King Charles to travel to Canada, deliver throne speech
"This historic honour matches the weight of our times," Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Friday as he announced the news. He added that Queen Camilla would join the visit.
Gov. Gen. Mary Simon issued a statement confirming the royal visit on May 26 and 27.
"Whit and I will be delighted to welcome Their Majesties King Charles III and Queen Camilla to Canada. Our Canadian identity is deeply rooted in our constitution and this visit highlights the enduring relationship between Canada and the Crown," she said.
"Now more than ever, we need to come together to ensure a future that builds on our shared global values of democracy, equality and peace."
Every new session of Parliament is opened by a throne speech, a document that lays out the government's expected direction and goals, and how it plans to achieve them.
When Charles and Carney met at Buckingham Palace before the election, the prime minister asked the King about the possibility of him coming to Canada to deliver the throne speech to open the next Parliament, CBC News has learned.
WATCH | King Charles and Prime Minister Mark Carney meet:
That Charles would come to Canada to deliver the speech from the throne "sends a clear message regarding his dedication to the role of King of Canada," Toronto-based royal author and historian Carolyn Harris said via email.
Much attention has focused in recent weeks on Charles's role as head of state of Canada, particularly in the face of repeated taunts from U.S. President Donald Trump about it becoming the 51st state.
Those who watch Charles closely saw an increase in signals and royal symbolism in support of Canada as it faced that repeated rhetoric, which resurfaced recently after a relatively quiet spell.
Charles also referenced his role as "King of Canada" during an address recently to the Italian parliament, a rare statement — particularly coming as it did in an international, non-Commonwealth setting.
The opening of Canada's new Parliament provides an "ideal opportunity" for a visit from Charles, who has not yet come to the country as monarch, said Harris.
"President Trump's comments about Canada becoming the 51st state, however, have increased the political significance of King Charles undertaking official engagements as King of Canada."
The King delivering the throne speech in Ottawa also follows historical precedent, she said.
"Queen Elizabeth II opened Parliament during her first visit to Canada as a reigning monarch in 1957."
WATCH | Queen Elizabeth reads the speech from the throne on Oct. 14, 1957:
The last time the speech was actually read by Canada's head of state was when Queen Elizabeth delivered it in 1977.
Simon's statement said the royal visit's detailed itinerary will be published at a later date by the Department of Canadian Heritage.
At two days, it will be a short visit, but that, too, has precedent.
"Queen Elizabeth II's 1957 visit to Canada to open Parliament was also quite short," said Harris.
Other factors and logistics likely played into the timing, she added.
"The specific dates of the visit will have been organized quite quickly after the election, and royal schedules are set long in advance," said Harris.
"There may be a longer Canadian royal tour scheduled in the future when there is more time for planning and preparation. King Charles III's cancer treatment also limits opportunities for extensive royal tours, as demonstrated by his visit to Australia and Samoa, which did not include New Zealand."
The visit will be the King's 20th visit to Canada, and the Queen's fifth. Their last visit was in May 2022, when Charles was still the Prince of Wales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
The Trump Administration Is Violating the First Rule of Disasters
In the days since the Texas flash-flood disaster, the Department of Homeland Security has had a stock response to questions about delays in the federal government's response, or about a recent rule requiring DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to personally approve FEMA expenditures over $100,000, including rescue teams. The response goes, over and over, like this: 'FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens … The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades.' The Trump administration has been using this line for more than a month now, in response to criticism of its plans to remake, or perhaps disband, FEMA. And many people who study emergency response agree that, to some degree, the agency needs reform. Yet now the administration's press to quickly strip down the agency is being tested against a devastating disaster for the first time. And it is violating a basic precept of emergency management: Be prepared. In any disaster, responding quickly can help save people and salve the harm. Protocols should be well known and well practiced before an event. An active disaster that killed more than 130 people, with more than 160 still missing, is not the occasion to switch up the norms. 'This is exactly what many of us are concerned about,' Andrew Rumbach, a senior fellow at the nonprofit Urban Institute, told me. However much FEMA might benefit from change, remaking it in an ad hoc fashion will just result in more devastation, he said: 'In the context of a really complicated emergency where lots of people's lives are at stake—that's just not where you want to see experimentation happening.' And FEMA's response to the Texas flash-flood disaster has not been business as usual. Noem didn't authorize FEMA's deployment of urban-search-and-rescue teams—deployed in the past within hours during similar events—until more than 72 hours after the flooding had begun, per CNN reporting. The agency failed to answer thousands of calls from flood survivors after allowing contracts for call-center workers to lapse one day after the disaster, according to The New York Times. FEMA had fewer than 100 people on the ground in Texas within four days of the disaster, and 311 by day five; within a week of Hurricane Helene, during what Donald Trump deemed a failed response to the flooding, FEMA deployed 1,500. The situation on the ground in these immediate post-event moments can create a fog-of-war atmosphere, and no complete assessment of the federal government's reaction will be possible until later. 'Like with any really catastrophic event, it's hard to understand what's happening at a micro level,' Rumbach said. Several non-FEMA rescue teams from other states and Mexico traveled to Texas to help, supplementing Texas's own robust emergency-response apparatus. But each of the other state teams waited on FEMA to call them up, as is protocol; FEMA didn't begin to activate any of them until last Monday, according to CNN. No missing person has been found alive since last Friday. 'It's clear that the initial response was much smaller and more measured than you would expect from FEMA,' Rumbach said. 'It's different from what you would expect a year ago, in terms of the number of personnel and the speed of response.' And FEMA is simply operating with fewer resources: About a quarter of the agency's staff has left since Trump took office in January, according to the Times. Due to vacancies, there is currently no FEMA regional administrator in any state along the Gulf Coast, just deputies. Right now, rather than 'lean' and 'deployable,' it might be more appropriate to describe FEMA as 'starved and hobbled.' But ostensibly, a FEMA-review council assembled by the Trump administration is meant to offer a plan to overhaul the agency. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who praised the Trump administration's response to the flooding as 'swift and very robust,' sits on that council. At a gathering of the council on the Wednesday after the floods (at which Abbott was absent), Noem reiterated her desire to see FEMA 'eliminated as it existed' and 'remade.' The council's recommendations are due in November. The administration does seem to understand that its plans to rapidly remake FEMA have real drawbacks. Noem has retained FEMA employees who looked like they'd be let go; Trump said last month that he intends to phase out FEMA only after this hurricane season. But reporting in recent days suggests that the administration is softening its tone on FEMA even further, at least for the moment. The Washington Post
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
World shares are mostly higher although worries continue over Trump's tariffs
