Major bank moves to attract rich customers with ‘VIP experience'
The promotion includes a £500 gift card and other perks for those who meet specific criteria, such as earning a salary of £100,000 or more.
To qualify, customers must fully switch to the bank's Premier account using the Current Account Switch Service (Cass). HSBC relaunched its Premier account in February.
The bank said the account gives qualifying customers access to new and enhanced benefits focused on key themes of wealth, international, travel and health.
'We have redesigned our Premier offering to ensure our perks and benefits echo what our customers want from a premium bank account, all still without a monthly fee,' Sabine Fichaux, head of customer propositions at HSBC UK, said.
The 'limited time' switching offer excludes existing HSBC and First Direct current account customers and is available to UK residents only.
Full switches using Cass must be completed by 12 August, 2025. Eligible customers will be sent an email on or after 9 November, 2025 to claim their gift card.
Last week, Lloyds Bank launched an account aimed at people with income or assets of more than £100,000.
Lloyds' offer of an account combining financial perks with 'premium lifestyle services' is part of its moves to grow its presence in this part of the market.
The Lloyds Premier account offers GP and wellbeing services, lifestyle benefits, travel perks, cashback, discounted mortgage rates and appointments with financial coaches, among its benefits.
The account will also offer customers 'ready-made investment portfolios with zero management fees for the first year'.
The deal also offers a 'Premier planning hub' within the mobile app, offering tools such as a 'net worth calculator' and 'wealth forecasting'.
People can also access other perks such as fee-free spending abroad on debit cards, and cinema tickets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Express
4 minutes ago
- Auto Express
How green is an EV? BMW reveals the surprise truth about EV vs ICE carbon footprints
Think the fuss over carbon footprints is a load of hot air? Tell that to BMW, which claims to have slashed the environmental impact of producing its all-new iX3 electric SUV by more than one-third. Despite manufacturing electric cars being more energy intensive than making ICE cars, BMW calculates the iX3 will break even with its X3 petrol equivalent after just 12,428 miles (20,000km) of driving. That means the average UK driver covering 7,000 miles a year will have paid off an iX3's embedded carbon debt in less than two years. And they'll have enjoyed every mile, if their experience lives up to our prototype drive. Advertisement - Article continues below The roll-out of BMW's 'Neue Klasse' vehicles, starting with the iX3 that arrives in the UK in March 2026, will trigger the reduced environmental impact. It's the result of a forensic approach of using renewable energy in its Hungarian car plant and supplier base, and by incorporating more recycled materials in the car, particularly aluminium, steel and thermoplastic. Producing batteries has a significant carbon cost. But it's a myth that EV batteries aren't recyclable: half of the lithium, cobalt and nickel in the iX3's battery is being used for a second time. Reducing the amount of raw materials needing to be mined, and powering anode and cathode production with green energy, drives down the battery's CO2 footprint by 42 per cent. All these figures, published for the first time today, have been independently verified – and Polestar is coming clean about how green its cars are too. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Fancy a used BMW iX3 ? Check out the Auto Express marketplace for great deals on new and used cars With the Neue Klasse cars, BMW has designed-in carbon-reducing processes on an unprecedented scale. 'In every component, we have to ask: can we get secondary raw materials in there? Can we use renewable energies? It's a total vehicle redesign,' explains Nils Hesse, BMW's vice president for product sustainability. Without this focus, the iX3 50 xDrive's manufacturing footprint would be 21 tonnes-of-CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) per vehicle. Instead it's been slashed to 13.5 tCO2e per vehicle – compared with 9.9 tonnes for a petrol X3 20i xDrive coming out of the factory gate. Advertisement - Article continues below But the iX3's 3.6-tonne greater CO2e debt compared with the petrol-powered X3 is paid off after 20,000km, assuming it's recharged using the typical European Union mix of renewable and carbon energy. Without the Neue Klasse carbon reduction measures, the breakeven point would be at 60,000km (37,284 miles). Run the iX3 and X3 for 200,000km (124,280 miles), and the petrol SUV will rack up a 52.8-tonne carbon footprint, compared with 14.6 tonnes for the EV recharged strictly on green energy, or 23 tonnes on the EU energy mix. That's potentially a 38-tonne advantage – for an iX3 powered by the long range, 108kWh battery. The tipping point for smaller battery cars will be lower. By weight, around one-third of the new iX3 comes from secondary materials, equivalent to around 740 kilograms. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below The wheel carriers and rims are up to four-fifths secondary aluminium, while recycling old fishing nets and ropes contribute 30 per cent of the plastics for the 'frunk', the 58-litre storage area in the iX3's nose. It's not just about making sure the right materials go in, but also making them easier to take out at the end of the iX3's life, to maximise 'circularity'. So the Econeer seat's fleece, glue and the seat textile are all made from the same material, meaning it can all be shredded together when the car is dismantled and sent away for re-use. BMW has also developed a new seat-mounting method and uses fewer components throughout to reduce disassembly time – an important factor to make the secondary-use supply chain economically viable. Advertisement - Article continues below 'The future goal is to establish a material cycle with the car as a resource, so that we can close the loop at the end,' says Nils Hesse. Many companies are now understating their sustainability initiatives, with right-wing political sentiment swinging against environmental action in Europe and the USA. BMW, however, will not be cowed. 'Sustainability is not only important, it's fundamental,' vows Glenn Schmidt, BMW's vice president of global sustainability. 'Sustainability isn't just something we say, we are making BMW sustainable. 'We are committed to being net zero by 2050 and we made the commitment in 2020 that we would conform to the Paris accords.' Schmidt says sustainability is 'something that needs to be embedded into all our activities, into our supply chain and also into our product development'. And crucial to that is measurement. In 2019, BMW calculated its activities generated 150m tonnes of CO2 equivalent. Last year it shrank this to 131 million tCO2e. BMW reckons it's on track to emit 109 million tCO2e in 2030, and the holy grail – its 'net zero' target – is 15 million tonnes per year in 2050. Click here for our list of the electric cars with the longest range ... Find a car with the experts Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Electric cars driven until they die: the truth about EV range Five EVs under £24k have joined Dacia's Spring on the UK market. How far can you go on a budget? We find out Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra slash electric car prices Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra aren't waiting around for the government grant by cutting £1,500 from their EV prices New MINI Cooper and MINI Aceman get the monochrome treatment New MINI Cooper and MINI Aceman get the monochrome treatment It's as simple as black and white for new MINI Cooper and MINI Aceman Monochrome
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's plan to use a British bank to target the Democrats
The elements of the story could be taken directly from a thriller: a British whistleblower with military credentials, secret meetings with top justice officials, a trail of encrypted spreadsheets allegedly linking a British bank to Iran's military and terror networks, and now, an explosive political backdrop involving President Donald Trump and his vendetta against the Democrat prosecutors who once tried to dismantle his empire. At the centre of it all is Standard Chartered, the UK's fifth-largest bank and a household name thanks to its sponsorship of Liverpool Football Club. The bank has already been fined nearly $2bn by American authorities for breaches of sanctions against Iran involving its US branch – having admitted wrongdoing for the first time in 2012 and then again in 2019. It is now facing fresh allegations, which it denies but which could yet see it forced to pay much more. According to whistleblower Julian Knight, a former RAF officer turned compliance executive at the bank, Standard Chartered's transgressions go further than previously admitted. He alleges the bank also concealed an additional $10bn in transactions involving Iranian firms carried out through its New York outpost, which it is yet to answer for. Some of the alleged transactions are said to have been linked to Iran's military, nuclear programme, and US-designated terrorist organisations such as Hezbollah and Hamas. The bank has always denied suggestions it conducted transactions for terror groups. The alleged dealings, which are claimed to have taken place between 2008 and 2013, came after Standard Chartered had announced in 2007 that it would cease all new business with Iranian customers as Washington ramped up pressure on the Islamic Republic. Knight (who left the bank in 2011) says he and fellow whistleblower Robert Marcellus, a currency trader, discovered the supposedly hidden transactions after re-examining spreadsheets and documents provided to US authorities in the past. But when they brought the new 'evidence' to New York attorney general Letitia James's office