&w=3840&q=100)
Ex-cop who mistook Black man's phone for gun gets 15 yrs to life for murder
Former Columbus officer Adam Coy shot Hill four times in a garage in December 2020, as the country reckoned with a series of police killings of Black men, women and children. He told jurors that he feared for his life because he thought Hill was holding a silver revolver.
Coy, who is being treated for Hodgkin lymphoma, told the court Monday he plans to appeal the verdict.
I feel my actions were justified, Coy said. I reacted the same way I had in hundreds of training scenarios. I drew and fired my weapon to stop a threat, protect myself and my partner." Prosecutors said Hill followed police commands and was never a threat to Coy.
In victim impact statements Monday, Hill's sisters and ex-wife described the 47-year-old as a gentle man who had never met a stranger. His grandchildren called him Big Daddy." Police body camera footage showed Hill coming out of the garage of a friend's house holding up a cellphone in his left hand, his right hand not visible, seconds before he was fatally shot. Almost 10 minutes passed before officers at the scene rendered aid.
Coy, who was fired afterward, had a lengthy history of citizen complaints, although most were declared unfounded. Weeks later, the mayor forced out the police chief after a series of fatal police shootings of Black people.
Columbus later reached a $10 million settlement with Hill's family, and the city passed a law requiring police to give immediate medical attention to injured suspects.
The local Fraternal Order of Police chapter said it would continue to support Coy, for both his sake and that of every officer who acts in good faith under department protocols.
While this incident was a heart-rending mistake, it wasn't murder, said Brian Steel, president of FOP Capital City Lodge 9.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
18 hours ago
- Mint
Epstein's Work for Leon Black Deserves IRS Probe, Wyden Says
(Bloomberg) -- A key Senate Democrat broadened his attack on the Trump administration's handling of records about the financing of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking network, urging the Internal Revenue Service to investigate his tax and estate planning work for private equity titan Leon Black. Ron Wyden, the Senate Finance Committee's top Democrat, wrote Thursday to IRS Commissioner Billy Long to question why the agency had not audited at least $158 million in payments that Black made to Epstein between 2012 and 2017 for complex tax-related transactions. A spokesman for Black denied that he engaged in wrongdoing. 'It is unthinkable that transactions amounting to tens of millions of dollars paid to a known criminal for the purpose of helping a mega-wealthy individual dodge billions in taxes were never audited or investigated,' wrote Wyden, an Oregon Democrat. 'When Americans think the system is rigged, this is the kind of abuse they think about.' Wyden is accelerating his attack on President Donald Trump's Treasury Department for failing to release any information about more than $1.5 billion in Epstein transactions that flowed through several US and Russian banks. His criticism comes amid widespread pressure for the Justice Department to release criminal records about the investigations of Epstein, who died in prison as he faced sex-trafficking charges, and Ghislaine Maxwell, his longtime associate who is serving a 20-year prison term. Black retired as Apollo Global Management Inc.'s longtime chief executive officer in 2021 amid controversies. An independent review done by an outside law firm for Black four years ago concluded that he 'had not engaged in any wrongdoing,' according to a spokesperson for Black. It says he 'had no awareness of Epstein's criminal activity and all of the fees paid were for legitimate tax, estate and philanthropy planning services and were vetted and approved by outside law firms.' Wyden began investigating Black's activities with Epstein in 2022, when Joe Biden was president and Democrats controlled the Senate. A spokesman for the Treasury Department said Friday in a statement: 'IRS takes all requests seriously and will review Senator Wyden's letter. That said, clearly the Senator's antics are politically motivated. If this was so pressing, where was the Biden administration the last four years and Senator Wyden when he was chairman of the Senate Finance Committee?' Wyden's staff has pursued a 'follow the money' strategy as it investigates the flow of funds in and out of Epstein's accounts before his 2019 death in prison. In a July 21 letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, he said his investigators found the Treasury Department has documented 4,725 wire transfers. The transfers were detailed by banks in so-called suspicious activity reports that are supposed to serve as an early-warning system to investigators about possible criminal activity. Some of the banks did not file the reports until years later. In his letter to Bondi, Wyden urged the Justice Department to 'immediately investigate' evidence in the Treasury files and subpoena records on Epstein from Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Deutsche Bank AG. Spokespeople for Bank of America and JPMorgan declined to comment. A Justice Department spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. 