
Mike Johnson Would Like You to Know About His Subservience
The president is the most maligned and attacked political figure in the history of American politics. There's no question about it, but he's also the most resilient. And you see at the same time, his approval ratings are skyrocketing. CNN had a story, I think, a day or two ago. He was at 90 percent approval rating. There's never been a president that high.
You can decide for yourself if you think this president is 'the most maligned and attacked political figure in the history of American politics' (Abraham Lincoln might disagree), but it is frankly ludicrous to say that Trump's approval ratings are 'skyrocketing' or that he represents a high-water mark of presidential popularity.
Recent surveys from YouGov, Quinnipiac University, The Associated Press-NORC and Reuters/Ipsos place Trump at roughly 40 percent approval. CNN, contra Johnson, puts Trump at 42 percent approval and 56 percent disapproval. Overall, according to the Strength in Numbers presidential approval average, 42.6 percent of Americans approve of the president's performance while 53.5 percent disapprove, for a net negative of -10.9 points, a low for his second term so far.
But the substance of Johnson's absurd claim about the president's popularity is less interesting to me than the fact that he would even say it. The House speaker's assertion that Trump was at a '90 percent approval rating' is the kind of falsehood you might hear from authoritarian state media. It is a servile display of allegiance as much as it is an attempt to mislead viewers. It's Johnson telling Trump he is his man.
In the neo-republican ideology that shaped the American founding, civic virtue is a key part of self-government. A corrupt people cannot, in this vision, form a free government. 'Just as good customs require laws in order to be maintained,' Machiavelli observed, 'so laws require good customs in order to be observed.'
For Frederick Douglass — the great abolitionist and thinker whose political philosophy was shaped by republican thinking — virtue includes self-respect, cultivated through education, and self-reliance. 'Liberty has its manners as well as slavery,' Douglass wrote to the Black abolitionist and journalist Martin Delany in 1871, 'and with those manners true self-respect goes hand in hand with a just respect for the rights and feelings of others.'
My immediate thought upon seeing Johnson's performance on air was to reflect on this relationship between self-respect and self-government. To tell such egregious lies for the approval of some higher authority is to prostrate yourself — to show, for the world to see, your lack of self-respect. This becomes all the more egregious when one considers that Mike Johnson, as speaker of the House of Representatives, is more an equal to the president, in the American constitutional order, than he is a subordinate. He should have the dignity, at least, to act as a peer and not a supplicant.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Jasmine Crockett Calls Trump 'Wannabe Hitler' Over Epstein Files
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Jasmine Crockett, a Texas Democrat, delivered sharp criticism of her Republican colleagues during a Saturday afternoon MSNBC interview, accusing them of showing loyalty to what she called a "wannabe Hitler" in reference to President Donald Trump. The remarks came amid growing controversy over the Trump administration's handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related files. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email on Sunday for comment. Why It Matters Epstein, a convicted sex offender, died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting further sex trafficking charges. The disgraced financier had well-documented connections to powerful figures, and his death has long prompted numerous conspiracy theories, particularly about a "client list" and the way in which he died. From lawmakers and attorneys to concerned voters, many say that full transparency is essential to restoring public trust and bringing clarity to one of the most high-profile criminal investigations in recent memory. The controversy has created fractures within Trump's own Make America Great Again (MAGA) base while highlighting broader questions about government transparency and executive accountability. What To Know During her Saturday MSNBC appearance on Alex Witt Reports, Crockett addressed Trump's reversal on releasing Epstein files after initially pledging transparency. The lawmaker predicted her Republican colleagues would avoid taking decisive action on the matter, noting that several GOP lawmakers "just skipped a previous vote this week." Crockett suggested Republicans are deliberately protecting Trump from potentially damaging revelations because "they understand that it is most likely problematic for him as well as the MAGA brand." The Texas Democrat characterized Republican loyalty to Trump in stark terms, saying lawmakers want to "pledge their loyalty" to someone she described as a "wannabe Hitler." She expressed skepticism that Republicans would support any measures "that may harm them or their fearless leader." Meanwhile, Trump's frustration with critics became evident in his Saturday Truth Social post, where he announced instructing the DOJ to release grand jury testimony related to Epstein. However, he simultaneously dismissed demands for broader transparency, writing that "nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request." The administration's handling has drawn criticism across party lines. Attorney General Pam Bondi previously claimed an Epstein client list was on her desk but now says no such list exists. The DOJ subsequently requested unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and convicted British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, though critics argue this represents only a fraction of available evidence. Scrutiny