Spotted: New Lexus LFR Supercar Caught Testing Around the Country
A new image of the Lexus LFR prototype was shared on Reddit; this story has been updated with the new image and embedded post (with permission from the original poster).
It's been over three years since Toyota unveiled the
GR GT3 concept
to preview a future race car. Since then, our sister site
Motorsport.com
has reported that a
street-legal version with a Lexus badge
is in the works. Fast-forward to mid-2025, and the production model is still a no-show. That said, we still get giddy with excitement whenever a prototype is spotted testing on public roads. A new spy video shows the road-going model out and about in California, and a spy photo shows a second prototype testing high in the mountains of Colorado.
The video, shared on
by veteran journalist
Jonny Lieberman
, was recorded from inside a BMW M5 Touring on Angeles Crest, shows what reports suggest will be called the Lexus LFR. The low-slung performance machine was in good company, as it appears Lexus was benchmarking the prototype against a previous-generation Mercedes-AMG GT. The two coupes were accompanied by a current-generation Toyota Sequoia equipped with power-extending tow mirrors. The SUV in the front of the fleet was also a
Sequoia
.
You know the LFR is going to look great when even the camouflaged prototype turns heads. Notably, it's missing the
large rear wing
previously seen on another test car. That aero element might be reserved for a hardcore, track-focused version, or it could be part of an optional package. You can tell the suspension is stiff from how the car bounces over even slight road imperfections, but that's how the cookie crumbles with dedicated sports cars.
The second photo shared on Reddit by user u/Viper287 shows a similar prototype—on a dirt road, of all places—high in the mountains of Hartsel, Colorado. Automakers regularly test prototypes at high altitudes, so that must have been what Lexus was doing here.
So, why is Lexus testing the
AMG GT
? The new LFR is also expected to feature a front-mounted twin-turbo V-8, albeit with a hybrid twist. Affalterbach's second-generation model is electrified as well, but the AMG GT seen in the footage was the original, purely combustion-powered version. The upcoming Japanese rival boasts sexy proportions with a wide body, lending it an exotic presence to match the Mercedes.
The fact that Lexus is benchmarking the AMG GT suggests it's setting the bar high for the LFR. However, don't expect it to be a direct successor to the
LFA
, as the new model is likely to slot lower in the lineup. As a result, it should significantly undercut the LFA's $375,000 price tag. A well-informed guess would place it above $150,000, especially considering the RC F already hovers around six figures.
For reference, the least expensive AMG GT with a V-8 is the GT 55 at $138,700. However, Lexus might be targeting the GT 63, which begins at $179,050. Mercedes also offers two flavors at $195,900: the hybrid
GT 63 S E Performance
and the track-ready GT 63 Pro.
Since Toyota and
Lexus
have been testing their new cars for years, we're hopeful they'll be revealed sooner rather than later. The race car is expected to compete in WEC in 2026, so the wait should be nearly over.
Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily.
back
Sign up
For more information, read our
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Use
.
Share this Story
X
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
11 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Denso Sonoma Nationals Qualifying
Friday At Sonoma Raceways Sonoma, Calif. Qualifying after two rounds Top Fuel 1. Brittany Force, 3.645 seconds, 343.16 mph; 2. Doug Kalitta, 3.661, 335.73; 3. Clay Millican, 3.699, 335.15; 4. Antron Brown, 3.699, 332.18; 5. Tony Stewart, 3.727, 328.62; 6. Josh Hart, 3.737, 331.28; 7. Ida Zetterstrom, 3.754, 328.70; 8. Justin Ashley, 3.770, 323.19; 9. Ron August, 4.316, 194.38; 10. Shawn Langdon, 6.940, 94.66. Funny Car 1. Matt Hagan, Dodge Charger, 3.861, 332.59; 2. Spencer Hyde, Ford Mustang, 3.865, 333.58; 3. Paul Lee, Charger, 3.890, 299.00; 4. Austin Prock, Chevy Camaro, 3.891, 334.24; 5. Jack Beckman, Camaro, 3.895, 331.45; 6. Hunter Green, Charger, 3.897, 331.12; 7. Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.927, 330.96; 8. Chad Green, Mustang, 3.927, 329.18; 9. J.R. Todd, GR Supra, 3.945, 332.43; 10. Daniel Wilkerson, Mustang, 3.952, 296.57; 11. Bob Tasca III, Mustang, 3.959, 321.35; 12. Jason Rupert, Mustang, 3.982, 298.54; 13. Dave Richards, Mustang, 4.027, 316.60; 14. Jeff Diehl, Toyota Camry, 4.066, 316.67; 15. Buddy Hull, Charger, 4.096, 290.57; 16. Cruz Pedregon, Charger, 4.441, 196.44. Not Qualified: 17. Alexis DeJoria, 4.484, 193.85; 18. Tim Gibbons, broke. Pro Stock 1. Greg Anderson, Chevy Camaro, 6.472, 210.41; 2. Dallas Glenn, Camaro, 6.473, 211.00; 3. Greg Stanfield, Camaro, 6.480, 211.66; 4. Aaron Stanfield, Camaro, 6.489, 211.16; 5. Cody Coughlin, Camaro, 6.503, 210.11; 6. Matt Latino, Camaro, 6.505, 210.18; 7. Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.513, 210.08; 8. Jeg Coughlin, Camaro, 6.514, 210.31; 9. Mason McGaha, Camaro, 6.534, 209.46; 10. Cory Reed, Camaro, 6.535, 211.10; 11. Erica Enders, Camaro, 6.536, 210.24; 12. Stephen Bell, Camaro, 6.551, 210.57; 13. Deric Kramer, Camaro, 6.570, 211.00; 14. Kenny Delco, Camaro, 6.587, 208.26; 15. Chris McGaha, Camaro, 6.589, 209.46; 16. Joey Grose, Camaro, 6.635, 207.02. Not Qualified: 17. Matt Hartford, 6.761, 183.12. Pro Stock Motorcycle 1. Richard Gadson, Suzuki, 6.702, 200.77; 2. Matt Smith, Buell, 6.740, 200.26; 3. John Hall, Beull, 6.759, 197.28; 4. Gaige Herrera, Suzuki, 6.761, 198.82; 5. Angie Smith, Buell, 6.780, 198.09; 6. Chase Van Sant, Suzuki, 6.860, 196.36; 7. Jianna Evaristo, Buell, 6.916, 196.24; 8. Freddie Camarena, Suzuki, 6.933, 194.04; 9. Clayton Howey, Suzuki, 7.014, 191.76; 10. Brad Hawkes, Suzuki, 7.339, 181.28; 11. Charles Poskey, Suzuki, 7.600, 184.12; 12. Chris Bostick, Suzuki, broke. _____
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Next Supra Will Actually Be A Toyota Rather Than A Reskinned BMW
The fifth-generation A90 Toyota Supra has been a pretty curious vehicle since it went on sale for the 2020 model year. At first, folks were excited to be getting a new Supra at all, considering the fact that Toyota discontinued the U.S. model back in 1998. Pretty quickly, though, folks realized it was pretty much just a G29 BMW Z4 with a different body on top. Its engine options, transmissions and running gear were pretty much identical to the Z4. Now, Toyota is said to be rectifying this slight oversight with its next-generation GR Supra. The sixth-generation model is expected to come around sometime in 2027, and it's going to be powered by a Toyota-built turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four hybrid that is said to put out around 400 horsepower, according to a Best Car report reviewed by Forbes. Right now, the GR Supra uses a BMW B48 inline-four and a B58 inline-six. Granted, these are both very good motors, but they're sort of inauthentic when it comes to a Toyota sports car. Read more: Cheap-Feeling, Underpowered, Or Just Ugly, These Cars Don't Justify Their Price More Than An Engine Engines aren't the only difference between the A90 and whatever comes next for Gazoo Racing. Best Car says it will sit on a rear-wheel-drive platform. There's no word on whether this will be an all-new platform for the automaker or if it'll take an existing one from Lexus. One thing is for sure: it won't be shared with the Z4. That being said, there still might be some sharing among automakers. While it's likely the next Supra will get that aforementioned inline-four, Forbes says it's possible Toyota is testing a Supra prototype fitted with Mazda's turbocharged 3.3-liter inline-six mild-hybrid powertrain found in the CX-70 and CX-90 crossover. In those applications, it makes 340 hp and 369 pound-feet of torque. If I had to guess, it would be tuned to put out a bit more power than that in a possible next-gen Supra. Since the Supra went on sale back in 2019, it has been a bit of a sales success compared to its more expensive, convertible brother — selling over 24,000 units compared to the Z4's 13,000. I know for the most part that people dig the Supra, but it always just felt inauthentic to me. Sure, on paper, the B48 and B58 are probably better than Toyota's equivalent engines, and it's probably the same story with the car's platform, but I don't know. If I'm buying a Toyota, I want a Toyota. It seems the automaker has realized this issue and is working to fix it. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla plans 'friends and family' car service in California, regulator says
