Societe Generale becomes first major bank to launch dollar-pegged stablecoin
The new digital currency, named 'USD CoinVertible', will be issued on both the Ethereum and Solana blockchains, with public trading expected to start in July, SocGen's crypto arm SG-FORGE said in a statement.
Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to a traditional currency, usually the dollar, allowing people to move large sums of money using blockchain networks instead of traditional banking payment systems.
The sector has seen rapid growth, driven by crypto company Tether, which has issued $155 billion of its dollar-pegged tokens.
SG-FORGE launched a euro-based stablecoin in 2023, although it has not been widely adopted, with just 41.8 million euros ($47.62 million) in circulation, according to its website.
SocGen said its stablecoins are classed as e-money tokens and will be regulated under MiCA, the European Union's landmark crypto regulation adopted in 2023.
Tether does not have a licence to operate in the European Union under MiCA.
Jean-Marc Stenger, CEO of SG-FORGE, said that there was demand for a regulated dollar-based stablecoin.
'At the moment, there are no other banking-related players in that space … that's definitely the feedback we have from the market, both corporates, financial institutions, but also crypto exchanges,' he said. 'There is a very, very strong need for well-regulated, robust offering in the crypto and stablecoin space'.
Stablecoin issuers typically take in dollars from customers and give them the crypto token in return. The issuers profit by investing these dollar holdings into yield-bearing assets such as bonds.
BNY will serve as the custodian for SG-FORGE's reserves, which will initially be kept in a cash account, before later being invested into other assets, Stenger said.
SG-FORGE said that its token can be used for crypto trading, cross-border payments, foreign exchange transactions and management of collateral and cash, and will be listed on various crypto exchanges, without giving further details.
The subsidiary has 'more than 15' crypto exchanges and brokers being onboarded as clients, Stenger added.
In the U.S., Congress is poised to pass legislation to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins. Bank of America could launch a stablecoin, its CEO said earlier this year, and some other large banks are considering issuing a joint stablecoin.
Tether is the world's largest stablecoin issuer. Its CEO said in a post on X that the company was the seventh biggest buyer of U.S. government debt in 2024, because it holds its dollar reserves in Treasuries.
The second-largest issuer, Circle, went public on the U.S. stock market on June 5 and saw its shares soar 48% on Friday.
Regulators have long warned that stablecoins could impact market stability by creating connections between mainstream finance and more volatile crypto markets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
SocGen lifts targets after French retail rebounds sharply
PARIS: Societe Generale, France's third-largest listed bank, raised its annual profit target on Thursday after a strong rebound in its French retail business lifted second quarter results above expectations. The French lender raised its 2025 return on tangible equity target, a key profitability measure, to around 9% from a previous goal of above 8%. It now expects its cost-to-income ratio, a key efficiency indicator, at below 65% this year versus a previous target of below 66%. The SocGen division that houses its core French retail business doubled its net earnings in the second quarter, driven by a 15% increase in net interest income. NII is the difference between what the bank earns on loans and pays on deposits. The rebound in the retail unit builds on momentum seen in the first quarter, as CEO Slawomir Krupa, who took the reins in 2023, presses ahead with turnaround efforts. Group net income jumped 31% to 1.45 billion euros ($1.66 billion) in the second quarter, compared to the same period last year, well above the 1.19 billion euros estimate of 15 analysts compiled by the company. Revenues over the period were up 1.6% to 6.79 billion euros, also beating analysts' average estimate. In addition, the bank announced an interim dividend of 61 euro cents per share to be paid in October. It plans a 1 billion euro share buyback in August. Cost cuts 'We remain fully focused on the precise and methodical execution of our 2026 roadmap to continue delivering sustainable and profitable growth for all our stakeholders,' Krupa said in a statement. The hard-driving company veteran was brought in to revive SocGen's shares after years of underperformance. He recently drew attention in France by urging staff to review remote working policies and spend at least four days a week in the office. Investor perception of the bank had long been hurt by repeated missed targets, the fallout from a rogue trading scandal during the 2008 financial crisis and a costly exit from Russia following the country's invasion of Ukraine. Krupa's plan, centered on reducing expenses, asset disposals, and strengthening the bank's capital, initially underwhelmed the market. But improved cost management has helped shares climb around 120% in the past year. SocGen's valuation, however, still remains well below its book value. The French lender's investment banking division, its largest, posted revenue in line with analysts expectations. Sales from trading in fixed income and currencies rose 7.3% to 615 million euros, trailing BNP Paribas's 27% jump. Equities trading revenue fell 2.9% to 962 million euros. SocGen's trading business benefited less from increased market volatility sparked by the wave of tariffs rolled out by US President Donald Trump than Wall Street peers and larger French rival BNP Paribas.
