Homicide Numbers Could Be at 60-Year Low for L.A.
Los Angeles is on its way to achieving its lowest homicide total in 60 years, according to an announcement from Mayor Bass today.The number of homicides in the city dropped by about 20 percent in the first six months of 2025. Bass credits safety strategies and a significant decrease in gang-related crimes affecting L.A. youth.'Especially with the summer underway, we will continue to implement comprehensive safety strategies with law enforcement and community organizations to keep Angelenos safe,' Bass said in an Instagram post this morning. 'That means swiftly responding when crime happens and holding people accountable while also working to prevent crime from happening in the first place.'
The LAPD reported 116 homicides through June 28, down from 152 during this time last year, NBC 4 says.Gang-related homicides in gang reduction and youth development zones have decreased by 56% since 2022, according to a FOX 11 report.
This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jul 9, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court overturns Mosby's mortgage fraud conviction, upholds perjury charges
Former Baltimore City State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby walks out of the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt with her daughers after Mosby's sentencing in May 2024. (Photo by Bryan Sears/Maryland Matters) A federal appeals court gave former Baltimore City State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby a partial win Friday, overturning her 2024 conviction for mortgage fraud but upholding perjury convictions in connection with the purchase of two Florida homes. A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also reversed a lower court's order that Mosby forfeit a Florida condo as a result of the mortgage fraud conviction, noting that with the conviction now overturned, the forfeiture was improper. Neither Mosby's attorneys nor prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for Maryland immediately responded to requests for comment on the case Friday. Friday's ruling is the latest turn in the legal trials of Mosby, who served two terms as Baltimore's top prosecutor, from 2105-2023. She was indicted in 2022 by a federal grand jury on two counts of perjury, for falsely claiming a COVID-19 hardship on an application to withdraw $90,000 from her retirement account, and two counts of mortgage fraud, on charges she made false statements on mortgage applications for the two vacation homes in Florida that she bought in 2021. Her trials on the charges were held separately. At her perjury trial, Mosby argued that questions on the form that was the basis of her perjury conviction were 'fundamentally ambiguous.' The form asked if she had suffrered 'adverse financial consequences' during the COVID-19 pandemic that justified allowing her to withdraw retirement funds early without penalty; she said she feared the pandemic could affect Mahogany Elite, a travel firm she had founded. Former prosecutor Mosby gets probation for perjury, false claims convictions But prosecutors argued that Mahogany Elite could not have suffered financial consequences because it was brand new — she had 'not yet started the company, earned any revenue, or incurred any costs.' Jurors apparently agreed, convicting her on Nov. 9, 2023, of both perjury counts. At her mortgage fraud trial, Mosby argued that prosecutors never established that she was in Maryland when the alleged crimes occurred, but an overbroad jury instruction allowed them to determine she was, even in the absence of evidence. That jury convicted her on Feb. 7, 2024, of a single fraud count. Federal prosecutors sought 20 months in jail for Mosby, in addition to supervised release and the forfeiture of her Longboat Key vacation condo. But U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby sentenced Mosby to three years supervised release, with one of those years under home confinement, along with the forfeiture of the condo. On appeal, the circuit court rejected her claims on the 'ambiguous' form, saying it was without merit. It was 'adequately clear' on the form what 'adverse financial consequences' meant, Circuit Judge Stephanie Thacker wrote in the ruling. But the court agreed with Mosby on the jury instruction, saying the trial court's instruction to jurors regarding the mortgage fraud case's venue was indeed 'erroneously overbroad.' Thacker's opinion said those instructions 'went so far as to say that the Government did not need to 'prove that the crime itself was committed in this district,''only that acts leading up to the crime were done in Maryland. That was wrong, Thacker wrote. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE After vacating the mortage fraud conviction, Thacker wrote, the court had to vacate the forfeiture of Mosby's condo in Longboat Key, what had originally been ordered because the condo was believed to be 'the fruit of the alleged mortgage fraud.' In a partial dissent, Judge Paul Niemeyer said he would have upheld the mortgage fraud conviction along with the perjury convictions. He wrote that the evidence at her trial 'amply and clearly demonstrated that venue was proper in Maryland by a preponderance of the evidence.' 'It showed that Mosby made the false statement in Maryland by obtaining and signing the false gift letter in Maryland and that she transmitted the statement from Maryland by uploading it to the Internet for use at the closing in Florida,' Niemeyer wrote. 'She also engaged her husband to wire the funds from Maryland in support of the gift letter. ' Those were all elements of the crime, which justfied its trial in Maryland, he wrote.
