
‘Dragon prince' dinosaur discovery is changing how scientists understand T. rex
CNN —
Scientists have identified a previously unknown 86 million-year-old dinosaur species that fills an early gap in the fossil record of tyrannosaurs, revealing how they evolved to become massive apex predators.
Researchers analyzing the species' remains have named it Khankhuuluu mongoliensis, which translates to 'dragon prince of Mongolia,' because it was small compared with its much larger relatives such as Tyrannosaurus rex, whose name means 'the tyrant lizard king.' The newly identified dinosaur was the closest known ancestor of tyrannosaurs and likely served as a transitional species from earlier tyrannosauroid species, according to the findings published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
Based on a reexamination of two partial skeletons uncovered in Mongolia's Gobi Desert in 1972 and 1973, the new study suggests that three big migrations between Asia and North America led tyrannosauroids to diversify and eventually reach a gargantuan size in the late Cretaceous Period before going extinct 66 million years ago.
'This discovery of Khankhuuluu forced us to look at the tyrannosaur family tree in a very different light,' said study coauthor Darla Zelenitsky, associate professor within the department of Earth, energy, and environment at the University of Calgary, in an email. 'Before this, there was a lot of confusion about who was related to who when it came to tyrannosaur species. What started as the discovery of a new species ended up with us rewriting the family history of tyrannosaurs.'
Multiple migrations over millions of years
Tyrannosaurs, known scientifically as Eutyrannosaurians, bring to mind hulking dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus rex and Tarbosaurus, which weighed multiple metric tons and could take down equally large prey.
With short arms and massive heads, they walked on two legs and boasted sharp teeth, Zelenitsky said.
But tyrannosaurs didn't start out that way. They evolved from smaller dinosaurs before dominating the landscapes of North America and Asia between 85 million and 66 million years ago, the researchers said.
While Tarbosaurus, an ancestor of T. rex, clocked in at between 3,000 and 6,000 kilograms (6,613 pounds and 13,227 pounds), the fleet-footed Khankhuuluu mongoliensis likely weighed only around 750 kilograms (1,653 pounds), spanned just 2 meters (6.5 feet) at the hips and 4 meters (13 feet) in length, according to the study authors.
Comparing the two dinosaurs would be like putting a horse next to an elephant —Khankhuuluu would have reached T. rex's thigh in height, Zelenitsky said.
'Khankhuuluu was almost a tyrannosaur, but not quite,' Zelenitsky said. 'The snout bone was hollow rather than solid, and the bones around the eye didn't have all the horns and bumps seen in T. rex or other tyrannosaurs.'
Khankhuuluu mongoliensis, or a closely related ancestor species, likely migrated from Asia to North America across a land bridge between Alaska and Siberia that connected the continents 85 million years ago, Zelenitsky said.
Because of this migrant species, we now know that tyrannosaurs actually evolved first on the North American continent and remained there exclusively over the next several million years, she said. 'As the many tyrannosaur species evolved on the continent, they became larger and larger.'
Due to the poor fossil record, it's unclear what transpired in Asia between 80 million to 85 million years ago, she added. While some Khankhuuluu may have remained in Asia, they were likely replaced later on by larger tyrannosaurs 79 million years ago.
Meanwhile, another tyrannosaur species crossed the land bridge back to Asia 78 million years ago, resulting in the evolution of two related but very different subgroups of tyrannosaurs, Zelenitsky said. One was a gigantic, deep-snouted species, while the other known as Alioramins was slender and small. These smaller dinosaurs have been dubbed 'Pinocchio rexes' for their long, shallow snouts.
Both types of tyrannosaurs were able to live in Asia and not compete with each other because the larger dinosaurs were top predators, while Alioramins were mid-level predators going after smaller prey — think cheetahs or jackals in African ecosystems today, Zelenitsky said.
'Because of their small size, Alioramins were long thought to be primitive tyrannosaurs, but we novelly show Alioramins uniquely evolved smallness as they had 'miniaturized' their bodies within a part of the tyrannosaur family tree that were all otherwise giants,' Zelenitsky said.
One more migration happened as tyrannosaurs continued to evolve, and a gigantic tyrannosaur species crossed back into North America 68 million years ago, resulting in Tyrannosaurus rex, Zelenitsky said.
'The success and diversity of tyrannosaurs is thanks to a few migrations between the two continents, starting with Khankhuuluu,' she said. 'Tyrannosaurs were in the right place at the right time. They were able to take advantage of moving between continents, likely encountering open niche spaces, and quickly evolving to become large, efficient killing machines.'
Revisiting a decades-old find
The new findings support previous research suggesting that Tyrannosaurus rex's direct ancestor originated in Asia and migrated to North America via a land bridge and underscore the importance of Asia in the evolutionary success of the tyrannosaur family, said Cassius Morrison, a doctoral student of paleontology at University College London. Morrison was not involved in the new research.
