
Silence surrounds the disappearance of Chilean grandmother Julia Chuñil. What really happened?
Chuñil, 72, is Mapuche, Chile's largest Indigenous group. A land defender who fought for Mapuche land rights and practised ancestral farming methods and medicinal techniques, she moved to this spot in 2015.
After a few years, she was subjected to threats and harassment from a local business owner, who offered her money on several occasions in an attempt to get her to leave. But she repeatedly refused to go.
Last November, Chuñil set off on a habitual hike with her three dogs to herd some animals, journeying up into the forest's steep hills. But only two dogs returned; Chuñil and her three-month-old hound, Cholito, have not been seen since.
'She knew the land like the back of her hand,' says her son Pablo Chuñil, gesturing towards the trees. 'It is impossible she would have gotten lost or fallen.'
Five months on, the search for her has made no significant progress, despite the efforts of her family, community and authorities. Footprints thought to be hers were found near an abandoned cabin along with tyre tracks, but no further evidence has surfaced.
The case highlights the struggle over land rights and the vulnerability of Indigenous defenders in Chile.
Supported by the NGO Escazú Ahora, her family filed a lawsuit demanding that authorities approach Chuñil's disappearance as a criminal investigation.
Before Chuñil moved to her property, it had been acquired by the government agency Conadi (National Corporation for Indigenous Development) as part of a Mapuche territorial recovery programme. It was initially assigned to another Mapuche community, which allegedly abandoned it because of its steep terrain, making it impractical for livestock.
The activist spotted the vacant land and moved in with her community, the Petreguel, believing that Conadi would transfer the land rights to them.
Clear title to land in this area is crucial, as evidenced by the marks of change on the forested hills that shape the skyline – acres of native oak trees are interrupted by the neat squares of pine and eucalyptus plantations. It is this burgeoning industry that Chuñil's family and friends fear could have led her to harm.
'The forestry companies squeeze and pressure the Indigenous,' says Jaime Raipan, a leader of a neighbouring Mapuche community and a close friend of Chuñil. 'The businessmen never leave [our] communities in peace.'
The Mapuche struggle for land rights is a deep-seated issue rooted in colonial injustice. In the 19th century, in its infancy as an independent nation, the Chilean state seized Indigenous lands and gave them to European – primarily German – settlers. The Mapuche were subjected to atrocious living and working conditions under European estate owners.
'There is a history of dispossession the state did not take responsibility for,' says Salvador Millaleo, a lawyer and human rights lecturer at Universidad de Chile. 'That has generated a multitude of conflicts to this day.'
Over the past decade, several Mapuche land defenders have gone missing under murky circumstances or have died suspiciously.
'Although the number of cases is not comparable to somewhere like Colombia, this has been happening in Chile for quite some time,' says Millaleo. 'But no ruling has found anyone responsible for their deaths – so impunity prevails.'
A minority of Mapuche groups in the Araucanía and Biobío regions have taken up arms to defend their land and families, resulting in violent clashes with authorities. However, police have also been accused of using disproportionate force against Mapuche groups across the country, resulting in allegations of killings, attacks and harassment against unarmed civilians.
In 2021, then president Sebastián Piñera announced a state of emergency in the two regions to confront armed groups accused of arson and violence against forestry companies.
Incumbent president, Gabriel Boric, made an electoral pledge to end military control in the area and promote dialogue in its place. In 2023, the government launched the Commission for Peace and Understanding to resolve tensions over land rights.
Initially scheduled to be published in November, the commission's report has been pushed back until the end of April. Meanwhile, Boric's government has presided over one of the longest periods of state of emergency in Chile's democratic history – more than 1,000 days and counting.
'The government has had a terrible policy in terms of Indigenous groups; it has made a lot of symbolic gestures, but little has been done,' says Millaleo.
Escazú Ahora is similarly critical of the government, highlighting the prolonged implementation of the Escazú Agreement, a legally binding pact in South America to protect land defenders.
Boric signed the Escazú Agreement as one of his first acts after taking office. Yet, three years on, Escazú Ahora calculates that only 20% of the agreement has been implemented, and a law to protect land defenders is still crawling through Congress.
Sebastián Benfeld, director of Escazú Ahora, says the government must 'take part in the legislative discussion' and allocate a budget to ensure the law is enacted with sufficient resources.
In 2024, Escazú Ahora documented 47 cases of human rights violations against environmental defenders in Chile, almost half of which were physical attacks. If the law had existed before Chuñil went missing, says Benfeld, it could have protected her from the alleged threats against her.
