Gavin Newsom drops biggest hint yet that he's running for president in 2028
Newsom, 57, was among the Democrats' most articulate surrogates last year, even as he brushed off speculation he was seeking the White House and made the case to reelect President Biden.
Now, the Democrat governor who has spent the past month feuding with the Trump administration over anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles, has made his clearest move yet that he's testing a 2028 run.
The South Carolina Democratic Party has invited Newsom for a two-day visit this weekend.
He will meet with victims and communities who have suffered natural disasters and 'speak to the urgent need for federal support and investment' from Washington.
In 2024, the southern state was moved to second in the nation behind only New Hampshire after its voters delivered the nomination in 2020 to Joe Biden.
Newsom was also active in the state during the 2024 race as a surrogate for Biden's failed, eventually aborted re-election campaign.
'For two days, Governor Newsom will listen to local concerns, share proven solutions on jobs, health care, and rural infrastructure, and spotlight South Carolinians who are already driving progress in their hometowns,' the state party said in a press release.
Newsom is considered one of the contenders for the Democrat nomination in 2028, alongside 2024 loser Kamala Harris and 2020 reject Pete Buttigieg.
Trump himself suggested Newsom should run, despite having clashed with a number of Trump policies.
'I'd love him to run for president on the other side,' Trump said of Newsom in May.
He brought up Newsom in a backhanded way, once again turning his name into an insult by calling him 'Gavin New-scum' while seated alongside new Canadian PM Mark Carney, at an event where Trump softened his push to make Canada the 51st state by saying it 'takes two to tango.'
Trump started tearing into a high-speed rail project that California voters approved back in 2008, with costs ballooning to an estimated $100 billion.
As Trump described it in the Oval Office, it is a 'little train going from San Francisco to Los Angeles that's being run by Gavin New-scum, the governor of California.'
'He has got that train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen. It's like totally out of control,' Trump said.
He complained that it's 'hundreds of billions of dollars for this stupid project that should have never been built.'
Newsom was the one Democratic candidate Trump feared when running against Biden - and later Harris - in the 2024 race, according to Alex Isenstadt's book Revenge: The Inside Story of Trump's Return to Power.
The ex-president worried that Biden could drop out of the race cuing a Democratic primary.
Instead Biden dropped out of the race so late that the party quickly got behind Harris.
'One person he had been worried about was California Governor Gavin Newsom. Always fixated on visuals, Trump thought the handsome, hair-gelled governor was "slick" and the future of the Democratic Party,' Isenstadt wrote.
Trump was also annoyed that Fox News Channel's Sean Hannity woud keep having Newsom on his primetime show, Isenstadt said.
But in November of 2023, Newsom debated Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who was running against Trump in the Republican primary.
Trump, reportedly, wasn't impressed.
He thought Newsom had 'bombed,' Isenstadt wrote.
'Ron's an idiot, he doesn't have what it takes. But I thought Newsom would be better,' Trump said at the time, according to Isenstadt's account.
Newsom was consistently questioned as to whether he wanted to run after Joe Biden's debate disaster in June of 2024.
He consistently declined any presidential ambitions and remained behind Biden until he eventually dropped out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'I'm a hard-enough bast***': Keir Starmer shrugs off disastrous first year as PM as he pleads for Labour MPs to stick with him saying the 'toughest' part is over
Keir Starmer has shrugged off his disastrous first year in No10 telling panicking MPs the 'toughest' part is over. The PM pleaded for his party to stick together and focus on 'fantastic' achievements in a BBC interview to mark the anniversary of his July 4 election landslide. But Sir Keir also acknowledged an array of blunders, saying caving into Labour rebels on welfare was a 'tough day' and he regretted a speech warning uncontrolled immigration could turn Britain into an 'island of strangers'. Speaking on the Political Thinking podcast with Nick Robinson, the premier tried to make a virtue out of U-turns on issues such as the national inquiry into grooming gangs, arguing it was 'common sense' to 'look again' when doubts were raised. And he bizarrely branded himself a 'hard-enough bast***' when asked whether he had the determination to revive Labour's fortunes. Pollsters and political historians have suggested Sir Keir has endured the worst start of any PM on record. Since racking up one of the biggest Commons majorities ever, the PM has seen his personal ratings nose-dive and Reform leapfrog Labour in voting intention. Polling guru Sir John Curtice has warned that Sir Keir was 'never especially popular' and the public 'still don't know what he stands for'. This week has been especially stormy, with the massive Labour rebellion on benefits reforms and chaos over Rachel Reeves breaking down in tears during PMQs. In his interview, Sir Keir insisted the government had 'done some fantastic things' and 'driven through so much change'. He said that included bringing down waiting lists in the NHS, as well as 'loads of improvements in schools and stuff that we can do for children'. Sir Keir went on: 'Whether that's rolling out school uniform projects, whether it's school meals, breakfast clubs, you name it - and also [bringing in] a huge amount of investment into the country. 