logo
Cathie Wood Offloads Roblox (RBLX) and Coinbase Stocks amid Strong Rallies

Cathie Wood Offloads Roblox (RBLX) and Coinbase Stocks amid Strong Rallies

Cathie Wood's ARK Invest ETFs (exchange-traded funds) made some interesting trade moves on Thursday. The ace hedge fund manager offloaded shares of fintech trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) and American online game platform company Roblox Corp. (RBLX). The moves suggest ARK is locking in gains as both stocks have rallied lately, possibly rebalancing positions after strong price runs.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
Wood Dumps Roblox Stock
On June 26, Cathie Wood's ARK Investment sold 247,753 shares of Roblox for approximately $18.77 million, marking a notable reduction in its stake in the gaming platform.
The move likely reflects profit-taking, as Roblox shares have been on a strong run. The stock rose over 2% on Thursday and recently hit a new 52-week high, its highest level since late 2021. The rally has been fueled by growing user engagement, better monetization, and the company's expansion into immersive digital content. Adding to the bullish outlook, Oppenheimer's Top analyst, Martin Yang, recently raised his price target on the stock from $80 to $125 while keeping a Buy rating. The firm also sees potential in Roblox's ad revenue and its ability to win market share from rivals.
What is Roblox Stock's Price Target?
According to TipRanks, Wall Street has a Moderate Buy consensus rating on RBLX stock, based on 15 Buys, five Holds, and two Sells assigned in the last three months. The average Roblox stock price target of $81.45 implies a 22.43% downside potential.
Wood Offloads Coinbase Stake
Alongside Roblox, ARK Invest also trimmed its position in Coinbase, selling 33,363 shares worth about $11.86 million. The sale likely reflects a mix of profit-taking and portfolio rebalancing as crypto stocks surge.
Coinbase shares jumped 5.5% on Thursday to close at a record $375.07, topping their previous all-time high from November 2021. The rally comes amid rising optimism over the growing acceptance of cryptocurrencies. Since the Senate passed a key crypto bill last week, the stock has surged over 45%. The strong run has also caught the attention of analysts. Yesterday, Oppenheimer's Top analyst, Owen Lau, raised his price target on Coinbase from $293 to $395, keeping a Buy rating. He sees the company as a major winner in the broader adoption of blockchain technology.
Is COIN Stock a Good Buy?
Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on COIN stock based on 13 Buys, 11 Holds, and zero Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average COIN price target of $287.88 per share implies 23.3% downside potential.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Suffers Legal Blow: ‘Grave Constitutional Violations'
Donald Trump Suffers Legal Blow: ‘Grave Constitutional Violations'

Miami Herald

time44 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Donald Trump Suffers Legal Blow: ‘Grave Constitutional Violations'

On Friday, a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump's executive order targeting legal firm Susman Godfrey, ruling it was "unconstitutional from beginning to end." This is the fourth defeat in court Trump has suffered since imposing punitive measures on a number of law firms that either were involved in legal cases against him or represented his political rivals. Newsweek contacted the White House and Susman Godfrey for comment on Saturday outside of regular office hours via email and telephone respectively. In March, Trump issued a slew of executive orders targeting law firms resulting in a number taking legal action, though others struck deals with the White House which saw them agree to do unpaid work on behalf of causes the president supports. Critics argued Trump's move was unconstitutional and an assault on free expression, whilst the White House said it was needed to combat what it termed "dishonest" activity. The executive orders Trump imposed on various law firms, including Susman Godfrey, featured a number of punitive measures such as blocking their employees access to government buildings, terminating government contracts and suspending security clearance. Friday saw District Judge Loren AliKhan conclude that in the case of Susman Godfrey, Trump's order was "unconstitutional from beginning to end." She said: "Every court to have considered a challenge to one of these orders has found grave constitutional violations and permanently enjoined enforcement of the order in full. "Today, this court follows suit, concluding that the order targeting Susman violates the U.S. Constitution and must be permanently enjoined." Trump's executive order targeting Susman Godfrey was already the subject of a temporary restraining order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on April 15. Susman Godfrey is the fourth law firm targeted by Trump's executive orders that has successfully fought to get them blocked in court, following Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale. The rulings were issued by judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents. In a statement, Susman Godfrey said: "The Court's ruling is a resounding victory for the rule of law and the right of every American to be represented by legal counsel without fear of retaliation. "We applaud the Court for declaring the administration's order unconstitutional. Our firm is committed to the rule of law and to protecting the rights of our clients without regard to their political or other beliefs. Susman Godfrey's lawyers and staff live these values every day." In his ruling on WilmerHale's case, Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush appointee, said: "The cornerstone of the American system of justice is an independent judiciary and an independent bar willing to tackle unpopular cases, however daunting. "The Founding Fathers knew this! Accordingly, they took pains to enshrine in the Constitution certain rights that would serve as the foundation for that independence." Friday's judgement means the executive order targeting Susman Godfrey will not go into effect. The Trump administration has not said whether it plans to appeal. Related Articles Exclusive: Democrat on How Trump's Tariffs Could Reshape Key Iowa RaceRepublican to Retire as Democrats Eye Potential House Seat: ReportsElon Musk Staffer 'Big Balls' Joining Social Security AdministrationHarvard Finds International Student Lifeline Amid Trump Visa Showdown 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

