Edited news graphic misrepresents ruling on Philippine VP impeachment
The post appears to attribute the remarks to Supreme Court Marvic Leonen, whose picture is included in the image.
He penned the tribunal's July 25 ruling that blocked Duterte's trial, saying it violated a constitutional provision against multiple impeachment proceedings within a single year (archived link).
The House of Representatives impeached Duterte in February, charging the vice president with graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against one-time ally and former running mate President Ferdinand Marcos.
"They just can't accept that SARA DU30 is innocent, no stain of corruption," says the image's Tagalog-language caption, using a popular nickname for the vice president.
Image
Screenshot of the false post taken August 4, 2025, with a red X added by AFP
The top court's 13-0 ruling came just days before the Senate was to begin its new session, with the vice president's political future hanging in the balance (archived link).
Widely expected to run for president in 2028, a Senate trial conviction would have barred Duterte permanently from public office.
The claim -- earlier debunked by Rappler -- has also spread on TikTok, YouTube and Threads (archived link).
Several users appeared to have been misled.
ipulated news graphic and misrepresent the Supreme Court's decision on the case.
"Our ruling does not absolve petitioner Duterte from any of the charges. Any ruling on the charges against her can only be accomplished through another impeachment process, followed by a trial and conviction by the Senate," the court said in its decision published on its official website (archived link).
It added a new impeachment process can only be initiated against Duterte starting February 6, 2026.
A reverse image search on Google found the original graphic published on the Facebook page of local media News5 on July 25, 2025 (archived link). It does not include the quote, "Duterte are innocent".
Image
Screenshot comparison of the false post (L) and the original News5 graphic
Duterte's impeachment trial has triggered a flurry of false posts, many of them debunked by AFP here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AFP
an hour ago
- AFP
AI image misrepresented as rally outside South Korean tech giant Samsung's headquarters
The image appearing to show scores of striking workers holding up placards demanding Samsung chairman Lee Jae-yong "join collective bargaining" was shared on Facebook on August 3, 2025. "Situation in front of Samsung HQ due to the yellow envelope bill," reads the image's Korean-language caption, referring to proposed amendments to South Korea's Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act that the ruling Democratic Party has . According to The Korea Times, the bill would broaden protections for workers and strengthen their right to take collective action, including an expanded definition of legitimate labour disputes (archived link). Business groups have criticised the bill, with a report in The Chosun Daily saying industry leaders had warned the proposed changes could escalate strikes, delay production, and force shutdowns (archived link). Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on August 4, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same image was also shared in similar posts in Facebook groups frequented by conservative users, as well as on the South Korean forum Ilbe. "The law hasn't even passed yet and these commies are already striking," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "They're taking part in Lee Jae Myung's plan to nationalise all businesses." But as of August 5, there have been no official reports of such a protest outside the . Hypothetical scenario A keyword search found the falsely shared image first appeared in a July 2025 report by South Korean outlet Edaily, which speculated on possible labour unrest if the yellow envelope bill were to become law (archived link). The image's caption says it was generated using ChatGPT. Image Screenshot of the AI image as it appears in the Edaily report A visual analysis of the image reveals inconsistencies indicating it was made with AI, such as distorted lettering on protest placards, misshapen or fused limbs on protesters, and an unnatural crowd arrangement. Although generative AI technology is improving rapidly, identifying visual inconsistencies remains the best way to distinguish fabricated content from genuine material. Image Screenshot of the falsely shared image, with visual inconsistencies highlighted by AFP Moreover, the buildings and environment in the falsely shared image do not match Google Street View imagery of the area outside Samsung's headquarters in Seoul (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the AI image (left) and Google Street View imagery of Samsung headquarters in Seoul (right) AFP has misrepresenting AI-generated images and videos as real-life events.