intensified following a Wall Street Journal report about a birthday letter from Trump to Epstein containing suggestive content. Trump has since sued the newspaper and found Rupert Murdoch, seeking at least $10 billion in damages. What People Are Saying Rep. Jasmine Crockett during a Saturday MSNBC interview: "They want to show that they're loyal to this, you know, I don't even know what to call him," she continued. "I've called him so many things, but this wannabe Hitler for sure. They want to pledge their loyalty to him, and they know that he does not want this released." She continued: "I think they also are concerned about the damage that it may do. If he's trying to hide it, they understand that it is most likely problematic for him as well as the MAGA brand, as well the Republicans. So, I don't anticipate that they will be on board for doing anything that may harm them or their fearless leader." President Donald Trump called out the Wall Street Journal over its report on Friday, writing on Truth Social: "If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had [then Attorney General Merrick] Garland and [former FBI Director James] Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!" MAGA loyalist Laura Loomer said during a livestream last week: "Pam Bondi is a coward. She didn't even sign her name to the memo. This isn't transparency—it's a cover-up." Rep. Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican, told CNN: "I think that the American people need to see what's in there, and that's not hard to understand. Across the board, government's supposed to work for us. If there's nothing there, show the blank sheet." FBI Director Kash Patel on X last week: "The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump — and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me." Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) arrives for the House Democratic leadership elections at the U.S. Capitol Nov. 19, 2024. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) arrives for the House Democratic leadership elections at the U.S. Capitol Nov. 19, 2024. Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images What Happens Next The release of grand jury information is expected to take weeks or possibly months, as legal teams review transcripts to determine what can be safely disclosed without exposing victims or sensitive details. Congressional Democrats are expected to continue pressing for comprehensive document release, though Crockett expressed skepticism about Republican cooperation.

Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Trump calls for name reversals of NFL's Commanders, baseball's Guardians
Many Native Americans and advocates have long called for all professional sports teams with Indigenous references — including names and mascots — to rebrand, arguing the use of such imagery is offensive. The Commanders and Guardians are among a handful of professional teams that have made changes. But Trump on Sunday characterized the changes as erasing the identity of Native Americans, saying: 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers,' want teams to keep the original names despite the pushback. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them,' Trump wrote. 'Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' Trump has previously voiced his disapproval for the Commanders' name change. Earlier this year, the president was asked if he would require the NFL team to restore its former name if a deal to bring the franchise, which now plays in Virginia, back to Washington was reached. At the time, Trump said the name change was 'degrading to the Indian population.' 'I can tell you that I spoke to people of Indian heritage who love that name and love that team, and I think it's a much superior name to what they have right now and it had heritage behind it, it had something special,' he said. The NFL did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Washington football team was founded in Boston in 1932. Originally called the Boston Braves, the team changed its name to the Boston Redskins in 1933 and moved to Washington in 1937. The franchise, under the ownership of George Preston Marshall, was the last team in the NFL to integrate, doing so in 1962 only after threats by the Kennedy administration. The team briefly went by the Washington Football Team in 2020 before it officially changed its name once more in 2022 following years of criticism from Native Americans and advocacy groups that said the former name was offensive. Though the Commanders' name was originally met with derision, the name has appeared to grow on fans. A 2024 Washington Post poll found that only 36 percent of Commanders fans said they liked or loved the name —but as of May this year, 62 percent say they like or love the name. The change followed the team's most successful season in decades. Regardless of public opinion, Washington Commanders controlling owner Josh Harris in February said the team would not be changing its name again. 'I think it's now being embraced by our team, by our culture, by our coaching staff, so, we're going with that,' Harris said. 'Now, in this building, the name Commanders means something. It's about players who love football, are great at football, hit hard, mentally tough, great teammates. It's really meaningful that that name is growing in meaning.'


Washington Post
a few seconds ago
- Washington Post
Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect
A Mississippi law that requires social media users to verify their ages can go into effect, a federal court has ruled. A tech industry group has pledged to continue challenging the law , arguing it infringes on users' rights to privacy and free expression. A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overruled a decision by a federal district judge to block the 2024 law from going into effect. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country.