
Solid-State Batteries Still Face Hurdles But The Prize Is Huge For EVs
Solid-state batteries have been hailed as a game-changer for electric vehicles — always five years away, but never quite arriving.
Solid-state champions say the technology, if perfected, would slash EV prices and weight, and maybe double range. Government subsidies wouldn't be required to sell them. Buyers would be infatuated.
The trouble is the technology remains on the drawing board. Some experts say a breakthrough is imminent. Others point to problems said to be intractable.
Because the prize is so tempting – an EV that can match and beat internal combustion engine's all-around utility - the world's leading automakers and the Chinese state are investing massively. These next-generation batteries seek to use solid electrodes and a solid electrolyte, replacing the liquid or gel electrolytes found in conventional lithium-ion batteries.
The consensus opinion is that success is one last heave away. You can exclude Donald Sadoway, Professor of Materials Chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, from the consensus. Sadoway, in an interview, said not only is the technology incomplete, the ability to produce at scale remains elusive.
The current lithium-ion battery technology, which has moved on from nickel-based chemistry to lithium-iron phosphate (LFP), will have to suffice for a while yet, he says. LFP batteries are cheaper with lower energy density providing less but acceptable range than nickel-based batteries. Nickel batteries will still be needed for more expensive cars which require longer range.
Cambridge, England-based technology consultants IDTechEX's vice president for research Dr James Edmondson thinks progress is being made and points out solid-state batteries are not a single technology but encompass various strategies with the ultimate goal of removing the liquid electrolyte and replacing it with a solid one. Some solid-state batteries that already exist have small liquid components.
Late in the decade
Edmondson expects to see prototypes of truly solid-state batteries between now and 2028 with premium vehicles the first adopters late in the decade.
'In terms of seeing them in larger production volume vehicles we wouldn't expect that until the 2030s. Even by 2035, we are predicting just over 100GWH of capacity for solid-state batteries, compared with our prediction for the overall EV car market at around 3,800GWH in the same year,' he said in an email exchange.
solid-state batteries have the potential to revolutionize the battery industry by offering improved ... More performance, safety and longevity; 3d rendering.
Will they live up to the promise of half the price, half the weight and twice the power?
'Solid state batteries will inherently start at a high cost due to their much less scaled manufacturing. Average cell cost for typical (lithium-ion) was around 80$/kWh in 2024, and we wouldn't expect solid state to match this until the late 2020s. Half the price would be a long way off, and maybe not possible, especially as lithium-ion is still decreasing, you eventually run into a base bill of material costs,' Edmondson said.
'Energy density for solid state certainly has the potential to be higher than the typical Li-ion. We would expect solid state cells to be able to achieve about 900Wh/L whereas the average high nickel NMC is around 400Wh/L,' he said.
Packaging the cells is complicated.
'Overall, solid state should still be able to achieve a significantly higher energy density, but it won't be as straightforward as having cells that contain twice as much energy means a pack with twice as much energy,' Edmondson said.
This is premature though, according to MIT's Sadoway, saying fundamental technical barriers remain.
'Solid-state technology is still in the research and development stage and I don't see anything in the market coming close to the finished product,' Sadoway said.
Fundamental physical barriers
Eliminating the liquid element is proving to be an elusive problem.
'We don't see anything coming into the market-place because of fundamental physical barriers, not any time soon. That's my assumption. I'm prepared to be surprised but I don't see how you can have all the key elements as solid. It really looks too difficult at the moment to overcome these barriers and if you do, there's the ability to manufacture. So there's a scientific problem and a manufacturing (at scale) problem,' Sadoway said.
Sadoway has for years pointed out basic problems developing solid-state technology haven't been solved. Sadoway has been working on an aluminum-sulfur battery, which he has said would be cheaper at scale and safer than lithium-ion because it was incapable of burning. The project has stalled for lack of funds.
Dr Timothy Gotsick, VP of Technology & Innovation at MacDermid Enthone Industrial Solutions, said today's batteries are already highly effective and efficient.
'It's easy to imagine even greater energy storage. By replacing lithium ions and liquid electrolytes, which are like using a basket-ball sized sponge to hold a cup of water, with lithium metal, you could pack the same energy into something the size of a tennis ball. The theoretical ratio of energy density between a graphite node and lithium metal is a little over 10. That is the basic principle behind a solid-state battery,' Gotsick said.