'The bank regrets our historical connection with Jeffrey Epstein,' Deutsche Bank said in a statement. 'We have cooperated with regulatory and law enforcement agencies regarding their investigations and have been transparent in addressing these matters in parallel.' In 2023, JPMorgan reached a $290 million settlement with Epstein's victims. It separately reached a $75 million settlement over Epstein with the US Virgin Islands, where he had a private retreat and took some of his victims. Deutsche Bank also agreed to pay $75 million to Epstein's victims. Black agreed to pay $62.5 million to the US Virgin Islands. That settlement agreement said Epstein 'used the money Black paid to him to partially fund his operations in the Virgin Islands.' Wyden spoke to reporters on Thursday, accusing the Treasury Department under Trump of suppressing critical information about Epstein's suspicious financial transactions, while he said banks were 'sleepwalking' over the matter. 'The longer this administration stalls, the more it becomes clear that there is something to hide,' Wyden said. 'There has been a concerted effort by the Trump administration to play down that these important records are at the Treasury Department.' Wyden said it's clear to him that banks helped fund Epstein's global sex-trafficking operations. 'I think they should be making as much of that information available as possible. I think everything should come out. Period,' Wyden said. --With assistance from Ava Benny-Morrison. (Updates in eighth paragraph with Treasury Department comment.) More stories like this are available on
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Former NBA star Kwame Brown takes a dig at Gilbert Arenas' arrest and Shannon Sharpe's exit from ESPN
The NBA world was rocked after Gilbert Arenas and NFL star Shannon Sharpe made headlines for wrong reasons. As reported by multiple media outlets, the former Memphis Grizzlies 'star, along with five others, was recently arrested for running an illegal gambling business. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Former NFL star Shannon Sharpe was shown the exit door by ESPN. Amidst all this, Kwame Brown, former NBA athlete, roasted Gilbert Arenas and Shannon Sharpe after the duo generated waves in NBA and NFL worlds. Kwame Brown roasts both Gilbert Arenas and Shannon Sharpe in a now-viral clip on X Former NBA star Kwame Brown did not leave a chance while taking a dig at Gilbert Arenas' arrest and Shannon Sharpe's exit from ESPN. The back-to-back events surfacing on July 30 and 31, Brown posted a celebratory clip while ridiculing the current state of both Arenas and Sharpe on X. He went on to group Arenas with Sharpe and said, 'Two birds, one stone.' According to the latest development on Gilbert Arenas' case, he was busted for being a part of an illegal poker game based in California with an Israeli boss. As soon as Gilbert Arenas was arrested, Kwame Brown uploaded a clip on X. Former NBA player Kwame Brown even reacted to former NFL star Shannon Sharpe's exit from ESPN. Sharpe even reached a settlement in a sexual assault case recently, but his eviction from ESPN has diverted the spotlight on him for wrong reasons. The feud between Gilbert Arenas and former NBA star Kwame Brown This is not the first time Kwame Brown has spoken about Shannon Sharpe in a negative light. Previously, Brown had accused the former NFL star of having a biased approach towards Black athletes. However, Brown's reaction is a result of a long-standing feud between them dating back to their Washington Wizards days. The duo have repeatedly spoken against each other during podcasts and interviews. Also Read: FAQ's 1. Why did ESPN cut ties with Shannon Sharpe? Former NFL star Shannon Sharpe was shown the exit door by ESPN after settlement of sexual assault lawsuit 2. Why was Gilbert Arenas arrested recently? Former NBA star Gilbert Arenas was arrested for running an illegal gambling business in California. 3. For which NBA team does Gilbert Arenas play? Gilbert Arenas used to play for the Memphis Grizzlies. He retired from NBA after the 2011-12 season.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Trump administration escalates action against George Mason University over faculty-backed diversity hiring goals
