
Why AI writing can't ever compare with a Stephen King novel
letters@scmp.com or filling in
this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification
I refer to
the PostMag article , 'Writer vs DeepSeek: can AI really replace the human touch?' (July 17).
It's no exaggeration to say that the emergence of AI large language models and apps over the last few years has added to anxieties that human writers might be pushed to the brink of extinction. Who needs a proficient writer who may need a couple of months to finish a novel when several prompts and interactions with AI could yield a product indistinguishable from that written by the original author?
In this era where time is money, writing and publishing might still be creative processes, but they're also business after all. Take away the human factor and those in the writing sector can still rake in huge sums, right?
On the surface, we're seeing an inevitable metamorphosis of the writing business model. However, as a reader, I would rate the human author over artificial intelligence any day.
Writing is the process of transforming human experience and personal interaction with the physical world via the five senses into an intellectually illuminating and emotionally engaging work aimed at connecting with another human on the deepest level through the greatest invention of humankind – language.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
When travellers think sustainability, make them think Greater Bay Area
Earlier this year, Hong Kong launched its first fully electric ferry . In June, jurisdictions within the Greater Bay Area development zone marked a national event for the environment. Against this backdrop, a quiet but important shift is under way. Policymakers in the Greater Bay Area are no longer just thinking about sustainability; they are setting it in motion. With the development zone becoming a hub for experimentation in smart infrastructure and climate innovation, the time is ripe to consider a low-carbon tourism corridor linking cities through cleaner and smarter ways to travel. Guangdong province, Hong Kong and Macau are already renowned for connectivity, with high-speed rail cross-border bridges and integrated metro systems . But while the physical infrastructure is world-class, the carbon cost of mobility remains high. Tourism, in particular, still leans heavily on diesel coaches, fragmented itineraries and high-emission transfers. Hong Kong has taken important first steps. The city's newly launched 400-seat electric ferry is capable of up to 52 daily trips. Trial runs are also under way for a second electric vessel. But the shift to a green tourism economy cannot rest on hardware alone. It must be matched by systems, partnerships and experiences that reflect the changing priorities of today's travellers. Neighbouring Shenzhen can offer valuable insight into this aspect. As of early this year, the city was home to over 1.3 million electric vehicles (EVs), or 28.6 per cent of its fleet. Shenzhen was the first city in the world to fully electrify its bus and taxi networks. The city boasts more than 370,000 charging stations. This transformation has been built on years of forward-looking and coordinated policy and collaboration between government and industry. The pace of Shenzhen's progress may not be replicable everywhere, but the mindset is transferable. Meanwhile, Hong Kong is gaining ground . While nearly seven out of 10 newly registered private cars are electric, progress in public and commercial transport lags behind. Only 1.4 per cent of the city's 6,000 franchised buses and just 0.5 per cent of its 18,000 taxis are electric. This is a concern given that public and heavy vehicles account for 80 per cent of transport-related emissions, which in turn make up one-fifth of our total carbon footprint.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Global approach' to AI regulation urgently needed, UN tech chief says
The world urgently needs to find a global approach to regulating artificial intelligence, the United Nations' top tech chief said this week, warning that fragmentation could deepen risks and inequalities. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, head of the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) agency, said she hoped that AI 'can actually benefit humanity.' But as concerns mount over the risks posed by the fast-moving technology – including fears of mass job losses, the spread of deepfakes and disinformation, and society's fabric fraying – she insisted that regulation was key. 'There's an urgency to try to get … the right framework in place,' she said, stressing the need for 'a global approach.' Her comments came after US President Donald Trump this week unveiled an aggressive, low-regulation strategy aimed at ensuring the United States stays ahead of China on AI. Among more than 90 proposals, Trump's plan calls for sweeping deregulation, with the administration promising to 'remove red tape and onerous regulation' that could hinder private sector AI development.


South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Global AI regulation urgently needed, UN tech chief says
The world urgently needs to find a global approach to regulating artificial intelligence, the United Nations' top tech chief said this week, warning that fragmentation could deepen risks and inequalities. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, head of the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) agency, said she hoped that AI 'can actually benefit humanity.' But as concerns mount over the risks posed by the fast-moving technology – including fears of mass job losses, the spread of deepfakes and disinformation, and society's fabric fraying – she insisted that regulation was key. 'There's an urgency to try to get … the right framework in place,' she said, stressing the need for 'a global approach.' Her comments came after US President Donald Trump this week unveiled an aggressive, low-regulation strategy aimed at ensuring the United States stays ahead of China on AI. Among more than 90 proposals, Trump's plan calls for sweeping deregulation, with the administration promising to 'remove red tape and onerous regulation' that could hinder private sector AI development.