Big Pay Packages Spark Growing Dissent Among UK Shareholders
Shareholder dissent over executive pay at British companies is rising just as firms seek to bolster pay packages to remain internationally competitive.
Three times as many companies faced opposition from more than 20% of shareholders so far this year compared with the same period in 2024, data from proxy-solicitation firm Georgeson Inc. shows.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Klopp Praises Wirtz as Liverpool Make Statement with Record Signing
Klopp Reflects as Liverpool Invest Big in Florian Wirtz New Era, Familiar Ambition at Anfield The summer of 2025 has already delivered a statement of intent at Anfield. Liverpool, now managed by Arne Slot, have secured the signing of Florian Wirtz in a deal worth £100 million plus £16 million in add-ons, a record fee for a British club. The move, completed ahead of a number of Europe's elite, has captured attention not just for the player involved, but for what it symbolises: Liverpool's continued evolution without Jürgen Klopp. Advertisement For many, it felt like a new chapter written in the same bold ink. Wirtz, 22, has been Germany's outstanding player for the past two seasons. His signature was hotly contested, with Bayern Munich, Manchester City and Real Madrid among the interested parties. Liverpool's ability to complete the deal speaks volumes about their standing under the guidance of Slot and the club's recruitment structure led by Michael Edwards and Richard Hughes. Klopp on Wirtz: Praise and Perspective With such a high-profile signing, scrutiny inevitably follows, especially when past remarks are unearthed. Jürgen Klopp, now watching events unfold from the sidelines, once said he would walk away from a club that paid £100m for a player. That statement has been referenced widely since Wirtz's arrival. Photo: IMAGO Advertisement But the former Liverpool manager has clarified his position and thrown his support behind the move. 'We all agree that we are talking about a great player here,' Klopp told German publication Welt. 'I know that I once said that I'm out if we pay £100m for a player. But the world is changing. That's just the way the market is.' It's a measured response from a coach who always balanced idealism with realism. Markets shift, values rise, and clubs must adapt to remain competitive. Klopp's words are not a retraction, but a reflection of modern football's demands, and Liverpool's place in it. Midfield Shaped for the Future What remains to be seen is where exactly Slot will deploy Wirtz. Klopp himself acknowledged the tactical uncertainty but left little doubt over the player's talent. Advertisement 'I don't know for which position Arne has planned for Florian exactly. He is an outstanding player who can give something big to any club.' Photo IMAGO Wirtz offers versatility across attacking midfield and forward roles. With Dominik Szoboszlai, Curtis Jones, and Harvey Elliott already competing for time, Slot will need to manage rotation and role definition carefully. Yet it's precisely this depth, and competition, that elevates a squad from contenders to champions. Wirtz Transfer Highlights Market Realities Liverpool's investment in Wirtz is about more than numbers. It is a message of intent: that they are still a force among Europe's elite. After years of carefully calibrated business under Klopp, this move feels like both continuity and change, building on past success while adapting to new realities. Advertisement 'Whether he will make the reigning English champions even better, however, remains to be seen,' Klopp concluded. His comment isn't laced with doubt, but with the wisdom of someone who knows football's unpredictability better than most. What is clear is that Liverpool now have a player capable of shaping matches at the highest level. Whether that leads to another title, or just a reinvention of their attacking identity, only time will tell.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Refresco CEO Hans Roelofs to step down after 18-year tenure
Refresco CEO Hans Roelofs will step down in August, concluding an 18-year tenure with the Netherlands-based drinks manufacturer. In a statement issued yesterday (26 June), Refresco, majority-owned by private-equity firm KKR, said it had started a search for a new chief executive. Refresco supervisory board chairman and KKR partner James Cunningham thanked Roelofs for "positioning Refresco for continued success in the years to come as we continue to expand the company's footprint'. Roelofs joined Refresco in 2007 after spells at meat group Dumeco and agri-food business Nutreco. Through M&A and organic growth, Refresco is now a company with operations in 13 countries. The business has 75 manufacturing sites and employs more than 14,000 staff. KKR invested in the group in 2022. Reflecting on his decision to retire, Roelofs said: 'This is the right time for me to step back, confident that the company will continue to grow and thrive on its unique entrepreneurial spirit and the agility of its people.' In 2024, Refresco generated revenue of €5.99bn ($x), up 1% on a year earlier. The volume of drinks sold stood at 13.83bn litres, down from 14.25bn litres in 2023. Some 26% of the company's volumes were carbonated soft drinks, with another 26% generated through water products. Sport and energy drinks accounted for 15%. Earlier this month, Refresco agreed to acquire Norway-based soft-drinks manufacturer Telemark Kildevann (TKV). TKV operates two production facilities in the Norwegian towns of Fyresdal and Aurskog and supplies products to retailers and branded customers in Norway and Sweden. Last year, Refresco snapped up Spanish plant-based beverage maker Frías Nutrición, purchased a production site from German beverage group Berentzen-Gruppe and bought US-based VBC Bottling Company, a fellow contract manufacturer. In May last year, Rotterdam-based Refresco opened its first European plant-based production line in Germany, marking an entry into the oat drinks' market. As part of the deal for the Berentzen-Gruppe facility, Refresco also bought the mineral-water brands Märkisch Kristall and Grüneberg Quelle. Commending Roelofs' leadership, Refresco supervisory board member and PAI managing partner Frédéric Stévenin said: 'Refresco went through a period of unprecedented growth and transformation." "Refresco CEO Hans Roelofs to step down after 18-year tenure" was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lynas Rare Earths Limited's (ASX:LYC) institutional investors lost 4.3% last week but have benefitted from longer-term gains
Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lynas Rare Earths' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company Insiders have sold recently We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. If you want to know who really controls Lynas Rare Earths Limited (ASX:LYC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.3% last week. However, the 50% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lynas Rare Earths, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Lynas Rare Earths Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lynas Rare Earths. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lynas Rare Earths' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Lynas Rare Earths is not owned by hedge funds. Australian Super Pty Ltd is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.5% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.2% by the third-largest shareholder. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our information suggests that Lynas Rare Earths Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own AU$33m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Lynas Rare Earths. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 12%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Lynas Rare Earths you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