My grandfather ‘the destroyer': Inside the ruthless world of NJ's frozen veggie kings
My grandfather ‘the destroyer': Inside the ruthless world of NJ's frozen veggie kings

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

My grandfather ‘the destroyer': Inside the ruthless world of NJ's frozen veggie kings

When John Seabrook first discussed writing a book about his grandfather, C.F. Seabrook, and the family's agricultural empire with his mother, her response shocked him, as he reveals in 'The Spinach King: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty' (WW Norton). 'Don't write about your family,' she said. 'Just don't.' Seabrook was perplexed. 'Maybe she knew what I was going to find out,' he writes. In 'The Spinach King,' he unearths the story of how his grandfather created one of the world's largest farming operations, as well as the ugly means that got him there. 9 C.F. Seabrook with factory workers in the 1950s. The Seabrook family's pioneering expansion of the frozen vegetable market is chronicled in a new book. Seabrook Educational and Cultural Center 'Charles Franklin Seabrook, my grandfather, was the principal dreamer, main promoter, master builder, and autocratic ruler of this industrial farming empire – and ultimately its destroyer,' he writes. At its peak in the mid-1950s, Seabrook Farms owned or controlled 50,000 acres in southwestern New Jersey, employed 8,000 people, and grew and packed about a third of the nation's frozen vegetables. Dubbed the 'Henry Ford of Agriculture,' C.F. Seabrook had taken over his father's farm in 1911, transforming its fortunes with his innovative approach to agriculture. He introduced new irrigation and mechanization and diversified into building roads and railroads. But it was his pioneering use of quick-freezing vegetables in the 1930s, partnering with Birdseye, that sent Seabrook stratospheric. 'In our family history, he was Thomas Edison and Henry Ford in the same Dagwood sandwich; a great American who had elevated us from dirt farmers to industrialists in a single generation,' writes John Seabrook. Seabrook Farms was so successful that a 1959 Life magazine story described it as 'the biggest vegetable factory on earth.' 9 C.F. Seabrook seen here with his family. Courtesy of John Seabrook 9 A tractor at Seabrook Farm, the family's vast agricultural estate in New Jersey. Heritage Images via Getty Images In 1969, meanwhile, director Stanley Kubrick featured an astronaut in '2001: A Space Odyssey' sucking a Seabrook Farms Liquipack on their way to the moon. Thousands of workers worked for Seabrook: Russians, Syrians, Germans, Hungarians, Jamaicans, and Japanese Americans, many personally sponsored by Seabrook under the Displaced Persons Act and all paying rent to him. Workers were divided into three sections; whites, 'negroes' and Americans, with each living in separate 'villages' and their rent depending on their ethnicity. African-Americans were given the worst accommodation, without water or sanitary facilities, with European immigrants receiving the next level of housing, and Americans the best standard. 9 Seabrook was known for his ruthless anti-labor practices, most notably during a 1934 labor strike by company workers. Bettmann Archive It also determined their job. 'In the workplace, Blacks were confined to the field and weren't allowed to work in the plant at all, to say nothing of management, which was entirely white, Protestant, and male,' adds Seabrook. Behind the public image of the successful businessman was a man feared by everyone. 'Ambition, energy, and ingenuity drove his rise,' writes Seabrook, 'but violence and terror allowed him to maintain control.' 9 The Seabrook family partners with Bird's Eye vegetables as part of the expansion plan that made them frozen food leaders. REUTERS The way he tackled a strike in the summer of 1934 was typical. Seabrook's revenues from quick-freezing were slow to materialize, and by that summer, it became necessary to cut wages and lay off workers. 'That was when the trouble started,' says Seabrook. 9 Bird's Eye products were so ubiquitous that they were even featured in the movie '2001: A Space Odyssey.' With resentment stoked by the workers' miserable living standards, C.F. Seabrook amassed a vigilante strike force to subdue protests and even enlisted the local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan to crush the 'Communist agitators' holding up operations. The results were violent and terrifying; the KKK burned crosses outside black workers' homes. Belford Seabrook, one of C.F. Seabrook's three sons, reportedly threw a small bomb into a house with a mother and her children inside. Workers had their homes surrounded with chicken wire to prevent their escape, and tear gas was employed to quell protestors. 9 C.F. Seabrook was compared to other American industrial moguls such as Henry Ford and Thomas Edison (above). Bettmann Archive Appeals were made to New Jersey Gov. Harry Moore to declare martial law and send in the National Guard. While a deal was eventually struck, most black strikers were fired, and others were evicted from Seabrook properties. C.F. Seabrook would, years later, recruit Japanese Americans from World War II incarceration camps, a 'model minority who would never challenge the old man's authority,' writes Seabrook. Remarkably, John Seabrook had never heard about the strike before he started researching for his book. Even his father, John M. Seabrook, who took over the business from his father, had never mentioned it. 9 'The Spinach King: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty' is written by John Seabrook. 9 'All that's left of the world that my bootstrapping grandfather built is a small museum at one end of the basement of the Upper Deerfield Township Municipal Building,' said author John Seabrook. 'This was arguably the single most significant event in Seabrook Farms history,' he writes. 'How could I have remained clueless of an event that convulsed the family, the company, the county, and the state?' Just as Seabrook Farms prospered during World War I, so it did again in World War II, as quick-freezing came into its own. But by April 1959, with his health failing, C.F. Seabrook had sold the business. By the end of the 1970s, Seabrook Farms was no longer. The plant was demolished, and the land was given to the township in lieu of taxes. 'All that's left of the world that my bootstrapping grandfather built is a small museum at one end of the basement of the Upper Deerfield Township Municipal Building,' adds Seabrook. 'Here the memory of C.F. Seabrook, his multicultural workforce, and his vegetable factory is preserved, swaddled in gauzy nostalgia.'

