logo
US brings charges in North Korean remote worker scheme that officials say funds weapons program

US brings charges in North Korean remote worker scheme that officials say funds weapons program

Time of India2 days ago
The Justice Department announced charges in a North Korean scheme. North Korea funded its weapons program. It used salaries of remote IT workers at U.S. companies. Workers used stolen identities to get jobs. Companies were tricked into paying wages to North Korean accounts. Some workers stole sensitive military technology. Cases were filed in Georgia and Massachusetts.
FILE - The U.S. Department of Justice logo is seen on a podium before a press conference with Attorney General Pam Bondi, Tuesday, May 6, 2025, at the Justice Department in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, file)
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Justice Department announced criminal charges Monday in a scheme by North Korea to fund its weapons program through the salaries of remote information technology workers employed unwittingly by U.S. companies.The charges arose from what law enforcement officials described as a nationwide operation that also resulted in the seizure of financial accounts, websites and laptops that were used to carry out the fraud.Separate cases in Georgia and Massachusetts represent the latest Justice Department effort to confront a persistent threat that officials say generates enormous revenue for the North Korean government and in some cases affords workers access to sensitive and proprietary data from the American corporations that hire them.The scheme involved thousands of workers who, armed with stolen or fake identities, were dispatched by the North Korean government to find work as remote IT employees at American companies, including Fortune 500 corporations. The companies were duped into believing that the workers they hired were based in the U.S. when many were actually stationed in North Korea or China, and the wages the victimized companies paid were transferred into accounts controlled by co-conspirators affiliated with North Korea, prosecutors say."These schemes target and steal from U.S. companies and are designed to evade sanctions and fund the North Korean regime's illicit programs, including its weapons programs," Assistant Attorney General John Eisenberg, the head of the Justice Department's National Security Division, said in a statement.In one case exposed on Monday in federal court in Massachusetts, the Justice Department said it had arrested one U.S. national and charged more than a half dozen Chinese and Taiwanese citizens for their alleged roles in an elaborate fraud that prosecutors say produced several millions of dollars in revenue and affected scores of companies.The conspiracy, court papers say, involved the registration of financial accounts to receive the proceeds and the creation of shell companies and fake websites to make it look like the remote workers were associated with legitimate businesses. Enablers inside the United States facilitated the workers' remote computer access, tricking companies into believing the workers were logging in from U.S. locations.The Justice Department did not identify the companies that were duped, but said that some of the fraudulent workers were able to gain access to and steal information related to sensitive military technology.The case filed in Georgia charges four North Korean IT workers with stealing virtual currency worth hundreds of thousands of dollars from their employers. The defendants remain at large.The Justice Department has filed similar prosecutions in recent years, as well as created an initiative aimed at disrupting the threat.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's president orders country to suspend cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog IAEA
Iran's president orders country to suspend cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog IAEA

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Iran's president orders country to suspend cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog IAEA

