
EXCLUSIVE The damning evidence that convicted 'moronic' Sycamore Gap tree duo: Arrogant pair thought they'd got away with tree felling that shocked the world.... but left vital clues
Detective Inspector Calum Meikle revealed officers were 'tipped off' about Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers' involvement a few weeks after the world famous tree was chopped down, in September 2023.
The 'intelligence' stated the pair of ground workers were responsible and had kept part of the tree as a trophy. It led officers to arrest both men and seize their phones.
Initially, Mr Meikle said, a two minute and 41 second video retrieved from Graham's device was 'all black.'
But they sent it to be digitally enhanced and when it came back the film was 'shocking.' There were gasps in the courtroom at Newcastle Crown Court when the now iconic grainy black and white video, accompanied by the unmistakable sound of a revving chainsaw and cracking wood, was shown for the first time.
'I'm always impressed with what our digital forensic units are able to achieve,' Mr Meikle told the Mail. 'But, as you have seen from the video, as the person filming moves back, it shows us that fantastically famous outline (which) was undoubtedly the Sycamore Gap tree.
'I was very pleased to have that evidence.'
Photographs of a wedge of the tree trunk and a chainsaw in the boot of Graham's Range Rover were also recovered from his phone.
Today Graham, 39, and Carruthers, 32, were jailed for four years and three months for felling the tree during a 'moronic mission' and damaging Hadrian's Wall in the process.
The court heard the pair, both from Cumbria, had only recently admitted, in interviews with the Probation Service, that they were responsible.
They now accepted they had driven 30 miles through a storm to chop down the iconic landmark, in the early hours of September 28, 2023.
Mrs Justice Christina Lambert said: 'I can now be sure you, Adam Carruthers, were the person who felled the tree and you, Daniel Graham, assisted and encouraged him by driving there and back and not least by filming it on your phone.'
Carruthers then forwarded the video to his partner as they fled the scene. They also took the pictures of the wedge, which has never been found.
The following morning, when news broke of the vandalism, the pair shared social media posts about the tree with Graham saying to Carruthers 'here we go,' as they 'revelled' in news reports about the crime.
Although prosecutors said the friends had chopped the famous tree down for 'a bit of a laugh,' and suggested Carruthers was so obsessed with the Sycamore Gap that he wanted the wedge as a special souvenir for his newborn daughter, neither has offered any proper explanation for why they did what they did.
Today Carruthers claimed he had drunk a bottle of whisky and could barely remember felling the tree.
But the judge said this was implausible because the act took skill and coordination.
'This was not the work of someone whose actions were significantly impaired through drink,' she said.
Graham, in contrast, continued to blame his accomplice, insisting cutting the tree down had been Carruthers' 'dream' and 'his show' which he simply went along with. He also claimed he was 'shocked' when Carruthers went through with the plan.
But Mrs Justice Lambert said the fact Graham filmed the felling and took photographs did not square with the behaviour of someone who was 'horrified and shocked' or was simply going along with Carruthers' plan.
Instead the judge said both men were 'equally culpable.' They did it for 'sheer bravado' and also got 'some sort of thrill' out of the media coverage afterwards, she added.
Mr Meikle said he understood why people were 'frustrated' by the lack of an explanation but said only Graham and Carruthers would be able to solve the mystery of their 'mindless thuggery.'
'As soon as anybody knows that I'm involved in this investigation, that's the first question they ask, they want to know why?' he added.
'That's something that we still don't fully understand. There are only two people that really will ever know.
'I certainly don't think that they fully understood the enormity of their actions.
'The local community are increasingly frustrated by the fact that they don't know why this has taken place, quite understandably. I am just happy to have delivered the two people that I know are responsible.'
Mr Meikle said that the case could prompt Britain to re-examine the way trees are valued.
'I think this whole incident will raise further legislation because trees aren't afforded the same protection that an ancient monument gets,' he said. 'So whilst Hadrian's Wall is an ancient monument, the tree itself wasn't.'