Propel EV beyond ICE cars
'The implications are enormous if this technology can be realized. EVs are already capturing significant market share. With maximum energy density, enhanced safety, and faster charging, nearly all objections to EV adoption would be eliminated. In fact, such advancements could propel electric vehicles beyond the capabilities of today's ICE cars,' Gotsick said.
Solid-state battery technology, the next frontier in energy storage, mind map infographics sketch.
'Of course if it were easy, it would already be done. But with stakes this high, many are racing to make it happen,' he said.
Gotsick pointed to the leading invetors in solid-state research –
Gotsick thinks the emergence of solid-state batteries can be measured in years, not decades.
'The change, when it comes, may look sudden. Due to the modular nature of EVs, it will probably be very easy to swap a smaller battery and its control systems into automotive designs. As a result, as soon as solid-state batteries are viable, they will see rapid adoption,' he said.
IDTechEx's Edmondson believes solid-state promise a lot but still have hurdles to jump.
Li-ion will maintain market majority
'We would expect production cars with solid-state batteries to be on the roads before the 2030s, but not in much larger production vehicles until the 2030s and even then, traditional Li-ion will still likely maintain the majority of the market share,' Edmondson said.
In Europe, politicians have decreed that no new ICE vehicles will be sold after 2035. Forecasts show that is very unlikely with current technology. Rapid introduction of solid-state would transform EV sales.
In the U.S., the Trump Administration dropped the plan to force at least half of U.S. new sedan and SUV sales by 2030 to be EVs. That's just as well because MIT's Sadoway says by 2035 in the U.S., ICE, hybrid and EV sales will be roughly the equivalent of today, but another problem will be demanding attention – the electric grid.
'Yes, in 2035 the U.S. the automobile market will be roughly the same as today, but by then the massive demand for electricity from computers, AI and EVs will combine to demand more electricity than the grid can supply,' Sadoway said.
Rapid solid-state rollout clearly won't solve all the problems for EVs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spear AI raises first round of funding to apply AI to submarine data
By Stephen Nellis SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A startup founded by U.S. Navy veterans aiming to help the U.S. military use artificial intelligence to decipher data gathered by submarines has raised its first round of outside capital. Washington-based Spear AI specializes in working with what is known as passive acoustic data, which is gathered by listening devices underwater. Its long-term aim is to use AI to help submarine operators understand whether an object heard could be a rain squall, a whale, or a vessel that could be a threat, and to detect where it is and how fast it is moving. The challenge is that most existing AI tools are trained on data such as words or images that have been painstakingly labeled and organized over years or decades by companies such as Scale AI, which recently signed a $14.8-billion deal with Meta Platforms. Data from acoustic sensors is different. Spear AI co-founders Michael Hunter, a former U.S. Navy SEAL analyst, and John McGunnigle, a former nuclear submarine commander for the U.S. Navy, are building a hardware and software platform that aims to prepare that data for AI algorithms. The company sells sensors that can be attached to buoys or vessels and a software tool to help label and sort the data gathered by the sensors to make it ready to be put into AI systems. The U.S. Navy this month awarded Spear AI a $6-million contract for its data-labeling tool. Spear AI, founded in 2021, has been self-funded and has about 40 employees. Hunter, the CEO, said it raised $2.3 million from AI-focused venture firm Cortical Ventures and private equity firm Scare the Bear. The funding will be used to double the company's headcount to support its government contracts and commercial business prospects, such as monitoring underwater pipelines and cables. Hunter said Spear AI also aims to sell consulting services, a model similar to defense tech firm Palantir. "We wanted to build the product and actually get it out the door before the contract came in to get it," Hunter told Reuters. "The only way you can do that is with private capital." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia AI Chip Repairs Soar In China
Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) chips keep China's repair shops busy despite U.S. export bans. Reuters reports that about a dozen boutique firms in Shenzhen have quietly built businesses fixing advanced Nvidia AI chipsH100s, A100s and morethat shouldn't even be in the country. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. One repair shop spun off a new unit late last year and now handles up to 500 GPUs a month, underscoring really significant repair demand, says a co?owner who's been tuning Nvidia gaming cards for 15 years. Meanwhile the Financial Times notes that nearly $1 billion of Nvidia AI chips still flowed into China in the three months after tighter U.S. export curbs, highlighting gaps in enforcement and the lengths firms will go to fuel AI projects. Analysts say these repair services not only keep existing hardware alive but also chip away at the impact of export restrictions meant to slow China's AI push. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minimize Your Apple Stock Risk Before Earnings on July 31 with This 1 Options Strategy