'And of course we've been busy getting three trade deals.' Sir Keir said he did not 'pretend' that the Labour revolt this week forcing him to neuter his benefit curbs was not a 'tough day'. 'I take responsibility,' he said. 'we didn't get the process right'. But he tried to make a virtue of his 'Sir U-turn' reputation, suggesting it meant he was listening. 'In the world that isn't politics, it is commonplace for people to look again at a situation and judge it by the circumstances as they now are and make a decision accordingly,' he said of the changes. 'And that is common sense, it's pragmatic, and it's a reflection of who I am. 'It was important that we took our party with us, that we got it right. 'And Labour politicians come into public life because they care deeply about these issues.' He said: 'I'm not one of these ideological thinkers, where ideology dictates what I do. I'm a pragmatist. You can badge these things as U-turns - it's common sense to me,' he said. 'If someone says to me, 'here's some more information and I really think it's the right thing to do', I'm the kind of person that says, 'well in which case, let's do it'.' In a message to Labour MPs, Sir Keir said the government needed to 'emphasise the many good things we have done'. 'We're only just starting. This in a sense is the toughest year, so we're only just beginning,' he said. It was put to Sir Keir that a friend he plays football with had described him as a 'hard bast***', but he appeared to have 'lost the dressing room'. 'Absolutely not,' he said. 'The Labour dressing room, the PLP, is proud as hell of what we've done, and their frustration - my frustration - is that sometimes the other stuff, welfare would be an example, can obscure us being able to get that out there.' He added: 'I'm a hard-enough bastard to find out who it was who said that, so that I can have a discussion with him.' Sir Keir said he was ready to turn things round, saying 'I hate losing in football, I hate losing in politics'.
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's big bill achieved what conservatives have been trying to do for decades
For decades, Republicans have argued that the US would be better off if taxes were low, and programs to help low-income Americans were harder to access. With Donald Trump's marquee tax and spending bill now set to become law, the country will find out what it's like to live under that sort of system. The massive legislation that Trump plans to sign Friday will make his campaign promises a reality by extending tax cuts enacted during his first term, and creating new deductions aimed at the working-class voters who backed his re-election. But it will also fundamentally reorder two major social safety net programs, slashing funding and imposing new work requirements that nonpartisan estimates say will cost millions of people their benefits. The ripple effects, experts say, will be felt across the country, and not just by the poor. 'Sometimes people like to feel like this is an us versus them [issue], but this is really all of us. It is the people that your kids are going to school with it, is your neighbor, the people that you play soccer with,' said Lelaine Bigelow, executive director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality 'This is going to have a massive effect on a lot of people around this country.' The 'one big, beautiful bill', as Trump calls it, won final approval by the House of Representatives on Thursday, in time for his signature on 4 July, the US Independence Day holiday. In addition to the tax cuts, it will also channel tens of billions in dollars towards immigration enforcement and building a wall along the Mexican border. To cut costs, Republicans included provisions to end green energy incentives created under Joe Biden, but the bulk of the savings will come from changes to two programs: Medicaid, which provides healthcare to low-income and disabled Americans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which helps low-income Americans afford food. Both programs will face new and stricter work requirements, and states will be forced to share part of the cost of Snap for the first time ever. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the bill's Medicaid changes could cost as many as 11.8 million people their healthcare, and the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities forecasts about 8 million people, or one in five recipients, may lose their Snap benefits. The GOP argues that the bill will not cut Medicaid or Snap, but weed out 'waste, fraud and abuse' thereby making the programs more efficient. At one point, House speaker Mike Johnson circulated research from the conservative American Enterprise Institute finding that, after sleeping, playing video games was how Medicaid recipients who do not work spend most of their time. If they did not act, Republicans warned, the 2017 tax cuts would expire this year, many Americans would be forced to pay more, and economic growth would suffer. However, analyses of the law found that it was the highest earners who felt most of the benefit from the tax regimen. Bigelow warns that the benefit cuts will be the most