Energy Department to Gut Funding for Solar and Wind Projects
The cuts, which would take money away from projects budgeted for the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30, focus on solar and wind projects, as well as state and local assistance for low-income families, according to an Energy Department document reviewed by The New York Times and Democratic lawmakers in Washington. Critics argue that the moves are illegal because Congress had previously approved the funding for specific projects.
In a joint statement about the funding changes, ranking Democrats on the Senate and House energy subcommittees called it a 'reckless decision' and demanded the agency immediately reverse its action. They argued that the moves would harm efforts to strengthen U.S. energy independence and drive up costs for all consumers.
'This outrageous, unlawful decision by the Trump administration is a direct attack on our energy independence and American families' ability to afford their monthly energy bill,' wrote Senator Patty Murray, Democrat from Washington, and Representative Marcy Kaptur, an Ohio Democrat. 'This isn't a bureaucratic misstep — it's a deliberate, partisan effort to sabotage bipartisan law and redirect funding.'
In response to inquiries about the cuts, an Energy Department spokeswoman said in a statement that the agency is working to 'instill a culture of transparence, performance and common sense.'
'The Department of Energy is working to advance its critical mission of unleashing affordable, reliable and secure energy for all Americans while increasing efficiency and promoting better stewardship of taxpayer dollars,' the spokeswoman said. The new funding levels 'help ensure that the Department accomplishes its critical mission for the American people.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance latest GOP politician to enter Syndey Sweeney jeans ad debate
Sydney Sweeney's jeans – excuse us, *genes – are continuing to stir controversy. Vice President JD Vance became the latest Republican politician to weigh in on a controversial American Eagle ad featuring Sweeney that critics argued promoted eugenics. "My political advice to the Democrats is continue to (call) everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi," Vance joked during an episode of the conservative "Ruthless" podcast on Friday, Aug. 1. "That appears to be their actual strategy." The Nazi party used the pseudoscience of eugenics, which promotes some genetic features as better than others, to justify the killing of Jews and countless other minority groups during the Holocaust. Sydney Sweeney dishes on the best jeans, her favorite rom-com and what's on her playlist American Eagle's campaign, which has spawned a fierce cultural debate, used wordplay to describe Sweeney, 27, as having "good genes," a wordplay to promote the brand's denim jeans. Critics have said the ad blitz amounts to a glorification of whiteness and a dog whistle for racist ideologies. But her supporters have said the ad is meant to be a light-hearted wordplay, defending the "Euphoria" actress and the brand. Sweeney previously told USA TODAY that denim was a staple of her wardrobe, but left out AE in her list of favored brands at the time. "I'm very much a white, plain T-shirt kind of girl. I jump around from a bunch of different brands and that kind of depends on what vibe I want to go for," she said. "I have my Levi's white T-shirts and my Cotton On white T-shirts that are just paired with casual jeans. Jean wise: I mean, I love Levi's, Frame, Agolde." Sydney Sweeney controversy, explained In one of several videos for AE, Sweeney, clad in a denim-on-denim outfit, says: "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color." "My jeans are blue," she says as the camera pans across her blue denim and her blue eyes. Soon after the campaign dropped, people began to sound the alarm on what they saw as a dangerous message about the beauty ideal, race and "good" versus "bad" genes. Vance, though, chalked the whole ordeal up to an overreaction from the "left" and a doubling down on a strategy that he thinks lost the Democrats the 2024 presidential election. Dunkin' ad about 'genetics' draws comparisons to Sydney Sweeney drama "I actually thought that one of the lessons (Democrats) might take is 'we're going to be less crazy.' And the lesson they have apparently taken is 'we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful,'" he said on the podcast. "Great strategy, guys. That's how you're going to win the midterm, especially young American men." The ad's critics, however, argued that a campaign selling jeans to women should not have been shot so clearly from the male gaze. Some consumers were quick to point out what they saw as the regressive nature of the material: A buxom blonde woman drawing attention to her body and employing a sensual tone, they argued, calling back to a stereotypical symbol of a bygone era. "Wasn't she the one who said she didn't want to be seen as an object?" one commenter asked on Sweeney's Instagram page, while another chided: "We can leave Nazi Germany back where it got conquered ty next!!!" Sweeney has not yet spoken out about the controversy, though several prominent members of the GOP have chimed in on her behalf. Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, for instance, took to X on July 29 to blast the left for criticizing the ad. "Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well…." he wrote. White House's communications director Steven Cheung, a longtime adviser for President Donald Trump, also maligned the criticism, calling it "cancel culture run amok." "This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024," he wrote on X July 29, adding that people are "tired" of this way of thinking. But, when a second ad campaign, this time from Dunkin', dropped featuring the same "genetic" themes, many critics felt vindicated, arguing that it signaled a greater cultural shift toward genetic hierarchy and racism. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Sydney Sweeney drama: JD Vance addresses American Eagle ad controversy
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon Falls on Fears That AWS Is Losing Market Share: Should You Buy the AMZN Stock Dip Here?
