Jury deliberates for second day in murder trial of woman accused of killing in-laws with poisonous mushrooms
The jurors who began deliberating Monday are sequestered, a rarity in Australia that reflects public and media fervor about the case against Erin Patterson, with several news outlets publishing live blogs that covered every moment of the two-month trial. The jurors will remain secluded until they reach a unanimous decision on the charges of murder and attempted murder.
Three of Patterson's four lunch guests — her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson — died in the hospital after the 2023 meal, at which she served individual beef Wellington pastries containing death cap mushrooms. The fourth, Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, became gravely ill but survived.
Advertisement
3 Erin Patterson is photographed in Melbourne, Australia, on April 15, 2025.
AP
3 Her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson died after eating the beef Wellington.
Provided
Patterson, 50, told the trial she didn't deliberately poison her guests and must have accidentally mixed up store-bought and wild mushrooms, which she had foraged herself without knowing they were death caps. She also said she ate the mushrooms but didn't get as sick because she threw up soon after the lunch due to an eating disorder.
Advertisement
Prosecutors in the case, which has gripped Australia for two years, said the accused woman researched, foraged and served the mushrooms deliberately and lied to investigators to cover her tracks. Patterson accepted she had disposed of a food dehydrator after the fatal meal and reset her phone multiple times.
3 Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, died in the hospital.
Provided
The prosecution said she lied about having a dire medical diagnosis to ensure her guests attended the lunch, cooked individual pastries to avoid poisoning herself, and faked symptoms to make it look as though she fell ill, too.
Advertisement
Prosecutors didn't offer a motive but suggested a deteriorating relationship between the accused and her estranged husband, Simon Patterson, as well as her exasperation with her former in-laws. Simon Patterson was invited to the fatal lunch but didn't go.
Patterson would face life in prison if she is convicted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Appeals court rules Alabama violated constitutional rights of man sentenced to death
A federal appeals court ruled Alabama prosecutors violated the constitutional rights of a man sentenced to death in 1990, saying Blacks were rejected from the jury during his trial. The Monday ruling from a three judge panel on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals means Michael Sockwell, 62, is eligible for a retrial. He was convicted of killing former Montgomery County Sheriff Isaiah Harris in 1988 when he was 26-years old. The panel issued a 2-1 opinion stating Alabama prosecutors violated Sockwell's 14th Amendment rights by 'repeatedly and purposefully' rejecting potential Black jurors who were believed to be more sympathetic to him on the basis of their shared race. Advertisement The Monday ruling from a three judge panel on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals means Michael Sockwell, 62, is eligible for a retrial. AP Prosecutors said Harris' wife hired Sockwell to kill Harris because she wanted to cover up an affair she was having and collect Harris' insurance money. There were no witnesses to the shooting. Sockwell, whose attorneys say has a low IQ that disqualifies him from the death penalty, initially told authorities in a videotaped confession that he killed Harris. At his trial, Sockwell testified that officers threatened to beat and kill him before he confessed and deprived him of food and water. Sockwell then testified that another man, who was having an affair with Harris' wife, committed the killing. Sockwell also denied he ever received money to kill Harris. Advertisement The jury voted 7-5 to sentence Sockwell to life in prison, but the judge overruled the decision and sentenced Sockwell to death. Alabama no longer allows a judge to override a jury's sentence in capital cases. Attorneys for Sockwell appealed the decision, arguing the prosecutors unconstitutionally used race as the basis for jury selection, rejecting 80% of the Black jurors who were eligible for Sockwell's trial — compared to only 20% white jurors who were disqualified. The appeal cited notes from the prosecutor that rejected one juror who she described as 'a (B)lack male, approximately twenty-three years of age, which would put him very close to the same race, sex, and age of' Sockwell. Sockwell then testified that another man, who was having an affair with Harris' wife, committed the killing. AP Judge Robert J. Luck, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, dissented. Luck