logo
Bill that would cut benefits for California rooftop solar weakened by legislators

Bill that would cut benefits for California rooftop solar weakened by legislators

Yahoo02-05-2025
California homeowners with rooftop solar panels may see a significant change when trying to sell their homes after the California State Assembly's Utilities & Energy Committee voted to end net metering for homes with solar when the property is sold to new owners.
Assembly Bill 942, backed by Lisa Calderon, D-Whittier, a former Southern California Edison executive, reforms utility-offered programs that provide energy credits to Californians who installed solar panels.
The bill initially aimed to end net energy metering for homeowners after 10 years instead of the original 20, but was amended to remove that controversial proposal that led to protests by rooftop solar owners outside of Calderon's office.
'I've gotten more opposition to this bill than to any other by eight to tenfold,' Assemblywoman Pilar Schiavo, D-Santa Clarita, who voted no, told the Los Angeles Times.
Here's what to know about Assembly Bill 942 and potential California rooftop solar billing changes.
More than 2 million homeowners and businesses in California have rooftop solar panels, according to the California Solar and Storage Association .
Rooftop solar was estimated to save all California homeowners $1.5 billion in bills in 2024 alone, according to CALSSA.
However, the Public Advocates Office of California estimates the NEM program costs customers without solar an estimated $8.5 billion by the end of 2024.
Utilities have fixed costs — wildfire safety measures, grid infrastructure, and maintenance —that must be paid regardless of how much electricity is consumed, the Public Advocates Office reported. If rooftop solar customers pay less, these fixed costs must be recovered from all other customers, dramatically increasing rates for non-rooftop solar customers.
"As the cost shift grows, it leads to higher retail electricity rates for all customers, which disproportionatelyaffects non-solar customers who are not benefiting from the financial incentives of solar programs," the Public Advocates Office reported in a fact sheet released with the study.
CALSSA, though, pushed back on that research with another study that found electricity rates have increased because of unnecessary spending on grid infrastructure.
"Rooftop solar keeps demand on the electricity grid from growing, which reduces the need to build grid expansions and saves everyone money," CALSSA said in a press release announcing the study.
If Assembly Bill 942 passes in California, homeowners with solar panels could see their monthly electricity bills increase by about $63 or $750 a year, the Center of Community Energy reported.
And requiring homes with rooftop solar sold or transferred to end net energy metering plans would hurt property values and break promises with millions of solar users, Brad Heavner, executive director of CALSSA said.
'Messing with home values and the transferability of property has long been considered a dangerous 'third rail' for California politicians, and this interference is no different,' Heavner told PV Magazine.
When NEM pricing ends, your utility will switch your account to a new solar billing plan, which will likely have different rate structures and won't have the same level of credit for surplus energy produced by your panels.
A workaround for the potential loss of NEM pricing is to install a solar battery at your home, energy consumer advocate website EnergySage.com reported.
Solar batteries store surplus energy at your house so you can use power generated by solar panels later instead of sending excess energy to your utility company, EnergySage reported.
Solar batteries cost about $9,000 to install after tax credits, EnergySage estimated.
Assembly Bill 942 is now scheduled for hearings in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. If passed by that committee, it will face a full review by the entire chamber.
This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Assembly Bill 942 would change some of the benefits of rooftop solar
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering

D-Wave Quantum recently experienced a notable exit from numerous Russell indexes, amid its successful $400 million equity offering. While index removals can reflect shifts in a stock's perceived value or stability, the substantial capital infusion might support its future endeavors. During the last quarter, despite these index exits, D-Wave Quantum saw a significant share price increase of 203%, outperforming a flat broader market alongside its ongoing developments such as the launch of the Advantage2 system and a strategic collaboration with South Korean institutions. These factors likely contributed positively to investor sentiment and price movements. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for D-Wave Quantum (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. Over the past year, D-Wave Quantum's shares have experienced a very large increase of 1751.96%, highlighting substantial long-term shareholder returns. In comparison to the US Software industry and the broader US market, which returned 26.3% and 14.8% respectively over the past year, D-Wave's performance has been exceptional. The considerable capital infusion from the $400 million equity offering mentioned in the introduction might aid in supporting D-Wave's revenue growth, which is forecasted to increase by 35% annually. However, despite recent share price surges and a closing price of $18.89, the current share price exceeds the consensus analyst price target of $16.57, indicating a potential overvaluation relative to market expectations. This price movement, juxtaposed with the company's ongoing unprofitability, raises questions about earnings forecasts in the near term. Learn about D-Wave Quantum's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include QBTS. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Achieves Successful US$400 Million Equity Offering

