South Carolina inmate has chosen to die by firing squad. If carried out tomorrow, it will be the first in the state.
A South Carolina death row inmate has chosen to die by firing squad, a controversial and rarely used execution method that's legal but viewed as an inhumane form of justice by many Americans. Brad Sigmon, 67, is scheduled to be executed on March 7. He was convicted in 2001 of killing his ex-girlfriend's parents at their home. Prosecutors said Sigmon also held his ex-girlfriend at gunpoint and attempted to kidnap her, but she escaped. He shot at her as she ran but missed.
Sigmon's execution tomorrow will be South Carolina's first death by firing squad, which was legalized in the state in 2021.
His life may be spared if South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster reduces his sentence to life without parole. McMaster will make the decision moments before the execution is set to take place, the Associated Press reports. In the 49 years since the state reinstated the death penalty, no governor has granted clemency.
On Tuesday, the South Carolina Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Sigmon to delay the execution because he didn't know enough about the lethal injection option.
Since 1976, there have only been three executions by firing squad, and they all occurred in Utah. If carried out, Sigmon's execution will be the first time in over 15 years that a U.S. inmate will be shot to death as an execution method.
According to the Associated Press, Sigmon's attorney, Gerald King, said in a statement that his client acknowledges a firing squad execution will be a violent death, but he considers it to be the best option available.
Electrocution, King said, would 'burn and cook him alive," while choosing lethal injection would mean risking "the prolonged death suffered by all three of the men South Carolina has executed since September — three men Brad knew and cared about — who remained alive, strapped to a gurney, for more than 20 minutes."
An execution by firing squad, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, usually involves the prisoner bound in a chair in front of a wall.
The prisoner can speak any last and final words before a firing squad stands in an enclosure about 20 feet away from the prisoner. Sandbags are placed near the chair to keep bullets from ricocheting around the room.
In accordance with South Carolina's rules, three volunteer employees from the Department of Corrections are all armed with weapons loaded with live ammunition.
The prisoner typically dies as a result of blood loss caused by a rupture of the heart or a large blood vessel, the DPIC website states.
In the U.S., 34 people have been executed by firing squad, according to data from the DPIC. It's the only method of execution that has a 0% botched rate. Comparatively, death by lethal injection has the most botched execution rate at 7.12%.
The most recent death by firing squad was in 2010, when 49-year-old Ronnie Lee Gardner was executed in Salt Lake County, Utah. He was declared dead two minutes after he was shot.
The following five states have authorized execution by firing squad in certain cases:
Idaho: Lethal injection is the primary method of execution under state law, but if the director of the Idaho Department of Corrections determines it's unavailable, then a firing squad will be used.
Mississippi: A 2022 state law allows corrections officials to choose their preferred execution method — either lethal injection, electrocution, firing squad or nitrogen hypoxia.
Oklahoma: If other methods like lethal injection, nitrogen hypoxia or electrocution are determined to be unconstitutional or otherwise unavailable, then death by firing squad is an authorized execution method under state law.
South Carolina: State law says a prisoner can choose their method of execution: electrocution, firing squad or lethal injection.
Utah: If lethal injection drugs are unavailable, or if a court finds the use to be unconstitutional, then death by firing squad will be the method of execution, according to state law.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
A millennial explains how he made $500K secretly working 3 remote jobs in tech
Charles thought that secretly working multiple jobs would protect him from layoffs. He was wrong. Between 2021 and 2023, Charles earned as much as $300,000 annually by juggling multiple full-time jobs in product and tech. The extra income helped him pay down debt, renovate his home, buy a rental property, and purchase a new car. When he got laid off from one of his jobs last August, he took comfort in still having a roughly $150,000 salary from his remaining role. But landing a new job proved harder than he expected. Then, in September, he got more bad news: he'd been laid off again. In just two months, he'd gone from two jobs to zero. Over the next six months, Charles said he applied to hundreds of jobs but couldn't land any. He had to rely on his wife's income and tap into much of the savings he'd built up through job juggling in recent years. "All that extra money I made kind of went away," said Charles, whose identity was verified by Business Insider but who asked to use a pseudonym, citing fears of professional repercussions. He's in his 30s and lives in the Northeast. "I'd never seen the job market that bad, and I was genuinely concerned for my financial future." But just as suddenly as he'd lost his jobs, his luck changed. A few months ago, he landed a full-time contract role through a personal connection — one that paid about $150,000 annually. Roughly a month later, after a recruiter reached out to him, Charles landed a second gig — a full-time contract role that paid about $175,000 annually. That same month, a different recruiter contacted him, leading to a third role, a full-time salaried position that paid about $185,000 a year. Do you have a story to share about secretly working multiple jobs or discovering an employee is doing so? Contact this reporter via email at jzinkula@ or Signal at jzinkula.29. And just like that, he was on track to earn more than $500,000 annually