Iran's president on Wednesday ordered the country to suspend its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency after American and Israeli airstrikes hit its most-important nuclear facilities, likely further limiting inspectors' ability to track Tehran's program that had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. The order by President Masoud Pezeshkian included no timetables or details about what that suspension would entail. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signaled in a CBS News interview that Tehran still would be willing to continue negotiations with the United States. 'I don't think negotiations will restart as quickly as that,' Araghchi said, referring to U.S. President Donald Trump's comments that talks could start as early as this week. However, he added: 'The doors of diplomacy will never slam shut.' Iran has limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West — though as of right now Tehran has denied that there's any immediate plans to resume talks with the United States that had been upended by the 12-day Iran-Israel war. Iranian state television announced Pezeshkian's order, which followed a law passed by Iran's parliament to suspend that cooperation. The bill already received the approval of Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, on Thursday, and likely the support of the country's Supreme National Security Council, which Pezeshkian chairs. 'The government is mandated to immediately suspend all cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency under the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and its related Safeguards Agreement,' state television quoted the bill as saying. 'This suspension will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists.' It wasn't immediately clear what that would mean for the Vienna-based IAEA, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. The agency long has monitored Iran's nuclear program and said that it was waiting for an official communication from Iran on what the suspension meant. A diplomat with knowledge of IAEA operations, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the situation in Iran, said that IAEA inspectors were still there after the announcement and hadn't been told by the government to leave. Iran's decision drew an immediate condemnation from Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar. 'Iran has just issued a scandalous announcement about suspending its cooperation with the IAEA,' he said in an X post. 'This is a complete renunciation of all its international nuclear obligations and commitments.' Saar urged European nations that were part of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal to implement its so-called snapback clause. That would reimpose all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East, and the IAEA doesn't have access to its weapons-related facilities. Iran's move so far stops short of what experts feared the most. They had been concerned that Tehran, in response to the war, could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons and allows the IAEA to conduct inspections to verify that countries correctly declared their programs. Iran's 2015 nuclear deal allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant, but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. The IAEA served as the main assessor of Iran's commitment to the deal. But Trump, in his first term in 2018, unilaterally withdrew Washington from the accord, insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Middle East. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran had been enriching up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. Israeli airstrikes, which began June 13, decimated the upper ranks of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and targeted its arsenal of ballistic missiles. The strikes also hit Iran's nuclear sites, which Israel claimed put Tehran within reach of a nuclear weapon. Iran has said the Israeli attacks killed 935 'Iranian citizens,' including 38 children and 102 women. However, Iran has a long history of offering lower death counts around unrest over political considerations. The Washington-based Human Rights Activists group, which has provided detailed casualty figures from multiple rounds of unrest in Iran, has put the death toll at 1,190 people killed, including 436 civilians and 435 security force members. The attacks wounded another 4,475 people, the group said. Meanwhile, it appears that Iranian officials now are assessing the damage done by the American strikes conducted on the three nuclear sites on June 22, including those at Fordo, a site built under a mountain about 100 kilometers (60 miles) southwest of Tehran. Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC analyzed by The Associated Press show Iranian officials at Fordo on Monday likely examining the damage caused by American bunker busters. Trucks could be seen in the images, as well as at least one crane and an excavator at tunnels on the site. That corresponded to images shot Sunday by Maxar Technologies similarly showing the ongoing work.

$16 million, no apology: Paramount settles Trump's '60 minutes' lawsuit
$16 million, no apology: Paramount settles Trump's '60 minutes' lawsuit

Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

$16 million, no apology: Paramount settles Trump's '60 minutes' lawsuit

In a rare and stunning move, Paramount Global agreed to pay US President Donald Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit over the editing of a 2024 60 Minutes interview with then Vice President Kamala Harris. The payment, announced quietly on Tuesday evening, marks one of the most significant capitulations by a major news organisation to a sitting president in US history. And it may be one of the clearest signals yet that the press is losing its most fundamental protections. 'Each settlement weakens the democratic freedoms on which these media organisations depend,' wrote Jameel Jaffer, head of the Knight First Amendment Institute. 'They create precedents… that will shape the way that judges and the public think about press freedom and its limits.' Paramount's settlement, which includes Trump's legal fees, comes with no apology. But it does include one unprecedented concession: future 60 Minutes interviews with presidential candidates will now come with full written transcripts. 'Another win for the American people,' a spokesman for Trump's legal team said, delivered by the president who is holding 'the fake news media accountable.' But the implications stretch far beyond a single interview. 'The deal is the clearest sign yet that Mr. Trump's ability to intimidate major American institutions extends to the media industry,' The New York Times wrote. Inside CBS, the mood was grim. Journalists at 60 Minutes had seen the lawsuit not only as frivolous but as a direct challenge to their ability to report freely. Scott Pelley, a CBS correspondent, called any settlement 'very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies.' Veteran CBS reporter Lesley Stahl was even more blunt in an interview with the New Yorker. 'There aren't any damages. I mean, he accused us of editing Kamala Harris in a way to help her win the election. But he won the election,' she said. 'It is a frivolous lawsuit.' Still, Paramount folded. Why? Part of the answer lies in the network's fragile corporate situation. Paramount+, the company's flagship streaming service, is bleeding hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Its CEO was ousted and replaced with an awkward 'office of the C.E.O.' Its cable business is in long-term decline, and its stock has plummeted more than 70 per cent over the last five years. All this while the company is negotiating a high-stakes merger with Skydance Media, one that needs the blessing of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to go through. While FCC Chairman Brendan Carr publicly claimed the Trump lawsuit was unrelated to the FCC's review of the Skydance deal, others weren't so sure. The Times reported that some Paramount executives believed settling the lawsuit might smooth the path forward with regulators. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders warned that such a payout 'could be construed as a bribe' and suggested congressional hearings might follow. Even though the FCC regulates Paramount's 27 local stations and not CBS News directly, Carr has taken a notably aggressive stance toward liberal media outlets. He opened inquiries into NPR and PBS, questioned public broadcasting funding, and revived reviews into the programming choices of ABC and NBC. The lawsuit against CBS wasn't even about Trump himself, who didn't appear in the segment. Instead, Trump claims that 60 Minutes violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, a law typically used by consumers against false advertising. His claim centered on how CBS edited Kamala Harris' remarks about Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Twenty-one seconds of the Harris interview aired on Face the Nation, and seven different seconds on 60 Minutes. CBS said it was edited for time, a standard practice in television, but Trump argued that it was designed to sway voters towards the Democratic nominee. Legal scholars were baffled. 'CBS' speech is not commercial, It's news,' wrote Noah Feldman, a Harvard law professor for Bloomberg. 'If news on a network with advertising counted as commercial speech, the First Amendment as we know it would be gutted.' Yet the case found a home in Amarillo, Texas, where there's only one federal judge – Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee with a record of hardline rulings. But the CBS settlement wasn't an outlier. In recent years, Trump has extracted millions from media giants. Disney paid $15 million (plus $1 million in legal fees) over a defamation claim tied to George Stephanopoulos. Meta paid $25 million over Trump's Facebook ban. Trump still has pending suits against the Des Moines Register and even the Pulitzer Prize committee. In many cases, these lawsuits are legally shaky—but politically potent. At the Pentagon, former Fox News host Pete Hegseth, now Defence Secretary, reassigned press workspace away from outlets like Politico, NPR, NBC, and The New York Times in favour of Breitbart, One America News, and HuffPost – which hadn't even asked for a spot. Reporters weren't banned, but the message was clear. 'The opposition party is the media,' former advisor Steve Bannon told Frontline in 2019. On the campaign trail in 2022, Trump said he would jail reporters who refuse to reveal confidential sources, even joking about prison rape. 'When this person realises that he is going to be the bride of another prisoner shortly, he will say, 'I'd very much like to tell you exactly who that was,'' Trump warned at a rally. Then, in 2023, he called on NBC to be investigated for treason over its coverage of criminal charges he faces. Similarly, after a contentious 2024 debate, he called for ABC News to lose its license. 'They oughta take away their license for the way they do that,' he told Fox & Friends. Trump's campaign has already changed how some major outlets operate. Jeff Bezos of The Washington Post and Patrick Soon-Shiong of The Los Angeles Times both refused to endorse Kamala Harris in 2024, citing public mistrust in media and the political risks of alienating federal regulators. Inside The New York Times, leadership is bracing for more to come. Executive Editor Joseph Kahn told NPR, 'we shouldn't pretend that [press protections] are only vulnerable in a place like Hungary or Turkey. They are also vulnerable here.' And while Trump and his allies criticised the Biden administration for pressuring social media companies to remove offensive content, Trump is doing the same thing, just more aggressively. '[Trump] is demanding that a private company kowtow to him—or else,' wrote Reason magazine. 'But his chilling crusade against the press… is an assault on the values that distinguish a liberal democracy from one that elects autocrats.'

Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing cracks China-linked scam, saves 8 victims across states
Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing cracks China-linked scam, saves 8 victims across states

India Today

time27 minutes ago

  • India Today

Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing cracks China-linked scam, saves 8 victims across states

The Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing has busted an international investment scam operated by cybercriminals linked to an official press release issued on July 2, 2025, the Cyber Crime Wing said its State Cyber Command Centre had identified eight victims, two each from Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, and one each from Rajasthan, Delhi, Jammu & Kashmir, and Uttar Pradesh, who were being targeted by the on data analysis and intelligence, a team led by Tmt. Shahnaz Illyas, IPS, Superintendent of Police, traced mule accounts directly controlled by Chinese scammers. The Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing immediately alerted the fraud risk management teams of several banks, placing the suspect accounts under surveillance. Further investigation revealed high-value international transactions pointing to a sophisticated global fraud network. Crucially, the cyber team identified eight victims who had not yet filed formal complaints but were already under the influence of scammers using fake investment platforms that promised high Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing promptly alerted cyber police units in the respective states, who have now registered cases. Quick intervention prevented the victims from transferring more money to the General of Police Shankar Jiwal, IPS, commended the investigation team for preventing financial losses and busting the scam network. Additional Director General of Police Dr. Sandeep Mittal, IPS, issued a public advisory urging people to beware of online scams promising huge profits and cautioned against sharing personal or banking details with unknown advised people not to fall for investment offers that sound too good to be true, to avoid sharing sensitive financial information with unknown persons, and to never lend bank accounts, ATM cards, or SIM cards to anyone. He also stressed the importance of enabling two-factor authentication, using strong passwords, and educating family members, especially senior citizens, about the dangers of online fraud.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store