%3Amax_bytes(150000)%3Astrip_icc()%2FTAL-new-zealand-LCPODEP60725-6e7eb0cf7d6648cb8b336bbafb669bd1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Meet the Māori: The First People of New Zealand
Most of the world is familiar with New Zealand for its awe-inspiring beauty: sweeping landscapes that appear to be an unimaginable green, oceans that sparkle as killer whales and dolphins breach the surface, and skies so blue you think you're dreaming. But there's something else that makes the island nation pure magic: its living cultural legacy. The Māori people, indigenous to Aotearoa, carry the country's history, which stretches back thousands of years, by way of storytelling and a deeply held reverence for the natural world.
'My whole upbringing pretty much revolved around those stories of my ancestors who sailed here to Aotearoa hundreds and hundreds of years ago and where they settled,' Hoturoa Barclay-Kerr, a master navigator and expert in traditional waka (canoe) voyaging, shared with Travel + Leisure in the episode. 'There's a very strong traditional and historical connection between what my name is and the past and what we do now in terms of trying to reconnect with those traditions and keep [them] alive.'
As Barclay-Kerr explained, the early Polynesian voyages to New Zealand weren't spontaneous adventures; they were meticulous missions driven by his ancestor's observations, planning, and expertise. 'You actually have to think it all out. And the preparation and the community involvement in helping you set up to go on a voyage like this takes a long time.'
It's the same for Rawiri Edward Manawatu, a cultural guide and business leader in Kaikōura, a coastal community on the South Island, who can count eight generations of great-grandparents who have called this place home. And because of this strong lineage, Manawatu can accurately describe what life was like all those years ago.
'A typical morning would look like the men and women getting up early in the morning with the sun and going out fishing, hunting, and doing the gardening,' Manawatu said. 'The kids would be taught how to do these types of things … and we had what we call tohunga as well—they were experts in all of these different types of things and would teach others how to do it.'
But like many Indigenous communities around the world, the Māori faced cultural disruption following colonization. In the 1800s, their land was seized, stolen, and sold. Even their spiritual practices and language were criminalized through the Tohunga Suppression Act. 'If you spoke Māori at school, you were hit by the teacher,' Barclay-Kerr shared. And, as Manawatu explained, 'We started to become second-class citizens at that time.' He added that many Māori are still working to reclaim their language and cultural identity today. 'When you haven't got your identity, and you don't know who you are, you don't know where you've been, you don't know where you're from—it disables you in the world today,' he said.
But thankfully, their legacy, stories, and culture have not just endured, but are thriving thanks to a new generation heeding the call.
'We have now all these young people, like all my grandchildren—they can all speak our language, which is a huge change," Barclay-Kerr shared. "That long-term living legacy of our language, as an example, is one that becomes a gift to the whole country.'
As a traveler, it's a culture you can learn more about and appreciate, too. Those seeking a deeper connection can take part in Manawatu's Māori Tours in Kaikōura to visit ancestral lands, battle sites, and remnants of traditional villages. 'I, myself, am a descendant of the ancestors that we're talking about,' he shared on the tour. Just make sure to approach the new customs you learn about with care.
'When the process or the protocol takes place of a traditional welcome, it's really important they stick to whatever their guides tell them,' Barclay-Kerr added. 'Ask permission. It makes a big difference.'
Hear more about the enduring legacies of the Māori people, including the art of navigation and the strength of cultural revival, in the newest episode of Lost Cultures: Living Legacies, available now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, Player FM, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Why the British and Irish Lions' uncertain future could be bad news for Australia
A British and Irish Lions tour is sold, principally, on history and mystery. Anachronistic in its very concept, the actions and anecdotes of trips of yesteryear are woven into the rich red fabric adorning the current crop, links with the century and a half of touring parties evident at every moment before, during and after each squad's assembly. The cultural capital of the Lions is vast and trades, primarily, on that which has gone before – each trip bringing with it a chance to stir the nostalgic senses with a retrospective look. The mystery is inherent: how will a squad drawn at short notice handle the pressure of coming together to take on a big southern hemisphere beast? Yet even the great bastions of heritage and history must eventually become forward-looking. A corporate and commercial behemoth in a sport lacking in that sort of commodity, this may be a time of great change for the British and Irish Lions as bigwigs look ahead to a future that feels more uncertain than usual. Which is not to suggest that the Lions are in any kind of jeopardy. The strength of the brand ensures that the concept is surely safeguarded for the foreseeable future. But for the first time in recent memory, it feels like the concept itself could be tweaked. Already, of course, there is a women's tour on the way, the exact details still be confirmed for the 2027 trip to New Zealand but the planning well underway, even if there are plenty within the game who question whether the sport is ready for such a venture. That will precede a men's trip to take on the All Blacks two years later. The British and Irish Lions are one of rugby's biggest brands (Getty Images) But speculation otherwise abounds, and there is no guarantee that the traditional quadrennial cycles remain intact. While the Lions' touring history stretches back to 188, the actual lineage of the now familiar format is not that long – it was only in 1989 that the tourists first travelled solely to Australia, and only in 1997 that the South Africa/Australia/New Zealand rotation was fully established after the fall of the apartheid regime. The