In Máfil, Chuñil's family claim they were raided by police five times, with dozens of officers searching their house. They describe the experience as traumatic.
Raipan, Chuñil's neighbour, says the residents distrust the authorities: 'The police do not help Chile's Indigenous groups.'
After Chuñil's disappearance, the family discovered that Conadi had given the land back to its original landowner, the same businessman who they claim made the threats toward Chuñil. Pablo believes Conadi failed in their responsibility to notify his mother that they had sold the land.
'If he was the real landlord, why would he offer my mum money to leave?' he says. 'He could have just put a judicial order to get her out.'
In writing, Conadi argued that the land was initially bought for a Mapuche community called Blanco Lepin. Yet, 'due to breach of contract and other complexities that the families had, this process was reversed,' which resulted in the 'restitution of the land to its [original] owner'.
Conadi has not replied to inquiries relating specifically to Julia Chuñil.
Justice minister Jaime Gajardo Falcón told the Guardian that the government has launched a 'roundtable' in the region; a dedicated taskforce that will use the human rights framework outlined by the Escazú Agreement – taking into consideration Chuñil's role as an environmental defender.
'We have expressed solidarity with the family and have offered them psychological and material support,' he wrote. 'There is concern and action from various national and regional state agencies in the ongoing search for Mrs Julia Chuñil.'
Chuñil's granddaughter, Lyssette Sánchez, walks around her grandmother's house, tidying her garden and pruning medicinal plants – chamomile, oregano, rue and matico. She learned about medicine from her grandmother and knows all the plants and their properties.
Sánchez says Chuñil taught her many things; the first was to be proud. 'You get racist people here – they don't say 'Mapuche', they say 'Indian,'' she says. 'It affected me a lot when I was younger, but [my grandmother] told me not to be ashamed of our roots.'
The family has rehomed Chuñil's animals and has now left the property for good. 'We have followed vultures – if she was somewhere on the hill, they would have led us to her,' says Pablo, pointing to the sky. 'She is not here. I've climbed these hills every day for months.'
They will not fight to keep Chuñil's patch of land. All they want is to know what happened to the fierce, strong-willed woman who made this place her home.
'It's so sad: a person who worked so hard for so many years … and someone comes along, maybe makes them disappear as if it were nothing,' says Sánchez, breaking down in tears. 'They don't see the harm they left behind.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
6 hours ago
- Metro
Search for British tourist, 28, missing in Tenerife for two weeks
A desperate plea has been made to locate a British tourist who disappeared in Tenerife two weeks ago. The 28-year-old, who has only been named as Gerallt, arrived on the island on July 7 but did not board his flight home to Manchester on July 12. Officers have become 'increasingly concerned' for his safety as authorities in Tenerife and the British Embassy make efforts to locate him. Gerallt is described as 5ft8in tall and has short black hair. He was last seen wearing a navy blue tracksuit and black trainers. North Wales Police released two pictures of Gerallt to help in efforts to identify him. Chief Inspector Wes Williams said: 'We are becoming increasingly concerned for Gerallt's welfare, however officers are following several lines of investigation. 'We are appealing for information from anyone who knows Gerallt, or who may have been contacted by him to contact us as soon as possible. 'We're keen to hear from anybody who believes they may have any information that could help our ongoing investigation. 'Even the smallest lead could prove vital or for Gerallt himself to make contact to let us, or his family know that he is safe and well.' Gerallt has vanished on the same island where Jay Slater went missing last summer, sparking a huge search effort. More Trending Mr Slater, from Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, and friends had been to the NRG music festival at the Papagayo nightclub in the resort of Playa de las Americas on June 16 last year. He left to go to an Airbnb flat near Masca in the early hours of the next morning, before setting off on the long walk back. A coroner concluded at an inquest into his death today that the teenager died by accident after falling down a ravine. The 19-year-old was attempting a 14-hour walk back to his accommodation from a night out drinking and taking drugs, Preston Coroner's Court heard. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Jay Slater's friend reveals final panicked texts from teen lost in mountains MORE: I was Jet2 and Virgin cabin crew – here's 3 'secret' European destinations MORE: Aitana Bonmati makes England claim and reveals Spain targeted one Germany star


Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Crackdown on dodgy streaming as 100s of sites used for watching Hollywood films and sport for free BLOCKED for all Brits
