Brave Illinois 5th-grade girl stands up to school board that allowed trans athlete to crush dreams of female students
Outraged parents and students alike have been criticizing the Naperville Community Unit School District 203 following the event last month, at which the transgender runner won three events against seventh-grade girls.
At a board meeting on Monday night, Cali McKinnon stood in front of the microphone and delivered a damning statement.
'I'm standing up for the girls who ran in the track meet,' she said.
'They worked really hard to get there and a boy came in and got first, and the boy made a fast girl not get the place she deserves.
'Men and women are very different, this is why there are boys sports and girl sports. I love sports and I would hate it if a boy came in and beat me.
'My favorite sports are soccer and swimming. In both of these sports boys and girls are separated.
'Boys and girls have different strengths, I think Naperville should keep girls and boys sports separate to make it fair for everyone.'
Outraged parents and students alike have been criticizing the Naperville Community Unit School District 203 following the event last month, at which the transgender runner won three events against seventh-grade girls
The youngster's comments were met with a round of applause from those in attendance.
Some of the banners held up by those included 'protect girls sports + spaces' and 'protect girls sports'.
One sign near the back of the room did appear to support trans rights.
At the meeting, the board also heard from a student named Layne, who said: 'I had gender dysphoria. The spread of transgender ideology is a result of a society that is growing sick.
'A symptom of a dysfunctional society without God. I want to expose these demonic entities because this is how we set our children free.'
Layne told the meeting that she was there representing the gay-rights group Gays Against Groomers.
Those in opposition to the inclusion of transgender athletes are part of the group Awake Illinois, set up by parents and concerned citizens in 2021.
At previous board meetings, group members have argued against the existence of transgender and intersex athletes, saying that chromosomes cannot be changed.
The group filed a civil rights complaint against the school district, saying that it violated Title IX.
Title IX is a law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs and activities that are backed with federal funds.
Doug Krein and his wife Marie Davis told Fox News last month that their 12-year-old daughter would have won a 200m race if not for the transgender athlete.
'My job as a parent is to advocate for my daughter and protect her. And the hardest thing is trying to tell her why she lost to a boy in seventh grade,' Krein said
'It's like they're trying to erase women's sports. Erase women.'
In a statement, the school district said: 'In regards to our procedures, Naperville 203 adheres to the Illinois Human Rights Act and the Illinois State Board of Education guidance, which prohibit discrimination in schools and ensure full and equal access to programs and services regardless of gender identity or other protected characteristics.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Washington Commanders move step closer to $3.7bn DC stadium… but Donald Trump threat still looms large
The Washington Commanders have received the green light to build a new $3.7billion stadium in DC - despite Donald Trump 's threat to scupper those plans if they don't revert their name back to the Redskins. Trump says he intends to block federal support for the stadium project unless the Commanders change back to the name it formerly adopted before being axed in 2020 amid pressure from fans, sponsors and Native American groups who considered 'Redskins' a racial slur. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original "Washington Redskins," and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, "Washington Commanders," I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' the president said on Truth Social last month. With Trump's threat still looming large, the Commanders cleared another hurdle in their aim to return to the site of their former home, RFK Stadium, on Friday when the District of Columbia Council approved the legislation. The bill passed by a 9-3 vote, though it still must be approved a second time by the council before being sent to Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, who negotiated the original plan with Commanders owner Josh Harris in April. Washington currently plays at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, but aims to open a new venue in 2030. After the bill was passed, Harris said on Friday: 'Today's approval by the Council is transformational for D.C. and brings the Commanders back to our spiritual home. Like many fans, RFK was the site of memories that fueled my love for this team and this city. Now we're closer than ever to reigniting that energy for a new generation. 'We're incredibly grateful to the Mayor and the Council throughout this process for their leadership and guidance. 'This is a historic moment. This project is about more than delivering a world-class stadium worthy of our players, fans and the region. It's about revitalizing a critical part of our city, creating thousands of jobs and unlocking long-term economic benefits for the District. We look forward to working with our fans, residents, community leaders and elected officials to deliver on this vision.' The ownership group led by Harris has been considering locations in Washington, Maryland and Virginia since buying the team from Dan Snyder in 2022. Congress passed a bill transferring the RFK Stadium land to the city that was signed by then-President Joe Biden in early January. That paved the way for making it possible to replace the old stadium with a mixed-use development, including the new playing field for the Commanders. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson's office recently estimated the redevelopment could generate $26.6bn in tax revenue over 30 years. The district would contribute $1bn toward the stadium project, while the team would fund the remaining $2.7bn. However, Trump is now threatening to stand in the way of the project if his Redskins wish is not fulfilled. That issue did not come up in Friday's council meeting. Fans and even some Native American groups have voiced support for the team's new ownership group to revert to 'Redskins.' Several public opinion polls of self-identified Native Americans have found most were not offended by the term, while critics have pointed to academic research by the University of Michigan and UC Berkeley that found the opposite was true. Trump appeared to reference the public polling in favor of a name change on Sunday. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' he claimed. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' He also demanded the same from MLB's Cleveland Guardians, née: 'Indians.' 'Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past,' Trump wrote.
