
Heico Earnings: How To Trade It?
Heico (NYSE:HEI), an aerospace and electronics firm, is set to announce its earnings on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. For traders focused on events, analyzing historical stock behavior surrounding earnings can be crucial, although the actual results will greatly affect the outcome. There are two primary strategies to think about if you intend to utilize historical patterns:
It's important to highlight that over the last five years, Heico has recorded negative one-day returns following earnings releases in 53% of cases. The median drop has been -3.1%, with a maximum one-day decline of -8.7%.
Analysts predict that Heico will report earnings of $1.12 per share, accompanied by sales of $1.11 billion. This would reflect an increase compared to the same quarter last year, when the company reported earnings of $0.97 per share on sales of $992 million. Fundamentally, Heico holds a current market capitalization of $42 billion. Over the past twelve months, the company produced $4.0 billion in revenue and was operationally profitable, achieving $871 million in operating profits and a net income of $567 million. However, if you're looking for potential growth with lower volatility compared to individual stocks, the Trefis High Quality portfolio offers an alternative — it has outperformed the S&P 500 and delivered returns exceeding 91% since its inception. Additionally, consider – Buy, Sell, or Hold HIMS Stock?
See earnings reaction history of all stocks
Here are some insights on one-day (1D) post-earnings returns:
Further details regarding observed 5-Day (5D), and 21-Day (21D) returns post earnings are summarized along with the statistics in the table below.
HEI 1D, 5D, and 21D Post-Earnings Return
A relatively lower-risk strategy (though not valuable if the correlation is weak) is to understand the relationship between short-term and medium-term returns post earnings, identify a pair that exhibits the highest correlation, and execute the relevant trade. For instance, if 1D and 5D demonstrate the strongest correlation, a trader could position themselves 'long' for the following 5 days if the 1D post-earnings return is positive. Below is some correlation data based on 5-year and 3-year (more recent) history. Note that the correlation 1D_5D refers to the correlation between 1D post-earnings returns and subsequent 5D returns.
HEI Correlation Between 1D, 5D and 21D Historical Returns
Occasionally, the performance of peers can affect the stock reaction following earnings. In fact, pricing may begin prior to the earnings being announced. Here is some historical data regarding the previous post-earnings performance of Heico stock compared to the stock performance of peers that released earnings just ahead of Heico. For a fair comparison, peer stock returns also represent post-earnings one-day (1D) returns.
HEI Correlation With Peer Earnings
Discover more about Trefis RV strategy that has outperformed its all-cap stocks benchmark (a combination of all 3: the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000), yielding strong returns for investors. Additionally, if you desire upside with a more stable experience than an individual stock like Heico, consider the High Quality portfolio, which has surpassed the S&P and achieved >91% returns since its inception.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
14 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP Files Securities Class Action Against Fiserv, Inc. and Certain of Its Executives
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP ('Labaton') has filed a securities class action lawsuit (the 'Action') on behalf of its client the City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System ('Hollywood Police') against Fiserv, Inc. ('Fiserv' or the 'Company') (NYSE: FI) and certain of its executives (collectively, 'Defendants'). The Action, which is captioned City of Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. Fiserv, Inc., No. 25-cv- 06094 (S.D.N.Y.), asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Fiserv common stock between July 24, 2024 and July 22, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Fiserv is a global provider of transaction processing software for banks and retail merchants. Fiserv's flagship product and most important growth driver is Clover, which provides merchants with a payment 'gateway' to facilitate the secure processing of credit, debit, and mobile payment transactions on behalf of financial institutions and their customers. The Action alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants misled investors by failing to disclose that: (a) due to cost issues and other problems with its older Payeezy platform, Fiserv forced Payeezy merchants to migrate to its Clover platform; (b) Clover's revenue growth and gross payment volume ('GPV'), the total monetary value of transactions processed through Clover, were temporarily and unsustainably boosted by these forced conversions, which concealed a slowdown in new merchant business; (c) shortly after these conversions, a significant portion of former Payeezy merchants switched to competing solutions due to Clover's high pricing, significant down time, and systematic compatibility issues; (d) as a result of these merchant losses, Clover's GPV growth was significantly slowing, and its revenue growth was unsustainable; and (e) based on the foregoing, Fiserv's positive Class Period statements about Clover's growth strategies, competition, attrition, GPV growth, and business prospects were materially false and misleading. The market began to learn the truth about Defendants' fraud on April 24, 2025. On that date, Fiserv shocked investors by reporting Clover GPV growth of only 8 percent for the first quarter of 2025, a material stepdown from 2024 GPV rates of between 14 and 17 percent. The Company attributed this slowing growth to lower 2025 transaction volumes from Payeezy merchants who had converted to Clover. On this news, Fiserv