Medicare Annual Wellness Appointment: A Guide
It is important to remember that an annual wellness visit (AWV) is not the same as a routine physical exam. Some people may use the terms interchangeably, but they are different types of appointments.
When making this appointment with your healthcare professional, be sure to specify it is for your Medicare AWV so it is billed and covered correctly.
Glossary of common Medicare terms
Out-of-pocket cost: This is the amount you pay for care when Medicare doesn't pay the full cost or offer coverage. It includes premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments.
Premium: This is the monthly amount you pay for Medicare coverage.
Deductible: This is the annual amount you must spend out of pocket before Medicare begins to cover services and treatments.
Coinsurance: This is the percentage of treatment costs you're responsible for paying out of pocket. With Medicare Part B, you typically pay 20%.
Copayment: This is a fixed dollar amount you pay when receiving certain treatments or services. With Medicare, this often applies to prescription medications.
What is a Medicare annual wellness visit?
Medicare adopted AWVs in 2011 to encourage both beneficiaries and clinicians to utilize preventive services.
This AWV is an appointment with your primary care physician (PCP) to create or update your personalized prevention plan. This plan may help prevent certain illnesses or disabilities based on your overall health and risk factors.
These visits are not head-to-toe physicals.
»Learn more: Medicare preventive services
Who is eligible for an annual wellness visit?
Anyone with Medicare is eligible for an AWV. Medicare Part B will cover the visit if:
you have had Part B for longer than 12 months
you have not had an AWV in the past 12 months
You also cannot have an AWV in the same year as your 'Welcome to Medicare' preventive visit.
What does an annual wellness visit cover?
AWVs typically include routine measurements, health advice, a review of your medical history and prescriptions, and more.
First annual wellness visit
Your first AWV will generally involve the following:
completing a health risk assessment (HRA), which helps you and your doctor develop a personalized prevention plan
establishing your medical and family history
establishing a list of your current providers and suppliers, which are any professionals who provide medical and mental health care.
taking routine measurements, such as:
height
weight
blood pressure
body mass index (BMI)
checking for any cognitive (thinking ability) impairments
reviewing your potential risk for depression
reviewing your functional ability and safety
establishing a screening schedule
establishing a list of your current risk factors and conditions
providing personalized health advice and necessary referrals to preventive counseling services or health education programs
completing a social determinants of health (SDOH) risk assessment
reviewing any current opioid prescriptions and screening for substance use disorders
providing advance care planning services if desired
Subsequent visits
Subsequent AWVs will typically involve:
reviewing and updating your HRA and SDOH risk assessment
updating your medical and family history
updating your list of providers and suppliers
taking your routine measurements
checking your cognitive abilities
updating your screen schedule
updating your list of conditions and risk factors
updating any health advice and referrals
giving advance care planning services if desired
»Learn more: Medicare end-of-life planning
What is the cost of an annual wellness visit?
Medicare AWVs are covered at no cost to you as long as your healthcare professional accepts assignment. This means they agree to accept the Medicare-approved amount as payment and not bill you for anything more.
The Medicare Part B deductible does not apply to wellness visits.
However, you may have to pay your deductible or coinsurance for any additional tests, services, or treatments your healthcare professional decides may be necessary based on your wellness visit.
Medicare will also only fully cover your AWV if it has been more than 12 months since your Welcome to Medicare visit. Your AWVs must also be spread out so that you do not have more than one in a 12-month period.
A note on Medicare Advantage
Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans are required to offer AWVs without charging a deductible, copayment, or coinsurance as long as you see an in-network provider and you meet all other eligibility requirements for the service.
Routine physical exams generally entail:
an updated health history
checking vital signs, such as blood pressure and heart rate
a visual exam where the doctor examines your appearance for signs of potential conditions
checking your eyes, nose, and throat
checking your skin and nails
testing your motor function and reflexes
laboratory tests, such as blood panels and urine tests
While a routine physical exam may be similar to a wellness visit, it is a separate appointment. Medicare doesn't cover routine physical exams.
The only time Medicare covers exams like this is if they are in relation to a specific diagnosis or treatment of an illness, injury, or symptom. Otherwise, you are responsible for 100% of the cost.
Annual wellness visit vs. Welcome to Medicare visit
A Welcome to Medicare visit is similar to an AWV. This appointment entails many of the same aspects.
However, this is an initial preventive visit within the first 12 months of being covered by Medicare Part B.
