Middle East ocean freight rates soar on Iran conflict, Strait of Hormuz shipping risks
Ocean freight rates to the Port of Khor Fakkan in the United Arab Emirates are surging as Israel continues to attack Iran and after a weekend which saw U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear targets.
Rates from Shanghai to the Khor Fakkan, which is situated on the UAE Indian Ocean coastline, are up 76% in comparison to mid-May, according to spot ocean freight rate data tracked by freight intelligence platform Xeneta. The average spot rates have reached $3,341 per forty-foot equivalent unit (FEU.)
The Port of Khor Fakkan is located outside the Strait of Hormuz. Due to its location, the port is considered to be one of the most important transshipment hubs for the Arabian Gulf, the Indian Sub-continent, the Gulf of Oman, and the East African markets.
"Shippers in the region have acted with caution as the level of risk has gradually increased," said Peter Sand, chief shipping analyst at Xeneta. "Shippers have been frontloading cargo in the most recent months, to bolster the supply chain from adverse disruptions to the flow of containerized goods."
The Port of Khor Fakkan has had 81 vessels arrive within the past 24 hours, and 51 ships are expected to arrive in the next 30 days, according to VesselFinder.
The conflict in the Middle East has elevated vessel security risks, which have added to operational costs. Vessels are also moving faster, which results in more fuel being used, which also adds to costs.
Iran's parliament voted to approve a closure of the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday, but it may not follow through on the move, according to many experts. It is expected to target ships for attack or seizure as part of its retaliatory plans, including ships showing a public U.S. affiliation, according to maritime security firm Ambrey.
One major oil tanker operator, Frontline, recently said it would accept no new contracts requiring travel in the Strait of Hormuz.
The oil market and stock market reactions to the escalation in the conflict were muted on Monday, without major moves in either trade. But Sand said the spread in ocean freight rates is a leading indicator of risk and uncertainty. The spread refers to the difference between spot market rates and long-term contract rates. The higher the spread, the greater the indication of market volatility and potential risks for shippers.
"During times like this, the spread in the market widens," said Sand.
It is up from $50 to $1,101 over the past 40 days (May 14 to June 23), according to Xeneta.
"The spread is showing the difference between what the smaller shippers, those without much negotiation power, versus the freight rates paid by the larger and stronger shippers," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Container rates from key US trade partner plummet 39%
The latest weekly ocean container shipping market reveals a stark contrast in rate movements across major trade lanes, as the trans-Pacific trade from the Far East to the United States saw a dramatic decline. The market average according to analyst Xeneta on Far East to U.S. West Coast services has fallen significantly since a spike on June 1. Declining spot rates have all but erased that recent surge, with rates standing at $3,317 per forty foot equivalent unit on June 27, up just 6% from May 31, effectively neutralizing the recent upward trend. This trade lane is particularly impacted by the U.S.-China trade war, and it is evident that capacity is now more than meeting demand, empowering shippers to push back against peak season surcharges by carriers. In contrast, the market average on the trade from the Far East to the U.S. East Coast has seen a more moderate decline, falling 9% since June 1 to $5,990 per FEU. Despite this drop, the spot rate remains 43% higher on June 27 than on May 31 with the spread between the coasts reaching $2,673, the highest in 10 months. 'Average spot rates have plummeted from Far East to U.S. West Coast, down 39% since June 1, but it has not been so dramatic into the US East Coast with rates holding up stronger – for now,' said Peter Sand, Xeneta chief analyst, in a note. 'The trans-Pacific into U.S. West Coast is the key battleground for carriers when it comes to China exports, so spot rates have fallen harder and faster as they prioritized bringing capacity back onto this trade in the immediate aftermath of the lowering of 145% tariffs.' Meanwhile, average spot rates from the Far East into the Mediterranean and North Europe, which experienced jumps in early and mid-June, remain elevated. On June 27, rates to the Mediterranean were 5% higher and to North Europe 14% higher compared to June 1, indicating sustained demand in these regions. The trade from North Europe to the U.S. East Coast has seen little change, with the market average staying flat from a week ago at $2,105 per FEU. This represents only a 3% increase from May 31. This trade lane is currently influenced by negotiations between the European Commission and Washington on a new trade agreement before July 9, when a 90-day pause on higher tariffs is set to expire. 