last year, Knight claims, officials failed to act. His allegations have now been seized on by Trump, who has repeatedly clashed with James, a Democrat, in recent years. On July 27, the president used his Truth Social account to post an article by The Gateway Pundit, a Right-wing American news website, alleging the attorney general – whose slew of legal cases against Trump, including a $454m civil fraud case last year, have seen the pair repeatedly clash publicly – failed to investigate Standard Chartered despite the new trove of information presented by Knight. That followed on from a seemingly important intervention by the Department of Justice, which last month moved to review previous court decisions related to the saga. The article Trump's account promoted described the case as James's 'biggest scandal yet'. In the past, the president has also labelled the New York attorney general a 'totally corrupt politician'. Whilst James appears to be the focal point of the Trump administration's concern, it has also taken aim at his Democratic predecessors over the case – clearly viewing it as a potential Achilles heel. Kari Lake, one of the president's most trusted allies, who serves in the Trump administration as senior advisor at the US Agency for Global Media, says: 'This is a serious issue. President Trump – trying to undo the damage caused by Biden and Obama with their destructive policies toward Israel and America as well as toward the people of Iran – has put forth a maximum-pressure zero-tolerance policy blocking any funding to Iran and its terror network. 'And now a British bank who operates in the United States is accused of processing billions of illicit payments to Iran. And the New York attorney general's office led by Tish James knew about it and did nothing. 'The Fed should have spotted these payments and stopped them, but they did not. The question is was it simply ineptitude on the part of Letitia James and the Federal Reserve or were they complicit in helping the Iranian regime?' The president's political war against the Democrats threatens to drag the bank back into uncomfortable territory, six years after it was fined $1.1bn when a US criminal investigation revealed breaches of sanctions on Iran and other countries. That followed on from a damning August 2012 ruling which saw Standard Chartered forced to shell out $340m to settle claims that it had left the US financial system 'vulnerable to terrorists' by hiding transactions linked to Iran. The following month, then chancellor George Osborne is reported to have intervened on the bank's behalf amid concerns in London that American regulators might withdraw Standard Chartered's US licence over the scandal. By the end of the year, the bank had escaped prosecution and kept its US licence. Knight claims the bank's internal data shows a far deeper pattern of deception. He argues that he, Marcellus and a forensic investigator 'decloaked' Excel spreadsheets to reveal 'a vast number' of previously undetected 'concealed transactions with sanctioned Iranian entities'. He alleges these findings were presented to officials in a series of meetings last year, including with Chris D'Angelo, James's right-hand man within the New York Attorney General Office. 'They [the meetings] were held at the invitation of the NYAG. I flew to New York to be present for the first meeting. We cannot understand why these transactions were not previously disclosed by the bank to the NYAG,' Knight says. In pursuit of a payout Cynics might suggest the whistleblowers are simply looking to cash in, and that Trump's return to the White House was what they needed to turn their fortunes around. Knight and Marcellus have unsuccessfully to date pursued a payout for their whistleblowing under a federal statute which means those who expose wrongdoing can lay claim to proceeds generated by fines, if their intervention proves integral to legal action being taken. The pair's case, known as the 'Brutus litigation', argues they provided material to US law enforcement agencies that proved Standard Chartered had acted in breach of sanctions. The administrations headed by Barack Obama and Joe Biden appeared to refuse to back the whistleblowers' claims, with government agencies arguing the fines imposed on the bank were based on evidence unrelated to the material provided by Knight and Marcellus. Standard Chartered itself argues the pair have concocted 'fabricated claims' in order to seek 'personal financial gain'. But the tide may be turning under Trump, with the Department of Justice last month giving notice that it wanted to review previous decisions which effectively buried the whistleblowers' arguments. In the filings, seen by The Telegraph, the DoJ stated that it wanted a 30-day extension to 'confer internally' about the issue. Danny Alter, former general counsel at the New York Department of Financial Services, who led previous enforcement actions against Standard Chartered, says the DoJ's move was 'highly unusual' and 'suggests that there's been a significant change in the government's thinking'. 