Graham and Carruthers were found guilty of causing £622,191 of criminal damage to the tree and £1,144 of damage to Hadrian's Wall, a Unesco world heritage site owned by the National Trust.
But Mr Meikle, who was asked to lead the inquiry for Northumbria Police because his father worked as a forester and he grew up with an understanding of the profession, insisted that what happened had far reaching consequences and, in many ways, was 'not just a (routine) criminal damage.'
'The tree means so much to so many people,' Mr Meikle added.
'That's why it will never be looked at as just a criminal damage or just a tree.
'It has been a very unique and very privileged role that I've held.'
The sycamore had stood for more than 100 years and achieved worldwide fame when it was featured in the 1991 Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman film, Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves.
Sycamore Gap timeline: How damage to the landmark tree unfolded
– September 28, 2023
12.32am A video is made on Daniel Graham's phone showing the sound of a chainsaw, followed by the sound of a tree falling
9.46am Police receive a report that the Sycamore Gap tree has been damaged. The investigation begins
– October 31, 2023
Graham and Adam Carruthers are arrested and interviewed. Police find two chainsaws, and a chainsaw blade and cover at Graham's house
– November 3, 2023
Graham and Carruthers are arrested and interviewed again. Carruthers' property is searched and a chainsaw is found
– April 30, 2024
Graham and Carruthers are charged with criminal damage. They both later plead not guilty.
- April 28, 2025
The trial of Graham and Carruthers begins at Newcastle Crown Court
- May 9, 2025
Graham and Carruthers are found guilty of cutting down the tree in an act of 'deliberate and mindless criminal damage'
July 15, 2025
Graham and Carruthers sentenced
The trial heard that the police investigation into the damage initially included people who had issues with the National Trust, and even a young boy who reported his brother.
Opening the case to jurors, prosecutor Richard Wright KC said: 'Though the tree had grown for over a hundred years, the act of irreparably damaging it was the work of a matter of minutes.'
Graham and Carruthers were 'best of pals' at the time and regularly worked together felling trees.
Graham's black Range Rover was picked up on automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras between Carlisle and Sycamore Gap at night on September 27 2023, and returning early the next morning. His phone was traced to cell sites making the same journey.
When police arrested the pair and searched Graham's phone, they found the video which showed the sycamore being cut down at 12.30am on September 28, that had also been sent to Carruthers.
They also found photos and videos of the wedge and chainsaw in the boot of Graham's 4x4, although these have never been found.
Messages and voice notes between Graham and Carruthers the next day showed them talking about the story going 'wild' and 'viral', referring to 'an operation like we did last night' and joking that damage looked like it had been done by a professional.
A man named Kevin Hartness posted about the tree on Facebook, writing: 'Some weak people that walk this earth; disgusting behaviour.'
Carruthers sent this post to Graham, and later sent a voice note in which he said: 'I'd like to see Kevin Hartness launch an operation like we did last night… I don't think he's got the minerals.'
In August last year, Graham made an anonymous phone call to the police in an attempt to implicate his friend and save himself.
Officers instantly recognised his voice as he told them that 'one of the lads that [did] it, Adam Carruthers,' had taken his chainsaws back home.
The 'anonymous caller' said if police searched Carruthers' home and workshop they would find the saws and part of the felled tree, along with a shotgun and a pistol.
No firearms, chainsaws or the tree wedge were found, however.
On December 1, 2024, days before the trial was originally scheduled to begin, Graham took to Facebook to accuse Carruthers of felling the tree, posting a series of images of his former friend.
'I truly would not do it,' he wrote.
'It's my picture everywhere. Well, here's a picture of the man with [the] hidden face.'
In a tense exchange with Mr Wright during his cross examination, Graham tried to justify turning on his friend.
He said Carruthers and an associate had tried to intimidate him into taking the blame for cutting down the tree, insisting that the criminal justice system would be lenient towards him due to his mental health issues.