Walmart exec sounds the alarm on concerning customer trend
Walmart exec sounds the alarm on concerning customer trend

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Walmart exec sounds the alarm on concerning customer trend

It's a pretty hard time to be a retailer right now. It doesn't matter if you're a large, multinational company or a niche shop on Main Street. Related: Amazon makes a massive $4 billion bet to take on Walmart The world of commerce is filled with complicated problems that often lack clear-cut solutions. That's especially the case in retail in the U.S. since the Trump administration announced broad tariffs that affect many countries around the world. Tariffs, or the duties companies pay to import foreign goods, are designed to help protect domestic interests and workers. They also tend to make items more expensive - either for companies or consumers. And some of the newly instituted tariffs affect our biggest trading partners. As it stands now, current tariff rates on China are at just over 50%. That means that a company would pay an average of a 50% tax to bring in Chinese-made goods to sell in the U.S., per the Peterson Institute for International Economics. In reciprocation, China's average tariff rate on U.S. goods is over 32%. "President Trump refuses to let the United States be taken advantage of and believes that tariffs are necessary to ensure fair trade, protect American workers, and reduce the trade deficit - this is an emergency," an official White House fact sheet argues. Image Source: Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images Tariffs certainly make the business side of things more complex. If they work with foreign suppliers, U.S. companies must now make a hard decision: either continue working with these suppliers and accept a more expensive operation, or seek domestic suppliers. Neither of these options is particularly easy. More Retail: Walmart makes drastic change amid alarming customer trendLowe's makes one of its largest ever billion-dollar acquisitionsSubway owner makes major billion-dollar fast food acquisitionAmazon makes a harsh decision amid concerning customer trend If a company chooses the former option, it must incur the price associated with tariffs. This often means either absorbing heightened costs that cut into their bottom line, or passing costs off to customers. Often, many companies do a mix of both, leaving no party happy with the solution. If a business chooses the latter option and seeks out new domestic suppliers, it must scramble to find one without disrupting supply chain and inventory too much. This can be a next-to-impossible task. Tariffs can make shopping more complicated, too. This is especially the case when dealing with a large-scale corporation, like Walmart (WMT) , which juggles extremely complex supply chains around the world and whose business hinges on pleasing millions of customers. Related: Walmart makes drastic change amid alarming customer trend On June 9, at the Oppenheimer Consumer Growth & E‑Commerce Conference, Walmart CFO John Rainey said his company was forced to get more nuanced when it comes to purchasing products from suppliers in the midst of the tariff uncertainty. "Let's use a barbecue pit as an example," Rainey explained. "If that's being imported and it has a certain tariff applied to that, given the elasticity expectations around that, we're going to sell fewer of them." So Walmart would purchase fewer barbecue pits under the assumption that fewer customers would be making bigger purchases on more expensive items. In some categories, Walmart might be buying "as much as 20% less of items to make sure that - or try to ensure that we don't get into a situation where we can't sell through the inventory that we you can't carry throughout the year," he continued. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store