Man arrested in Memphis for stealing, selling hit movies before release
Steven R. Hale, 37, allegedly stole and sold DVDs and Blu-rays for popular films such as 'F9: The First Saga,' 'Venom: Let There Be Carnage,' 'Godzilla v. Kong,' 'Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings,' 'Dune,' and 'Black Widow.'
Hale is also accused of stealing and selling the pre-release Blu-ray 'Spider-Man: No Way Home,' which was found to have been 'ripped,' meaning he attained the film by bypassing the encryption that prevents the unauthorized copying of the material.
CA company sues TN sheriff's office, claims hemp mistaken for marijuana
The U.S. Attorney's Office says the digital copy of the Spider-Man movie was then illegally made available over the Internet more than a month before its official scheduled release date. Copies of the movie were downloaded tens of millions of times, which resulted in an estimated loss of tens of millions of dollars to the copyright owner.
The thefts took place between February 2021 and March 2022 while Hale was working for a multinational company that manufactured and distributed DVDs and Blu-rays of movies, according to a press release.
📡 for Memphis and the Mid-South.
📧 and have the latest top stories sent right to your inbox.
Hale was indicted on two counts of criminal copyright infringement, of which each count holds a maximum penalty of five years in prison if convicted, and one count of interstate transportation of stolen goods, which holds a maximum penalty of 10 years.
The FBI is investigating the case.
The U.S. Attorney's office says Senior Counsel Matthew A. Lamberti, Trial Attorney Debra Ireland of the Criminal Division's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Raney Irwin for the Western District of Tennessee are prosecuting the case.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
23 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
After surge during pandemic, homicides fall significantly
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The findings of the council's study through the first six months of this year largely align with other private sources of data that offer clues to national trends about crime. The FBI has typically provided official nationwide crime data once a year. It last released nationwide statistics in September. Advertisement Overall, the council found that homicide rates fell 17 percent in the first half of the year in 30 cities it tracked in that category. But some of the largest cities, ones with historically high murder rates, posted much larger drops, according to the study. Chicago's rate is down 33 percent compared with the first six months of last year, St. Louis has fallen 22 percent in the same period, and Baltimore is down 24 percent. Advertisement Denver, which in 2021 recorded its highest number of homicides since 1981, had the sharpest decline in its homicide rate among the cities in the sample, down 45 percent compared with the same period last year, according to the study. Boston, which did not submit figures on homicides for this report, has also experienced a decline in murders. The Real-Time Crime Index, published by Jeff Asher, a New Orleans-based crime analyst, tracks a much larger number of cities than the council does. That index, which follows more than 400 police agencies, shows that murders are down 20 percent through May, compared with the same period in 2024. Other violent crimes, such as robbery and aggravated assault, are also down significantly. In contrast to the council's findings, Asher's figures, based on his larger sample of cities, show that aggravated assaults are still higher than just before the pandemic. Gun violence overall has also declined. According to an analysis by Asher based on data compiled by the Gun Violence Archive, there are 16.4 percent fewer shooting victims nationally this year through June as compared with the same period last year. In addition, the Major Cities Chiefs Association, an organization of police executives from 69 of the largest cities in the nation, reported double-digit declines in four violent crime categories in most of the cities they represent in the first three months of this year as compared with last year. Homicides and robbery were each down 20 percent, while rape fell 14 percent, and aggravated assault was down 11 percent. Advertisement After surging in 2020 and 2021, homicides started to decline in 2022. But in 2023 they fell at what was then the fastest rate in recorded history, and they have been falling even faster ever since. Even shoplifting, which increased last year as cities struggled to deal with retail theft, has fallen by double digits so far this year, according to the council's analysis, which relied on data from 25 cities on that topic. Shoplifting had become a topic of political debates, especially in California, where voters who were frustrated with seeing so many items in stores locked away approved a ballot measure to roll back a major criminal justice reform law and impose tougher penalties for stealing. Criminologists say it's too early to provide definitive explanations for the whipsaw-like shifts in crime of recent years. Adding to the puzzle, say analysts, is that crime has fallen so sharply despite a surge in gun buying during the pandemic, and despite decreases in staffing levels at police agencies. 'Probably in the most simple form, it's simply that the shock waves of the pandemic that contributed to the spike have largely dissipated,' said Adam Gelb, the CEO of the Council on Criminal Justice. This article originally appeared in
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump team's Epstein files pivot coincided with Trump being told he was in the files