Business Recorder
18-07-2025
- Business Recorder
Virtual assets law: a faulty approach
The emergence of Pakistan's regulatory framework for crypto assets unfolds not through a linear evolution but as a series of abrupt pivots, uncertain mandates, and fragmented institutional posturing. Initial state responses oscillated between prohibition and passive ambiguity, particularly crystallized through the State Bank of Pakistan's 2018 circular barring financial institutions from engaging with crypto-related activity. However, a noteworthy departure has occurred with the promulgation of the Virtual Assets Ordinance, 2025 ('the Ordinance') on July 8, 2025. This Presidential Ordinance, issued under Article 89 of the Constitution becoming effective immediately, defies parliamentary process and oversight as no emergency existed for not presenting it as a Bill before the Parliament. It reveals an institutional attempt to assert authority over a previously unregulated domain. Yet rather than embodying a product of rigorous legislative deliberation, the Ordinance resembles an amalgam of foreign statutes hastily adapted to domestic soil, lacking coherence and structural fidelity to Pakistan's socio-legal ecosystem. The Ordinance introduces a licensing and regulatory regime under which Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) are to operate drawing clear inspiration from frameworks such as the European Union's Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) Regulation, the United Arab Emirates' VARA rulebook, and Singapore's Payment Services Act. For instance, the classification of VASP categories, as outlined in Schedule 1, closely mirrors MiCA's broad taxonomy of crypto-asset services. Inclusion of custody, exchange, and token issuance services under one regulatory umbrella reflects a consolidation seen in Singapore's Monetary Authority guidelines. Furthermore, capital requirements imposed under Schedule 2 strongly resemble United Arab Emirates' licensing prerequisites. Despite these parallels, the Ordinance suffers from superficial mimicry rather than thoughtful transposition. The Ordinance appears to have been drafted in undue haste, attempting to regulate a highly volatile and technically nuanced sector without erecting a solid and reliable institutional or legal foundation. References made to other existing Pakistani laws within the Ordinance, such as Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010, Securities Act, 2015, and Companies Act, 2017, are broadly worded failing to adequately address issues specific to virtual currencies. These laws, originally fashioned for traditional financial instruments and corporate structures, lack definitional clarity and enforcement mechanisms appropriate for digital assets. Moreover, to date, no substantive amendments have been made to these foundational statutes to incorporate the realities and peculiarities of blockchain-based assets. Mere invocation of these statutes in the Ordinance does not bridge this gap. The use of generic cross-references to legacy financial legislation creates interpretive ambiguity, risking inconsistent application and regulatory arbitrage. The resulting legal uncertainty may inhibit development of a stable and predictable crypto-asset ecosystem. Ordinance's overreliance on non-specific statutory references undermines its credibility as a standalone regulatory framework exposing it to challenge both from a constitutional and administrative perspective. Inclusion of Schedule 1 in the Ordinance categorizing 'Virtual Asset Services' deserves scrutiny. The definitions employed, such as 'broker-dealer services' and 'exchange services', are broadly phrased and lack operational precision. For example, classification of 'broker-dealer services' in clause (c) as including trading on one's own account may inadvertently encompass individuals or businesses engaged in proprietary trading for treasury management purposes, creating overregulation and deterring legitimate activity. The exemption carved out for sole-account dealers is not sufficiently delineated and could be manipulated to escape oversight. Such drafting anomalies reflect a limited understanding of digital asset market dynamics. The category of 'custody services', defined as safekeeping or controlling virtual assets or means of access on behalf of customers, lacks an articulation of technical standards for security, segregation of assets, and recovery protocols in the event of platform insolvency or cyber compromise. In jurisdictions such as Switzerland and Germany, regulations include specific custody protocols and operational audits, with agencies like BaFin requiring compliance with these standards. Absence of these benchmarks in the Ordinance reveals a superficial regulatory posture. The 'exchange services' classification aggregates fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-crypto conversions, as well as matching orders and maintaining order books. However, it provides no indication of