People can sometimes evade restrictions by using a VPN - a service which keeps your internet activities private People can sometimes evade restrictions by using a VPN - a service which keeps your internet activities private OUT OF STREAM Crackdown on dodgy streaming as 100s of sites used for watching Hollywood films and sport for free BLOCKED for all Brits Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HUNDREDS of illegal streaming sites have reportedly been blocked for viewers in the UK - and will be impossible to access even with a virtual private network (VPN). Piracy sites with servers in the UK were blocked earlier this month by Cloudflare, an internet infrastructure giant that acts as the middleman between websites and their visitors, TechRadar reported. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The company uses geo-blocking, meaning the websites are simply unavailable in the UK Credit: Getty Those visiting the pirate streaming sites are expected to be met with Cloudflare's Error HTTP 451 - a block reserved for law-breaking websites only. Pirate streaming sites are already blocked by most internet service providers in the UK, such as BT, Virgin Media and Sky. People can sometimes evade restrictions by using a VPN - a service which keeps your internet activities private. But due to a recent legal order, Cloudflare has reportedly blocked access to up to 200 pirate streaming websites. READ MORE ON STREAMING STREAM OVER Dodgy streaming networks closed in raid as 'piracy barons' caught with £430k And this block cannot be bypassed with a simple VPN. Cloudflare is the company connecting web users to their desired websites - which means they can step in and block access at any time. The company uses geo-blocking, meaning the websites are simply unavailable in the UK. While the sites were barred earlier this month, the legal case calling for their blocking may have started as early as February 2024, TechRadar reported. A private law firm delivered a court order to Google, requesting to block 14 piracy sites, according to the Lumen Database. Watch as police seize wads of cash from illegal streaming kingpin who made £1 million However, Torrentfreak estimates that as many as 200 pirate domains could be affected. It forms part of a European crackdown on piracy. In May, French streaming giant Canal+ scored a legal victory when a landmark ruling ordered five popular VPN providers to block access to over 200 illegal sports streaming sites.


Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Telegraph
Asylum seeker ‘faked baby with European' to win right to stay
An asylum seeker won the right to stay in Britain after using fake birth and death certificates to claim he had a baby, an immigration court heard. Sameer Khan, a Pakistani citizen, presented the forged documents to a tribunal as part of his bid to stay in the UK, judges were told. He used the certificates to successfully argue the child proved his marriage to a European citizen was not one of 'convenience' but a genuine relationship, which therefore gave him the right to remain in Britain. But the Home Office has since uncovered evidence that the documents presented to the court to support his case were fake, throwing into doubt whether the child had ever been born. After the accusation of fraud, Mr Khan's case will now be heard again after judges were told his alleged dishonesty undermines his entire case to stay in Britain. An upper immigration tribunal was told Mr Khan had applied for leave to remain under the European Union settlement scheme after claiming to have married an EEA citizen – named at the hearing as Ms Rumenova – in Cyprus in August 2020. The Home Office refused the application on the basis that there were 'reasonable grounds for suspicion that the marriage was entered into for the purpose of securing leave to remain, and so was a marriage of convenience', the tribunal was told. Mr Khan appealed, and a hearing of a first-tier tribunal in November 2024 presided over by Judge Sarah Farmer was shown documents 'said to establish cohabitation and the relationship'. 'There was also a birth certificate for a child, 'AK', said to have been born in the United Kingdom on 10 August 2023 in Slough, County of Berkshire,' the tribunal was told. '[Mr Khan] and [Ms Rumenova] were named on the birth certificate as the parents of AK.' But the couple did not attend the asylum hearing, the tribunal heard, having emailed to say that the baby had died the week before. 'The Judge recorded in the Decision that [they] had emailed the Tribunal on the morning of the hearing, to say their child, AK... had died in the week before the hearing, and so they could not attend the hearing,' the tribunal said. Later that day, the judge was emailed a death certificate, saying the child had died of epilepsy related seizures and vomiting on Nov 15 2024, at Wexham Park Hospital in Slough, and the death had been registered on Nov 18 2024, the same day as the hearing. Judge Farmer allowed Mr Khan's appeal against the Home Office's decision to deny him leave to remain after finding that there was a 'wealth of reliable evidence', including the birth and death certificates, to show the relationship was not one of convenience. Document authenticity concerns After officials made checks, the registry office confirmed the birth and death certificates were forgeries. As a result, upper tribunal judges Daniel Sheridan and Hannah Graves said the evidence undermined the original ruling. They said there was 'sufficient' evidence to establish that there are 'legitimate concerns about whether those documents are genuine and capable of reliance'. 'We therefore find that the Judge was led into error, albeit inadvertently. We find that error was material and infects the credibility assessment made by the Judge, which was central to the findings of fact made and the outcome of the appeal,' they said. 'We therefore do not preserve any findings made in the Decision but set it aside in its entirety. The matter is now remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing, before another judge than Judge Farmer.'