He added: 'If someone is costing me money and affecting my business then I will f***ing grass.
'No doubt about it he [Carruthers] is the one holding the chainsaw. Adam felled the tree, I don't know 100 per cent who the other person was.
'I was annoyed about my business suffering through his actions.'
To explain away number plate and phone site evidence against him, Graham insisted that Carruthers and an accomplice had taken his car, with his phone inside, and driven to the Sycamore Gap without his knowledge while he had been sleeping in his caravan.
Graham and Carruthers, seen here in a court sketch, were arrested in connection with the felling of the tree in October 2023
Carruthers, for his part, did not directly accuse Graham of being involved in felling the tree.
But he insisted that on the evening the tree was felled he had tried to take his partner and young children for a meal at the Metrocentre in Gateshead but turned back because their 11-day-old baby was unsettled.
Jurors rejected these flimsy alibis and found the pair unanimously guilty.
The iconic tree that captured the world's imagination: Sycamore Gap became a backdrop to Hollywood blockbuster and site of helicopter crash that nearly killed a national treasure
Known to some as the Robin Hood Tree after its appearance in Kevin Costner's 1991 film, Sycamore Gap was one of the most photographed trees in the country.
It stood next to Hadrian's Wall near Crag Lough in Northumberland and is believed to have been planted in the early 18th century.
It is said to have once stood alongside others but eventually became the only one left - making it especially photogenic.
In Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, the hero - played by Costner - is seen pulling leaves from the tree as he walks under it with the warrior Azeem, who is played by Morgan Freeman.
The tree also featured in the music video for American star Bryan Adams' hit (Everything I Do) I Do It for You, which was the soundtrack for Costner's Robin Hood film.
In 2003, the tree escaped damage when a helicopter that was filming documentary series British Isles - A Natural History crashed less than 100 feet away.
The four onboard the aircraft were injured, but presenter Alan Titchmarsh, who was standing on the ground, narrowly escaped harm.
Titchmarsh said at the time: 'I was pretty shaken and I was worried the copter was going to explode. The crew scrambled out and ran like hell.'
An eyewitness added: 'Alan Titchmarsh was very lucky not to be hit.
'He was almost underneath the helicopter when it fell but jumped out of the way as it came down.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Evesham attacks on animals with catapult investigated
A teenager has reportedly been using a catapult to hurt animals on a waterway, police were called to Bridge Street, Evesham, Worcestershire, on Tuesday afternoon following the reports anti-social behaviour.A teenage boy was found and searched but no catapult was found, a force spokesperson Lee Baker said they were keen to speak to a teenage boy who was seen wearing a neon pink T-shirt and added that extra patrols would be carried out in the area. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Doctor suspended for theft cleared to return to work
A Liverpool-based doctor who stole lip fillers and botox from a former employer has been cleared to return to Nimrit Dhillon was suspended in 2023, after being found guilty of taking items from a former employer worth £1, self-referring to the General Medical Council (GMC), she was suspended for eight months following a three-day hearing by the Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service (MPTS).In a reflective statement, made public by the MPTS, Dr Dhillon has since acknowledged her actions were "wholly unacceptable". She said she had used the suspension period "to reflect extensively, to rebuild my ethical understanding and to ensure that I never repeat these mistakes". Documents made public by the MPTS set out how, in May 2023, Dr Dhillon, who runs an aesthetic procedures business in Liverpool, stole Belotero Intense lip fillers and boxes of Bocouture botox worth £450.A week later, she stole a further three 100-unit boxes of botox and one box of 50-unit Belotero Volume dermal fillers, as well as an additional box of botox and fillers, totalling £700 in 8 June 2023, Dr Dhillon took four more boxes of 100-unit botox belonging to Facethetics Training in Aigburth, worth £ was convicted in August the same year. At a hearing last September at Liverpool Magistrates Court. she was sentenced to a 12-month community order, an unpaid work requirement of 200 hours and ordered to pay £1,450 in a reflective statement, made public by the