'If accurate… recently revealed evidence of the many billions of US dollars in criminal transactions that Standard Chartered allegedly conducted for Iran's military complex and terrorist proxies, like Hamas and Hezbollah, is mind boggling,' Alter says. 'It is a financial blueprint for how Iran built its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes and funded global terrorism, despite years of US economic sanctions. 'You have to wonder if the enormous risks and costs of the recent US military operations to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme played a role in the government's seeming re-evaluation of Standard Chartered's case and the bank's potential liability.' Standard Chartered, for its part, remains defiant. Referring to the case brought by Knight and Marcellus, a spokesman said: 'The long-running qui tam lawsuit against Standard Chartered has been dismissed multiple times. The trial court already twice rejected the claims brought by a former employee and his associates who have for more than a dozen years sought personal financial gain through fabricated claims against the bank. 'The frivolous appeal of that rejection remains pending. The US government long ago concluded that there is no merit to the baseless accusations of sanctions and plaintiff's various arguments have been described by the courts as 'on the verge of vexatious and frivolous', 'without merit' and 'threadbare'. 'We will continue to vigorously defend against attempts to profit from fabrications and to damage our reputation.' But the DoJ's recent move may signal the case is not dead after all. Ultimately, Standard Chartered could soon yet find itself back in the spotlight - this time, not just as a defendant in a sanctions case, but as an unwitting pawn in a bitter political feud.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
FIFA faces Dutch class action over player transfer regulations
Aug 4 (Reuters) - A Dutch soccer players' group is preparing a "potentially billion-dollar" class action claim against FIFA and other soccer associations, seeking compensation over alleged loss of income due to restrictive transfer rules, it said on Monday. The Dutch Foundation for Justice said world soccer governing body FIFA's rules had affected approximately 100,000 players in European member states and the United Kingdom since 2002. The foundation added that consultancy firm Compass Lexecon had estimated that damages could run into billions of euros, with the foundation's board member Dolf Segaar telling Dutch news agency NOS that "it is a billion-dollar claim". The Dutch Football Association (KNVB) is among the associations to be named in the suit. "This case is being brought in the Netherlands under the Dutch Act on the Settlement of Mass Damages in Collective Action (WAMCA), which allows this legal action to be launched by JfP on behalf of a large group of professional footballers," it added. FIFA and the KNVB did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comment. The foundation added that a preliminary analysis from global economic consulting company Compass Lexecon estimated that professional footballers collectively earned around 8% less over their careers than they would have due to FIFA's regulations. "All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful FIFA Regulations," foundation chair Lucia Melcherts said in a statement. "'Justice for Players' is bringing this claim to help achieve justice for footballers and fairness." The foundation added that the case was launched following a ruling on French player Lassana Diarra, who was fined 10 million euros ($11.56 million) by FIFA for leaving Lokomotiv Moscow one year into a four-year deal. In October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union said some of FIFA's rules on player transfers went against European Union laws and free movement principles in the case linked to former Chelsea, Arsenal and Real Madrid player Diarra. Following the ruling by the EU's top court, FIFA in December adopted an interim framework concerning the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players. The interim regulatory framework affects the calculation of compensation payable if there is a breach of contract and the burden of proof in relation to both compensation payable and an inducement to breach a contract. Justice for Players said it will be advised by law firm Dupont-Hissel, founded by Jean-Louis Dupont. Dupont is the same lawyer who took the landmark case of Belgian Jean-Marc Bosman, which in 1995 cleared the way for players in the European Union to move to other clubs at the end of contracts without a transfer fee being paid. Dupont-Hissel also represented Diarra in his case against FIFA, with Dupont saying in 2024 that a judgment backing the player would be a milestone in modernising football governance. He added that it would allow players' unions and club associations to regulate their employment practices. ($1 = 0.8654 euros)