For your Welcome to Medicare visit, you need to bring the following with you:
family health history
medical records, including immunization records
a list of any prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, vitamins, and supplements you are currently taking
»Learn more: Welcome to Medicare visit
The information on this website may assist you in making personal decisions about insurance, but it is not intended to provide advice regarding the purchase or use of any insurance or insurance products. Healthline Media does not transact the business of insurance in any manner and is not licensed as an insurance company or producer in any U.S. jurisdiction. Healthline Media does not recommend or endorse any third parties that may transact the business of insurance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
27 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Women are being erased from medical research—again
When we started Equal Research Day on June 10, 2022—the anniversary of women finally being included in U.S. clinical research in 1993—we intended it to be a celebration of progress and a call for more inclusive science. We wanted to mark how far we'd come and how much opportunity still lay ahead. We never imagined that just three years later, we'd be fighting to keep that progress from being undone. The Trump administration's ongoing federal actions targeting women, diversity, and equity—such as budget cuts affecting critical research funding, and the sporadic erasure of critical data and education—have already caused massive damage and hindered progress for health parity in only five short months. We're just beginning to wrap our minds around the lost progress and bleak future that we're facing if there is no change of course. And we don't have time, let alone four years, to wait on continuing health parity work—for women and for all marginalized groups harmed by the administration's actions. If it feels like we are going back in time, it's because we are. As founders building the future of women's health, we can't stay quiet. We are witnessing the erasure of women —again. Medicine's long history of leaving women behind While women weren't required to be included in clinical research until 1993, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) didn't required researchers to account for sex as a biological variable until 2016. While some progress has been made, even in 2024 we were far from closing the research gap—particularly for marginalized and underrepresented groups. Because women have been left out of research for so long, many of the drugs, diagnostics, and standards of care we rely on today were never tested on women's bodies. As a result, women are diagnosed, on average, four years later than men across hundreds of diseases. Women are more likely to die in surgery if their surgeon is a man, and women are twice as likely to die after a heart attack, compared to men. We're more likely to be misdiagnosed, to experience severe medication side effects, and to be told our symptoms are 'all in our heads.' Behind already, we're taking massive steps backwards in closing the gender health gap and reaching health equity. In 2025, history is repeating itself This year alone, the NIH slashed $2.6 billion in contracts, plus an additional $9.5 billion for research grants, a devastating blow to women's health research. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI)—a decades-long study of 160,000 women, critical for better understanding chronic disease, hormone therapy, and more— was abruptly defunded in April (an apparent reversal to the cut was later confirmed in May), leaving the WHI in limbo for weeks. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) fired 18% of its staff, including entire teams dedicated to maternal health, contraceptive guidance, and drug-resistant sexually transmitted infection (STI) tracking. And the National Science Foundation (NSF) canceled over 1,400 grants, especially those tied to gender, equity, or health disparities. Federal agencies were given directives to reject funding for any research grants that include 'banned words' such as 'women, trans, or diversity,' at the NIH, and for the NSF, an even longer list, including: -'Female' and 'women,' but not male or men -'Male dominated' -'Gender' -'Equity' -'Diversity' -'Minority' -'Underrepresented' -'Antiracist' -'Diversity' -'Trauma' -'Biases' -'Disability' -'Inclusion' -'Victims' -'Racially' This is targeted, strategic, and deeply dangerous for not only women, but for all underserved and under-researched groups that need the funding and research the most. Data and education are disappearing, too As if defunding wasn't enough, the federal government scrubbed over 8,000 public health web pages. These included critical health guidance on contraception, LGBTQ+ health, STIs, and maternal outcomes. Some of the pages were hastily scrubbed and restored while missing key facts, essentially erasing certain groups. The CDC removed or changed key datasets and web pages on the LGBTQ+ community and other underrepresented, marginalized groups. The CDC also pulled fact sheets on HIV prevention, HIV diagnosis, and transmission, and then republished some of the information, leaving out transgender people. The FDA also took down an entire website dedicated to minority health and health equity. This kind of censorship isn't just alarming—it's life-threatening. If we can't see the data, we can't measure the problem. And if we can't measure the problem, we can't fix it. This is more than a research crisis. It's a public health emergency, and it will hit the most vulnerable communities the hardest. The U.S. has the highest maternal mortality rate of any wealthy nation. Erasing programs like PRAMS –which monitors postpartum complications, means entire states are now totally unequipped to track