technical, operational, or liquidity benchmarks for functioning as an exchange. No clear definition and requirements are laid down regarding prevention of wash trading or liquidity mirroring. The oversight of algorithmic trading and market manipulation risks, well-acknowledged internationally, is glaringly missing. The lack of granularity in these definitions may lead to both overreach and under-enforcement. Inclusion of lending and borrowing services appears forward-thinking, yet the clause fails to distinguish between collateralized, over-collateralized, and algorithmic lending models. Given the global controversies surrounding platforms like Celsius and Terra-Luna, the omission of risk buffers and liquidity thresholds in such definitions may lead to replication of failures within Pakistan's regulatory purview. The provision on derivatives services also lacks clarity on permissible underlying assets, leverage caps, margining, and clearing obligations. The Schedule's provision on fiat-referenced token issuance services, analogous to stablecoin issuance, requires a more robust framework. The Ordinance mandates establishment and administration of reserve assets but fails to define the nature, composition, and auditability of such reserves. This is in stark contrast to frameworks like MiCA, which require regular attestation of reserves, segregation of backing assets, and mandatory redemption rights. Without such safeguards, Pakistani consumers and investors remain exposed to systemic vulnerabilities. The capital requirements prescribed in Schedule 2 amplify the Ordinance's exclusionary tendencies. Imposing a minimum paid-up capital of billion on exchanges and token issuers effectively prohibits startups, SMEs, and even well-established fintechs from entering the market. This figure, though inspired by UAE and EU standards, disregards the local financial and technological environment. The Rs 100 million requirements for broker-dealer services and Rs 200 million for custody services are similarly prohibitive, especially when coupled with compliance, infrastructure, and legal costs. The Ordinance appears designed for incumbents and well-capitalized foreign players, erecting entry barriers that stifle domestic innovation. The economic impact of these high thresholds is likely to be severe. Startups and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) constitute the bulk of Pakistan's fintech and blockchain innovation ecosystem. By mandating paid-up capital far exceeding industry norms within Pakistan's own regulatory infrastructure (e.g., NBFCs, mutual funds), the Ordinance reflects a protectionist rather than enabling character. It renders Pakistan's virtual asset environment an exclusive domain for the privileged, in direct contradiction to the digital financial inclusion objectives articulated in the National Financial Inclusion Strategy (NFIS). The designation of 'Significant Issuers' under sections 26-27 [Schedule-3] and related threshold market capitalization exceeding Rs 5 billion or five million domestic users introduces further complications. Though the intention to impose enhanced governance on systemic actors is commendable, the provision is poorly calibrated. The mandatory requirement for significant issuers to maintain 3% of reserve assets as own funds, capped at Rs. 2 billion, does not consider market volatility or token model diversity. In the absence of clear stress testing frameworks or audit requirements, such thresholds may inadvertently penalize token issuers experiencing organic growth rather than managing genuine systemic risks. The Ordinance's regulatory philosophy appears inherently conservative, prioritizing compliance and capital buffers over innovation, inclusion, and agility. The pace of technological evolution in the blockchain domain renders such rigid structures counterproductive. The sandbox rules sections, 42-44, lack clear eligibility criteria, transparent evaluation metrics, and defined procedures for transitioning successful innovations to full licensing, creating uncertainty for innovators. The no-action relief mechanism offers limited legal certainty, as relief letters can be withdrawn arbitrarily without safeguards, potentially deterring participation. Enforcement powers granted to the Authority are broad but lack procedural oversight, risking overreach. Penalties, including fines up to Rs 100 million or 5% of turnover, may disproportionately burden firms. The Authority should clarify sandbox participation and exit criteria, strengthen legal certainty around no-action relief, introduce independent oversight of investigatory powers, scale penalties appropriately, define emergency intervention protocols, ensure tribunal independence, and provide detailed transitional guidelines. Additionally, the Ordinance does not distinguish between low-risk innovation (such as community tokens) and high-risk instruments (such as leveraged derivatives), thereby imposing a one-size-fits-all model that is bound to fail. The overarching