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Toxic civil war rips apart island paradise loved by multimillionaires... and could see it completely wiped out
Well-heeled residents of Nantucket are embroiled in furious clashes over plans to protect mansion-lined stretches of coastline from falling into the ocean. The windswept paradise is a favorite of the Biden clan and also attracts Hollywood elites such as Beyoncé, Kourtney Kardashian and many others - but the very beaches that lure stars to the island paradise are now in danger.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Judge allows the National Science Foundation to withhold hundreds of millions of research dollars
The National Science Foundation can continue to withhold hundreds of millions of dollars from researchers in several states until litigation aimed at restoring it plays out, a federal court ruled Friday. U.S. District Judge John Cronan in New York declined to force the NSF to restart payments immediately, while the case is still being decided, as requested by the sixteen Democrat-led states who brought the suit, including New York, Hawaii, California, Colorado and Connecticut. In his ruling, Cronan said he would not grant the preliminary injunction in part because it may be that another court, the Court of Federal Claims, has jurisdiction over what is essentially a case about money. He also said the states failed to show that NSF's actions were counter to the agency's mandate. The lawsuit filed in May alleges that the National Science Foundation's new grant-funding priorities as well as a cap on what's known as indirect research expenses 'violate the law and jeopardize America's longstanding global leadership in STEM.' Another district court had already blocked the the cap on indirect costs — administrative expenses that allow research to get done like paying support staff and maintaining equipment. This injunction had been requested to restore funding to the grants that were cut. In April, the NSF announced a new set of priorities and began axing hundreds of grants for research focused on things like misinformation and diversity, equity and inclusion. Researchers who lost funding also were studying artificial intelligence, post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans, STEM education for K-12 students and more. Researchers were not given a specific explanation for why their grants were canceled, attorney Colleen Faherty, representing the state of New York, said during last month's hearing. Instead, they received boilerplate language stating that their work 'no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities." NSF has long been directed by Congress to encourage underrepresented groups like women and people with disabilities to participate in STEM. According to the lawsuit, the science foundation's funding cuts already halted efforts to train the next generation of scientists in fields like computer science, math and environmental science. A lawyer for the NSF said at the hearing that the agency has the authority to fund whatever research it deems necessary — and has since its inception in 1950. In the court filing, the government also argued that its current priorities were to 'create opportunities for all Americans everywhere' and 'not preference some groups at the expense of others, or directly/indirectly exclude individuals or groups.' The plaintiff states are trying to 'substitute their own judgement for the judgement of the agency," Adam Gitlin, an attorney for the NSF, said during the hearing. The science foundation is still funding some projects related to expanding representation in STEM, Cronan wrote in his ruling. Per the lawsuit filed in May, for example, the University of Northern Colorado lost funding for only one of its nine programs focused on increasing participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields. The states are reviewing the decision, according to spokespeople from the New York and Hawaii attorney general offices. The National Science Foundation declined to comment. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
