'Every Tom, Dick and Harry is Authorised to Issue Content Takedown Orders': X Tells Karnataka HC
This statement made by X's lawyer K.G. Raghavan before the Karnataka high court on Tuesday (July 1) drew a sharp rebuke from the Union government's counsel.
During the court hearing, Raghavan said that X had recently received a notice from the railways department to remove a video in which a car was being driven on a railway track. He told the court that while it was news the government found it unlawful.
"This is the danger, My Lord, that is done now, if every Tom, Dick, and Harry officer is authorised," Raghavan told the high court, reported Reuters.
Raghavan's statement resulted in immediate condemnation from solicitor general Tushar Mehta.
'Officers are not Tom, Dick, or Harry ... they are statutory functionaries. No social media intermediary can expect completely unregulated functioning,' said Mehta.
During the hearing presided by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, senior advocate Aditya Sondhi, appearing for an association of digital media houses, who has filed an intervention application argued, 'We are content creators who are ultimately affected by any take-down orders,' reported LiveLaw.
Justice Nagaprasanna also took objection to the 'Tom Dick and Harry" remarks.
'These are officers of the Union of India. I take objection to this. They are officers and not Tom, Dick and Harry,' said Justice Nagaprasanna during the hearing.
X has approached the court seeking a declaration that Section 79(3)(b) IT Act does not confer the authority to issue information blocking orders and such orders can only be issued after following the procedure under Section 69A of the Act read with the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules.
It is also seeking a direction to various ministries of the Union of India from taking coercive or prejudicial action against X in relation to any 'Information Blocking Orders' issued other than those issued in accordance with section 69A of the IT Act, read with the blocking rules.
The court posted the matter for final hearing on July 8 and permitted the petitioner to amend the petition and implead different ministries of the Union of India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Why did the Dalai Lama refrain from naming a successor? Is it linked to 1995 abduction of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima?
The Dalai Lama on Wednesday announced that he intends to reincarnate, paving the way for a successor to take on a mantle that stretches back 500 years after his death. The eagerly awaited statement, delivered just days before the ailing Nobel Peace Prize laureate's 90th birthday, quashed speculation, started by the Dalai Lama himself, that he might be the final spiritual leader of Tibet, bringing an end to a centuries-old tradition. Speaking during a week of celebrations in the northern Indian hill town of Dharamshala to mark his birthday, the Dalai Lama said a non-profit institution he has set up will have sole authority to identify his reincarnation, countering China's insistence that it will choose his successor. As per experts, the Dalai Lama's decision to forgo naming a successor may be linked to the abduction of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima. In May 1995, six-year-old Gedhun Choekyi Nyima was named by the 14th Dalai Lama as the 11th Panchen Lama, a role second only to the Dalai Lama in Tibetan Buddhist hierarchy. However, three days after the announcement, on May 17, 1995, the boy was allegedly kidnapped by Chinese authorities and his family taken into custody. They have remained missing ever since. Weeks later, China installed its own Panchen Lama, Gyaincain Norbu. Even today, the Tibetan exile community continues to recognise Gedhun as the legitimate Panchen Lama, while the Chinese government backs its own chosen successor. In the last 30 years, China has shared only limited details about Gedhun, like in 2007 and again in 2020, when officials claimed he had completed college and is employed. However, no photographs, videos, or public sightings have ever verified such claims. They also stated that 'the family wished to maintain a private life'. Several human rights activists noted that the Chinese government should be pressured to secure the freedom of Gendun Choki Nyima and his family. In May of this year, US Secretary Marco Rubio voiced a similar concern. Shortly after the Dalai Lama's Wednesday announcement, China's Foreign Ministry once again said that the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama must be approved by the central government in Beijing. Spokesperson Mao Ning reasoned that Tibetan Buddhism is a religion with Chinese characteristics and that the reincarnation process must follow traditional methods, including drawing lots from a golden urn. Mao Ning cited an 18th-century Qing dynasty tradition in which a golden urn was used to draw lots in order to identify the reincarnations of prominent Buddhist leaders. "The reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, the Panchen Lama and other great Buddhist figures must be chosen by drawing lots from a golden urn, and approved by the central government," said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
YesMadam turns everyday wellness into meaningful moments