idea of taking a tour to France, which would represent a radical rethink, will not go away. Discussions have begun over possible pre-tour meetings in 2027 and 2029, while former Lions scrum half Matt Dawson recently told The Times that it would be 'insane' not to organise a full trip and itinerary. Such an idea would be glorious fun, with the fire and fervour of the French fans sure to cancel out the sea of red, and the depth of the sport in the country sure to provide compelling contests throughout the tour. A Lions tour would probably land well in a nation where club rugby is often king. It is a personal view, however, that a trip to less far-flung shore would have a rather different and likely inferior feel, though providing greater accessibility to a wider spectrum of supporters would be welcome. Equally, those that criticise the Lions as being Anglocentric or imperialistic would relish a broadening of the boarders; the performance and passion shown by Argentina in their two pre-tour encounters in the last two decades show that a return for the Pumas to the touring schedule more regularly would be embraced. Equally, the development of Pacific Island nations, Japan and others could be aided – it feels a misstep that Fiji, particularly, were not an opponent on this trip. An already congested calendar has limited room for expansion, though, which means that one of the traditional touring locations would surely have to be squeezed. For various reasons, it feels unlikely that New Zealand or South Africa would be under threat; Australia, by contrast, feel almost interminably imperilled in the modern landscape, and this has not necessarily been a buoyant start. The failure to release Wallabies to already under-powered Super Rugby Pacific sides has led to tour games generally won with a degree of comfort by the Lions, even amid plenty of errors. Australia may need a strong series to prove they remain worthy opponents of the Lions (AP) This should be a time of prosperity and promise for the Wallabies as they gear up for a home World Cup in two years' time, and yet the alarm bells still ring. Financial pressures on the unions have eased slightly – aided by this Lions trip – but it is not long since the Melbourne Rebels were lost as an entity, while rugby union is ever more marginalised by the popularity of the NRL and AFL. The truth is that the opening skirmishes of this Lions tour barely made a dent in the sporting psyche; that will change once the Tests are underway a bit, but union generally has to be content to play second or third fiddle. Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii swapped rugby league for union - but most go the other way in Australia (Getty) Within that comes a talent drain – the (expensive) luring of Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii is a mere breath into a prevailing wind that blows young talent to league from union. Amidst that, there are nonetheless intriguing reports of NRL superstar Kalyn Ponga hiring an agent in union to keep his options open – though it would be an All Blacks call that the son of Kiwi parents would covet. Next summer will see South Africa and New Zealand tussle in a traditional tour of their own kind, expected to be sold on the strength of their rivalry as the Rugby Championship is ripped up in the name of bringing together two of the sport's fiercest foes in an encounter of greater meaning. What this means for Australia and Argentina is still somewhat unclear, but with the death of the traditional summer tour for the European nations with the advent of the Nations Cup in 2026, the established rugby calendar will certainly start to look rather different. It all makes this a rather opportune moment for the Wallabies to prove a few doubters wrong. By ranking and recent record, they are the poorest of the Lions' opponents of the modern era but never doubt the capacity of an Australian sporting side to rise to the occasion.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Web Travel Group Limited (ASX:WEB) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 56% of the company
Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in Web Travel Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders Insiders have been selling lately Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Web Travel Group Limited (ASX:WEB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Web Travel Group, beginning with the chart below. View our latest analysis for Web Travel Group What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Web Travel Group? Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Web Travel Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Web Travel Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Web Travel Group. Our data shows that State Street Global Advisors, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.5% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 5.5% of the stock. In addition, we found that John Guscic, the CEO has 1.6% of the shares allocated to their name. Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. Insider Ownership Of Web Travel Group The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. We can see that insiders own shares in Web Travel Group Limited. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own AU$69m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Next Steps: I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Web Travel Group you should be aware of. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Skift
4 days ago
- Skift
Accor Adds Its First Las Vegas Resort
The DJIA jumped 508 points while Nasdaq was up 127, the S&P 500 rose 49 points, and the 10-year treasury yield was up .05 to 4.39%. Lodging stocks were mostly higher, led by the timeshare stocks as investors reacted positively to Travel + Leisure's earnings, sending the stock up 7% to a new 52-week high. HGV also hit a new high, up 5% and VAC was up 4% on the day. HLT, the other one who reported earnings, saw its stock go down -3% today. STR reported U.S. lodging data for the week ended 7/19. U.S. hotel RevPAR was down -3.3% with occupancy down -2.6% to lead the decline. Group RevPAR was down -4.6%. Hilton and Travel + Leisure kicked off the industry's earnings season. HLT beat estimates, but their report was described as mixed by many for various reasons. The beat was viewed as being from items like owned hotel income and other revenues and expenses, while Management Fees, Incentive managem