what happens to postpartum women. Shuttering research labs and programs on STIs, HIV, and sexual health will hinder progress for women's sexual health and disease prevention, particularly for women and LGBTQ communities. Finally, widespread government directives to cut research funding for anyone who focuses on gender threaten to undo all the progress we've made since 1993, and this in turn, hinders what we can change moving forward. We know that when women are under-researched, we pay the highest price. Women already spend 25% more of their lives in worse health than men. And, 64% of common medical interventions are less effective or less accessible for women, compared to only 10% for men. For every woman diagnosed with a women's health issue, approximately four are not diagnosed. (There are 97 similar statistics published in our book, 100 Effed Facts About The Gender Health Gap.) This will only get worse with the current federal actions. What can be done While some companies and researchers are stepping in to fill the void, in reality, no private innovation can replace the scale, accountability, and public good of federally funded research. As founders of a women's health company, we believe more than anyone about the power of private, high-growth solutions for the world's most pressing problems. We are doing our part at Evvy. But even we don't see the path through without government investment. Alone, we simply can't approach the scope and magnitude of what the government to help the more than 50% of the population who deserve better. Startups can pilot new tools, but they can't collect longitudinal data on maternal mortality across all 50 states. Academic labs can push science forward, but they can't maintain national health surveillance systems. The erosion of public health infrastructure means we're losing the connective tissue that links discovery to care. And without it, even the best innovations risk being isolated solutions in a broken system. This isn't just about research; it's about rights. It's about refusing to let an entire half of the population be sidelined under the excuse of cost cutting. We need to fund the science that sees us, protect the data that tells our stories, and build a healthcare system where women's bodies are studied, understood, and prioritized. We can fight for funding, for research, for truth. And, most importantly, we can fight to make sure women are never again an afterthought in the story of medicine. To help, join the Equal Research Day campaign to demand equal research funding for women, or donate to nonprofits funding critical research like Women's Health Access Matters and the Foundation for Women's Health. Priyanka Jain is CEO and cofounder of Evvy.
CBS News
28 minutes ago
- CBS News
Deion Sanders' "cancer-free" announcement draws relief, gratitude across the sports world
Deion "Coach Prime" Sanders, head coach of the Colorado Buffaloes football team, announced for the first time publicly on Monday that he had been diagnosed with bladder cancer and that he is now considered "cancer-free." Sanders and his medical team spoke at a 40-minute news conference on Monday about his diagnosis and treatment at a news conference, where Sanders said he had no warning or risk factors associated with bladder cancer and urged people to get checked by a doctor early and often. "Men, everybody, get checked out," he pleaded, flanked by doctors. "Because if it wasn't for me getting tested for something else, they wouldn't have stumbled upon this. And make sure you get the right care, because without wonderful people like this, I probably wouldn't be sitting here today." Despite moments of brevity at the news conference, Sanders stressed the importance of cancer testing, getting emotional at times while speaking. "Get checked out," he repeated with emphasis. "It could've been a whole other gathering if I hadn't." Sanders thanked his medical team, God, and his family, as well as others who reached out with encouragement. "Randy Moss called me every other day to make sure I was straight," he said. "Randy Moss prayed for me, he and his wife told me what I need to be doing -- he's gone through some things very similar (...) he gave me so much strength and so much guidance and so much love, respect, and appreciation. Thank you, Randy, I really appreciate you." Figures from around the sports world expressed a range of reactions from relief that Sanders was now cancer-free to gratitude for his urging of others to be proactive about their health. "You LOVE to see it," former NFL quarterback Robert Griffin III wrote on X. "God's got your back always." Earvin "Magic" Johnson, the NBA Hall of Famer, tweeted, "I'm happy to hear that my friend Deion Sanders has been cleared of cancer. I'll be praying that God continues to bless him with good health and lifelong prosperity!" Michael Strahan, NFL Hall of Famer, wrote on X that he was "Proud of my brotha," and went on to praise his work as a coach and a mentor. "He has continued to fight and do it while using his platform to help others. Love you my man... and can't wait to see you back out there doing what you are meant to do, COACH!!" Strahan continued. "If you don't believe he's doing this for the love of the kids and giving young men and women an opportunity on and off the field, I respectfully ask you to please think again."
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What are your questions about lifestyle changes and cognitive decline?
Healthy habits like eating a nutritious diet and getting regular exercise can protect your brain as you age. Research shows that it may even help after physical signs of cognitive problems begin. What do you want to know about how your lifestyle might affect your risk of cognitive decline, including conditions such as Alzheimer's disease? Share your questions with CNN below.