'The new species provides essential data and information in part of the family tree with few species, helping us to understand the evolutionary transition of tyrannosaurs from small/ medium predators to large apex predators,' Morrison wrote in an email.
The study also shows that the Alioramini group, once considered distant relatives, were very close cousins of T. rex.
What makes the fossils of the new species so crucial is their age — 20 million years older than T. rex, said Steve Brusatte, professor and personal chair of Palaeontology and Evolution at the University of Edinburgh. Brusatte was not involved in the new study.
'There are so few fossils from this time, and that is why these scientists describe it as 'murky,'' Brusatte said. 'It has been a frustrating gap in the record, like if you suspected something really important happened in your family history at a certain time, like a marriage that started a new branch of the family or immigration to a new country, but you had no records to document it. The tyrannosaur family tree was shaped by migration, just like so many of our human families.'
With only fragments of fossils available, it's been difficult to understand the variation of tyrannosaurs as they evolved, said Thomas Carr, associate professor of biology at Carthage College in Wisconsin and director of the Carthage Institute of Paleontology. Carr was not involved in the new research. But the new study sheds light on the dinosaurs' diversity and clarifies which ones existed when — and how they overlapped with one another, he said.
More samples from the fossil record will provide additional clarity, but the new work illustrates the importance of reexamining fossils collected earlier.
'We know so much more about tyrannosaurs now,' Carr said. 'A lot of these historical specimens are definitely worth their weight in gold for a second look.'
When the fossils were collected half a century ago, they were only briefly described at the time, Brusatte said.
'So many of us in the paleontology community knew that these Mongolian fossils were lurking in museum drawers, waiting to be studied properly, and apt to tell their own important part of the tyrannosaur story,' he said. 'It's almost like there was a non-disclosure agreement surrounding these fossils, and it's now expired, and they can come out and tell their story.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
China's new electronic warfare tech disrupts enemy systems while protecting friendly signals
Chinese researchers have reportedly developed a new electronic warfare (EW) system that can simultaneously interfere with enemy systems while keeping friendly ones untouched in a 'null zone'. Likened to the eye of a storm, this new technology represents a significant shift in conventional EW systems. To help conceptualize how it works, think of a storm. Everything inside it is disrupted by intense electromagnetic noise. But the center of a hurricane, colloquially called 'the eye', is completely calm. The new technology intentionally creates the 'eye' for friendly forces, even in the middle of aggressive electronic warfare. The innovation reportedly works on coordinated drones (unmanned aerial vehicles) acting as precise jamming sources. These drones emit carefully crafted radio signals that can be adjusted for waveform, amplitude, phase, and timing (all controllable radio frequency signal parameters). Dual drones act in tandem to create 'the eye' The dual feature of both jamming enemy devices while allowing ally communication involves two drones acting in conjunction. While the first acts as the primary jammer, neutralizing enemy signals through disruptive waves; the second emits a counter signal that nullifies the jamming wave at an location where friendly forces are operating. The signals cancel each other out at the point they intersect, creating 'the eye' or the calm. In signal processing terms, the technology uses beamforming and phase cancellation strategies, typically found in advanced communications but now repurposed for electronic warfare. Older conventional jamming or suppression EW systems tend to be omnidirectional, with the signal effectively broadcast in all directions in a 3D space. Such systems are not picky, and tend to suppress all vulnerable electronic systems within range. These systems tend to be manned to some extent and have a relatively low precision. More advanced systems, like those used on the EA-6B 'Prowler', EA-18G 'Growler', or even Russia's 'Khibiny', use directional jamming techniques that are more focused. Potentially revolutionary but only in simulation stage The new Chinese system, on the other hand, would overcome many of these downsides. During computer simulations, the researchers tested the system under heavy jamming conditions. The jamming signals were 100 times stronger than the target signal (20 dB = 10^2). Despite this, they were able altogether to cancel out the interference at the friendly receiver. "Under the simulation condition of a 20 dB interference-to-signal ratio, electromagnetic interference at the target legitimate user can be reduced to zero," wrote the team led by Yang Jian, a professor at the Beijing Institute of Technology, in a peer-reviewed paper published in the Chinese journal Acta Electronica Sinica. The feat is impressive if the claims are true, as it implies extremely precise spatial control of the electromagnetic environment. For military applications, this would be very useful as it would enable a kind of 'selective jamming', offering a huge tactical edge. It would enable secure operations in contested environments (e.g., GPS-denied zones). Such a system would also make EW less of a blunt instrument and more of a surgical tool. As impressive as all this sounds, it is essential to note that the system is currently simulation only and not proven in real-world tests. It also relies heavily on precise drone coordination and advanced real-time signal control, which is technically difficult to pull off under combat conditions.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Photons pass the famous Bell test but without entanglement, shows latest study