Apple (AAPL) is certainly a familiar name for investors. But it has been acting strangely this year, especially for a stock that was the first to cross the $3 trillion market cap level. As we see here, it is still above that perch. However, questions about the firm's ability to continue to deserve its lofty multiple, currently around 30x trailing earnings, and its ability to compete in the artificial intelligence business have dogged AAPL this year. The stock is off more than 14% year to date, well behind the broader market. More News from Barchart Low IV Alert: Stocks that Could be Ready to Pop Unusual Volume in Las Vegas Sands Call Options - Investors Bullish on Macao Gambling Alpha From Ashes: 'Big Loser' Comstock Resources (CRK) is Flashing a Statistically Significant Reversal Signal Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! That makes next week's earnings report even more of an 'event' than usual. So if you look at investing first as an exercise in risk management, and not as a sport or a casino game, an option collar might be a way to get exposure to AAPL while reducing the risk associated with a post-earnings decline. Show Me the Chart First! That's what I say to myself, as well as the folks I coach on using collars. Sure, you can technically collar any stock or ETF with a liquid options market. However, 'throwing good money after bad' is not a great habit. So as a 40-year chartist, and one who has seen a ton of manic markets, I only want to move forward if the stock chart indicates to me that there's a fighting chance the stock will go higher. That said, we're seeing again this earnings season that any company can be 'taken out back and shot,' to use a phrase from old Western movies. So with AAPL, I look at the daily chart below with my eyes wide open. I see a stock that is trying to mount a comeback. That 20-day moving average in yellow is trending well. But the PPO below is a bit choppy. And while many technicians wax poetic about this or that indicator, I'm a bit more visual, and less jargony. The weekly chart below is more encouraging, and also less. What? Allow me to explain. This is a market characterized by stocks that have been down on their luck suddenly surging in price. That makes traditional technicians happy, because it is positive momentum. However, like a sprinter in a horse race, if the speed can't be maintained long enough, the finish will not be as successful as the start. I see that risk with AAPL's weekly chart here. The 20-week moving average is still in a downtrend, and the PPO just crossed up. That latter aspect of the chart is good, but when that occurs so far below zero, it is less reliable. This all paints a picture for me of a stock that has a chance to move higher, but that an event like the forthcoming earnings report on Thursday, July 31 could easily blow that out of the water. But for those who like AAPL, collaring it can allow you to have your cake and eat it too. Here's one collar combination I zeroed in on. The table below shows four different combos, so you can see a small fraction of the variety of strike prices, expiration dates, break-evens and upside/downside combinations one can explore using Barchart's tools. How to Collar Apple Before Earnings: An Example The combination I'll focus on is the top one above. It goes out 5 months to Dec. 19, the last AAPL expiration date this year. So there's some time. The stock was trading near $214 on Friday morning, and the collar involves buying 100 shares of AAPL, buying a put option with a strike price of $205, and selling a call option struck at $260. This means I can sell AAPL at $205 if it declines below that level between now and Dec. 19. And if it rises to $260, roughly its all-time high reached at the end of last year, I could be forced to sell it. Talk about a high-class problem! That range is not the 'final' range for this collar setup, however. There's the net cost of the options. The puts cost $8.85 a share and the calls bring in $1.83, for the downside protection and for giving up profits, respectively. That nets out to about $7 a share. So if we take that $205 to $260 range and drop both levels by the net cost of $7, viola! We have an 'effective range' for this collar of $253 to $198. Recall that AAPL trades at $214 in this example. That produces upside potential of 18% and downside risk of 7.5%, for about a 2.5-to-1 reward/risk ratio. Option Collars Are Just 1 Way to Manage Risk To me, that ratio is as important a factor in investing as anything, whether you achieve it through an option collar or another strategy. So whether it is collaring popular stocks like AAPL, tactically managing assets, other options strategies, or simply using the strategy of 'position-sizing,' there are more ways than ever to manage risk in these modern markets. Earnings season is a great reminder of that. On the date of publication, Rob Isbitts did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data