YesMadam is a startup that's quietly changing the way people think about beauty and wellness. Started in 2016 by brothers Aditya and Mayank Arya, the company was built on a simple idea: why not bring salon and wellness services directly to people's homes, where they feel most comfortable? Over time, this idea has grown into a trusted platform that now operates in more than 55 Indian cities. They aim to give people access to the kind of care they would expect from a premium salon, but in the comfort of their own homes. But what makes YesMadam stand out isn't just convenience — it's how personal their approach feels. One example that recently caught attention was a small birthday surprise planned by a customer named Samarth. He didn't want a big party or flashy lights; he simply wanted to gift his friend a peaceful home spa session. When the YesMadam team heard his story, they went beyond the request. Along with the beautician, they sent a guitarist who played her favourite song, added a cake, a thoughtful gift hamper, and a handwritten note. The entire experience was warm and unexpected. When the video of the moment was shared online, it touched thousands of people who saw in it something real — a reminder of what care really looks like. This kind of story shows what YesMadam is trying to build. It's not just about beauty services; it's about creating space for comfort, connection, and care. Elderly people, new mothers, those recovering from illness, or simply too busy to step out now have access to self-care without having to leave home. It saves time, avoids crowded places, and makes regular wellness routines easier to stick to. At a time when everything feels fast and impersonal, YesMadam is offering something different: a chance to slow down and bring a little bit of calm and relaxation right into your living room.
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Startup founder revokes ₹22 lakh job offer over candidate's religious remarks, sparks debate
An Indian startup founder has ignited an online debate after he revoked a lucrative job offer worth ₹ 22 lakh per annum over a candidate's alleged derogatory comments targeting religious communities on LinkedIn. Mohammed Ahmed Bhati, founder of recruitment platform Jobbie, shared on the professional networking site that while the candidate had aced the interview process and even went the extra mile to suggest improvements to the company's platform, the offer was withdrawn following a routine background check that revealed 'deeply disrespectful' public remarks. 'No matter how talented someone is, respect and basic decency matter to us more. Talent gets you in the door, but values decide if you stay,' Bhati wrote in a widely circulated post. According to Bhati, the candidate had applied for the job after seeing Jobbie's viral Reddit post about conducting 450 interviews for over 12,000 applicants. The individual stood out not just for their skills but also for their proactive attitude, including building their resume using Jobbie's tools and suggesting platform tweaks. However, just before onboarding, the startup reportedly discovered the candidate had made recent comments on LinkedIn that could be construed as offensive to religious groups. 'We were ready to extend an offer above our budget. But during the final background check, we found public posts that included remarks which could hurt religious sentiments. That's not a value we are willing to compromise on,' Bhati explained. The decision has triggered a sharp divide online. While some praised Bhati for prioritising values over pure technical competence, others questioned whether rescinding a job offer over social media comments is justified. Critics labelled the move an example of 'cancel culture in hiring', arguing that companies should focus on performance, not personal opinions. A user wrote, "Revoking an offer letter for a professional position based on someone's social media activity goes out to show how this cancel culture can actually affect organisation when wrong people get in leadership position. And posting it here isn't virtue signalling either. It simply shows how immature and insecure you are as a leader. Good luck finding good candidates." Another user commented, "You're trying to assert your power, acting like, 'I built this platform, so I decide who gets hired based on whether they align with my beliefs or not.' But I'm sure if someone from another religion did the same against yours, you wouldn't stay silent, you'd be the first to call it out." "Only a fresher can understand what was the importance of this position. There is so much to do and learn, education makes a human being grounded, teaches gratitude and keeps him humble. But now I know why the cultural round is important," the third user wrote. Supporters, however, applauded the stand, highlighting the importance of workplace ethics, inclusion, and cultural sensitivity. "Everyone with a hate comment, I have a question.I mean, would you be comfortable working with/under a racist/casteist or even a sexist? I know I would not. Qualifications should not be the only parameter to assess an employee. Companies generally have zero tolerance policy against the same. It's better to reject candidates before they are hired and cause severe social and emotional damage to others," a user wrote. "Great decision, I would say," another user wrote.
