Hongkongers use driving schools over border to get cheap licences illegally
Checks by the Post on popular mainland social media platform RedNote have found that a driving school in Shenzhen is offering tailor-made packages for Hong Kong residents, including ways to circumvent legal requirements.
It charges 6,800 yuan (HK$7,422) for a driving course to obtain a licence in Shenzhen, including five test retakes within three years. In Hong Kong, it costs learner drivers at least HK$15,000 for lessons and other fees before taking the test.
The process is also much faster in Shenzhen, where a licence can be attained within three months, compared with at least a year in Hong Kong, assuming a learner passes written and road tests.
'We will lend you our employees' addresses. They are real and reliable,' an agent with the driving school told a Post reporter pretending to be a potential customer.
'More than 1,000 Hongkongers have successfully used our service to obtain mainland driving licences and get them converted in Hong Kong in the past two years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
26 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
How Hong Kong stock exchange has simplified the IPO process
Tech – particularly that from mainland China – is currently the cornerstone of Hong Kong's IPO market. Professional services company EY reported that a majority of the 10 biggest IPOs on the Hong Kong stock exchange (HKEX) in 2024 were tech firms. On June 12, it shared that for the first half of 2025, A-share deals and proceeds increased 14 per cent year-on-year, with large IPOs propelling Hong Kong to world-leading IPO proceeds of US$14 billion. Advertisement 'The surge is largely driven by substantial government investments in research and development, and support to enterprises spearheading the technology advancement and innovation ecosystem,' said Jack Chan, EY China chairman and Greater China regional managing partner. 'National strategic plans like Made in China 2025 have further enhanced market penetration, allowing Chinese enterprises to capture significant global market presence.' Jack Chan, EY China chairman and Greater China regional managing partner. Photo: Handout Made in China 2025 was unveiled 10 years ago and has largely succeeded in encouraging the development of technology and advanced manufacturing sectors. Responding to this, HKEX and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) jointly launched the Technology Enterprises Channel (TECH) in May to help ease the listing process for specialist technology companies (under Chapter 18C of the listing rules) and biotech companies (18A). The channel will make dedicated teams available to help new firms get advice on listing rules, requirements and eligibility, especially as they apply to firms with products the markets may not be familiar with. HKEX's Guide for New Listing Applicants repeatedly states that many examples were non-exhaustive, making assessments for eligibility a case-by-case exercise, particularly as many of the firms that would use TECH may be developing unfamiliar technologies. 'TECH is an important communication channel,' Chan said 'through which potential applicants can clarify their queries with HKEX in detail.' Advertisement Chan continued that other than this initial guidance, the IPO process remains the same. After enquiring via the channel, firms hope to have more clarity before meeting with the listing division and submitting pre-IPO enquiries. TECH helps these companies clarify the applicable listing rules before a new listing application is submitted.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
University of Michigan investigated after 2 Chinese scientists charged with bio-smuggling
The University of Michigan is under federal scrutiny after two Chinese scientists linked to the school were separately charged with smuggling biological materials into the United States. The US Education Department on Tuesday opened an investigation into the university's foreign funding, citing the pair of cases that were announced days apart in June. It said the 'highly disturbing criminal charges' raise concerns about Michigan's vulnerability to national security threats from China. 'Despite the University of Michigan's history of downplaying its vulnerabilities to malign foreign influence, recent reports reveal that UM's research laboratories remain vulnerable to sabotage,' said Paul Moore, chief investigative counsel of the department. US President Donald Trump has made it a priority to increase transparency around foreign gifts and contracts to US universities, especially those tied to China. Similar investigations have been opened at Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University of California, Berkeley. It joins efforts from Republicans in Congress who have urged universities to cut research ties with China, saying China exploits the relationships to steal technology. Michigan ended a partnership with a university in Shanghai in January amid pressure from House Republicans who called it a security risk. Chinese scientist Jian Yunqing is accused of trying to bring a toxic fungus into the US. Photo: Sanilac County Sheriff's Office via AP The new investigation demands financial records from Michigan, along with information about research collaborations with institutions outside the US. The Education Department accuses Michigan of being 'incomplete, inaccurate and untimely' in its public disclosures around funding from foreign sources.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
The EU is doing itself no trade favours in pushing China on Russia
Ahead of the China-European Union summit , set to take place in Beijing on July 24, the 27-nation bloc seems determined to adopt a firm stance in its relationship with the world's second-largest economy. While accusing China of aiding Russia's war efforts in Ukraine, the EU also seeks what it sees as fairer economic relations. But can the growing pressure influence Beijing's position on Moscow and the Ukraine conflict? In a recent speech, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Brussels 'cannot accept' that China is 'de facto enabling Russia's war economy' . She also said the EU's process of 'de-risking, not decoupling' from the world's second-largest economy must 'speed up'. This comes just days after Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reportedly told top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas that Beijing did not want to see a Russian loss in Ukraine because it feared the United States would then shift its whole focus to Beijing. Von der Leyen's rhetoric suggests the EU has adopted an 'if you're not with us, you're against us' dichotomy in its approach towards China. But even if Beijing does not wish for Russia to lose the war, it does not necessarily mean it is interested in Moscow accomplishing all of its goals in Ukraine. Similarly, American support for Kyiv does not automatically imply that Washington wants Ukraine to secure a complete victory over Russia. If the US really benefits from the war and China is, as widely seen, the conflict's 'big winner' , then what does either power have to gain from ending the stalemate? More importantly, from Beijing's perspective, it would be highly problematic if a Russian victory resulted from US President Donald Trump's betrayal of Kyiv, however unlikely that seems. There is no free lunch in politics and policymakers in Beijing are fully aware the US would expect the Kremlin to make concessions in exchange for any US abandonment of Ukraine. What if those concessions mean Russia's decoupling from China? There has been growing concern among Russian analysts that Trump aims to sow discord between Moscow and Beijing, eventually using Russia as an instrument against China. But given that Trump, increasingly annoyed with Russian President Vladimir Putin, now says Washington must continue to send weapons to Ukraine and is threatening to to impose tariffs on any country doing business with Russia, the chances of Moscow and Washington normalising relations any time soon are rather low. Thus, the scenario of Russia being used by the Americans against China is not on the horizon.