D-Wave Quantum recently experienced a notable exit from numerous Russell indexes, amid its successful $400 million equity offering. While index removals can reflect shifts in a stock's perceived value or stability, the substantial capital infusion might support its future endeavors. During the last quarter, despite these index exits, D-Wave Quantum saw a significant share price increase of 203%, outperforming a flat broader market alongside its ongoing developments such as the launch of the Advantage2 system and a strategic collaboration with South Korean institutions. These factors likely contributed positively to investor sentiment and price movements. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for D-Wave Quantum (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. Over the past year, D-Wave Quantum's shares have experienced a very large increase of 1751.96%, highlighting substantial long-term shareholder returns. In comparison to the US Software industry and the broader US market, which returned 26.3% and 14.8% respectively over the past year, D-Wave's performance has been exceptional. The considerable capital infusion from the $400 million equity offering mentioned in the introduction might aid in supporting D-Wave's revenue growth, which is forecasted to increase by 35% annually. However, despite recent share price surges and a closing price of $18.89, the current share price exceeds the consensus analyst price target of $16.57, indicating a potential overvaluation relative to market expectations. This price movement, juxtaposed with the company's ongoing unprofitability, raises questions about earnings forecasts in the near term. Learn about D-Wave Quantum's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include QBTS. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@

Is California one of the worst places to retire? What's missing in a new ranking
Is California one of the worst places to retire? What's missing in a new ranking

San Francisco Chronicle​

time18 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Is California one of the worst places to retire? What's missing in a new ranking

Is California a good place to retire? That depends on whom you ask. A lot of people have chosen to retire here and are happy with their decision. California, particularly the Bay Area, is undergoing a tectonic reordering of the demographic landscape as the population ages. By 2040, more than 1 in 5 Californians will be 65 or older. Already, there are about as many senior citizens in San Francisco as there are children. Clearly, many people think California is a good place to live out your golden years, especially if you've made the right financial moves. But not everyone agrees. Retirement planning services platform Retirement Living recently published its annual ranking of the best and worst states to retire in the U.S. Wyoming, West Virginia and Florida took the top three spots. California's place on the list: No. 46. The fifth-worst state to retire, in other words. There are many, many factors you could take into consideration in putting together a list like this. No one study could capture everything that's good and bad about living and retiring in California. But here's a look at why California landed so low on this list — and what it misses about the state's advantages. How the study ranked states Jailyn Montero, a media relations specialist for Retirement Living, explained the methodology: Researchers categorized data points in three areas, affordability, economic strength and quality of life. To measure affordability, the study looked at the amount of savings needed to retire and the state's income and property tax rates. Economic strength looked at the senior poverty rate and the percent of seniors still working past age 65. Quality of life was heavily weighted in how states were ranked, accounting for 60% of a state's overall score, and took into account things like wellbeing index, weather, property and violent crime, and health care facilities per capita. California ranked 47th in affordability, 40th in economic strength, and 21st in quality of life. The factors that brought down California's ranking the most had to do with the cost of living, Montero said, including state taxes, the percent of seniors living in poverty (12%) and the percent of seniors working past what's traditionally considered retirement age. California actually moved up in Retirement Living's rankings from the 2024 results. This year, researchers removed opinion-driven survey data from their results. People's perceptions about what it's like to live in other states — especially a place that looms as large in the popular and political imagination as California — do not always reflect reality. And it's highly unlikely most seniors surveyed would have lived in enough states to make an informed assessment. When that opinion data was factored in for the 2024 list, California ranked dead last. What the study misses about California Taxes are a critical part of what makes a retirement destination affordable, and the Retirement Living study oversimplifies and likely overestimates how much people — particularly older adults — get taxed here. The study simply compares the top marginal tax rate for each state. Some states, including Wyoming, Texas and Florida, don't tax income at all. Fourteen states, including Arizona, Idaho, North Carolina and Georgia, use a flat tax rate, ranging from 2.5% to 5.8%. But in California, we have a graduated income tax, so the more money you make, the higher tax rate you pay, with the top rate at 12.3%. Taxpayers earning more than $1 million get another 1% tacked on. The study uses that top rate of 13.3%, but realistically, most seniors probably land in the 6% to 9% state income tax rate, Montero said. California is also one of the states that doesn't tax Social Security, and whether or not those benefits are taxed wasn't factored into the state rankings, Montero said. If you rely exclusively on Social Security benefits in retirement, which millions of seniors do, you'd pay no state income taxes in California. Plus, as every California homeowner knows, your property taxes are strongly impacted by Proposition 13, the 1978 law that limits how much they can increase each year. If you've owned your home long enough to have paid off the mortgage, you are probably paying a fraction of the property taxes that your new next-door neighbor is paying. Montero said Prop 13's property tax limitations were also not factored into their assessment. So, if you're moving to California for the first time and planning to buy property, and you're still earning more than a million dollars a year in income, then you could get hit with a mighty tax bill. But if you're already living here and have owned your home for some time, you may be getting a better deal than you would be if you pulled up stakes to move to somewhere like Wyoming, West Virginia or Florida. Again, no study can take every possible facet of retirement into account. But another key one that's missing: Montero said her team included a category for golf courses per 1,000 senior residents. But pickleball court availability? Nowhere to be found. Here's the overall ranking of all 50 states: Wyoming West Virginia Florida Montana Delaware Maine Pennsylvania Mississippi Idaho Kentucky Missouri North Dakota Michigan South Dakota Indiana Iowa Arkansas Alabama Ohio Wisconsin Georgia Alaska South Carolina Minnesota Tennessee Oregon Louisiana Kansas Nebraska New Hampshire North Carolina Nevada Utah New Mexico Washington Colorado Oklahoma Illinois Arizona Rhode Island Virginia Vermont Texas Connecticut Maryland California New Jersey Massachusetts New York Hawaii

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store