emphasized that the prosecutor noted the race of white potential jurors too, a fact Luck said indicated race was not a disqualifying factor for jurors in Sockwell's case. Advertisement The opinion, written by former President Bill Clinton-appointed Judge Charles Wilson, also cited four other cases in the years leading up to Sockwell's case where the state prosecutor appeared to have illegally rejected Black jurors based solely on their race, demonstrating a 'pattern' of choosing juries with 'discriminatory intent.' The Alabama Attorney General's Office did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment Tuesday morning. Luck disputed that the prosecutor had a pattern of discrimination and said 17% of the jury in Sockwell's trial was Black out of a jury pool that was 24% Black to begin with. ___ Riddle is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Appeals court rules Alabama violated constitutional rights of man sentenced to death
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Alabama prosecutors violated the constitutional rights of a man sentenced to death in 1990, saying Blacks were rejected from the jury during his trial. The Monday ruling from a three judge panel on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals means Michael Sockwell, 62, is eligible for a retrial. He was convicted of killing former Montgomery County Sheriff Isaiah Harris in 1988 when he was 26-years old. The panel issued a 2-1 opinion stating Alabama prosecutors violated Sockwell's 14th Amendment rights by 'repeatedly and purposefully' rejecting potential Black jurors who were believed to be more sympathetic to him on the basis of their shared race. Prosecutors said Harris' wife hired Sockwell to kill Harris because she wanted to cover up an affair she was having and collect Harris' insurance money. There were no witnesses to the shooting. Sockwell, whose attorneys say has a low IQ that disqualifies him from the death penalty, initially told authorities in a videotaped confession that he killed Harris. At his trial, Sockwell testified that officers threatened to beat and kill him before he confessed and deprived him of food and water. Sockwell then testified that another man, who was having an affair with Harris' wife, committed the killing. Sockwell also denied he ever received money to kill Harris. The jury voted 7-5 to sentence Sockwell to life in prison, but the judge overruled the decision and sentenced Sockwell to death. Alabama no longer allows a judge to override a jury's sentence in capital cases. Attorneys for Sockwell appealed the decision, arguing the prosecutors unconstitutionally used race as the basis for jury selection, rejecting 80% of the Black jurors who were eligible for Sockwell's trial — compared to only 20% white jurors who were disqualified. The appeal cited notes from the prosecutor that rejected one juror who she described as 'a (B)lack male, approximately twenty-three years of age, which would put him very close to the same race, sex, and age of' Sockwell. Judge Robert J. Luck, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, dissented. Luck emphasized that the prosecutor noted the race of white potential jurors too, a fact Luck said indicated race was not a disqualifying factor for jurors in Sockwell's case. The opinion, written by former President Bill Clinton-appointed Judge Charles Wilson, also cited four other cases in the years leading up to Sockwell's case where the state prosecutor appeared to have illegally rejected Black jurors based solely on their race, demonstrating a 'pattern' of choosing juries with 'discriminatory intent.' The Alabama Attorney General's Office did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment Tuesday morning. Luck disputed that the prosecutor had a pattern of discrimination and said 17% of the jury in Sockwell's trial was Black out of a jury pool that was 24% Black to begin with. ___
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Castleford's Horne given six-match suspension
Liam Horne had been ever-present for Castleford Tigers in Super League this season [ Castleford Tigers hooker Liam Horne has been given a six-match suspension and fined after being found guilty of making unnecessary contact with a player who is injured or maybe injured. The 27-year-old committed the offence in Saturday's Super League defeat by Wigan Warriors. Advertisement Horne, who pleaded not guilty, will now be unavailable until the trip to Catalans Dragons on Saturday, 23 August. He will also have 36 penalty points added to his disciplinary record. Meanwhile, Hull KR forward Rhyse Martin, 32, was found not guilty of the same offence in his side's win over Wakefield Trinity on Friday. The Australian did plead guilty to a separate charge of head contact and was given one penalty point.