The news Wednesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi told President Donald Trump back in May that his name appeared in the Jeffrey Epstein files isn't that surprising, in context. We've known the two men had a relationship dating back decades, and we've seen Trump's name appear in various previously released Epstein-related materials. Being in the documents isn't proof of any wrongdoing. But the news is significant in another way: It adds to questions about precisely why the administration changed its tune on the Epstein files. That doesn't mean there's been a cover-up of any actual Epstein-related misconduct by Trump; there remains no real evidence of that. But the administration clearly started downplaying the Epstein information – in a rather abrupt shift – around the same time Trump was told his name appeared in the files. What's more, sources familiar with the review told CNN the files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims about Trump and others that the Justice Department found not to be credible. In other words, extensive disclosures could have at least created problems for Trump. And the administration appeared to abruptly move away from such disclosures. We'll get to the full timeline in a second. But a few key things stand out: While we don't know the precise date in May that Bondi briefed Trump, the efforts to downplay Epstein conspiracy theories and previous promises for disclosure really kicked off on May 18, when top FBI officials Kash Patel and Dan Bongino appeared together on Fox News and suddenly said Epstein had indeed died by suicide. News of that May briefing contradicts Trump's claim from July 15 that Bondi hadn't told him he was in the files. When asked, Trump told reporters: 'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing.' If this is a nothingburger, why hide that? Elon Musk's later-deleted claim that Trump wasn't releasing the Epstein files because he was in them was lodged June 5, after the May briefing. Trump's recently launched, baseless claims that powerful Democrats 'made up' the Epstein files would fit with his tendency to deflect and distract when there's something he doesn't want out there. Prior to May, the administration had repeatedly promised extensive disclosures. Bondi in early March said Americans would 'get the full Epstein files,' subject to some redactions, and that 'everything's going to come out to the public.' Trump said on April 22 that '100% of all of these documents are being delivered.' But by late May and early June, Patel and Bongino for the first time indicated there wasn't much to the information and walked back those promises. On May 29, Bongino suggested it amounted to 'nothing.' On June 4, he downplayed the case as a 'hot potato for folks.' On June 6, Patel went further than the administration had before in suggesting disclosures would be limited to avoid re-victimizing people, saying, 'Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.' The administration ultimately did not release substantial new documents, saying in its July 7 memo that it 'found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials' and citing how many of them were under court seal. The administration did hype the files in one big way in early May. Bondi said on May 7 that the information included 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' By June 6, Patel appeared to walk back Bondi's claim. The DOJ's memo a month later did not back it up. And now, the full timeline. Feb. 21: Attorney General Pam Bondi is asked by Fox News about an Epstein 'client list,' and she responds by saying that it's 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' (The administration has since claimed she was referring to other documents.) Feb. 26: Bondi on Fox hypes a release of documents set for the following day, calling it 'breaking news,' and saying it will include 'a lot of information.' Feb. 27: The White House invites right-wing social media influencers to the White House and gives them binders of Epstein-related documents. But the documents are mostly old news, and some influencers cry foul. March 1: Bondi tells Fox that Americans will 'get the full Epstein files,' subject to redactions to 'protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses.' March 3: Bondi tells Fox's Sean Hannity that DOJ has received a new 'truckload of evidence' from the FBI. She adds that 'everything's going to come out to the public.' March 14: Bondi repeats on Fox Business Network that she has received a new 'truckload of documents.' She adds that 'we will get out as much as we can, as fast as we can, to the American people, because they deserve to know.' March 23: Bondi tells Fox News that 'we are releasing all of these documents as soon as we can get them redacted to protect the victims …' April 22: President Donald Trump is asked in the Oval Office about when the Epstein files will be released and says, '100% of all of these documents are being delivered.' May 7: Bondi claims there are 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' Her public claim comes shortly before the release of a secretly recorded video in which she made a similar claim. Sometime in May: Bondi briefs Trump about the Epstein files and tells him his name appears in them, among several other high-profile figures, CNN has confirmed. The files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims, including about Trump, that the DOJ found to be not credible, sources said. (The precise date of this briefing isn't clear, but White House officials noted Wednesday that Trump's name was already in the binders Bondi handed out earlier this year.) May 18: For the first time, the administration begins downplaying the Epstein conspiracy theories. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino appear together on Fox News and say Epstein indeed died by suicide. This despite both of them having promoted the conspiracy theories before joining the FBI. May 19: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says the administration is 'committed to releasing those files,' but defers to the Justice Department on timing. May 29: Bongino on Fox again downplays the significance of what will soon be released. 