice measures equated to $776 million over the past decade. The IPA's Research Fellow Margaret Chambers said the Allan government needed to be transparent with the Victorian people and release a detailed summary of spending on Indigenous related policies. Ms Chambers also pressed the government to reveal its treaty plans and slammed Premier Allan for dividing the Victorian people. 'The Victorian government is not being honest and upfront with Victorians about its plan to divide the community on racial grounds,' Ms Chambers told the Herald Sun. 'With a Treaty scheduled to be finalised inside the next 12 months, and despite the volume of secret meetings over the past decade, very little is known about what this treaty will entail. 'Any Treaty will fundamentally change Victoria's legal structure and will likely require already financially stretched Victorian taxpayers to pay billions of dollars to activists aligned to the Allan government.' A joint statement released by the government the states First People's Assembly in early July stated the draft Treaty has been settled behind closed doors after a lengthy consultation phase and that Victoria's First People's Assembly would be made permanent. The state is also negotiating separate Treaties with local Indigenous communities.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.