'Shippers are seeing how this game is playing out and are calling the carriers' bluff by pushing back on the higher rates and peak season surcharges,' said Sand. 'It is only a matter of time until shippers do the same into the U.S. East Coast and spot rates begin to fall sharply there too.' Find more articles by Stuart Chirls maritime chief 'not a big fan' of ocean carriers' 'approach' as agency reviews antitrust immunity Drewry: No 'lasting impact' from tariff break as ocean rates fall again With Mideast shipping on high alert, Maersk re-opens Israel portMaersk unveils new AI platform to simplify customs tasks The post Container rates from key US trade partner plummet 39% appeared first on FreightWaves.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump should weaponize the Financial Action Task Force to make America safer
President Trump promised to make America safer, stronger and more prosperous. To fulfill that vision, he is already deploying bold leadership. But he also has at his disposal underused tools that can maximize U.S. leverage without relying on foreign aid or military deployments. The Financial Action Task Force is exactly that kind of instrument: a high-impact, low-cost global watchdog that targets the arteries of illicit finance. The Financial Action Task Force isn't a bureaucracy or a treaty-bound institution. It's a results-driven enforcement regime with teeth. By controlling access to global financial systems, the Financial Action Task Force can compel reforms in countries that sponsor terrorism, enable kleptocracy or tolerate organized crime. It's a tool of pressure that strikes where it matters most: capital and markets. And it fits naturally with the president's transactional, results-focused style. The most compelling case for the task force's power isn't theoretical — it's real. In 2018, the Financial Action Task Force gray-listed Pakistan for failing to curb terrorist financing. The fallout was swift. Foreign investment dried up, banks pulled back and multilateral lenders grew wary. The financial squeeze was real — and effective. What followed was a sweeping reform campaign. Over four years, Pakistan passed dozens of laws, empowered regulators, froze assets of proscribed groups and brought prosecutions under revamped statutes. The Financial Action Task Force verified that Pakistan had completed all 34 required actions and removed it from the gray list in 2022. Pakistan remains under post-delisting monitoring. The Financial Action Task Force and its members, including the U.S., continue to assess compliance. Given Pakistan's sustained reforms, that status should be extended in good faith — demonstrating that countries which follow the rules earn lasting recognition. This isn't about rewarding friends — it's about reinforcing the Financial Action Task Force's credibility. When countries respond to pressure with meaningful reform, they should be acknowledged. That sends a message to others: the system works, and performance earns a path back to legitimacy. Lebanon offers the opposite example. Once a financial hub, it has collapsed into dysfunction. Since 2019, Lebanon has suffered one of the worst economic meltdowns in recent history, driven by corruption and mismanagement. Former central bank governor Riad Salameh faces international investigation for laundering hundreds of millions of dollars. Trust in the banking sector has vanished. Hezbollah, a U.S.-designated terrorist group, freely exploits the chaos in Lebanon, financing itself through narcotics, smuggling and unregulated remittance networks. The Financial Action Task Force's mission is to prevent exactly this. Yet Lebanon has not been gray-listed. That's a serious oversight. A listing would pressure Lebanese elites, constrain Hezbollah's funding channels and expose Iranian influence — all without deploying a single U.S. asset. It would show that the global financial system has rules, and they are enforced. Other countries also demand scrutiny. Turkey is already gray-listed but shows inconsistent implementation. Nigeria, with its vast informal economy and entrenched corruption, remains a potential hub for illicit flows. These gray-zone economies blur the lines between legal and criminal finance. The Financial Action Task Force gives the U.S. a way to highlight these risks — and demand reform — without direct intervention. The Financial Action Task Force is tailor-made for Trump's approach to global engagement. It relies on measurable benchmarks and delivers tangible consequences. It doesn't care about ideology. It cares about enforcement, audits, prosecutions and safeguards. That makes it the perfect fit for a doctrine based on leverage and accountability. To fully unlock the Financial Action Task Force's potential, President Trump should: Skeptics claim multilateralism has no place in nationalist policy. But the Financial Action Task Force isn't the United Nations. It's a coalition of financial powers — many U.S.