I'm a financial independence influencer. There are 3 questions everyone should ask before starting their FI journey.
My journey to financial independence, or FI, started long before I had heard of or read about this term.
I'm a Certified Public Accountant, and I began my career at a big accounting firm. I lived at home with my parents when I got my first job and started saving big chunks of my salary. I was frugal and made decisions in the service of a life I wanted in the future.
In 2013, I read the Mr. Money Mustache blog, and it all made sense to me. His post on the "shockingly simple math behind Early retirement" has become one of the seminal articles in our community. The article was a thunderbolt in my life, and my reaction was: "Oh, wow, I can actually do this."
I left my full-time job in early 2015, at age 35, about 13 years after I started working. Since then, I have gone on an entrepreneurial journey and have worked on a travel rewards website, a newsletter, and a podcast called ChooseFI, which I have been running for nine years.
To me, FI is not only about quitting your job early and never working again. It's about reaching a point where we can control the most important and finite aspect of our lives, which is our time.
FI can be a yearslong journey that requires making changes and sacrifices. From talking to people on my podcast and answering questions at FI events, here are three questions I wish everyone would ask themselves before starting their journey to FI.
1. Are you ready to make a change?
One of the biggest issues people have is that they are ashamed of their financial lives. They feel that they've made mistakes and are stuck. My question to them is, are you ready to make a change? If you've messed up financially, are you ready to stop beating yourself up about past mistakes? I've made calamitous money mistakes, but I've still reached FI.
If you are working toward building a nest egg, are you willing to think long term and forgo everyday convenience in exchange for building a better life in the future? It's about not succumbing to instant gratification like buying fancy cars and going out to dinner all the time. It's also about the little things, like planning a week's worth of meals that you can cook at home, so you don't end up getting fast food just because it's 6 o'clock on a Tuesday evening and no one's eaten yet.
On the other hand, if you are someone who has a significant savings rate, are you willing to spend more of it to ensure you are making your life better?
2. Can you rethink what 'afford' means?
In modern American society, saving money is seen as countercultural and unusual. And that's ridiculous.
In order to live a functioning life, you need to have a savings rate. And you need to account for that rate every time you ask yourself whether you can afford something.
Some people make $5,000 a month and think that means they can spend up to $5,000 that month. That mindset needs to change to, "Hey, I need a savings rate. Can I afford this if I'm ever going to retire or have any kind of financial security?" If you decide your savings rate is 30%, that means you only have $3,500 to spend a month.
This doesn't mean you're depriving yourself. It's about prioritizing spending on what is most important to you and saving to have freedom in the future.
3. Are you ready to have conversations about money?
While no one should stuff financial independence down other people's throats, you have to have conversations about money with your family or partner.
I've seen every combination of FI relationships work — many where one partner is working and the other has retired early. Those were the result of significant conversations that weren't just, "Hey, I'm retiring today, but can you still pay the bills?"
Getting on the same page financially is important for any couple, whether in the FI community or not, because we know, money is one of the biggest stressors in life and in relationships.
It's OK to date somebody who has significant debt, because that happens. But are you on the same page? Are they trying to pay that debt off?
There's, of course, no requirement that you have this certain net worth to date somebody in the FI community. But is it going to go well if you have a 50% savings rate and the person you're dating is going more and more into debt every month? No.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pony AI Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PONY) last week's 5.9% decline must have disappointed individual investors who have a significant stake
Significant control over Pony AI by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions The top 4 shareholders own 50% of the company Insiders own 23% of Pony AI Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Pony AI Inc. (NASDAQ:PONY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 24% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). While insiders who own 23% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$4.6b last week,individual investors took the most losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pony AI, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Pony AI Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Pony AI already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pony AI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pony AI. With a 17% stake, CEO Jun Peng is the largest shareholder. With 12% and 12% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Toyota Motor Corporation are the second and third largest shareholders. Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Pony AI Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$4.6b, and insiders have US$1.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. With a stake of 19%, private equity firms could influence the Pony AI board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public. It appears to us that public companies own 12% of Pony AI. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pony AI better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Pony AI (including 1 which can't be ignored) . But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $359.72 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

39 minutes ago
White House suggests some countries could see tariff deadline shifted
Chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers Stephen Miran said that some countries that are negotiating with the United States in good faith could see tariffs delayed as President Donald Trump's deadline to strike trade deals closes in. Speaking with ABC News' "This Week" anchor George Stephanopoulos, Miran hedged on what deals are in the works. 'On tariffs, the president's deadline is approaching for the deals. You've only seen three deals so far. What should we expect next?' Stephanopoulos asked. 'I'm still optimistic that we're going to get a number of deals later this week. Part of that is because all the negotiating goes through a series of steps that lead to a culmination timed with the deadline,' Miran said. Pressed on if these other deals fail to come through and if Trump would extend the deadline, Miran indicated that could be possible. 'Well, my expectation would be that countries that are negotiating in good faith and making the concessions that they need to get to a deal, but the deal is just not there yet because it needs more time, my expectation will be that those countries get a roll, you know, sort of get the date rolled,' he said. Asked which countries could see that date shifted, Miran refused to elaborate, but said that he has heard good things about talks with Europe and India. 'I would expect that a number of countries that are in the process of making those concessions, you know, they might see their date rolled. For the countries that aren't making concessions, for the countries that aren't negotiating in good faith, I would expect them to sort of see higher tariffs,' Miran said. 'But again, the president will decide later this week and in the time following whether or not the countries are doing what it takes to get access to the American market like they've grown accustomed to.' Stephanopolous was also joined by former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who balked at the potential economic benefits of Trump's tariffs. 'It probably will collect some revenue at the cost of higher inflation for American consumers, less competitiveness for American producers," Summers said. 'So higher prices, less competitiveness, and not really that much revenue relative to what's being given to the very wealthy in this bill.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Investors in JELD-WEN Holding (NYSE:JELD) from five years ago are still down 73%, even after 14% gain this past week
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (NYSE:JELD) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 15% in the last month. But will that repair the damage for the weary investors who have owned this stock as it declined over half a decade? Probably not. Five years have seen the share price descend precipitously, down a full 73%. So we don't gain too much confidence from the recent recovery. The million dollar question is whether the company can justify a long term recovery. While the stock has risen 14% in the past week but long term shareholders are still in the red, let's see what the fundamentals can tell us. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Given that JELD-WEN Holding didn't make a profit in the last twelve months, we'll focus on revenue growth to form a quick view of its business development. When a company doesn't make profits, we'd generally hope to see good revenue growth. Some companies are willing to postpone profitability to grow revenue faster, but in that case one would hope for good top-line growth to make up for the lack of earnings. Over half a decade JELD-WEN Holding reduced its trailing twelve month revenue by 1.9% for each year. While far from catastrophic that is not good. If a business loses money, you want it to grow, so no surprises that the share price has dropped 12% each year in that time. We're generally averse to companies with declining revenues, but we're not alone in that. Fear of becoming a 'bagholder' may be keeping people away from this stock. The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on JELD-WEN Holding While the broader market gained around 15% in the last year, JELD-WEN Holding shareholders lost 65%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 12% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand JELD-WEN Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for JELD-WEN Holding you should be aware of, and 1 of them can't be ignored. JELD-WEN Holding is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio