College coaches seem to be realizing that a union will cure the chaos
The other half is this — there can't be a salary cap without an antitrust exemption. And there's two ways to get one. First, beg Congress for it. Two, have a nationwide union of college football players.
We've been arguing for months that college football should embrace a union. By creating a multi-employer bargaining unit, the schools would acquire the ability to impose rules that would apply among various distinct and independent businesses.
Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy recently went there, acknowledging that the players should be dubbed 'employees' (because they are), with collective bargaining aimed at removing the chaos becoming the next step.
It's smart, because it's the right solution. The NCAA and its members don't need the federal government to clean up a mess that resulted from decades of corruption that denied players the ability to make money. The universities should be responsible for finding the solution, and the best solution is a nationwide union and Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Salary cap? Check. Transfer rules? Check. Real, enforceable players contracts? Check.
Chaos largely resolved — but for the practical inability to police or limit true NIL payments.
So why aren't more coaches clamoring for this? They don't want what will go along with getting the things they want. First and foremost, a union will take a close look at practice rules, limiting the ability of college coaches to basically beat the shit out of their players without oversight or consequence.
Padded practices, all the time. Double sessions in high heat and humidity. Former players, deep into their 20s, coming back and suiting up against teenagers.
Currently, there are few if any limitations on the mandatory work. Then there's the voluntary stuff, which seemingly keeps the players running and lifting and borderline puking throughout the offseason, with few breaks.
With a union, those things will change. Players will have rights. They'll have power. And the Nicktators of the college football world do not want the players to have the ability to push back against the men who have basically become kings and emperors of the colleges that employ them.
Basically, the college coaches want it both ways. Rules to apply to the players. No rules to apply to the coaches.
The coaches may need to sacrifice their unlimited power over their teams, in order to bring some balance to the post-corruption chaos of college football.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Everything Colorado football fans need to know about the 2025 TCU Horned Frogs
There's no doubt that every Colorado football fan remembers where they were the last time the Buffaloes played in Fort Worth, Texas. Then, newly hired head coach Deion Sanders led his team, featuring new additions Travis Hunter and Shedeur Sanders, into TCU's house and escaped with an improbable victory. The game ignited a media frenzy around Colorado, vaulting the team into must-see television every single week. It's been a long two years since that game, and much has changed about the two programs. Shedeur and Hunter are now NFL players, while TCU has completely rebuilt its roster back into a team that can contend for a Big 12 title. These two new-look programs meet each other in Amon G. Carter Stadium in week six of the 2025 season. Fresh off a contest with BYU, Colorado will be heading into a true hostile environment for the first time all season. Meanwhile, the Horned Frogs will be fresh off a bout with the defending conference champions, Arizona State, revealing how well they can keep pace with the top of the conference. Opponent Previews: Georgia Tech, Delaware, Houston, Wyoming, BYU 2024 in review TCU is coming off a surface-level impressive 2024 season, with nine wins and a bowl victory to its name. A closer look at their schedule reveals that the Horned Frogs weren't particularly impressive last season. They didn't face a single ranked opponent and suffered a blowout loss to the eventual No. 12 seed in the CFP and their rival, SMU. They were the definition of a slow-starting team, losing three of their four losses in the first half of the season. TCU was often in many of their games, playing in seven one-score games, many of which went in their favor, a mark that will be hard to repeat. The brightest spot of 2024 was, by far, the emergence of quarterback Josh Hoover, who grew into his role at the helm of Sonny Dykes' air raid offense. The Horned Frogs built momentum at the end of 2024, which they'll need to carry into 2025 if they want to contend for the conference title. Head coach profile The Horned Frogs' headman has been coaching football at TCU for four seasons, after he came over from SMU. Dykes' tenure has been a rollercoaster for the program, with its peak being their first victory in the College Football Playoff and an unexpected appearance in the national championship game in 2022. However, the year following saw the Horned Frogs still hurting from their shellacking in the title game at the hands of Georgia, ultimately going 5-7. Dykes has proven capable of building and leading contenders, but not consistently. Top offensive player Entering his third season as the quarterback for the Horned Frogs, Hoover showed an impressive jump in his second season. Despite throwing the ball over 470 times, Hoover completed 66% of his passes for almost 4,000 yards, 27 touchdowns and only 11 interceptions. Hoover is a leader in the Horned Frog locker room, reportedly turning down a large offer from Tennessee to enter the transfer portal. TCU is losing Hoover's top three targets from last season, Savion Williams, J.P. Richardson and Jack Bech to the NFL, so more will be on his shoulders heading into this season. Top defensive player A preseason All-Big 12 selection, Bud Clark might be the Horned Frog with the most hype, outside of Hoover, heading into 2025. Entering his final collegiate season, Clark has been a staple of consistent, high-quality play in TCU's secondary. For the last three seasons, Clark has totaled three or more interceptions and never landed below the 30 total tackle mark. Coming off a fantastic season last year, the Buffaloes will have to scheme around No. 21 in this matchup. 