stock dropped 18.5 percent, closing at $176.90 per share on April 24, 2025. Then, on May 15, 2025, Fiserv disappointed investors by disclosing that GPV growth deceleration would continue throughout 2025. On this news, Fiserv stock dropped 16.2 percent, closing at $159.13 per share on May 15, 2025. Finally, on July 23, 2025, Fiserv lowered the top end of its full-year organic growth guidance range and confirmed that its quarterly organic revenue in the Merchant segment had decelerated to 9 percent year-over-year from 11 percent in the previous quarter. On this news, Fiserv stock dropped 13.9 percent, closing at $143.00 per share on July 23, 2025. If you purchased or acquired Fiserv common stock during the Class Period and were damaged thereby, you are a member of the 'Class' and may be able to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff. Lead Plaintiff motion papers must be filed no later than September 22, 2025. The Lead Plaintiff is a court-appointed representative for absent members of the Class. You do not need to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff to share in any Class recovery in this action. If you are a Class member and there is a recovery for the Class, you can share in that recovery as an absent Class member. You may retain counsel of your choice to represent you in this action. If you would like to consider serving as Lead Plaintiff or have any questions about this lawsuit, you may contact Connor C. Boehme, Esq. of Labaton at (212) 907-0780, or via email at cboehme@ You can view a copy of the Complaint online here. Hollywood Police is represented by Labaton, which represents many of the largest pension funds in the United States and internationally with combined assets under management of more than $4.5 trillion. Labaton's litigation reputation is built on its half-century of securities litigation experience, more than ninety full-time attorneys, and in-house team of investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants. Labaton has been recognized for its excellence by the courts and peers, and it is consistently ranked in leading industry publications. Offices are located in New York, Delaware, London, and Washington, D.C. More information about Labaton is available at


Business Wire
14 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Securities Fraud Investigation Into Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED) Announced – Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces an investigation of Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. ('Barnes & Noble' or the 'Company') (NYSE: BNED) on behalf of investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON BARNES & NOBLE EDUCATION, INC. (BNED), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING A CLAIM TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Is The Investigation About? On July 18, 2025, Barnes & Noble disclosed that '[c]ertain information regarding the recording of cost of digital sales was brought to the attention of management' and that, as a result, 'management believes that the Company may have a potential overstatement of up to $23.0 million in the aggregate to its accounts receivable balance as of its May 3, 2025 fiscal year-end.' On this news, Barnes & Noble's stock price fell $2.36, or 21%, to close at $8.87 per share on July 21, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you purchased Barnes & Noble securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800, Century City, California 90067 Call us at: 310-914-5007 Email us at: info@ Visit our website at: Follow us for updates on Twitter at If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.


Business Upturn
31 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Deadline Alert: Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Investors Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP About Securities Fraud Lawsuit
LOS ANGELES, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming August 18, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Reddit, Inc. ('Reddit' or the 'Company') (NYSE: RDDT) securities between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR REDDIT INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. What Happened? On May 1, 2025, after market hours, Reddit released its first quarter 2025 financial results, marking a third consecutive quarter with slowdown in daily active user growth. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $4.96, or 4.2%, to close at $113.83 per share on May 2, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Then, on May 19, 2025, Wells Fargo analysts downgraded Reddit's stock, stating that Google's AI features would likely cause 'permanent' disruptions to user traffic for Reddit, and that traffic to Reddit from Google Search would continue to decline and ultimately hurt Reddit's advertising revenue. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $5.24, or 4.6%, to close at $107.99 per share on May 19, 2025. Then, on May 21, 2025, Baird analysts downgraded Reddit's stock, citing similar concerns as Wells Fargo. On this news, Reddit's stock price fell $9.79, or 9.3%, to close at $95.85 per share on May 21, 2025, thereby injuring investors further. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google Search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) Defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner the Company was unable to overcome in the short term; (5) Defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for their outlook on user rates and advertising revenues; and (6) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Reddit securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than August 18, 2025 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Charles Linehan, Esq., Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP,1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 310-201-9150, Toll-Free: 888-773-9224 Visit our website at Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.