widespread effect of the bill. Her center's research found that 34% of the country's population will be negatively affected by the bill, mostly through the Snap and Medicaid cuts, while just under 2% of taxpayers are in the income bracket that will get most of the tax relief. And though the bill cuts taxes on tips, overtime and car loan interest, they only to last through 2028. Even Americans who do not interact with federal safety programs could feel the economic effects of its retrenchment. Fewer Snap enrollees could mean less business for grocery stores, while rural hospitals could be hard hit by the Medicaid cuts, even with a $50bn fund included in the bill to help those in poor financial shape. Robert Manduca, a University of Michigan sociology professor, forecast a $120bn per year hit to local economies from the benefit cuts. Employees and business owners, he warned, 'might see their job become less secure because the demand in their local economy is getting reduced'. Paradoxically, the bill is still hugely expensive. The CBO forecasts it will add $3.3tn to the deficit through 2034, mostly due to the tax cuts. For fiscal hawks concerned about the sustainability of the country's budget deficit, which has yawned higher in recent years as Washington DC battled the Covid-19 pandemic with massive fiscal stimulus, there's little beauty in Trump's bill. 'Yes, the economy may well enjoy a sugar-high the next couple of years, as borrowing stimulates near-term consumption,' said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which advocates for lowering the deficit. 'But a sugar-high won't be sustained, it will do real damage, and often what comes next is the crash. The longer-term health of our economy, American families, and our children will be worse off due to this debt-financed bill.'
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
What we know about Zarah Sultana's new left-wing political party and Jeremy Corbyn's role
On Thursday evening, ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana announced plans to set up a new left-wing political party alongside Jeremy Corbyn, taking aim at the government for having 'completely failed to improve people's lives'. 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper,' Ms Sultana said, adding that 'just 50 families now own more wealth than half the UK population'. She promised to offer an alternative to 'managed decline and broken promises' – but what exactly will that look like in practice? Here, The Independent runs through everything we know so far about the new left-wing offering in Westminster. What is their mission? And do they have any policies? As disaffection grows with Sir Keir Starmer's government following last week's humiliating climbdown on welfare, Ms Sultana is attempting to offer a left-wing alternative to the Labour Party of today. While the group is still in its formative stages and has yet to set out any clear policies, Ms Sultana's social media statement gave a strong indication of where the party's priorities will lie. Their key mission, Ms Sultana suggested, was to offer an alternative to Labour, Reform and the Tories, which she claimed were fighting for billionaires. As a result, we can expect her to put a strong emphasis on tackling poverty, given Ms Sultana previously had the Labour whip suspended from her for voting to lift the two-child benefit cap, and later voting against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. The MP also accused the government of wanting to 'make disabled people suffer' – indicating support for a bolstered welfare state. When it comes to foreign policy, her party is likely to have a strong emphasis on supporting Palestine, after she accused the government of being an 'active participant in genocide'. She also claimed both Sir Keir and Nigel Farage 'smear people of conscience trying to stop a genocide in Gaza as terrorists'. It comes just days after Ms Sultana voted against a motion to proscribe Palestine Action as a terror organisation. But at the same time, she also said the public wants more money 'spent on public services, not forever wars' – indicating she would support a reversal of the government's defence spending boost. Who is involved? While Ms Sultana said she will be leading the party with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, The Times reported overnight that Mr Corbyn – who has been approached for comment - had not yet agreed to co-lead the project. He is yet to issue a statement supporting the movement. She said the party will involve 'other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country'. It is likely to be made up of Labour activists on the left of the party who have grown disillusioned with Sir Keir's government, believing it has shifted too far to the right as part of an attempt to combat the threat of Reform UK. How much support do they have? It is too early to tell what kind of backing Ms Sultana's party would have in practice. Overnight, she's had more than 14,000 sign-ups to her page. More broadly, polling conducted by More in Common last month – well before the MP unveiled her party – asked the public how they would vote if a left-leaning party led by Mr Corbyn emerged. The hypothetical scenario saw 10 per cent of voters say they would back the party, taking three points from Labour, four points from the Greens, one point from the Lib Dems and one point from the SNP. Labour was left with 20 per cent support, neck and neck with the Tories, while Reform UK was on 27 per cent.