across his three jobs — more than he'd ever made in his years of job juggling. However, he would soon learn that landing the roles wasn't the end of his professional challenge. Charles is among the Americans who have secretly juggled multiple remote jobs to increase their incomes. Over the past three years, BI has interviewed more than two dozen "overemployed" workers who've used their extra cash to travel the world, buy expensive weight-loss drugs, and pay down student debt. To be sure, holding multiple jobs without employer approval could have professional repercussions and lead to burnout. Additionally, tech layoffs and return-to-office mandates have created obstacles for current and aspiring job jugglers. However, most job jugglers have told BI that the financial benefits have generally outweighed the downsides and risks and that they're doing whatever they can to maintain their over-employed status. Juggling three jobs was lucrative — but not sustainable Earning more than $30,000 a month across his three jobs was a financial boon for Charles, but he knew he couldn't keep it up. The hours weren't the issue. Charles said he only worked roughly 40 hours each week, and that the companies operated in different time zones, which limited the number of hours he had to work all three jobs simultaneously. He said he used separate laptops and calendars to keep his roles siloed — and often worked on one job while sitting silently in a meeting for another. The bigger problem came when the manager at his full-time role began pushing him to work from the office, a shift that would require a roughly two-hour commute each way. Charles said the recruiter had told him during the interview process that working remotely wouldn't be an issue, which made the change of tune particularly frustrating. "I'm not wasting four hours of my time so I can sit in a meeting for two hours when I can just hop on Zoom," he said. While the commute alone wasn't appealing, the larger concern was that working in an office would make job juggling nearly impossible. To make matters worse, Charles said the job wasn't turning out to be a good fit. He considered dropping the job, but said he was hesitant to let it go because it was his only full-time role. He worried that if the economy took a downturn, his two contract roles would be cut first, making the full-time position his most stable option. After considering his options, Charles decided to resign. He said his goal is for at least one of his contract roles to eventually convert into a full-time position. In the meantime, he's looking for other opportunities that offer the flexibility, stability, and pay he's come to value. He's also hoping the income from his two remaining jobs will help him restore the savings he depleted over the past year. "For me, it's about building my savings back up and then putting that money away for a nest egg," he said. "That's kind of the priority until I get to a point where I'm comfortable where I'm at financially."
2 hours ago
Russia launches biggest aerial attack on Ukraine since the start of the war
KYIV, Ukraine -- Russia launched its biggest aerial attack against Ukraine overnight, a Ukrainian official said Sunday, part of an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the 3-year-old war. Russia fired a total of 537 aerial weapons at Ukraine, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, told the Associated Press that the overnight onslaught was 'the most massive air strike,' on the country, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles. The attack targeted regions across Ukraine including western Ukraine, far from the frontline. Poland and allied countries scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace, the Polish air force said Sunday. Kherson regional Gov. Oleksandr Prokudin said one person died in a drone strike. Six people were wounded in Cherkasy, including a child, according to regional Gov. Ihor Taburets.
The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
Biden, Harris attend funeral for slain Minnesota lawmaker
Former President Biden and Vice President Harris attended the Saturday funeral of slain Minnesota lawmaker, state Rep. Melissa Hortman, in Minneapolis. A man impersonating a police officer shot and killed Hortman, her husband Mark and their golden retriever in an attack officials describes as 'politically motivated.' State Sen. John Hoffman (D) and his wife Yvetter were also shot in their homes. The suspected shooter, Vance Boelter, is in custody. Biden and Harris were joined by over a thousand mourners who gathered to celebrate the life of Hortman and her husband on Saturday. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), his wife Gwen, former Gov. Mark Dayton (D), Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan (D) and Attorney General Keith Ellison (D) also attended the funeral. 'Melissa Hortman will be remembered as the most consequential speaker in Minnesota history. I get to remember her as a close friend, a mentor, and the most talented legislator I have ever known,' Gov. Tim Walz said in his eulogy, according to the Associated Press. 'For seven years, I have had the privilege of signing her agenda into law. I know millions of Minnesotans get to live their lives better because she and Mark chose public service and politics.' Hortman was remembered for her tenure as Speaker in the state legislature as well as her extensive legislative agenda, which included free public school lunch. Walz honored her as the first woman to lie in the Minnesota Capitol rotunda in St. Paul on Friday for public viewing. Biden also paid his respects at the state Capitol on Friday. During his eulogy, Walz lauded the lawmaker as a close friend and public servant. 'Maybe it is this moment where each of us can examine the way we work together, the way we talk about each other, the way we fight for things we care about,' Walz said, per AP. 'A moment when each of us can recommit to engaging in politics and life the way Mark and Melissa did — fiercely, enthusiastically, heartily, but without ever losing sight of our common humanity.'