'There is nothing in the file at this point on the Epstein case,' he says. 'And there's going to be a disclosure on this coming shortly.' He says the administration will release video of the jail on the day of Epstein's death that backs up that assertion. June 4: Bongino is pressed on Hannity's show about the lack of Epstein disclosures. He downplays the case as a 'hot potato for folks' and then alludes to his own evolution on the subject: 'I'm not paid for my opinions anymore. I work for the taxpayer now. I'm paid on evidence. That's it.' June 5: Elon Musk claims while lashing out at Trump that the 'real reason' the president is not releasing the Epstein files is because '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files.' He provides no evidence for his claims and later deletes the post, while expressing regret for some of the things he said about Trump. June 6: Patel appears on Joe Rogan's podcast and downplays the looming disclosures again. 'We're gonna give you everything we can,' Patel says, before adding that 'we're not gonna re-victimize women. We're not going to put that sh*t back out there. It's not happening, because then he wins. Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.' Patel also appears to contradict Bondi's claim about 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,' telling Rogan the videos from Epstein's island are 'not of what you want.' July 6: Axios breaks the news that the DOJ has officially concluded that Epstein died by suicide and there was no 'client list,' despite Bondi's comments in February. July 7: The DOJ releases an unsigned memo laying out these conclusions. DOJ says it won't release any further documents because much of it is under court-ordered seal. 'Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography,' the memo says. The memo also undercuts Bondi's claims of 'tens of thousands of videos' of Epstein 'with children or child porn.' July 8: Trump for the first time lashes out at people still asking questions about Epstein, calling those questions a 'desecration.' He tells reporters: 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years.' He cites recent deadly floods in Texas and adds: 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this.' The president will go on to make similar comments over the next two weeks, including baselessly suggesting various powerful Democrats are behind the Epstein files. July 15: Trump is asked about whether Bondi told him his name was in the files and denies it. 'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing and – in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen,' he says. July 23: We learn Trump is indeed in the files.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Speaker Johnson: Epstein drama ‘not a hoax,' Congress wants ‘full transparency'
House Speaker Mike Johnson has insisted that the drama surrounding the case of late child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein 'is not a hoax' and that lawmakers want to see justice for the victims as he grapples with a growing firestorm over the issue. 'We want full transparency,' Johnson (R-La.) told CBS News' 'The Takeout with Major Garrett' Wednesday. 'We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils — let's call it what it was — to be brought to justice as quickly as possible.' 'We want the full weight of the law on their heads.' Advertisement A weeks-long controversy has roiled Trump's MAGA movement after the Justice Department and FBI concluded in a July 6 memo that Epstein most likely killed himself in his Manhattan jail cell and didn't have an 'incriminating client list' of rich and powerful people who took part in sex with girls as young as 14. The conclusion has caused headaches for Johnson after House Democrats won over several Republicans in a push to publicly release the full case file. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hasn't seen the Jeffrey Epstein evidence in question. REUTERS Advertisement 3 Interest in Jeffrey Epstein was revived after a DOJ and FBI memo this week kicked up a firestorm and demands within MAGA world for more transparency. AP On Monday, the House Rules Committee — the lower chamber's gatekeeper for most legislation that gets a floor vote — was forced to adjourn by Republicans who wanted to short-circuit a Democratic effort to force the disclosure of the Epstein files. Johnson then opted to send lawmakers home to their districts Wednesday for the August recess — one day ahead of schedule — due to the House floor effectively being frozen over the Epstein revolt. President Trump has seethed at the controversy, calling out 'past' supporters as 'weaklings' for buying into the 'hoax.' Advertisement 'It's not a hoax. Of course not,' Johnson told Garrett. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson has been careful not to break with President Trump on the Jeffrey Epstein ordeal. Getty Images 'I've never seen the Epstein evidence; it wasn't in my lane, but I had the same concerning questions that a lot of people do,' he later added. Rank-and-file lawmakers are pushing Johnson to hold a vote to compel the release of outstanding documents once the House returns from its recess Sept. 2. Advertisement Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) are pursuing a discharge petition — a legislative technique to force a vote on a bill without the speaker's blessing — to that effect. Meanwhile, Trump has announced his support for the release of grand jury testimony in the cases against Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell. On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her legal team in Tallahassee, Fla. to discuss the case. Additionally, the GOP-led House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Maxwell for testimony, with an interview tentatively set for Aug. 11.