Amazon (AMZN) released its Q2 earnings after the close last night on Thursday, July 31, and the stock is trading lower today as the company's guidance came in lighter than consensus estimates. Moreover, fears of its enterprise-focused Amazon Web Services (AWS) losing market share spooked investors. While it has been a strong earnings season for the 'Magnificent 7,' as names like Microsoft (MSFT) and Meta Platforms (META) zoomed higher after showing progress on artificial intelligence (AI) monetization, Amazon will join Tesla (TSLA) as only the second constituent to gap down after the June quarter earnings. (Apple (AAPL), while lower today, is off just 1.83%.) In this article, we'll look at some of the key takeaways from Amazon's Q2 earnings and examine whether it makes sense to buy the dip here. More News from Barchart With UnitedHealth Under DOJ Investigation, Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold UNH Stock Now? Trump Won't Take Away Tesla's Subsidies. Does That Make TSLA Stock a Safe Buy Here? Can AMD Stock Hit $210 in 2025? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Amazon Q2 Earnings Analysis Amazon reported revenues of $167.7 billion in the quarter that easily surpassed the $162.09 billion that analysts were expecting. The company's earnings per share came in at $1.68, ahead of the $1.33 that analysts were modeling. The company guided for Q3 revenues between $174 billion and $179.5 billion, implying a YoY growth between 10%-13%, which was better than Street estimates. However, management guided for Q3 operating income between $15.5 billion and $20.5 billion, with the midpoint of that range trailing the consensus estimate of $19.48 billion. Weaker-than-expected guidance has been a recurring theme for Amazon over the last few quarters, as the company has blamed macroeconomic conditions, and more recently, 'tariff and trade policies' along with 'recessionary fears' as factors affecting its guidance. Key Takeaways from Amazon's Q2 Earnings The key reason Amazon stock is falling today seems to be due to the relatively tepid performance of AWS. Here are some of the key takeaways from that segment's performance. AWS Margins Dipped in Q2: During Q2, AWS revenues rose 17.5% YoY, and it now has an annualized revenue run rate of $123 billion. However, that segment's operating margin fell to 32.9% as compared to a record high of 39.5% in Q1. The company attributed lower margins to higher stock-based compensation, higher depreciation expense, and adverse forex movements. AWS Might Be Losing Market Share: Expectedly, Amazon faced questions over AWS losing market share in cloud, as Microsoft (MSFT) Azure and Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) Cloud – the top two cloud players in that order, after Amazon – reported 39% and 32% yearly revenue growth, respectively, in the June quarter. Notably, during its fiscal Q4 2025 earnings release, Microsoft said that Azure's annual revenue was $75 billion in the quarter, marking the first time that the Satya Nadella-led company provided a dollar number for that business. Azure is Now 65% the Size of AWS: Alluding to Microsoft, CEO Andy Jassy said that while Azure is around 65% the size of AWS, Amazon has a 'pretty significant" leadership position in the cloud market. Responding to a question about AWS, Jassy said, 'We're growing faster than others and sometimes others are growing faster than us.' Jassy added, 'The security and the privacy of that data matter a lot, and there are very different results in security in AWS than you'll see in other players.' AMZN Stock Forecast After Q2 Earnings Analysts don't seem too perturbed by Amazon's guidance, though, and several brokerages - including Rosenblatt, Bank of America, Piper Sandler, Barclays, and Susquehanna - all raised the stock's target price following the earnings report, while maintaining their respective ratings. To be fair, the target price adjustments haven't been to