2025 schedule Way-too-early Colorado matchup preview Both of these teams enter with significant question marks on the offensive side of the ball. Colorado's quest to find replacements for Shedeur and Hunter will most likely not be over by this point in the season, and that could cause some huge stumbles for the Buffaloes. The Horned Frogs are replacing virtually their entire offensive skill group, and there are likely to be huge bumps in the road. Ultimately, the Horned Frogs should get the better of the Buffaloes in a tight contest. While both teams have questions, Hoover's play could elevate a lacking skill group over the hump, mainly if Colorado's pass rush can't produce as effectively as it did last season. If Kaidon Salter impresses early on, I might have to revisit this game, but for now, TCU strikes me as a team with fewer questions to answer. Contact/Follow us @BuffaloesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook for ongoing coverage of Colorado news, notes and opinions.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dems couldn't save Biden's energy programs — so they'll try to make them a weapon against the GOP
Democrats failed to excite voters last year with the promise that former President Joe Biden's clean energy tax breaks would lower prices, expand the power grid and create hundreds of thousands of jobs. But the passage of the GOP megabill is giving them a chance to try the economic sales pitch again — this time, by warning that Republican policies will cost Americans money. That message represents an attempt by Democrats to craft a winning political argument out of President Donald Trump's newly signed tax and spending law, which eviscerated Biden-era incentives for clean technologies such as wind and solar power. It's also an effort to flip the usual partisan energy debate by portraying Republicans as the party of electricity shortages and rising prices. Their targets would include the moderate Republicans who spent months urging Congress to preserve the Biden tax breaks because of their projected economic gains for GOP-held districts — only to fold and vote for Trump's bill anyway. Trump is moving aggressively to enforce the law, ordering agencies to hasten the phase-out of green energy incentives despite a widespread consensus that the U.S. will need to ramp up electricity from all sources to meet the growing power demands of artificial intelligence. 'Democrats now have the high ground of price and Republicans are now the party of electricity shortages,' Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said in an interview. 'We're just not going to have enough electrons to go around and the prices will go up — and that will be 100 percent because Republicans passed this ridiculous bill.' Schatz added that Democrats don't need to lead with their traditional message that clean energy is essential for dealing with climate change. 'The people who care about climate are already with us,' he said. Besides Schatz, Democratic climate leaders aligned on the new messaging include Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico and Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida. Eleven Democrats said in interviews that an emerging consensus in their party is cohering around a new campaign emphasizing pocketbook issues. Some of the Democrats' environmental allies are going all-in on the message. Clean Energy for America, an advocacy group, plans to plaster billboards with ads in seven swing districts attacking Republican House members who 'just voted to raise your electricity bill.' Climate Power, a Democratic-aligned strategic communications operation, launched a six-figure national advertisement playing heavily on Fox News contending that the GOP's policies renege on Trump's promise to lower prices. Republicans scoffed at the notion that Democrats will succeed in promoting themselves as energy price populists. 'It's tough for the Democrats because they've made climate their energy priority for decades,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist and former aide to then-Sen. Marco Rubio who is a partner at Firehouse Strategies. 'Voters associate liberals with prioritizing climate change over energy affordability.' Also inconvenient for the Democrats is the fact that oil prices are hovering near four-year lows, GOP strategist Ford O'Connell said. So even if Democrats cling to a message that Republican policies raise energy prices, he said, those price hikes are unlikely to show up in the real world before the midterms. 'That's just something that Democrats keep saying over and over, but it's just not going to be true because the argument defies gravity,' O'Connell said. Blaming Republicans for future energy price increases is 'too abstract,' said David Victor, an expert on climate change and energy markets who works as a professor of innovation and public policy at the University of California San Diego. He added that for people who simply believe that green energy is expensive, the Democratic counterargument will be drowned out. 'People don't believe it,' he said. 'All kinds of claims are being made.' The Democrats' plans to seize on the energy argument is part of a larger effort to hammer Republicans over projections that the megabill will steer huge tax breaks to the wealthy while kicking millions of poorer Americans off Medicaid. It also recognizes the new realities of the U.S. energy markets, including the rise of AI data centers and the fact that U.S. power consumption is moving up after almost 20 years of nearly flat demand. Democrats believe the time is ripe to revive the call to speed the growth of wind and solar power — and bash the Republicans for taking the green power incentives off the table. They also contend that Trump's law will spike power prices by making renewable electricity more expensive. 'We're going to need to build assets for a growing grid. Choosing not to build things is fucking stupid,' Rep. Sean Casten (D-Illinois) said. Castor agreed with the messaging approach, adding that her Tampa-area constituents are already well aware of how climate change is affecting their lives. But when she talks to them about what's at stake in the Capitol and the White House, she said she focuses on 'higher costs, higher electric bills.' 