MPTS, Dr Dhillon said she accepted "full responsibility" for her actions."I was dishonest and I stole property," she said."These actions were wholly unacceptable and fell far below the standards expected of any medical added she "deeply regretted" harm caused to colleagues and to "the reputation of the profession, to public trust, and to those who relied on me to act with honesty and integrity".After serving her suspension, it has been confirmed the GMC has revoked any barriers to the University of Leeds graduate returning to GMC and Dr Dhillon agreed in writing, signed by both parties last month, that her fitness to practise is no longer impaired by reason of her conviction, and the suspension imposed should be revoked for the outstanding GMC found "the risk of repetition of the behaviour that led to her conviction is so low as to be negligible". Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


BreakingNews.ie
22 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Garda (32) convicted of assaulting teenager in Temple Bar in 2021
A garda has been convicted of assaulting a teenager in Temple Bar four years ago following a trial at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. Lorcan Murphy (32) of Pearse Street Garda Station pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm under section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997. Advertisement The assaults on the then 17-year-old took place on Essex Street, Dublin 2 and Pearse Street Garda Station on June 1st, 2021. After four hours and 20 minutes of deliberation, the jury returned unanimous verdicts of guilty on both counts. There was complete silence in the court after the jury delivered its verdict. Judge Pauline Codd thanked the jurors for their service. She adjourned the matter for sentencing until November 3rd next, in order to prepare a probation report and a victim impact statement. She remanded Murphy on continuing bail. Advertisement The evidence 'I was assaulted, I was tripped up supposedly, I fractured my skull,' the complainant told the court, adding that he had no recollection of events. He said he'd been 'drinking that day' and had also been 'smoking weed'. He also said that he 'could have been' carrying alcohol. He went to meet his girlfriend in Temple Bar and said the last thing he remembered was walking past McDonald's on Grafton Street. He said 'waking up in James' Hospital' was the next thing he remembered. Someone in the hospital told him he was involved in an incident with the gardaí. Advertisement He said he ran out of the hospital as he 'freaked out' and thought nothing was wrong with him. He woke up with a pain in his head, then went to the Mater Hospital before being transferred to Beaumont Hospital, where he stayed for five days. He said he had headaches but has no issues with his memory. The complainant stated that he had spoken to Garda Siochána Ombudsman Commission (Gsoc) and provided them with two videos: one of himself on the ground, which someone else had recorded, and another of the garda approaching him, which he had taken himself. Advertisement He stated that he was not charged with any offences in relation to the events in Temple Bar that day. The complainant agreed during cross-examination that he had no recollection of the incident, due to a head injury, but accepted that alcohol and cannabis could have contributed to his lack of memory. Defence counsel asked the witness if he was someone who would obstruct the gardaí, and he said that 'sometimes if they came to me Ma's house'. When asked how he would obstruct the gardaí, the complainant said: 'Just resist arrest, but I wasn't resisting arrest this time'. Advertisement He accepted that he was interviewed by Gsoc, now Fiosru, but disagreed with a suggestion that he lied about his alcohol consumption. The jury heard that the complainant has 44 previous convictions, and 10 days after this alleged incident, he kicked and beat a person after they had withdrawn money from an ATM on O'Connell Street, then went through their pockets. The complainant stated that he is a person who is respectful to others in society and has not engaged in anti-social behaviour since he was 15. When it was put to him that beating people up and robbing them in public is not respectful, he replied, 'I'm paying for my mistakes'. Other evidence CCTV was shown to the court of two gardaí, one of whom was Mr Murphy, on Essex Street, along with CCTV from Pearse Street Garda Station. Darragh Fitzpatrick gave evidence that he had gone to Essex Street after hurling training to socialise with friends. Asked if he saw any interaction between gardaí and the complainant, he replied: 'He seemed out of it, he didn't seem to know