the scale that we have seen in the past, as Amazon's latest earnings have raised a question mark about AWS's market domination in the cloud market. Scott Devitt, Managing Director of Equity Research at Wedbush Securities, gave a B+ to Amazon's earnings. While he is not too apprehensive about the Q3 guide, given the fact that Amazon tends to provide a conservative forecast that it happens to beat more often than not, he believes the plunge today is related to AWS's relatively weak performance vis-à-vis other big cloud players. Should You Buy Amazon Stock On the Dip? I have been a bit bearish on Amazon for the last month or so, given the tariff uncertainty. The company managed to dodge the tariff bullet in Q2 as President Trump scaled back his rhetoric. Sellers on its platform had also built up inventory in advance to absorb the tariff costs. However, as that inventory now withers away and tariff uncertainty comes back to haunt markets, we could see some volatility in names like Amazon. From a valuation perspective, Amazon currently trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 36.6x, which, while not overly demanding, is not mouthwateringly cheap either, especially for the short term. Overall, I am not rushing to buy the Amazon stock dip here, even though I continue to remain invested in the company for the long term. On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi had a position in: AMZN, GOOG, MSFT, META. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why NuScale Power Stock Crashed Today
Key Points Fluor announced it will convert 15 million of its Class B shares in NuScale into Class A shares. Once this happens, Fluor will be able to begin selling the Class A shares on the stock market. Investors expect this is precisely what Fluor intends. 10 stocks we like better than NuScale Power › Shares of NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR), the nuclear reactor-builder, tumbled 11.7% through 11:50 a.m. ET Friday -- not for any fault of its own, mind you. Instead, you can blame it all on Fluor (NYSE: FLR), which has decided to unload a big chunk of the NuScale shares it owns. Fluor selling out? Fluor reported poor earnings this morning, you see -- with sales down 6% year over year and adjusted profit cut nearly in half. More importantly to NuScale investors, though, is the fact that Fluor wants to convert 15 million of the Class B NuScale shares it owns to Class A shares... and then sell them. And why? As Fluor pointed out, gains in the value of its NuScale shares contributed $3.2 billion in "pre-tax mark-to-market gains" on its profit in Q2 -- but the roller-coaster ride that is NuScale is also contributing to "volatility" in Fluor's results, and forcing Fluor management to make "recurring fair value measurements" as it tracks NuScale's ups and downs. Is it time to sell NuScale stock? To fix this, Fluor said in its post-earnings conference call, the company will later this month convert 15 million NuScale Class B shares into Class A shares. The implication is that Fluor might then sell these A shares for cash. More than just simplifying accounting, this would return value to shareholders, says Fluor, by letting them cash in on NuScale's remarkable high-flying stock. It would also, however, threaten to flood the market with cheap NuScale shares, depressing the share price. This, in a nutshell, is what's worrying investors today. This is the reason they're selling off NuScale stock. With NuScale stock up fivefold over the past year, and this new risk on the horizon, it looks like a good time to sell. Should you invest $1,000 in NuScale Power right now? Before you buy stock in NuScale Power, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and NuScale Power wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends NuScale Power. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why NuScale Power Stock Crashed Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