The US Justice Department has escalated its scrutiny of diversity policies in higher education, launching a formal review of George Mason University (GMU) over a Faculty Senate resolution that praised President Gregory Washington for advancing the university's diversity goals. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to a report by The Washington Post , the resolution referenced an earlier institutional aim to ensure that faculty and staff demographics reflect the diversity of the student body — a goal that federal officials now suggest may signal race- or sex-based hiring, which would violate civil rights law. In a letter obtained by The Washington Post , Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon informed GMU's Board of Visitors that the Department viewed the resolution's language as potentially endorsing discriminatory hiring practices. The letter warns of the possibility of extensive penalties and instructs the university to preserve all communications between the Faculty Senate and President Washington's office, indicating an unusually deep level of federal scrutiny into internal university governance. Part of a broader campaign against DEI The GMU investigation is one of four federal inquiries recently launched into the university, all in rapid succession and tied to its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts and its handling of antisemitism allegations. These inquiries come as the Trump administration intensifies its efforts to reshape higher education institutions and curb DEI programs through legal and regulatory pressure. President Gregory Washington, the first Black leader of GMU, has been under increased federal focus following his implementation of several DEI initiatives, including an anti-racism task force established in 2020. His administration has defended these policies as compliant with federal mandates. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now However, critics within and outside the university view the latest investigations as politically motivated efforts to remove him from leadership — a concern amplified after the recent resignation of University of Virginia President James E. Ryan under similar federal pressure. The Faculty Senate resolution and its implications As reported by The Washington Post , the Faculty Senate passed a resolution affirming the university's 2013 diversity plan and expressing support for President Washington's leadership. The resolution stated that Washington had successfully fulfilled the diversity-related goals he was hired to achieve and called the federal investigations 'politically motivated.' The resolution also urged the GMU Board of Visitors to strongly support Washington during his scheduled annual review and to uphold fairness and transparency in the evaluation process. The Justice Department, however, focused on one particular line in the resolution referring to the 2022 goal of aligning faculty and staff demographics with those of the student population. This was interpreted by the Department as potential evidence of hiring decisions based on race or sex. The letter did not indicate whether any specific hiring incidents were under review but signalled a broader intent to examine the university's practices and internal decision-making structures. Mounting pressure ahead The timing of the DOJ's letter, just before the board's scheduled review of Washington, has intensified speculation about federal intentions and the possible use of these investigations to influence leadership decisions. GMU's faculty union, part of the American Association of University Professors, has expressed concern that the board, composed entirely of appointees of Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, could cite the investigations as justification for penalising or removing Washington. According to The Washington Post , the university's Board of Visitors has pledged full cooperation with the Department of Justice and the Department of Education. Meanwhile, the university community is preparing for what could become a high-stakes board meeting, with faculty groups encouraging turnout in support of Washington. A politicised educational landscape GMU, once a commuter college and now one of Virginia's largest public universities with over 40,000 students, is well known for housing ideologically conservative academic hubs such as the Antonin Scalia Law School and its economics program. Several board members have ties to the Heritage Foundation, a right-leaning think tank closely associated with Project 2025, a policy roadmap for a potential second Trump term. The controversy at GMU follows a growing trend in which the federal government is intervening in university policies and governance through investigations, warnings, and threats of funding withdrawal. Just last week, Columbia University agreed to pay over $200 million to settle discrimination claims, including allegations related to antisemitism, under pressure from the same administration. As The Washington Post highlights, this is a rare instance where the Justice Department has weighed in not on a university policy, but on a faculty resolution, raising alarms about federal overreach into campus speech and shared governance. What this means for universities The GMU case underscores a rapidly shifting dynamic between the federal government and public higher education institutions. Faculty members and academic observers are increasingly concerned that symbolic statements, long considered protected expressions of opinion in the university setting, are now being used as triggers for punitive federal action. This episode is being watched closely by administrators, faculty, and legal experts across the US, as it may set a precedent for how the federal government engages with, or challenges, campus DEI efforts and faculty governance in the years ahead. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us .