TOKYO (AP) — Shares were mostly higher in Europe on Monday following gains in Asian markets despite lingering worries about President Donald Trump's latest updates to his tariffs. Shares in tech giant Nvidia jumped 5.2% in pre-market trading after its CEO said the Trump administration will let it sell to China its advanced H20 chips used to develop artificial technology. Germany's DAX gained 0.3% to 24,222.95 and the CAC 40 in Paris was up less than 0.1% at 7,812.14. Britain's FTSE 100 was nearly unchanged at 8,996.90. The future for the S&P 500 gained 0.4% while that for the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.1%. In Asian trading, Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 rose 0.6% to finish at 39,678.02. A nationwide election for the upper house of Japan's Parliament, set for Sunday, also added to the wait-and-see attitude among market players. Analysts say the ruling pro-business Liberal Democratic Party may face an uphill battle and will likely need coalition partners, including possibly new ones, to keep its grip on power. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 added 0.7% to 8,630.30. South Korea's Kospi edged up 0.4% to 3,215.28. Hong Kong's Hang Seng rose 1.6% to 24,590.12, while the Shanghai Composite dipped 0.4% to 3,505.00, after the government reported that China's economy slowed in the last quarter as Trump's trade war escalated. Tuesday's data showed the economy expanded at a robust 5.2% annual pace, compared with 5.4% annual growth in January-March. In quarterly terms, the world's second-largest economy expanded by 1.1%, according to government data. Despite worries about the damage Trump's tariffs may have on the region's exporters, speculation continues that he may ultimately back down on them. They don't take effect until Aug. 1, which leaves time for more negotiations. On Wall Street Monday, the S&P 500 edged up by 0.1%, the Dow added 0.2% and the Nasdaq composite rose 0.3%. If Trump were to enact all his proposed tariffs on Aug. 1, they would raise the risk of a recession. That would not only hurt American consumers but also raise the pressure on the U.S. government's debt level relative to the economy's size, particularly after Washington approved big tax cuts that will add to the deficit. For the time being, the uncertainty around tariffs could help keep markets unsteady. This upcoming week has several potential flashpoints that could shake things up. The latest reading on inflation across the U.S. comes Tuesday, with economists expecting it to show inflation accelerated to 2.6% last month from 2.4% in May. Companies are also lining up to report how they performed during the spring. JPMorgan Chase and several other huge banks will report their latest quarterly results Tuesday, followed by Johnson & Johnson on Wednesday and PepsiCo on Thursday. Fastenal, a distributor of industrial and construction supplies, reported Monday a stronger profit for the latest quarter than analysts expected. Its stock rose 2.9%, though it also said that market conditions remain sluggish. Shares of Kenvue rose 2.3% in shaky trading after the former division of Johnson & Johnson said CEO Thibaut Mongon is stepping down. Kenvue, the maker of Listerine and Band-Aid brands, is in the midst of a strategic review of its options, 'including ways to simplify the company's portfolio and how it operates,' according to board chair Larry Merlo. Some of the biggest moves in financial markets were for crypto, where bitcoin continues to set records. This upcoming week is Crypto Week in Washington, where Congress will consider several bills to 'make America the crypto capital of the world.'
2 hours ago
Equatorial Guinea urges UN to block the sale of a Paris mansion seized by France
THE HAGUE, Netherlands -- Lawyers for Equatorial Guinea accused France of 'neo-colonial' behavior on Tuesday, urging United Nations judges to block the sale of a mansion on one of Paris' poshest avenues in the latest instalment in a long-running legal tug-of-war over the multimillion-dollar property. The African country filed a case at the International Court of Justice in 2022, alleging France is violating international law by refusing to return assets seized during a corruption investigation into Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, the son of Equatorial Guinea's long-serving president. France's approach 'may be described as paternalistic and even neo-colonial. We cannot accept such disdain for our sovereignty from France," Carmelo Nvono-Ncá, Equatorial Guinea's agent, told The Hague-based court. Equatorial Guinea has asked the court for a series of urgent orders, known as provisional measures, to return the swanky mansion on one of Paris's most prestigious streets, Avenue Foch, and to prevent France from selling the building. Obiang was convicted in 2017, and given a three-year suspended sentence for embezzling millions of dollars in public money. French authorities seized money, luxury vehicles and the building, which boasts a hammam, a cinema and a night club. The 57-year-old has faced scrutiny for corruption in other countries as well. In 2021, he was sanctioned by the United Kingdom for misappropriating public funds, including spending $275,000 on the bejeweled glove that Michael Jackson wore on his 'Bad' tour. Switzerland and Brazil have also opened investigations into his finances. In 2020, the International Court of Justice ruled that the building was a private residence, not a diplomatic outpost, rejecting a claim from Equatorial Guinea that the seizure violated international law. Equatorial Guinea returned to The Hague in 2022, arguing the French government was obliged to return the assets based on a U.N. anti-corruption convention. Despite its oil and gas riches, Equatorial Guinea has a dramatic gap between its privileged ruling class and much of the impoverished population. The former Spanish colony is run by Africa's longest-serving president, Obiang's father Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo.