what was going on.' Mr Fitzpatrick said he saw 'a bit of grabbing and handcuffs being placed on him [the complainant] and hearing something about a knife'. When he heard the word 'knife', he took a step back. He said he saw a garda, identified as Mr Murphy, 'spear tackle' the complainant. Mr Fitzpatrick described the complainant going 'limp and lifeless', adding that he was 'frozen' and was 'initially very shocked'. Defence counsel put to Mr Fitzpatrick that when he heard the word 'knife', he had the benefit of retreating. He replied, 'I think I stood my ground,' but acknowledged that he may have taken a step back. Aileen Fitzmaurice's evidence was that she could not hear what was said between the gardaí and the complainant, but thought there was an 'aggressive demeanour'. She said everything happened quite quickly; the complainant ended up face down on the ground. He was restrained by the gardaí, and she then heard shouting, 'Where is the knife?' The gardaí first lifted the complainant to his feet, and then she described, 'It was like they flipped him in a sudden manner and bashed his head off the ground.' She also described hearing a loud sound. Under cross-examination, she confirmed she heard 'where is the knife' said repeatedly, but she could not remember the exact sequence of events. Eoghan Hickey's evidence was that he heard one of the gardaí saying 'drop the knife' repeatedly. He described the complainant as being 'limp' when he was brought to the garda van. He agreed with defence counsel during cross-examination that he heard gardaí shouting 'where is the knife' while the complainant was upright. Dr Haroon Khan gave evidence of being called to Pearse Street Garda Station. He said he noted the complainant was intoxicated, tried to rouse him, but did not speak to him before having him transferred to the hospital. Consultant neurosurgeon Mr John Caird gave evidence that the complainant had a fracture to the skull and a contusion to the brain and has made an excellent recovery. The defence case Two statements from Mr Murphy were read to the jury. He went to assist a colleague, who was dealing with the complainant. He instructed the complainant to remove his hands from his pockets, then noted the young male tense up. He stated that the complainant was again asked to remove his hands from his pockets, but he did not comply. Mr Murphy said the complainant produced a glass bottle in such a way that he believed he was at risk of being struck with the bottle, which was then pushed out of the complainant's hand. The complainant was informed that he was being placed under arrest. He was placed on the ground, and another garda placed one handcuff on him. The complainant's second hand was under him, and he was resisting arrest. Mr Murphy said he managed to take hold of the complainant's second hand, and he was handcuffed. He said that the complainant was spitting towards him. Mr Murphy stood up and took the complainant to his feet. He told a crowd which had gathered to get back, but they didn't. Mr Murphy said he felt unsafe both for himself and the arrested complainant. He said he had his hand on the complainant's back and felt him shift his weight, and Mr Murphy then performed a leg sweep. The side of the complainant's body and head made contact with the ground. Mr Murphy checked him visually and said that at no stage was he unconscious. He requested prisoner transport and that a doctor be called to Pearse Street Garda Station. Closing speeches Prosecuting counsel John Gallagher BL told the jury the prosecution's case is that excessive force was used in the leg sweep, which resulted in the complainant's head impacting the ground. He submitted that the level of force used to bring the complainant to the ground after his initial arrest was not reasonable, inherently dangerous and likely to cause injury to the complainant. World Keith Byrne jailed for 15 years for murder of Kirs... Read More He said the prosecution also says that pulling the complainant's head using his hair in Pearse Street Garda Station, then applying force to his chest, is also an assault, which caused harm in the form of immediate pain. Justin McQuade BL, defending, told jurors that the law requires them 'to stand in the shoes of Garda Murphy and view the situation that unfolded through the circumstances he believed them to be'. He said the force used was a leg sweep, and it was an 'unfortunate secondary impact' when the complainant hit his head on the ground, adding that his client 'did not have the luxury of picking a softer landing point'. Mr McQuade suggested that if gardaí are going to be criminalised for using force, they may be slower to use it in the future and that benefits no one.