legal inconsistencies further delegitimize the Ordinance. Although the document cites Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016,Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010, and other laws, they do not specifically address blockchain traceability, private key security, or decentralized finance activities. Similarly, Income Tax Ordinance 2001 is silent on the classification of gains from crypto trading, whether they constitute business income, capital gains, or speculative gains, resulting in tax ambiguities that may lead to litigation and non-compliance. The lack of legislative amendments to the underlying laws renders the Ordinance an isolated and unsupported enactment. This legal vacuum prevents consistent enforcement and frustrates expectations of VASPs seeking certainty. The result is an underdeveloped ecosystem governed by disconnected laws. Provisions related to 'closed ecosystems' or 'closed-loop systems', and critical analysis of definitions e.g., consumer protection, AML-CFT framework, and taxation-related provisions will be analyzed in our coming articles. Failure to integrate the Ordinance with a broader digital economy vision dilutes its impact. The uncoordinated insertion of regulatory obligations, unsupported by infrastructure, legal amendments, or tax clarity, will most likely hinder rather than harness the potential of crypto technologies. Implementation of the Ordinance, in its current form, could entrench systemic challenges, deter foreign direct investment, and exclude domestic talent from participating in the digital asset revolution. The absence of consultative processes and empirical market assessments reveals a policy framework reactive to compliance optics rather than developmental objectives. The government must reconsider its approach by (i) introducing a risk-based, tiered licensing regime; (ii) aligning existing laws through amendments specific to virtual assets; and (iii) developing consultative mechanisms with industry stakeholders and technical experts to ensure adaptive regulation in this dynamic field. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
14-07-2025
- Business Recorder
Bitcoin climbs to record $123,000 as US to debate crypto rules
SINGAPORE: Bitcoin surpassed $120,000 for the first time on Monday, marking a milestone for the world's largest cryptocurrency as investors bet on long-sought policy wins for the industry this week. Bitcoin scaled a record high of $123,153.22 before pulling back slightly to trade 2.4% higher around $122,000. Later in the day, the U.S. House of Representatives will debate a series of bills to provide the digital asset industry with the nation's regulatory framework it has long demanded. Those demands have resonated with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has called himself the 'crypto president' and urged policymakers to revamp rules in favour of the industry. 'It's riding a number of tailwinds at the moment,' said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore, citing strong institutional demand, expectations of further gains and support from Trump as reasons for the bullishness. 'It's been a very, very, strong move over the past six or seven days and it's hard to see where it stops now. It looks like it can easily have a look at the $125,000 level,' he said. Bitcoin jumps to record on institutional investor demand The surge in bitcoin, which is up 30% so far this year, has sparked a broader rally across other cryptocurrencies over the past few sessions even in the face of Trump's chaotic tariff policies. Ether, the second-largest token, scaled a more than five-month peak of $3,059.60, while XRP and Solana gained about 3% each. The sector's total market value has swelled to about $3.81 trillion, according to data from CoinMarketCap. 'What we find interesting and are watching closely are the signs that bitcoin is now being seen as a long-term reserve asset, not just by retail investors and institutions but even some central banks,' said Gracie Lin, crypto exchange OKX's Singapore CEO. 'We're also seeing increasing participation from Asia-basedinvestors, including family offices and wealth managers. These are strong signs of bitcoin's role in the global financial system and the structural shift in how it is perceived, suggesting that this isn't just another hype-driven rally,' Lin said. Earlier this month, Washington declared the week of July 14 as 'crypto week,' during which members of Congress are set to vote on the Genius Act, the Clarity Act, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act. The most significant bill is the Genius Act, which would create federal rules for stablecoins. Elsewhere, prices of crypto stocks and exchange traded funds advanced. In U.S. premarket trading, shares of crypto exchange Coinbase surged 1.7%, while bitcoin holder Strategy climbed 3.3%. Crypto miner Mara Holdings jumped 4.6%. Hong Kong listed spot bitcoin ETFs launched by China AMC, Harvest and Bosera all hit record highs.
