
Benefit cuts show welfare state is not safe in Labour Government hands
When Keir Starmer became Prime Minister a year ago this week, we were all looking forward to seeing the back of the some of the worst Tory policies.
There had been years of attacks on the welfare state and some of the most vulnerable people in our society – whether that was the humiliating assessment processes, the bedroom tax, the two-child cap, the rape clause and much more besides.
Twelve months on, people are entitled to wonder exactly what has changed.
Following Labour's winter fuel payment debacle – which has caused so much anguish and distress for millions of older people - this week MPs will vote on the UK government's disability cuts bill.
This is a bill straight out of the Iain Duncan Smith playbook - a classic case of pretending to help people while actually causing them significant harm.
Despite what Labour are claiming, this is not about getting people into work. Disability payments are designed to support people with the extra living costs they face as a result of their disability or their long-term condition – regardless of whether they are in employment.
Nor will this ultimately save the public purse money. Restricting living support for people may actually make it harder for them to get into sustainable employment – and increase the pressure on public services, like the NHS.
What these cuts will actually do – as many charities and independent experts are warning – is push tens of thousands more people, including thousands of children, into poverty.
Following an outcry from his backbenchers, the Prime Minister announced watered down plans last week – but this panicked half u-turn has actually made the cuts even more unjustifiable.
Making the cuts apply to new claimants will create a two-tier system, where new claimants get less than existing ones for the same conditions. That is completely unfair.
Despite many senior Labour figures such as Sadiq Khan, Andy Burnham, and the Welsh Labour government finding their voice on these cuts, Labour's Leader in Scotland Anas Sarwar has stood beside Keir Starmer all the way.
The SNP government will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment and we will reject the UK government's attack on disabled people's rights.
SNP MPs will this week vote against Labour's welfare bill – and we are calling on all MPs to do likewise.
Fundamentally, issues like this speak to our values as a society.
None of us know what will happen to us in our lives – any one of us could require financial help because of a disability or illness.
I want people in such a situation to know that they are valued, and that there is a safety net there for them – not to be treate d as some kind of fiscal inconvenience.
But it's clear that whether it's Labour or Tories in power, the welfare state is not in safe hands at Westminster.
CHILD POVERTY
The Big Issue magazine's latest report into child poverty across the UK makes for sobering reading.
It found that since the SNP Government introduced child poverty reduction targets in 2017, the number of children in relative poverty in Scotland has fallen by 12%. That is around 21,000 fewer children. In stark contrast, numbers in England and Wales have grown by an astonishing 320,000 over the same period.
The SNP Government is putting our money where our mouth is. Scotland is the only part of the UK with a child payment for families on low incomes, and we are the only part of the UK getting rid of the two child cap. That's on top of the work we're doing to expand free school meal provision and access to childcare for working families.
But there is so much more to do. Eradicating child poverty is a personal priority for me. It is not only morally the right thing to do, but I also believe that there is no greater long-term investment that we can make in Scotland's future success than by ensuring every young person has the opportunity to thrive.
FREE SCHOOL MEALS
it was great to visit Springburn Academy last week to unveil the SNP Government's latest expansion to free school meals provision. We know the positive impact that a nutritious meal can have on learning and achievement, and I'm pleased that, from August, an additional 6,000 pupils in S1-S3 across Scotland will benefit from healthy lunches.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watchdog investigates BBC for airing Bob Vylan ‘death to the IDF' Glastonbury chant
Ofcom is seeking urgent information from the BBC regarding its broadcast of Bob Vylan 's "death to the IDF" chant during their Glastonbury performance. The BBC has since stated it "should have pulled" the live stream, condemning the chant as "utterly unacceptable" and containing "antisemitic sentiments." Avon and Somerset Police are assessing video evidence from both Bob Vylan and Kneecap 's performances at the festival to determine if any offenses were committed. Senior political figures, including Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, have demanded explanations from the BBC concerning the broadcast. Rapper Bob Vylan, of the performing duo, has defended his controversial remarks, stating "I said what I said" and calling for a change in foreign policy.


Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
BBC regrets not stopping Glastonbury livestream of Bob Vylan
LONDON, June 30 (Reuters) - Britain's BBC said it regretted not stopping the livestream of punk-rap duo Bob Vylan's set at Glastonbury after the performance included chants against the Israeli military, drawing condemnation from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The BBC has come under fire for allowing the performance to be shown live on Saturday as a Bob Vylan member led the crowd in chanting "death, death to the IDF," a reference to the Israel Defense Forces, following chants of "free, free Palestine." The BBC, which broadcasts the festival in southwest England, issued a warning on screen while the set was being streamed online, but said on Monday it should have gone further. The comments were "utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves," the national broadcaster said in a statement. "The team were dealing with a live situation but with hindsight we should have pulled the stream during the performance," the BBC added. "We regret this did not happen." The BBC said it would look at its guidance around live events so that in future its teams were clear on what is acceptable content to be shown.

Leader Live
36 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Discussing possible punishments for welfare rebels ‘not constructive'
Ministers are set to lay out the concessions they will make on Monday, in the hope that the climbdown will be enough to secure backbench votes this week. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment will only apply to new claimants from November 2026, and ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit after 126 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the Government's Bill. Although the changes are expected to get some of those rebels on board, there are still threats of revolt. Baroness Jacqui Smith – who served as a chief whip under Sir Tony Blair – was asked on Sky News what the consequences should be for Labour MPs who vote against the Government on the matter. She said: 'I don't think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here.' Baroness Smith later added: 'It's always the case in legislation that you introduce the Bill, you have a second reading on the principles, and then you think about the detail as you take that through all of its stages in Parliament. I'm sure that that will continue to happen.' Asked on Times Radio whether rebels will have the whip removed, education minister Baroness Smith said that it is important to 'keep talking' to MPs. The legislation is due to be voted on on Tuesday at its second reading, and the Government will amend the Bill at the Commons committee stage to put the changes in place. The original plans restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit. "I draw on the substantial evidence, the voices of those impacted and my conscience which determines that I cannot cross by on the other side and have no choice but to vote against the UC & PIP Bill."My full statement in comments👇#York #PIP #Welfare — 💙Rachael Maskell MP (@RachaelMaskell) June 29, 2025 The changes to Pip will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. Plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit have also been altered, with all existing recipients to have their incomes protected in real terms. Details of a review of the Pip assessment, to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people, will also be published. The original amendment signed by 120-plus backbenchers is expected to be withdrawn after some MPs were appeased by last week's announcement. However, a new one is expected to be tabled by rebels on Monday. Labour MP Rachael Maskell said she would sign the new amendment aiming to stop the Bill, saying it was not clear how the promised concessions would be brought in. 'There's no confidence … we're being asked to sign a blank cheque even with these changes,' she told the PA news agency. Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a Labour whip over the reforms, told The Guardian there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement' and that she had not decided how to vote. Olivia Blake, a Labour MP with a disclosed disability, told the paper the changes could create 'an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently'. Clive Efford, the MP for Eltham and Chislehurst, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that he will still not support the Government's measures. 'There are choices that the Government can make here; there are other places it can go to identify the resources. What we want to see, and fully support, is measures the Government is putting in the palace to assist people to move into work, the right to try, we support, but we can't guarantee the savings,' he said. 'When you're asking for £3.5 billion regardless of the impact of those changes, that can only adversely affect people who are in the benefit system.'