CNET
25 minutes ago
- CNET
This Massive AT&T Data Breach Settlement Could Pay $5K to Some: Find Out if You're Eligible
The 2024 hack of AT&T servers was one of the five biggest data breaches of the year. AT&T/CNET It's a tough time for AT&T -- especially with the recent conference call troubles for Donald Trump -- but their struggles could be your gain thanks to the $177 million settlement it's agreed to pay to customers that fell victim to data breaches in 2019 and 2024. On Friday, June 20, US District Judge Ada Brown granted preliminary approval to the terms of a proposed settlement from AT&T that would resolve two lawsuits related to the data breaches. The current settlement would see AT&T pay $177 million to customers adversely affected by at least one of the two data breaches. The settlement will prioritize larger payments to customers who suffered damages that are "fairly traceable" to the data leaks. It will also provide bigger payments to those affected by the larger of the two leaks, which began in 2019. While the company is working toward a settlement, it has continued to deny that it was "responsible for these criminal acts." For all the details we have about the settlement right now, keep reading, and for more info about other recent settlements, find out how to claim Apple's Siri privacy settlement and see if you're eligible for 23andMe's privacy breach settlement. What happened with these AT&T data breaches? AT&T confirmed the two data breaches last year, announcing an investigation into the first in March before confirming it in May and confirming the second in July. The first of the confirmed breaches began in 2019. The company revealed that about 7.6 million current and 65.4 million former account holders had their data exposed to hackers, including names, Social Security numbers and dates of birth. The company began investigating the situation last year after it reported that customer data had appeared on the dark web. The second breach began in April of 2024, when a hacker broke into AT&T cloud storage provider Snowflake and accessed 2022 call and text records for almost all of the company's US customers, about 109 million in all. The company stressed that no names were attached to the stolen data. Two individuals were arrested in connection with the breach. Both of these incidents sparked a wave of class action lawsuits alleging corporate neglect on the part of AT&T in failing to sufficiently protect its customers. Who is eligible to file a claim for the AT&T data breach settlement? As of now, we know that the settlement will pay out to any current or former AT&T customer whose data was accessed in one of these data breaches, with higher payments reserved for those who can provide documented proof that they suffered damages directly resulting from their data being stolen. If you're eligible, you should receive a notice about it, either by email or a physical letter in the mail, sometime in the coming months. The company expects that the claims process will begin on Aug. 4, 2025. How much will the AT&T data breach payments be? You'll have to "reasonably" prove damages caused by these data breaches to be eligible for the highest and most prioritized payouts. For the 2019 breach, those claimants can receive up to $5,000. For the Snowflake breach in 2024, the max payout will be $2,500. It's not clear at this time how the company might be handling customers who've been affected by both breaches. AT&T will focus on making those payments first, and whatever's left of the $177 million settlement total will be disbursed to anyone whose data was accessed, even without proof of damages. Because these payouts depend on how many people get the higher amounts first, we can't say definitively how much they will be. When could I get paid from the AT&T data breach settlement? AT&T expects that payments will start to go out sometime in early 2026. Exact dates aren't available but the recent court order approving the settlement lists a notification schedule of Aug. 4, to Oct. 17, 2025. The deadline for submitting a claim is currently set at Nov. 18, 2025. The final approval of the settlement needs to be given at a Dec. 3, 2025, court hearing for payments to begin. Stay tuned to this piece in the coming months to get all the new details as they emerge. For more money help, check out CNET's daily tariff price impact tracker.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Tracking Devices Were Removed From N.Y.P.D. Vehicles at Chief's Request
A former New York City police chief embroiled in an overtime-abuse investigation ordered the removal of tracking devices from department vehicles assigned to him and his subordinates, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. The devices, known as automated vehicle location devices, are used to keep officers safe and can help record their time and movements for purposes of accountability. The former police official, Jeffrey Maddrey, who resigned as chief of department in December, asked during his two-year tenure in that role that the devices be taken off the vehicles, according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the investigation's confidentiality. It was unclear how many vehicles were involved. Mr. Maddrey, whose home was searched by federal agents in January, was the department's highest-ranking uniformed officer, a job from which he oversaw operational planning and the development of crime-fighting strategies. During his tenure, which began in December 2022, overtime use exploded, particularly by officers who worked for him and other high-ranking officials with close ties to Mayor Eric Adams. Mr. Maddrey, once a close ally of Mr. Adams, resigned in December after he was accused of pressuring a lieutenant who worked in his office into a sexual relationship in exchange for giving her overtime opportunities. This week, four former chiefs filed lawsuits against Mr. Adams and Mr. Maddrey, among other officials, accusing them of creating a culture of cronyism and corruption, where officers who tried to resist faced humiliation and retaliation. Federal investigators learned of the removal of the tracking devices as they examined allegations of overtime abuse and misconduct against Mr. Maddrey, which began after the sexual abuse accusation surfaced in December. Federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York have questioned or have sent subpoenas to detectives, officers and high-ranking department officials, according to one of the people who was familiar with the investigation. Several officers received subpoenas in the past month, according to the person. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