In an earnings call this week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk teased an expansion of his company's fledgling robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area and other U.S. markets. But California regulators are making clear that Tesla is not authorized to carry passengers on public roads in autonomous vehicles and would require a human driver in control at all times. 'Tesla is not allowed to test or transport the public (paid or unpaid) in an AV with or without a driver,' the California Public Utilities Commission told CNBC in an email on Friday. 'Tesla is allowed to transport the public (paid or unpaid) in a non-AV, which, of course, would have a driver.' In other words, Tesla's service in the state will have to be more taxi than robot. Tesla has what's known in California as a charter-party carrier permit, which allows it to run a private car service with human drivers, similar to limousine companies or sightseeing services. The commission said it received a notification from Tesla on Thursday that the company plans to 'extend operations' under its permit to 'offer service to friends and family of employees and to select members of the public,' across much of the Bay Area. But under Tesla's permit, that service can only be with non-AVs, the CPUC said. The California Department of Motor Vehicles told CNBC that Tesla has had a 'drivered testing permit' since 2014, allowing the company to operate AVs with a safety driver present, but not to collect fees. The safety drivers must be Tesla employees, contractors or designees of the manufacturer under that permit, the DMV said. In Austin, Texas, Tesla is currently testing out a robotaxi service, using its Model Y SUVs equipped with the company's latest automated driving software and hardware. The limited service operates during daylight hours and in good weather, on roads with a speed limit of 40 miles per hour. Robotaxis in Austin are remotely supervised by Tesla employees and include a human safety supervisor in the front passenger seat. The service is now limited to invited users, who agree to the terms of Tesla's 'early access program.' On Friday, Business Insider, citing an internal Tesla memo, reported that Tesla told staff it planned to expand its robotaxi service to the San Francisco Bay Area this weekend. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment on that report. In a separate matter in California, the DMV has accused Tesla of misleading consumers about the capabilities of its driver assistance systems, previously marketed under the names Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (or FSD). Tesla now calls its premium driver assistance features, 'FSD Supervised.' In owners manuals, Tesla says Autopilot and FSD Supervised are 'hands on' systems, requiring a driver at the wheel, ready to steer or brake at all times. But in user-generated videos shared by Tesla on X, the company shows customers using FSD hands-free while engaged in other tasks. The DMV is arguing that Tesla's license to sell vehicles in California should be suspended, with arguments ongoing through Friday at the state's Office of Administrative Hearings in Oakland. Under California state law, autonomous taxi services are regulated at the state level. Some city and county officials said on Friday that they were out of the loop regarding a potential Tesla service in the state. Stephanie Moulton-Peters, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in a phone interview that she had not heard from Tesla about its plans. She urged the company to be more transparent. 'I certainly expect they will tell us and I think it's a good business practice to do that,' she said. Moulton-Peters said she was undecided on robotaxis generally and wasn't sure how Marin County, located north of San Francisco, would react to Tesla's service. 'The news of change coming always has mixed results in the community,' she said. Brian Colbert, another member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors, said in an interview that he's open to the idea of Tesla's service being a good thing but that he was disappointed in the lack of communication. 'They should have done a better job about informing the community about the launch,' he said. Google spinoff Waymo, which is far ahead of Tesla in the robotaxi market, obtained a number of permits from the DMV and CPUC before starting its driverless ride-hailing service in the state. Waymo was granted a CPUC driverless deployment permit in 2023, allowing it to charge for rides in the state. The company has been seeking amendments to both its DMV and CPUC driverless deployment permits as it expands its service territory in the state. This article was originally published on