AFP
3 hours ago
- AFP
Old photo misrepresented as Lee Jae Myung's recent vacation
A post shared on Facebook on August 4, 2025 claimed the photo showed Lee and First Lady Kim Hye Kyung enjoying a holiday at the beach. Text seen in the screenshot reads: "The president is on vacation, Lee Jae Myung and first lady Kim Hye Kyung" and "Watersports are best when the country is flooded." The post surfaced as torrential rains triggered flooding and caused damage across parts of South Korea (archived link). Image Screenshot of the misleading Facebook post, captured August 4, 2025. Orange X added by AFP Other posts sharing the same image suggest it was taken as Lee is on summer leave from August 4 to 8 in the coastal South Gyeongsang province, South Korean newspaper Hankyoreh reported, citing the presidential office (archived link). "People are dying and this guy is photographed in a swimsuit, how can we call him our leader," reads one comment left in the post. Another comment reads, "The economy is dying and people are suffering but he chooses to take a swim." But the photo is old and does not show Lee on holiday in 2025. Combined reverse image and keyword searches show the same picture was posted to Lee's verified Facebook account on August 28, 2017 (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison between the photo shared with the misleading claim (left) and the original photo posted in August 2017 on Lee's Facebook page (right) In the caption, he wrote about filming for the reality show "Same Bed, Different Dreams," a program featuring celebrity couples which aired that month on SBS (archived link). A segment from the show available on YouTube shows Lee and Kim wearing the same swimsuits while surfing at the beach (archived link). At the time, Lee was serving as mayor of Seongnam, a city south of Seoul. Similar photos of the couple at the beach were also published in multiple local reports about the TV program at the time (archived here and here). Lee is a frequent target of disinformation online which AFP previously debunked multiple times.
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Brazil judge places former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest
Brazil's Supreme Court issued a house arrest order on Monday for former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial for allegedly masterminding a coup plot following his defeat to incumbent President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in the 2022 general elections. Judge Alexandre de Moraes, who has been leading investigations into Bolsonaro's alleged misconduct before the top court said the 70-year-old former president had violated precautionary measures imposed on him by spreading content through his three lawmaker sons. Bolsonaro's legal team said in a statement that they will appeal the decision. His attorneys stressed that his words 'good afternoon, Copacabana, good afternoon my Brazil, a hug to everyone, this is for our freedom', broadcast from the cell phone of one of his children during a protest in Rio de Janeiro 'cannot be regarded as ignoring precautionary measures or as a criminal act'. 'The flagrant disrespect to the precautionary measures was so obvious that the defendant's son, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, decided to remove the posting in his Instagram profile, with the objective of hiding the legal transgression,' wrote de Moraes. De Moraes also said that Bolsonaro 'addressed protesters gathered in Copacabana, in Rio' on Sunday so his supporters could 'try to coerce the Supreme Court.' Flávio Bolsonaro claimed on X that Brazil 'is officially in a dictatorship' after his father's house arrest. 'The persecution of de Moraes against Bolsonaro has no limits!' the senator wrote. Bolsonaro's trial has been in the spotlight following the re-election of US President Donald Trump, who's been a vocal supporter of Bolsonaro during his legal proceedings. Trump has often clashed with President Lula da Silva over the proceedings, calling them illegal and demanded his acquittal on several occasions. The 47th US president has even tied his latest tariffs of 50% on Brazilian exports to the United States directly to his ally's judicial situation. He's called the case against Bolsonaro a 'witch hunt', triggering nationalist reactions from Brazilian lawmakers from across the political spectrum. In a statement just hours after the ruling was announced, the US State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere condemned Justice de Moraes' order on X and vowed to 'hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct.' 'Putting even more restrictions on Jair Bolsonaro's ability to defend himself in public is not a public service. Let Bolsonaro speak!' the US State Department body said. The post comes just days after the State Department announced sanctions against de Moraes over 'serious human rights abuse', misuse of power and the unfair and politically motivated targeting of Bolsonaro. Brazil's government has not commented on the case yet. What is Bolsonaro accused of? Brazilian prosecutors accuse Jair Bolsonaro of leading a criminal organisation that plotted to overturn the elections, including plans to kill Lula and de Moraes, after the populist leader narrowly lost his re-election bid in 2022. Monday's order comes a month after Bolsonaro was ordered to wear an ankle monitor to track his movement and imposed a curfew on his activities while legal proceedings are underway. Only family members and lawyers are allowed to visit Bolsonaro following this ruling and all mobile phones were confiscated from his home. The latest ruling from the Brazilian justice comes a day after tens of thousands of Bolsonaro supporters took the streets in the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, pleading for Brazil's congress to pardon him and hundreds others who are either under trial or jailed for their roles in the destruction of government buildings in the capital Brasilia on 8 January, 2023. Bolsonaro is expected to remain in Brasilia for his house arrest as he is not allowed to travel. He also has a house in Rio de Janeiro, where he held his electoral base as a lawmaker for three decades. The former army captain is the fourth former president of Brazil to be arrested since the end of the country's military rule from 1964 to 1985, which Bolsonaro supported. Lula was imprisoned for almost 600 days between 2018 and 2019 in a corruption conviction that was later tossed out by the Supreme Court, citing the bias of the judge in the case.