'Bread and butter, kitchen table issues — costs, their electric bills — are not going to see relief from Republicans,' said Castor, who chaired the now-defunct House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis when Democrats controlled the House from 2020 through 2022. Of course, the jobs-and-prosperity message failed Democrats at the ballot box last year, possibly because the slow rollout of Biden's $1 trillion-plus in energy, climate and infrastructure spending meant that many of its projected economic gains had not yet appeared. The Biden administration's gargantuan spending initiatives also played little role in the campaign messaging by his would-be successor, then-Vice President Kamala Harris. One economic data point in the Democrats' favor this time: Power bills have increased an average of 9 percent since January, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, giving Democrats a chance to try to tie any utility bill increases to the Republican law. That upward pressure on prices is likely to accelerate, given that the U.S. doesn't have enough power supply to meet a nearly 20-percent projected increase in demand during the next five years. And the new Republican budget law raises costs on wind and solar — even though those sources, combined with batteries, accounted for 93 percent of all new power added to the grid last year, according to the EIA. Republicans have vowed to plug the gap with fossil fuels and nuclear energy. (Trump's new law includes policies to boost production from those sources, for example by slashing royalties for fossil fuel production on federal land.) But orders for natural gas turbines face a years-long delay. New nuclear energy faces cost challenges and long lead times. And no utility has announced plans to build new coal-fired power plants, which still face an uncertain regulatory environment and stiff competition from other energy sources. Environmental and clean energy groups have largely swung behind the economic message. One group in the pro-pocketbook crowd, Climate Power, called Republicans' bill a 'National Rate Hike' in a memo last month. It cited an analysis by the Clean Energy Buyers Association, a trade group working with data center developers, that said repealing tax credits would raise household power bills $110 annually as early as next year. But John Marshall, CEO of the Potential Energy Coalition, said the most persuasive way to get people to care about transitioning to clean energy and tackling planet-heating emissions is to talk about climate change more, not less. On a matter that may be instructive for energy policy, voters prefer positions that encourage more options, not fewer, said Marshall, whose nonpartisan, nonprofit organization conducts research on climate communication. Grounding conversations in how climate change affects pocketbooks — such as rising insurance premiums — also moves people. But talk of future jobs at the national scale sounds too theoretical, he said. 'Climate is not a dirty word,' he said. 'The smart play is to talk about the issue, but just talk about it in a slightly different way and make it relevant to different people's lives.' During last year's campaign, supporters of the Democratic policies faced 'a continual challenge' in trying to warn that Republican policies would kill future clean energy jobs and investments, said Jason Walsh, executive director of the BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition of labor and environmental groups. But he said enough of those jobs have since materialized that it's possible to hold GOP lawmakers accountable for businesses that close or construction projects that shut down. 'The new thing is we are moving from the abstract and the conceptual to, 'This is what they did,'' Walsh said. Democrats' environmental allies also need to confront the lingering reputation of a 'green premium' that leads many people to believe that wind and solar power are expensive, said Holly Burke, spokesperson for the green group Evergreen Action. In fact, wind and solar are cheaper per megawatt-hour than coal, and in many places they're even competitive with natural gas, the United States' dominant electricity source. Those facts give Democrats a potential opening, Burke said. 'In October 2026 I'd be surprised if candidates are messaging on this specific bill, but what they will be messaging on is the impacts,' she said. 'Your utility bill is your utility bill. Folks know Trump ran on lowering electricity costs and that Republicans are in charge.'
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Virginia Democrat on possible shutdown: ‘It's time to stand up for the American people'
Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.) said he supports Democrats' threats to shut down the government if Republicans proceed with the rescissions package, saying his party should use all the leverage they can to prevent cuts to previously approved funding. 'I say it's time to stand up for the American people,' Subramanyam said in an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' when asked what he says about a shutdown. 'It doesn't matter if you're a Democrat or a Republican. I mean, I'm hearing from both sides. They're fed up with this administration, and they want to see some changes, not just in this administration, but even in the Democratic Party,' he continued. 'And, so, yes, absolutely, the time to fight was yesterday,' he added. Republicans are ramping up efforts to pass a package that President Trump requested last month, which includes more than $9 billion in funding cuts for foreign aid and public broadcasting programs. However, the push faces staunch opposition from Democrats, who argue that the executive branch's efforts to undermine previous funding decisions made on a bipartisan basis by Congress could further erode trust between the two sides in current talks. And they are warning that the efforts threaten bipartisan negotiations to fund the government ahead of a September shutdown deadline. Subramanyam said he thinks it's important Democrats use the leverage they have now. 'We need to continue to make sure that when we do have leverage — the few times we do have leverage — we have to use it,' he said. 'And we have to strike a hard bargain and not just fold in the last minute.' 'And so, I do think that we should fight,' he added.