-aligned — that enforces rules through markets, not mandates. It doesn't issue demands — it denies access. That's why it works. The Financial Action Task Force lets the U.S. shape behavior globally through compliance. No tanks. No foreign aid. No drawn-out negotiations. Just access — or the loss of it. In today's world, real power lies not only in weapons, but in finance. In deciding who moves money, who attracts capital and who retains legitimacy. Trump understands deals. The Financial Action Task Force is a deal: meet the standard, and you're in. Fall short, and you're out. We have seen the positive impact the Financial Action Task Force has had on Pakistan. Using Pakistan as an inspiring example, President Trump should strongly advocate the task force be effectively applied to other nations. That's not globalism. That's leverage. And it's a roadmap to a world that's safer, stronger and more prosperous — on America's terms. Christopher Shays served in Congress from 1987 to 2009. He held key committee leadership positions overseeing budgets for the departments of Defense and State.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Maersk Resumes Haifa Imports; Strait of Hormuz Shipping Normalizes
Less than a week after canceling its port calls to Israel's Port of Haifa amid the country's then-brewing conflict with Iran, Maersk began accepting imported cargo at the port again on Wednesday. Israel and Iran have appeared to honor a Tuesday ceasefire after the countries traded missile attacks for 12 days, likely giving the Danish ocean carrier the go-ahead to clear ships to return to Haifa. The U.S. brokered the ceasefire after intervening in the conflict with airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. More from Sourcing Journal Pakistan Slashes Port Qasim Export Fees 50% in Bid to Revive Trade, Lure Ocean Carriers China Port Volumes Hit Record Highs on US Tariff Truce US-Iran Clash Sparks Strait of Hormuz Blockade Threat Fears Maersk has yet to confirm when it will begin accepting export cargo. 'We are monitoring the situation very closely and based on the recent developments and with prospects of a ceasefire currently in place, we expect to be able to reopen export cargo acceptance once the lower safety risk of doing so has been reconfirmed,' said Maersk in a customer advisory update Thursday morning. Maersk also noted that current diversion plans and contingencies for cargo from Haifa are actively being finalized on a case-by-case basis. Throughout the conflict, the carrier had maintained operations at Israel's Port of Ashdod, with the company saying it will promptly reassess both decisions based on security assessments and maritime advisories. After the ceasefire announcement, maritime security firm Ambrey assessed that a threat to U.S.-affiliated merchant shipping was lowered, but acknowledged that there was a 'realistic possibility that the conflict could restart.' In the advisory, Maersk also gave updates regarding the opposite side of the Arabian Peninsula. According to the ocean carrier, the Strait of Hormuz remains navigable as of Wednesday, but that the team is working out contingency plans on a case-by-case basis to adapt to any other potential changes. Worries that Iran would attempt to close off the Strait of Hormuz in some capacity appear to have subsided with the ceasefire, but security agencies dedicated to maritime risk assessment remain cautious. The Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) said in a Thursday advisory note that the regional threat level across the Strait of Hormuz, Arabian Gulf and Northern Arabian Sea is still 'significant,' although shipping in the strait has returned to normal levels. On Wednesday, 127 ships traversed the Strait of Hormuz, the agency said, up from 103 on June 19. Last June, 114 vessels on average transited the waterway daily. However, there are lingering threats of electronic interference that can impact a ship's navigation systems with high levels reported during dark periods, JMIC says. Angeliki Frangou, a CEO of Greece-based tanker Navios Maritime Partners, told CNBC Tuesday that many liners are only transiting during daytime because of the jamming of GPS signals of vessels. According to tracking data from maritime risk analytics firm Windward, 55 vessels between June 12-24 transmitted 101 atypical destination messages such as 'China owned' or 'Russian crude' across the Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea and Red Sea as protective measures since those ships are less likely to be targeted in an attack. JMIC recommends shipping companies to adhere to security advisories and conduct detailed vessel- and voyage-specific risk assessments for any operations or transit through the region. Given the prevalence of electronic interference, the agency also said to employ enhanced visual lookouts and rely more heavily on visual, radar-based navigation. What remains to be seen in the area is whether freight rates will react to the returning cadence of ships to the strait. Ships didn't even have to enter the Strait of Hormuz for customers to feel the heat of higher prices. Rates from Shanghai to the Port of Khor Fakkan, located on the UAE's coastline on the Gulf of Oman, accelerated 76 percent over mid-May, according to data from Xeneta. As of Monday, an average 40-foot container on that route cost $3,341.