For decades, entanglement has been the hallmark of quantum weirdness, a ghostly connection between particles that Einstein famously called "spooky action at a distance." It is at the heart of quantum computing, encryption, and our deepest understanding of the recently, researchers in China have pulled off something that sounds almost impossible. They passed one of the toughest tests in quantum physics, the Bell test, without using entangled result is shaking up how scientists think about non-locality, a mysterious property that allows particles to affect each other no matter how far apart they are. It has always been thought that entanglement was the key ingredient behind such non-local effects. However, the new study suggests that non-locality might arise even without entanglement. "Our new work may provide a new perspective to people's understanding of non-local correlations," said Xiao-Song Ma, one of the authors of the study and a professor at Nanjing University. How to entangle without entanglement The foundation of this breakthrough lies in a 60-year-old idea. In 1964, physicist John Bell designed a test, now known as the Bell test, to check whether nature follows the rules of quantum mechanics or obeys more traditional, local theories, where distant objects can't instantly influence each strong violations of Bell's inequality so far have relied on entangled particles. That's because entanglement was believed to be the only way to produce the non-local correlations needed to beat Bell's test. However, in this new study, scientists built a setup that seemed to defy this rule. Instead of using entangled particles, they created photons using four special illuminated with lasers, each crystal emitted a pair of photons with measurable properties like polarization (the direction the light wave oscillates) and phase (how its wave wiggles in space and time). The photons then traveled through a carefully designed maze of optical devices, crystals, lenses, and beam splitters before reaching two separate detectors, labeled Alice and Bob. Normally, in a Bell test, Alice and Bob each measure one half of an entangled interesting here is that the experiment was built in a way that explicitly avoided creating entanglement. The researchers even included extra components to block any accidental entanglement between properties like frequency or speed. Yet, when they crunched the numbers using Bell's inequality, the photons seemed to talk to each other in a non-local way, just like entangled ones—but how was this even possible? The answer may lie in a lesser-known quantum property, called indistinguishability by path identity. "We report the violation of the Bell inequality that cannot be described by quantum entanglement in the system but arises from quantum indistinguishability by path identity," the study authors note. Due to this property, it became impossible to tell which photon came from which crystal, and the paths taken by photons overlapped and blended perfectly. The particles became fundamentally indistinct and led to non-local correlations that entanglement usually provides. The significance of indistinguishability The experiment raises exciting but controversial possibilities. If indistinguishability can mimic or even replace entanglement in some cases, it might open up new routes for building quantum devices, especially ones that are simpler to engineer. However, there are also important caveats. Some physicists point out that the team used a method called post-selection, where only certain photon detection events are counted. They argue this might artificially boost the appearance of quantum correlations. Moreover, it is also possible that there might still be entanglement involved, just not between photons, but at the level of the quantum fields that create them. The study authors acknowledge these concerns and are already working on improvements. They aim to eliminate post-selection by increasing the number of photons their crystals can produce. If successful, it could mark a major milestone in quantum foundations. The study is published in the journal Science Advances. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
China takes bold step forward in global race for limitless energy device: 'We have fully mastered the core technologies'
China takes bold step forward in global race for limitless energy device: 'We have fully mastered the core technologies' China is rapidly closing in on an achievement that could transform the way we power homes, cities, and industries forever. The country has entered the final assembly phase of a next-generation fusion reactor called the Burning Plasma Experiment Superconducting Tokamak, which is expected to be operational by 2027, per Popular Mechanics. If it's successful, BEST would mark a major milestone in the race toward achieving fusion energy, a process that mimics the same physics that power the sun. Unlike conventional energy sources, fusion doesn't rely on fossil fuels such as coal and oil. It's more environmentally friendly because it does not produce heat-trapping pollution or long-lived radioactive waste (like fission energy does) and uses abundant fuel sources such as hydrogen. The potential payoff is limitless, low-cost, renewable power. According to state media and the South China Morning Post, BEST is an intermediary step between China's earlier tokamak project and a much larger demonstrator called the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor. "We have fully mastered the core technologies, both scientifically and technically," chief engineer Song Yuntao told the Post. In 2022, the United States made global headlines when researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory achieved net energy output from fusion for the first time. China is now doubling down on its own efforts, building not only BEST but a network of other fusion and hybrid reactors. Fusion energy could someday power entire cities with minimal fuel and near-zero pollution. This would dramatically slash energy costs for residents and businesses while also reducing the amount of heat-trapping gases we generate, which is driving rising global temperatures. That means cleaner air and fewer health issues, such as respiratory and heart diseases, linked to pollution. While skeptics have said that fusion is always "30 years away," the BEST project and its American counterpart, SPARC — built by a startup spun out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are showing real results. With a target date of 2027, BEST may help bring fusion's promise into the real world much sooner than expected. Should the U.S. be investing more in battery production to catch up with China? Absolutely We're investing a good amount We should be investing less I have no idea Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword