Scholar backs tighter curbs on temples
Asst Prof Krich Pooyeeyama from Thammasat University's Faculty of Law said senior monks receive state-funded salaries and exercise broad authority, but the National Anti-Corruption Commission cannot audit their assets because monks are not classified as state officials under the anti-graft law.
He backed a ministerial regulation that will take effect on Oct 1, requiring temples to deposit their income into bank accounts under the temple's name, limit cash holdings to 100,000 baht, and submit annual financial reports to the NOB.
He said a 2021 regulation with similar requirements already exists but has been poorly enforced. The move follows growing public concern over financial scandals involving senior monks and a lack of transparency in temple asset management.
"Monks making headlines are all senior figures, and the core issue stems from a lack of transparency in the management of temples, where senior monks wield unchecked power," he said.
Temples are public legal entities, and monastic positions, from abbots to the Supreme Patriarch, are comparable to government roles, with state-funded salaries and statutory authority, including the ability to grant or withhold benefits.
However, laws do not clearly mandate asset declarations for monks, making auditing the clergy inapplicable and leaving a gap in accountability.
He said the NOB must play a central role in enforcing compliance by providing standardised forms and guidance on managing temple finances.
He also commented on the draft law, the Patronage and Protection of Buddhists, which would criminalise serious monastic offences such as sexual misconduct, introducing fines and prison sentences.
While Asst Prof Krich backs discipline, he warned criminal penalties must be clearly defined to avoid infringing on personal rights and freedoms. He also questioned whether deeply moral issues like these should even fall under criminal law.
A recent poll by the National Institute of Development Administration reflects public concern over the issue. Nida held a nationwide survey from July 14 to 16, following news of sex and financial scandals between a woman known as "Sika Golf" and many senior monks.
Among 1,310 Buddhist respondents, 76% believed some monks have engaged in misconduct such as drug use, gambling, or sexual relations. Nearly 58% said their faith in monks had declined, though 68% said their faith in Buddhism remained intact. Over 94% supported penalties for misbehaving monks, and 93% also supported punishing laypeople involved in sexual misconduct with monks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Opposition MP under fire for criticising military
Political activist Srisuwan Janya has filed a petition with the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) demanding an investigation into what he described as 'serious ethical misconduct' by a People's Party MP. The move followed a Facebook post by Sahassawat Kumkong, an MP for Chon Buri, who criticised the military over the Thai-Cambodian border conflict. Mr Srisuwan said the post, since deleted, belittled the military which was carrying out its duties while the nation stood in moral support of its role in defending national sovereignty. The post was a disgrace to his position as MP and constituted a breach of the kind of ethics expected of political officeholders, said the serial petitioner. He called on the NACC to launch the probe and asked the Supreme Court to suspend the MP from his duties and revoke his right to contest elections for life. Mr Sahassawat later apologised for his actions and said he had no intention to incite hatred or divisiveness. People's Party deputy leader Rangsiman Rome on Wednesday issued an apology, saying Mr Sahassawat had been warned by the party. He reaffirmed the party's support for the military in defending national sovereignty while cautioning against using the Thai-Cambodian conflict as justification for a military coup. 'Our stance never changes. We support what is good and demand reforms where they are needed. While we stand with the military in protecting the people, our call for reforms remains,' he said.
Bangkok Post
3 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Weed networks still fuming
The Writing Thailand's Cannabis Future Network on Tuesday filed a petition with the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to probe Public Health Minister Somsak Thepsuthin and other officials for issuing the latest cannabis regulations to please investors rather than small-scale growers. The complaint outlined five key concerns, including the removal of protection for vulnerable groups previously included in the 2022 regulation, such as a ban on cannabis sales to young people under 20. The 2025 version replaces the ban with a medical prescription system, making access far easier for the young, whom the state should protect, said the network. The group also touched on the imposition of Good Agriculture and Collection Practice (GACP), which requires that distributors and exporters must be certified by the Department of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine. However, the criteria of the certifications and the sources of the cannabis are never announced, and thus, only a few are ever granted. The complaint addressed cannabis growers, many of whom have held legal licences and have been operating under the 2022 regulation. They now find that their products are unsellable, resulting in major losses for small businesses and communities. The regulation will also take immediate effect upon publication in the Royal Gazette, without allowing time for adaptation for the nearly 20,000 licensed shops, the network noted. The pro-cannabis network also accused the minister of unethical conduct due to his association with certain business groups in public and a lack of transparency, which limited access to economic opportunities for growers. The network said Mr Somsak, as public health minister, understands the cannabis industry in Thailand and the repercussions once the regulations come into effect. Yet, it added that he proceeded without any backup measures, which suggests his intention to benefit certain investors.
Bangkok Post
4 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Analysts advise not to stoke proxy war
Prominent security and foreign affairs scholars have raised red flags about the escalating Thai-Cambodian conflict, warning that it risks descending into a regional proxy war between the US and China. Panitan Wattanayagorn, an independent national security scholar, said the Trump administration's use of tariffs as leverage in ceasefire negotiations shows the US president's broader campaign promise to act as a global peacemaker. By linking economic tools to security matters, the US gains influence in both spheres and keeps domestic political interests in play. Mr Panitan warned that China's early move to offer mediation had triggered a US urgency to act first. "Cambodia was smart -- they invited China early. Now Beijing's involvement has deepened the geopolitical complexity," he said. The academic urged the Thai government to communicate more clearly on global platforms that it does not welcome external mediation but supports coordinated cooperation and called on Thai negotiators to propose a temporary military freeze, a safe zone, and Cambodian troop withdrawal as preconditions for talks. Meanwhile. Dulyapak Preecharush, deputy director of the East Asian Studies Institute at Thammasat University, said that military survival and territorial control outweigh economic concerns for both countries. He believed that even with a ceasefire framework, fighting may continue as a means to gain a territorial advantage. "Cambodia has deployed heavy weapons like the BM-21 rocket system, targeting civilians in violation of humanitarian norms. Thailand had no choice but to respond militarily," he said. "Looking at other global conflicts, peace often comes only after one side suffers major losses. This situation may still end in a temporary ceasefire, not lasting peace," he said. Both Mr Panitan and Mr Dulyapak agree that the current fighting is not yet a full-blown proxy war, though it shows early signs. "Nationalism and territorial claims still dominate," Mr Dulyapak said of the skirmishes so far. He concluded that if the US and China resist taking sides, they may still find a way to de-escalate. "It won't be sustainable peace, but short-term calm is still achievable."
